Search

Background: Expedited discharge following esophagectomy is controversial due to concerns for higher readmissions and financial burden. The present study aimed to evaluate the association of expedited discharge with hospitalization costs and unplanned readmissions following esophagectomy for malignant lesions. Methods: Adults undergoing elective esophagectomy for cancer were identified in the 2014–2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients discharged by postoperative day 7 were considered Expedited and others as Routine. Patients who did not survive to discharge or had major perioperative complications were excluded. Multivariable regression models were constructed to assess association of expedited discharge with index hospitalization costs as well as 30- and 90-day non-elective readmissions. Results: Of 9,886 patients who met study criteria, 34.6% comprised the Expedited cohort. After adjustment, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.71, p = 0.001) and increasing Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (AOR 0.88/point, p<0.001) were associated with lower odds of expedited discharge, while laparoscopic (AOR 1.63, p<0.001, Ref: open) and robotic (AOR 1.67, p = 0.003, Ref: open) approach were linked to greater likelihood. Patients at centers in the highest-tertile of minimally invasive esophagectomy volume had increased odds of expedited discharge (AOR 1.52, p = 0.025, Ref: lowest-tertile). On multivariable analysis, expedited discharge was independently associated with an $8,300 reduction in hospitalization costs. Notably, expedited discharge was associated with similar odds of 30-day (AOR 1.10, p = 0.40) and 90-day (AOR 0.90, p = 0.70) unplanned readmissions. Conclusion: Expedited discharge after esophagectomy was associated with decreased costs and unaltered readmissions. Prospective studies are necessary to robustly evaluate whether expedited discharge is appropriate for select patients undergoing esophagectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although early discharge after colectomy has garnered significant interest, contemporary, large-scale analyses are lacking. Objective: The present study utilized a national cohort of patients undergoing colectomy to examine costs and readmissions following early discharge. Methods: All adults undergoing elective colectomy for primary colon cancer were identified in the 2016–2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients with perioperative complications or prolonged length of stay (>8 days) were excluded to enhance cohort homogeneity. Patients discharged by postoperative day 3 were classified as Early, and others as Routine. Entropy balancing and multivariable regression were used to assess the risk-adjusted association of early discharge with costs and non-elective readmissions. Importantly, we compared 90-day stroke rates to examine whether our results were influenced by preferential early discharge of healthier patients. Results: Of an estimated 153,996 patients, 45.5% comprised the Early cohort. Compared to Routine, the Early cohort was younger and more commonly male. Patients in the Early group more commonly underwent left-sided colectomy and laparoscopic operations. Following multivariable adjustment, expedited discharge was associated with a $4,500 reduction in costs as well as lower 30-day (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.74, p<0.001) and 90-day non-elective readmissions (AOR 0.74, p<0.001). However, among those readmitted within 90 days, Early patients were more commonly readmitted for gastrointestinal conditions (45.8 vs 36.4%, p<0.001). Importantly, both cohorts had comparable 90-day stroke rates (2.2 vs 2.1%, p = 0.80). Conclusions: The present work represents the largest analysis of early discharge following colectomy for cancer and supports its relative safety and cost-effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: While safety-net hospitals (SNH) play a critical role in the care of underserved communities, they have been associated with inferior postoperative outcomes. This study evaluated the association of hospital safety-net status with clinical and financial outcomes following esophagectomy. Methods: All adults (≥18 years) undergoing elective esophagectomy for benign and malignant gastroesophageal disease were identified in the 2010–2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Centers in the highest quartile for the proportion of uninsured/Medicaid patients were classified as SNH (others: non-SNH). Regression models were developed to evaluate adjusted associations between SNH status and outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and resource use. Royston-Parmar flexible parametric models were used to assess time-varying hazard of non-elective readmission over 90 days. Results: Of an estimated 51,649 esophagectomy hospitalizations, 9,024 (17.4%) were performed at SNH. While SNH patients less frequently suffered from gastroesophageal malignancies (73.2 vs 79.6%, p<0.001) compared to non-SNH, the distribution of age and comorbidities were similar. SNH was independently associated with mortality (AOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.50), intraoperative complications (AOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20–1.74) and need for blood transfusions (AOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.35–1.93). Management at SNH was also associated with incremental increases in LOS (+1.37, 95% CI 0.64–2.10), costs (+10,400, 95% CI 6,900–14,000), and odds of 90-day non-elective readmission (AOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00–1.23). Conclusions: Care at safety-net hospitals was associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and non-elective rehospitalization following elective esophagectomy. Efforts to provide sufficient resources at SNH may serve to reduce complications and overall costs for this procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With limited national studies available, we characterized the association of frailty with outcomes of surgical resection for colonic volvulus. Methods: Adults with sigmoid or cecal volvulus undergoing non-elective colectomy were identified in the 2010–2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Frailty was identified using the Johns Hopkins indicator which utilizes administrative codes. Multivariable models were developed to examine the association of frailty with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, stoma use, length of stay, hospitalization costs, non-home discharge, and 30-day non-elective readmissions. Results: An estimated 66,767 patients underwent resection for colonic volvulus (Sigmoid: 39.6%; Cecal: 60.4%). Using the Johns Hopkins indicator, 30.3% of patients with sigmoid volvulus and 15.9% of those with cecal volvulus were considered frail. After adjustment, frail patients had higher risk of mortality compared to non-frail in both sigmoid (10.6% [95% CI 9.47–11.7] vs 5.7% [95% CI 5.2–6.2]) and cecal (10.4% [95% CI 9.2–11.6] vs 3.5% [95% CI 3.2–3.8]) volvulus cohorts. Frailty was associated with greater odds of acute venous thromboembolism occurrences (Sigmoid: AOR 1.50 [95% CI 1.18–1.94]; Cecal: AOR 2.0 [95% CI 1.50–2.72]), colostomy formation (Sigmoid: AOR 1.73 [95% CI 1.57–1.91]; Cecal: AOR 1.48 [95% CI 1.10–2.00]), non-home discharge (Sigmoid: AOR 1.97 [95% CI 1.77–2.20]; Cecal: AOR 2.56 [95% CI 2.27–2.89]), and 30-day readmission (Sigmoid: AOR 1.15 [95% CI 1.01–1.30]; Cecal: AOR 1.26 [95% CI 1.10–1.45]). Frailty was associated with incremental increase in length of stay (Sigmoid: +3.4 days [95% CI 2.8–3.9]; Cecal: +3.8 days [95% CI 3.3–4.4]) and costs (Sigmoid: +$7.5k [95% CI 5.9–9.1]; Cecal: +$12.1k [95% CI 10.1–14.1]). Conclusion: Frailty, measured using a simplified administrative tool, is associated with significantly worse clinical and financial outcomes following non-elective resections for colonic volvulus. Standard assessment of frailty may aid risk-stratification, better inform shared-decision making, and guide healthcare teams in targeted resource allocation in this vulnerable patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) are often underinsured and urgently admitted for open or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The present study evaluated the association of safety-net status with outcomes among patients with TBAD. Methods: The 2012-2019 National Inpatient Sample was queried to identify all adults admitted with type B aortic dissection. Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) were defined as institutions in the top 33% for the annual proportion of uninsured or Medicaid patients. Multivariable regression models were utilized to assess the association of SNH with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost, and non-home discharge. Results: Of an estimated 172 595 patients, 61 000 (35.3%) were managed at SNH. Compared to others, patients admitted to SNH were younger, more commonly non-white, and more frequently non-electively admitted. From 2012 to 2019, the annual incidence of type B aortic dissection increased in the overall cohort. Additionally, utilization of TEVAR at non-SNH increased significantly (2012: 6.5% vs 2019: 9.8%), while that of SNH remained similar (2012: 7.4% vs 2019: 7.9%). Patients undergoing open repair had higher mortality at both SNH (12.4 vs 7.8%, P <.001) and non-SNH (13.1 vs 6.1%, P <.001) compared to those receiving TEVAR. After risk adjustment, compared to non-SNH, SNH status was associated with greater odds of mortality, perioperative complications and non-home discharge. Conclusions: Our finding suggests that SNH have inferior clinical outcomes for TBAD as well as reduced adoption of endovascular management strategies. Future studies to identify barriers to optimal aortic repair and ameliorate disparities at SNH are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The present national study characterized the incidence and factors associated with VTE following bariatric operations and its association with postoperative outcomes and resource use.Methods: Adults (≥18 years) undergoing elective sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass (laparoscopic and open) were identified in the 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes for deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism were used to ascertain the presence of VTE. Multivariable linear and logistic models were developed to evaluate the independent association of VTE with outcomes of interest.Results: Of an estimated 537,522 patients meeting inclusion criteria, .55% developed VTE during index hospitalization (.14%) or within 90 days of index discharge (.41%). Compared to others, VTE patients were older (51.8 vs 44.9 years, P<.001), more commonly male (20.0% vs 31.5%, P<.001), and had gastric bypass (56.3% vs 31.9%, P<.001) or an open procedure (21.9% vs 2.6%, P<.001). After risk adjustment, several factors including increasing age, male gender, gastric bypass and open approach remained associated with increased odds of VTE. Patients with VTE during index hospitalization had greater odds of mortality (AOR 11.6, 95% CI: 6.12-22.19) and increased index LOS (β:+14.1 days, 95% CI: 11.7-16.5) and hospitalization costs (β: +$53,100, 95% CI: 43,100-63,500). Additionally, VTE patients had greater odds of readmission within 90 days (AOR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.40-2.47).Conclusions: Although VTE is uncommon following bariatric operations, it is significantly associated with increased mortality, readmission, and resource use. Further research is necessary to ascertain optimal management of VTE for bariatric surgery patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]