Search

Background: Incidental intradural tumors of the spine in the pediatric population are rare lesions whose management remains unclear. Surgeons must balance the risks of iatrogenic deficits and complications after surgical resection against the risks from progressive growth of the tumor. Moreover, the natural history of an incidental finding can be difficult to predict. Here, we review the literature on incidental intradural tumors of the spine and present considerations for their management. Summary: Growth of the tumor or changes in radiographic features are usually indications for resection. Asymptomatic lesions can be found in patients with genetic syndromes that predispose to tumor formation, such as neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2, schwannomatosis, and Von-Hippel-Lindau syndrome, and careful workup of a genetic cause is warranted in any patient presenting with multiple tumors and/or cutaneous features. Close follow-up is generally favored given the heavy tumor burden; however, some recommend pre-emptive resection to prevent permanent neurological deficits. Incidental intradural tumors can also occur in association with hydrocephalus, significant syringomyelia, and cord compression, and surgical treatment is usually warranted. Tumors may also be discovered as part of the workup for scoliosis, where they are not truly incidental to the scoliosis but rather are contributing to curve deformation. Key Messages: Thorough workup of patients for associated genetic syndromes or comorbidities should be undertaken in pediatric patients with incidental intradural tumors. Further research is needed into the natural history of these incidental lesions. Incidental tumors can often be managed conservatively with close follow-up, with surgical intervention warranted for expanding tumors or new-onset symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a critical tool used in the identification of epileptogenic zones. Although stereotactic frame-based SEEG procedures have been performed traditionally, newer robotic-assisted SEEG procedures have become increasingly common. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy, efficacy of the ExcelsiusGPS robot (Globus Medica, Audubon, PA) in SEEG procedures. Five consecutive adult patients with drug resistant epilepsy were identified as SEEG candidates via a multidisciplinary epilepsy surgery committee. Preoperative scans were merged onto the robot to plan electrode placement. With the use of a camera system, dynamic reference base, and surveillance markers, the robotic arm was used to establish the trajectory of the electrodes. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were merged onto the preoperatively planned trajectory and the radial, depth, and entry errors were calculated. Fiducial registration error was calculated for 4 cases to determine error between the patient and intraoperative CT merge. A total of 59 electrodes were placed. The mean age at surgery was 41.6 ± 15.1 years. Mean operating room time, anesthesia time, and surgical time was 301.6 ± 44.4 min, 261.6 ± 50.2 min, and 155.8 ± 48.8 min, respectively. The overall mean depth, radial, and entry errors were 2.5 ± 1.9 mm, 1.9 ± 1.5 mm, and 1.6 ± 1.2 mm. Mean fiducial registration error retrospectively calculated for 4 of 5 cases was 0.13 ± 0.04 mm. There were no perioperative complications. The initial performance of the ExcelsiusGPS robotic system yielded comparable results to other systems currently in use for adult SEEG procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Following spine surgery, delays in referral to rehabilitation facilities leads to increased length of hospital stay (LOS), increases costs, more risk of hospital acquired complications, and decreased patient satisfaction.Purpose: We sought to create a prediction calculator to determine the expected LOS after spine surgery and identify patients most likely to need postoperative nonhome discharge. The goal would be to facilitate earlier referral to rehabilitation and thereby ultimately shorten LOS, reduce costs, and improve patient satisfaction.Study Design: Retrospective.Patient Sample: We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients who underwent spine surgery for all indications between January and June 2018.Outcome Measures: Length of stay and discharge disposition.Methods: Demographic variables, insurance status, baseline comorbidities, narcotic use, operative characteristics, as well as postoperative length of stay and discharge disposition data were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of LOS and discharge disposition.Results: Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included. Mean age was 59 years, 46% were females, and 52% had private insurance vs 7% with Medicaid and 41% with Medicare. The most commonly performed procedure was lumbar fusion (31.9%). Mean LOS after surgery was 4.8 days and 18% had prolonged LOS >7 days. Age, insurance type, marriage status, and surgical procedure were significantly associated with LOS and discharge disposition. The final model had an area under the curve of 89% with good discrimination. A web based calculator was developed: https://jhuspine1.shinyapps.io/RehabLOS/ CONCLUSIONS: This study established a novel pilot calculator to identify those patients most likely to be discharged to rehabilitation facilities and to predict LOS after spine surgery. Our calculator had a high predictive accuracy of 89% compared to others in the literature. With validation this tool may ultimately facilitate streamlining of the postoperative period to shorten LOS, optimize resource utilization, and improve patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the main surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Controversy exists about the need to resect the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) to directly decompress the nerve roots, or if it is sufficient to indirectly decompress with diskectomy and graft placement. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of PLL resection after ACDF. A retrospective review was performed of all patients that underwent first-time ACDF for cervical radiculopathy at a single tertiary care institution between 1999 and 2013. Comparative analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Two hundred patients were included with a mean follow-up of 39 months. Average age was 54 years, 62% were women, and diabetes and current smoking status were noted in 11% and 15%, respectively. PLL resection was performed in 127 patients (64%), and no significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the 2 cohorts. One durotomy occurred in the resected PLL cohort, and none were seen in the unresected PLL group. No differences were seen in perioperative complications. At the time of last follow-up, improvement in radiculopathy was observed in 94% of the resected PLL group compared with 81% of the unresected PLL group (P = 0.008). After controlling for confounders, PLL resection had 3.8 times greater odds of leading to postoperative improvement in radiculopathy. ACDF leads to a high rate of success in improvement of preoperative radiculopathy. Excision of PLL during surgery leads to 3.8 times greater odds of improvement in this symptom, with no significant difference in the complication rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Of the more than 30,000 posterior cervical spine fusions performed annually, 7%-12% will be complicated by postoperative C5 palsy, a condition characterized by new-onset deltoid weakness with or without C5 dermatomal findings and biceps weakness. Posterior translation of the cervical spinal cord has been proposed as a risk factor for this complication.Purpose: To evaluate if C5 palsy can be predicted by spinal cord float back.Study Design/setting: Retrospective cohort.Patient Sample: Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing posterior cervical decompression between 2002 and 2017 for degenerative cervical spine pathologies.Outcome Measures: Occurrence of C5 palsy as evaluated by manual motor testing (MMT).Methods: We recorded baseline neurological status, operative notes, details of postoperative course, and both pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging images. Float back was defined by the change in the distance between the spinal cord and posterior face of the C4/5 annulus from preoperative to postoperative imaging. C5 palsy was defined by new-onset deltoid weakness on MMT.Results: We identified 242 patients with a mean age of 62.4 years and mean follow-up of 27.9 months. Forty-two (17.4%) experienced postoperative C5 palsy. On univariable analysis, significant predictors of postoperative C5 palsy were mean C4/5 foraminal diameter (2.8 vs. 3.2 mm; p<.001), anterior projection of the C5 superior articular process (4.12 vs. 3.70 mm; p=.04), cord float back (0.35 vs. 0.28 cm; p=.02), undergoing laminectomy of the C5 (p=.02) or C4 and C5 levels (p=.02), and undergoing instrumented fusion extending one level above and below the C4/5 level. Foraminotomy of the C4/5 level was not predictive of postoperative palsy. On multivariable analysis mean C4/5 foraminal diameter (odds ratio=0.38 per mm; p<.01) predicted C5 palsy; cord float back at the C4/5 level was not predictive of C5 palsy.Conclusions: Spinal cord float back was not an independent predictor of C5 palsy on multivariable analysis. Only smaller foraminal diameter was independently predictive of postoperative C5 palsy. This suggests that chronic preoperative compression of the C5 roots, not postdecompression float back may be the biggest contributor to the etiology of postoperative C5 palsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Posterior atlantoaxial fusion is an important armamentarium for neurosurgeons to treat several pathologies involving the craniovertebral junction. Although the potential advantages of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) are well documented in the lumbar spine, its indication for C1-C2 fusion has not been well characterized. In our institution, we apply rhBMP-2 to the C1-C2 joint either alone or with hydroxyapatite, locally harvested autograft chips, and/or morselized allogenic bone graft for selected cases—without conventional posterior structural bone graft. We report the clinical outcomes of the surgical technique to elucidate its feasibility. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective review of data from 2008 to 2016 and identified 69 patients who had undergone posterior atlantoaxial fusion with rhBMP-2. The clinical records of these patients were reviewed, and the baseline characteristics, operative data, and postoperative complications were collected and statistically analyzed. Results The average age of the 69 patients was 60.8 ± 4.5 years, and 55.1% were women. With an average follow-up period of 21.1 ± 4.2 months, the C1-C2 fusion rate was 94.3% (65 of 69), and the average time to fusion was 11.4 ± 2.6 months (range, 5–23). The overall reoperation rate was 10.1% (7 of 69), with instrumentation failure in 7 patients (10.1%), adjacent segment disease in 2 (2.9%), and postoperative dysphagia and dyspnea in 2 patients (2.9%). No ectopic bone formation or soft tissue edema developed. Conclusions Although retrospective and from a single center, our study has shown that rhBMP-2 usage at the C1-C2 joint without posterior structural bone grafting is a safe and reasonable surgical option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The surgical management of deformity, degenerative pathology, neoplasms, trauma and infection in the lumbosacropelvic spine remains a challenge due to high mechanical demand around this area, risks of pseudarthrosis, and invasive nature of the procedures. To date, two instrumentation techniques are primarily available: iliac screws (ISs) and S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws. Previous articles demonstrated lower rates of complications with S2AI screws as compared to ISs; however, none of them have focused on elderly patients who may harbor significant comorbidities, and as such, require more meticulous perioperative management, given these invasive and lengthy procedures. PURPOSE To report safety profile of S2AI in patients over 60 and address differences between S2AI screws and ISs. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Single-center, retrospective, case-control study. PATIENT SAMPLE Single center, retrospective cohort who underwent lumbosacropelvic fixation with more than two-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES Rates of complications such as mortality, unplanned reoperation, cardiorespiratory complications, transfusion-related complications and functional outcome measures such as visual analogue scale for back pain. METHODS Between October 2010, and December 2014, 171 sacropelvic fusion procedures with IS or S2AI screw instrumentation were performed in 161 patients. The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) patients over 60years old and (2) patients with more than two-year follow-up periods, which yielded 15 patients (IS) and 41 cases (S2AI), respectively. Rates of complications such as mortality, unplanned reoperation, pseudoarthrosis, cardiorespiratory complications, transfusion-related complications and functional outcome measures such as visual analogue scale for back pain and ambulatory status were collected and statistically analyzed. Intergroup comparison of binary variables was performed via Fisher's exact test. Intergroup comparison of continuous variables was achieved using unpaired t-tests. For the analyses on pain and functional outcomes, the perioperative comparisons for each group and intergroup comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. All reported p values are 2-sided and p values <.05 were regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS Baseline characteristics such as age, sex, smoking history, diagnoses and comorbidities were similar in both groups. The S2AI group had lower rates of reoperation (19.5% vs 66.6%, p=.002), surgical site infection (0% vs. 16.0%, p<.001), wound dehiscence (0.0% vs. 20.0%, p<.001) and postoperative hyperkalemia (17.7% vs. 43.8%, p=.04) and had lower volume of estimated blood loss (EBL) [ml] (1817.5vs. 2775.6, p=.01) and transfused red blood cell units (4.6vs. 8.0, p=.001) than the IS group, while rates of mortality, L5-S1 pseudarthrosis, and other cardiorespiratory complications were similar in both groups. Pain relief and functional recovery were achieved in both groups without any significant intergroup differences. On multivariate analyses, use of S2AI screws over ISs, smoking, and operated levels were independent predictors of volume of transfusion. CONCLUSIONS Use of S2AI screws over ISs in the elderly was associated with lower rates of reoperation, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence and lower volume of EBL and RBC transfusion, while achieving similar clinical and functional outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Occipitocervical fusion is the gold standard stabilization method for several pathologies involving craniovertebral junctions, including basilar invagination, atlantoaxial trauma and neoplasm. However, its postoperative clinical course is oftentimes complicated by dysphagia and dyspnea, presumably due to loss of mobility across occiput-C1-C2 joints, which could lead to aspiration pneumonia and acute airway obstruction, respectively, and are life-threatening complications in this procedure. The exact mechanism and its predictors still remain widely unstudied, but a previous article involving healthy volunteers elaborated on the importance of the occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle (O-EAa, "the angle formed by the McGregor line and the line connecting the external acoustic meatus and the midpoint of the inferior end plate of C2"), when predicting the narrowest oropharyngeal airway space (nPAS, "the narrowest anterior–posterior distance from the posterior pharyngeal wall to the back of the tongue between the levels of the uvula tip and the epiglottis tip") on X-rays, which theoretically should directly correlate with postoperative dysphagia. Here, we aimed to evaluate whether pre- and postoperative radiographical measurements such as O-EAa and nPAS could predict postoperative dysphagia in adult patients who underwent occipitocervical fusion procedures. PURPOSE To identify predictors of postoperative dysphagia in patients with adult occiptocervical fusion surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective, single-center. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent occipitocervical fusion at a single institution. OUTCOME MEASURES Prolonged postoperative dysphagia (more than 30 days). METHODS Single-center, retrospective data review from 2010 to 2016 identified 57 patients who underwent spine surgery involving occipitocervical fusion procedures. Among those, 51 patients had more than one-year follow-up as well as an adequate postoperative assessment of swallowing functions. Clinical records of those 51 patients (average age: 53.3, female: 54%) were collected and statistically analyzed. A total of 16 patients (31.4%, group (A)) were diagnosed with postoperative dysphagia associated with occipitocervical fusion, who were compared with 35 patients without this complication (group (B)) in terms of baseline characteristics, operative data and radiographical findings including perioperative O-EAa and nPAS at patients' neutral positions. Intergroup comparison of binary variables was performed via Fisher's exact test. Intergroup comparison of continuous variables was achieved using unpaired t -tests. ROC curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic value of O-EAa and nPAS for postoperative dysphagia. Furthermore, the Pearson's correlation was assessed between O-EAa and nPAS. Finally, a multilinear regression model was created to identify factors influencing nPAS. All reported p values are two-sided and p values <.05 were regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS There were no statistically significant difference in terms of baseline characteristics including age, sex, BMI, smoking and comorbidities or operative data such as estimated blood loss, operative time and operated levels. While preoperative O-EAa and nPAS were similar between the two groups (P=.39 and.55, respectively), postoperative O-EAa ((A) 89.3° versus (B) 104.5°, p<.01) and nPAS ((A) 9.9 mm versus (B) 13.6 mm, P=.01) as well as perioperative changes in O-EAa ((dO-EAa), (A) −4.1° vs. (B) 0.6°, P=.01) and nPAS (dnPAS, (A) −2.0 mm vs. (B) 0.2 mm, P=.01) were significantly different. The cut-off value of dOEA-a <−2.4° to predict postoperative dysphasia yielded sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 100% (AUC=0.939), which was comparable to dnPAS >−1.1 (sensitivity 81.8%, specificity 100%). The Pearson's correlation coefficient between these two parameters were 0.747 (p<.001). In a linear regression analysis, nPAS (mm) was found to be affected by O-EAa (estimate=0.2, P=.04) and sex (estimate=−4.8 (female=1), P=.03), but not by BMI in this model (R square=0.42). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative changes in O-EAa and nPAS were associated with postoperative dysphagia. Intraoperatively, O-EAa measurement on fluoroscopic images could be utilized as a surrogate marker for nPAS, thereby potentially allowing us to decrease the risk of this crucial complication. These data may prompt multicenter, prospective studies to further validate them and translate them into better patient care in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]