Search

Background: In this study, we evaluate a new bioadhesive for intra-abdominal onlay mesh fixation of a polypropylene-polyvinylchloride graft., Methods: Three pieces of a commercially available polypropylene/polyvinylfluoride mesh, each 3 × 3 cm in size, and three pieces of the same mesh coated with a polysaccharide bioadhesive were fixated to the surface of the anterior abdominal wall of 30 New Zealand white rabbits. The fixation was performed either by using four transabdominal Prolene(®) 4/0 sutures, four spiral tacks (Protack 5 mm Tyco), or cyanoacrylate glue (Glubran(®) GEM, Viareggio, Italy). Each mesh position and the according kind of fixation were randomized before implantation. The animals were sacrificed 12 weeks postoperatively. After determining the extent of intra-abdominal adhesions, the meshes were excised en bloc with the anterior abdominal wall for tensile strength measurements and histological analysis., Results: All meshes coated with the bioadhesive adhered to the intact peritoneum without extra fixation. Irrespective of the fixation technique coated meshes led to more and stronger adhesions. Mesh shrinkage by scarring was increased in coated meshes fixed with glue and low in uncoated meshes fixed with tacks. Testing the tensile strength, coated meshes fixed with transfascial sutures achieved the best results (16.14 ± 6.1 N), whereas coated meshes fixed with glue showed the lowest strength (10.39 ± 4.81 N). The foreign body reaction was considerably more distinctive using coated mesh. The mesh ingrowth was not influenced by this reaction., Conclusions: All meshes coated with the new bioadhesive were self-adhesive in that way; they stayed in position when attached to the peritoneum. Although this may facilitate intra-operative mesh fixation, the bioadhesive displayed several disadvantages, such as stronger adhesions and an increased shrinkage of the implant. The tensile strength was not influenced by the use of the bioadhesive. At present, we see no major advantage for polysaccharide bioadhesive applied in this study.

Background: Cyanoacrylate glues are tissue adhesive with high adherent and hemostatic properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cyanoacrylates glue for polypropylene-polyvinylidene fluoride (PP-PVDF) intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) fixation in a rabbit model., Materials and Methods: In 40 New Zealand white rabbits, three pieces (3×3cm) of a PP-PVDF mesh (n=120) were fixed in IPOM technique on both sides of a midline laparotomy. For mesh fixation we used spiral tacks, nonabsorbable sutures, or cyanoacrylate glue in a randomized manner. All animals were killed after 12 wk. The prosthetic materials were excised en bloc with the anterior abdominal wall for evaluation of the tensile strength and histologic analysis. Results are presented as mean and standard deviation., Results: Meshes fixed with glue showed a significantly higher tenacity of adhesions (2.75±0.97) compared with those with tacks (2.44±0.97 sutures versus 1.91±0.92 tacks). The percentage of adhesions in the glue group was comparable to the suture group (36.50% ± 27.60% glue, 37.62% ± 27.36% suture). The tensile strength of stapled and sutured meshes was significantly higher than the tensile strength glued mesh (14.15±0.97N suture versus 14.84±0.74 stapler versus 9.64±0.78N glue). Mesh shrinkage was irrespective of the fixation technique. The inflammation reaction was more pronounced in the glue group., Conclusions: Although cyanoacrylate glue showed a considerable cellular ingrowth in this rabbit model, sutures and tacks proved to be superior for IPOM fixation of PP-PVDF meshes in terms of tensile strength., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the technique of prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic intraperitoneal incisional and ventral hernia repair using cyanoacrylat glue (Glubran GEM, Viareggio, Italy) in comparison with fixation methods using spiral tacks (Protack 5mm, Tyco) or transabdominal Prolene 4/0 sutures respectively., Method: Through a midline laparotomy 3 pieces (3 x 3cm) of mesh (n = 60) where fixed onto the intact peritoneum on either side of a midline laparotomy in 10 New Zealand White rabbits. Two types of meshes where compared: ePTFE meshes (Gore-Tex Dual Mesh W.L. Gore and Associates, Inc. Medical Products Division, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA) and polypropylene/ polyvinylfluorid meshes (Dyna Mesh - IPOM P.J. Dahlhausen and Co. GmbH, Germany). All animals were killed after 12 weeks. Upon scoring of the adhesions the prosthetic materials were excised en bloc with the anterior abdominal wall for tensile strength analysis and histologic evaluation., Results: In contrast to ePTFE meshes fixed with cyanoacrylat glue, PP meshes fixed with transabdominal sutures as well as with spiral tacks showed the highest percentage and tenacity of adhesions (p<0.033). Independent of the method of fixation, ePTFE meshes revealed a significantly higher shrinkage than PP prosthesis (41% vs 17% related to original mesh surface; p<0.033). The strength of the mesh incorporation was significantly higher in PP meshes (p<0.033). Fixation of PP meshes with cyanoacrylat glue showed an equivalent tensile strength as ePTFE meshes fixed with spiral tacks (6.6 +/- 2.7 N vs 6.6 +/- 3.1N)., Conclusion: In this rabbit model, intraabdominal fixation of PP composite meshes with cyanoacrylat glue was equivalent to ePTFE mesh fixation with spiral tacks concerning tensile strength analysis. Adhesions between mesh and abdominal wall were found more frequently after PP fixation. In contrast, mesh shrinkage was more evident after ePTFE mesh implantation.