Search

BACKGROUND Outcomes of left lateral segment (LLS) grafts in pediatric recipients were compared between living (LD-LLS) and deceased donor (DD-LLS) grafts. METHODS 195 LLS grafts (99DD-LLS-96LD-LLS) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 9.1years. The primary endpoints were overall patient/graft survival. RESULTS LD-LLS grafts were younger (0.9vs.1.4years, p = 0.039), more likely to have a fulminant liver failure (17.9%vs.5.3%,p = 0.002), less likely to have a metabolic disorder (6.3%vs.25.5%,p = 0.002), and less likely to be undergoing retransplantation (5.3% vs.16.2%,p = 0.015). There was a trend toward decreased hepatic artery thrombosis in LD-LLS grafts (6.6% vs. 15.5%,p = 0.054). No differences in the overall biliary complications occurred. The LD-LLS group had prolonged survival compared to the DD-LLS group with 10-year survival rates of 81%, and 74% (p = 0.005), respectively. LD-LLS grafts had longer graft survival compared to DD-LLS grafts (10-year graft survival 85%vs.67%,p = 0.005). Recipient age >1year (HR 2.39,p = 0.026), aortic reconstruction (HR 2.12,p = 0.046) and vascular complication (HR 3.12,p

Biliary strictures affect 4%−12% of pediatric liver transplantations. Biliary strictures can contribute to graft loss if left untreated; however, there remains no consensus on the best course of treatment. Study objectives included analyses of outcomes associated with biliary stricture management strategies via percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), or surgery. We identified pediatric liver transplantation recipients (2011–2016) with biliary strictures from the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) registry and retrieved imaging, procedural, and operative reports from individual centers. Subanalyses were performed to specifically evaluate PTC and ERCP for “optimal biliary outcome” (OBO), defined as graft survival with stricture resolution and without recurrence or surgery. A total of 113 children with a median follow-up of 3.9 years had strictures diagnosed 100 days (interquartile range, 30–290) after liver transplantation; 81% were isolated anastomotic strictures. Stricture resolution was achieved in 92% within 101 days, more frequently with isolated anastomotic strictures (96%). 20% of strictures recurred, more commonly in association with hepatic artery thrombosis (32%). Patient and graft survival at 1 and 3 years were 99% and 98% and 94% and 92%, respectively. In a subgroup analysis of 79 patients with extrahepatic strictures managed by PTC/ERCP, 59% achieved OBO following a median of 4 PTC, and 75% following a median of 3 ERCP (P < 0.001). Among patients with OBO, those with ERCP had longer time intervals between successive procedures (41, 47, 54, 62, 71 days) than for PTC (27, 31, 36, 41, 48 days; P < 0.001). Allograft salvage was successful across all interventions. Stricture resolution was achieved in 92%, with 20% risk of recurrence. Resolution without recurrence was highest in patients with isolated anastomotic strictures and without hepatic artery thrombosis.

International audience; Variations in graft arterial anatomy can increase the risk of postoperative hepatic arterial thrombosis (HAT), especially in presence of a replaced or accessory right hepatic artery (RHA). We retrospectively analyzed 223 cases of liver transplantations with the presence of an RHA on the graft. Patient outcomes were compared according to the four different reconstruction methods used: (i) the re-implantation of the RHA into the splenic or gastroduodenal artery (n = 106); (ii) the interposition of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) (n = 83); (iii) dual anastomosis (n = 24); (iv) use of an aortic patch including the origins of both the SMA and the coeliac trunk (n = 10). A competing risk analysis and Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) were used. We found that the interposition of the SMA method was associated with a significantly lower incidence of HAT, at 4.8% compared to the re-implantation method at 17.9%, dual anastomosis at 12.5%, and aortic patch at 20%, p = .03. In the competing risk analysis with IPW, the only risk factor for RHA thrombosis was the type of reconstruction. Taking the SMA interposition group as the reference, the sub-hazard ratio (sHR) was 5.05 (CI 95 [1.72; 14.78], p

Introduction: T-tube placement during liver transplantation (LT) is still debated. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the usefulness of T-tube after LT in two cohorts differing in post-transplant risk. Methods: A total of 327 LTs performed between 2015 and 2018 were included in the analysis. LTs from donation after circulatory death and living donation, split-liver transplants, and LTs with hepaticojejunostomy were excluded. T-tube was reserved for marginal grafts, high-risk recipients, and bile duct size discrepancy. A balance of risk (BAR) score of ≤9 defined the low-risk cohort (232 patients, 68 with and 164 without T-tube), while a BAR score of &gt, 9 defined the high-risk cohort (95 patients, 43 with and 52 without T-tube). Postoperative complications were estimated with the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Postoperative biliary complications were classified in anastomotic stricture (AS), non-anastomotic stricture (NAS), and biliary leakage (BL). Results: In the low-risk cohort, LTs with and without T-tube had similar rates of NAS (0 vs. 2.9%, p = 0.36), AS (2.9 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.83), and BL (1.4 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.64). Analogous outcomes were found in the high-risk cohort: NAS (0 vs. 0), AS (0 vs. 5.7%, p = 0.11), and BL (0 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.27). There were more postoperative complications among patients with T-tube, in both the low-risk (CCI 29 vs. 21, p &lt, 0.001) and high-risk (CCI 51 vs. 29, p &lt, 0.001) cohort. No differences in primary non-function, hepatic artery thrombosis, and mortality were observed. Conclusions: T-tube placement did not influence postoperative biliary complications. Although the two cohorts were normalized for post-transplant risk, LT recipients with T-tube had a more complicated course.

Background Post-operative biliary complications have been reported to occur in 10-33% of pediatric liver transplantation (LTx) recipients. (2-10) Percutaneous intervention has become the primary treatment method for these complications; however, efficacy and outcomes of these patients have not been well studied. Methods Institutional pediatric LTx from 1998 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the patients referred for percutaneous treatment of post-LTx biliary strictures. Clinical parameters, percutaneous transhepatic biliary cholangiograms (PTC), biliary catheter placement, cholangioplasty, and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Results Of the 396 consecutive pediatric LTx recipients during our study period, 50 (12.6%) were diagnosed with biliary strictures on PTC. LTx biliary reconstruction was Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) in 28 (56%), choledochojejunostomy (CJ) in 11 (22%), and choledochocholedochostomy (CC) in 11 (22%). Median age at LTx was 23.2 months (IQR, 10.9-90.6) and 14 (28%) patients developed hepatic artery thrombosis. Forty-four (88%) patients were treated with internal/external biliary catheters, of whom 38 (76%) underwent balloon cholangioplasty. By 12 months, 84% of patients had complete stricture resolution and catheter removal. Median total duration of catheter drainage was 152 days (IQR, 76-308). Eight patients required additional surgery (biliary reconstruction or re-LTx) or died with drainage catheter in place from complications unrelated to PTC intervention. Amongst the six (12%) treated with unilateral external biliary drainage catheters, two had catheters removed for inadequate drainage but then had spontaneous biliary obstruction resolution, one underwent duct reconstruction, and three required long-term catheterization. Conclusions Biliary strictures following pediatric LTx can be successfully treated with internal/external biliary drainage catheters and cholangioplasty if the stricture can be crossed. However, patients with isolated strictured ducts may require long-term external catheter drainage until re-LTx or percutaneous obliteration of isolated ducts.

OBJECTIVES Liver transplant is the most effective treatment modality for patients with end-stage liver disease, metabolic disorders, hepatic malignancy, and acute liver failure. When a graft fails after primary liver transplant, retransplant of the liver remains the only option. Here, we report the past 12-year experience of the Shiraz Transplant Center regarding liver retransplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of a 12-year period (2004-2015) of the Shiraz Center in Iran. RESULTS Of the 3107 patients who had a liver transplant during the study period, 58 retransplants were performed (1.86%) in 57 patients. The leading cause of retransplant was primary nonfunction in 24 patients (41.4% of retransplant cases and 0.77% of all liver transplant cases). The second leading cause of retransplant was vascular complications in 25 patients (23 with hepatic artery thrombosis and 2 with portal vein thrombosis), accounting for 43.1% of retransplant cases and 0.80% of all liver transplant cases. In addition, 5 patients (8.6%) had retransplant for rejection, which accounted for 0.16% of all liver transplant cases. Four patients with retransplant (6.9%) had recurrence of primary disease, which accounted for 0.12% of all liver transplant cases. Most liver retransplants occurred early (≤ 30 days after primary transplant) at the Shiraz Transplant Center. Five-year survival rate after retransplant was 35%, and retransplant for hepatic artery thrombosis was more common in children. CONCLUSIONS Because most patients required retransplants in the early period after primary transplant, the decision for retransplant must be considered carefully with full multidisciplinary evaluation and only in skilled hands. Retransplant in subgroups of patients with little chance of a successful outcome should be avoided.

Aim. To report a rare case of split liver transplantation in two urgent recipients treated in hospitals that are very far from each other. Material and methods. Partial liver grafts were obtained by controlled full-right/full-left in situ splitting. The left lobe was transplanted in a 7-year-old child with severe hepatic failure (PELD score 39) resulting, probably from an progressive intrahepatic familial cholestasis in Novosibirsk. The right lobe was used for re-transplantation in a 28-year-old patient with hepatic artery thrombosis (UNOS status 1A) after living donor right lobe liver transplantation in Moscow. Results. The course of the early post-operative period in recipient 1 was complicated by infected total pancreatonecrosis with the development of limited biliary leakage and the formation of a stricture, which required reconstructive cholangiojejunostomy 12 months after transplantation. Recipient 2 consistently underwent biliary leakage, arrosive arterial bleeding, graft artery thrombosis, all of which could become fatal. Complications were successfully eliminated by the consistent use of surgical and endovascular interventions. Conclusion. The presented observation is, firstly, an example of effective inter-center cooperation, and secondly, a demonstration of the existing problems of postmortem organ donation, which determine the need for such extreme surgery in critical situations.

BACKGROUND Thromboembolic complications are relatively common causes of increased morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period in liver transplant patients. Early postoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT, incidence 2%-2.6%) and early hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT, incidence 3%-5%) have a poor prognosis in transplant patients, having impacts on graft and patient survival. In the present study, we attempted to identify the predictive factors of these complications for early detection and therefore monitor more closely the patients most at risk of thrombotic complications. AIM To investigate whether intraoperative thromboelastography (TEG) is useful in detecting the risk of early postoperative HAT and PVT in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). METHODS We retrospectively collected thromboelastographic traces, in addition to known risk factors (cold ischemic time, intraoperative requirement for red blood cells and fresh-frozen plasma transfusion, prolonged operating time), in 27 patients, selected among 530 patients (≥ 18 years old), who underwent their first LT from January 2002 to January 2015 at the Liver University Transplant Center and developed an early PVT or HAT (case group). Analyses of the TEG traces were performed before anesthesia and 120 min after reperfusion. We retrospectively compared these patients with the same number of nonconsecutive control patients who underwent LT in the same study period without developing these complications (1:1 match) (control group). The chosen matching parameters were: Patient graft and donor characteristics [age, sex, body mass index (BMI)], indication for transplantation, procedure details, United Network for Organ Sharing classification, BMI, warm ischemia time (WIT), cold ischemia time (CIT), the volume of blood products transfused, and conventional laboratory coagulation analysis. Normally distributed continuous data are reported as the mean ± SD and compared using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Non-normally distributed continuous data are reported as the median (interquartile range) and compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables were analyzed with Chi-square tests with Yates correction or Fisher’s exact test depending on best applicability. IBM SPSS Statistics version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) was employed for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS Postoperative thrombotic events were identified as early if they occurred within 21 d postoperatively. The incidence of early hepatic artery occlusion was 3.02%, whereas the incidence of PVT was 2.07%. A comparison between the case and control groups showed some differences in the duration of surgery, which was longer in the case group (P = 0.032), whereas transfusion of blood products, red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets, was similar between the two study groups. Thromboelastographic parameters did not show any statistically significant difference between the two groups, except for the G value measured at basal and 120’ postreperfusion time. It was higher, although within the reference range, in the case group than in the control group (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, clot lysis at 60 min (LY60) measured at 120’ postreperfusion time was lower in the case group than in the control group (P = 0.035). This parameter is representative of a fibrinolysis shutdown (LY60 = 0%-0.80%) in 85% of patients who experienced a thrombotic complication, resulting in a statistical correlation with HAT and PVT. CONCLUSION The end of surgery LY60 and G value may identify those recipients at greater risk of developing early HAT or PVT, suggesting that they may benefit from intense surveillance and eventually anticoagulation prophylaxis in order to prevent these serious complications after LT.

Background The reconstruction of hepatic artery is a challenging part of the pediatric liver transplantation procedure. Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and stenosis are complications which may result in ischemic biliary injury, causing early graft lost and even death. Methods Two hundred and fifty-nine patients underwent liver transplantation in 2017 in a single liver transplantation group. Among them, 225 patients were living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and 34 deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Results In LDLT all reconstructions of hepatic artery were microsurgical, while in DDLT either microsurgical reconstruction or traditional continuous suture technique was done depending on different conditions. There were five (1.9%) HATs: four (4/34, 11.8%) in DDLT (all whole liver grafts) and one (1/225, 0.4%) in LDLT (P = 0.001). Four HATs were managed conservatively using anticoagulation, and 1 accepted salvage surgery with re-anastomosis. Until now, 3 HAT patients remain in good condition, whereas two developed biliary complications. One of them needed to be re-transplanted, and the other patient died due to biliary complications. Conclusions Microsurgical technique significantly improves the reconstruction of hepatic artery in pediatric liver transplantation. The risk for arterial complications is higher in DDLT. Conservative therapy can achieve good outcome in selected HAT cases.

BACKGROUND The use of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for primary liver transplantation (LT) may quell concerns about allocating deceased donor organs if the need for retransplantation (re-LT) arises because the primary LT did not draw from the limited organ pool. However, outcomes of re-LT after LDLT are poorly studied. The purpose of this study was to analyze the Adult to Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Study (A2ALL) data to report outcomes of re-LT after LDLT, with a focus on long-term survival after re-LT. METHODS A retrospective review of A2ALL data collected between 1998 and 2014 was performed. Patients were excluded if they received a deceased donor LT. Demographic data, postoperative outcomes and complications, graft and patient survival, and predictors of re-LT and patient survival were assessed. RESULTS Of the 1065 patients who underwent LDLT during the study time period, 110 recipients (10.3%) required re-LT. In multivariable analyses, hepatitis C virus, longer length of stay at LDLT, hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary stricture, infection, and disease recurrence were associated with an increased risk of re-LT. Patient survival among re-LT patients was significantly inferior to those who underwent primary transplant only at 1 (86% versus 92%), 5 (64% versus 82%), and 10 years (44% versus 68%). CONCLUSIONS Approximately 10% of A2ALL patients who underwent primary LDLT required re-LT. Compared with patients who underwent primary LT, survival among re-LT recipients was worse at 1, 5, and 10 years after LT, and re-LT was associated with a significantly increased risk of death in multivariable modeling (hazard ratios, 2.29; P

Introduction Routinely, pediatric donor (PD) grafts are allocated to pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients; however, occasionally they can be allocated for adult recipients (ARs). Some authors reported decreased patient/graft survival and higher vascular complications, such as hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), in LT in ARs using PDs. Methods It is a retrospective study enrolling 1202 ARs undergoing LT using whole liver grafts during the period of January 2002 to April 2019. The patients were categorized according to donor age in 2 groups: PDs and adult donors (ADs). The variables were collected from the database including the graft to recipient weight ratio (GWRW) and the incidence of HAT and graft primary nonfunction (PNF). Results The AD group had 1152 patients, and the PD group had 50 patients. PNF occurred in 68 (5.66%) patients, and the distribution between the 2 groups were similar: 65 (5.64%) in the AD group, and 3 (6%) in the PD group (P = .915). HAT was diagnosed in 30 (2.6%) patients in the AD group and in 6 (12%) patients in the PD group. HAT was significantly higher in the PD group (P = .001). In the PD group, the GWRWs among patients diagnosed with HAT were similar (P = .152). Conclusion HAT is higher in PDs, although it is a viable alternative with satisfactory results. Serial Doppler in the first week and early introduction of platelet antiaggregants and/or anticoagulants may be beneficial, albeit it is not clear if it could reduce the incidence of HAT.

We report this case of a 5-year-old child post combined liver and renal transplant for primary hyperoxaluria. Patient developed hepatic artery thrombosis on day 3 posttransplant that was managed by reexploration and reanastomosis of the hepatic artery. On day 4, the patient again developed hepatic artery thrombosis that failed to revascularize by surgical exploration and reanastomosis. Tissue plasminogen activator was injected into the hepatic artery intraoperatively to lyse any clot; however, no revascularization could be achieved. Subsequently, catheter angiogram confirmed no flow in the hepatic artery. A4 × 22 mm revive stent retriever was deployed across the site of occlusion and retrieved after 5 minutes of indwell time. Two such passes were made and complete recanalization of the hepatic artery was achieved. The hepatic artery remained patent as confirmed on serial Doppler images post intervention.

Liver transplantation presents unique challenges in patients who do not accept blood transfusions. The difficulty of balancing chemical augmentation and handling the technical difficulty of the surgery make transfusion-free liver transplantation an exception rather than the norm. However, at our center, we have performed 27 successful living donor liver transplants in transfusion-free patients. We describe a case of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) after living donor liver transplantation requiring retransplantation. This first report of safe retransplantation without blood products demonstrates that even graft-threatening complications can be safely managed in a transfusion-free setting. However, it remains unclear if the medical augmentation to meet hematologic and coagulation parameters before transfusion-free transplantation may increase the risk of postoperative HAT and other thrombotic complications. Although it is our center’s experience that the thrombosis rate is comparable with the published rate in standard transfusion-eligible living donor liver transplantations and this case demonstrates that HAT can be safely managed in this setting, further study on the risks and benefits of hematopoietic stimulants as pretransplant optimization is warranted.

We report the case of a 38-year-old woman who underwent orthotopic ‘split’ liver transplant, complicated by hepatic artery thrombosis on the first postoperative day. The patient was successfully treated with an endovascular approach by mechanical thromboaspiration of the hepatic artery, using neurovascular devices, angioplasty and stenting at the site of the surgical anastomosis.

Background Split liver transplantation addresses donor shortages by facilitating the transplant of two recipients using one donor liver. Some still consider these grafts inferior due to prolonged cold ischaemia time and at times difficult vascular reconstruction. Techniques such as in-situ splitting, machine perfusion and interposition grafts may address these challenges and thereby address these concerns. The aim of this review is to assess these technical advances in split liver transplantation, their utility and outcomes. Methods A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Keywords included ‘split liver transplantation’, ‘arterial reconstruction’, and ‘machine perfusion’. Data found was synthesised into sections including: methods of splitting, full-left full-right splitting, donor cholangiography, machine perfusion and arterial reconstruction. Results A total of 78 articles met inclusion criteria after screening of 151 eligible articles. These were subdivided into the following categories: in-situ (25), ex-vivo (25), full-left full-right splitting (15), donor cholangiography (2), machine perfusion (6), and arterial reconstruction (5). The in-situ splitting technique reduces the cold ischaemia time compared to the ex-vivo technique which may improve graft quality and liver splitting during normothermic machine perfusion is a novel technique with the potential to incorporate the best aspects of both techniques. Interposition grafts are often required during split liver transplantation but have an increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis. Conclusion Advancements in technique have allowed many of the unique challenges of split liver transplantation to be overcome. Overall, this supports the use of split liver transplantation in broader and riskier settings and we advocate for liver transplant surgeons to not hesitate in using these grafts liberally and expanding their recipient selection criteria.

Introduction: In pediatric liver transplantation (pLT), hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is associated with inferior transplant outcome. Hepatic artery reconstruction (HAR) using an operating microscope (OM) is considered to reduce the incidence of HAT. Methods: HAR using an OM was compared to a historic cohort using surgical loupes (SL) in pLT performed between 2009 and 2020. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of HAT. Secondary endpoints were 1-year patient and graft survival determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and complications. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for HAT and adverse events. Results: A total of 79 pLTs were performed [30 (38.0%) living donations; 49 (62.0%) postmortem donations] divided into 23 (29.1%) segment 2/3, 32 (40.5%) left lobe, 4 (5.1%) extended right lobe, and 20 (25.3%) full-size grafts. One-year patient and graft survival were both 95.2% in the OM group versus 86.2% and 77.8% in the SL group (p = .276 and p = .077). HAT rate was 0% in the OM group versus 24.1% in the SL group (p = .013). One-year patient and graft survival were 64.3% and 35.7% in patient with HAT, compared to 93.9% and 92.8% in patients with no HAT (both p < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed HAR with SL (p = .022) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) (p = .014) as independent risk factors for HAT. The occurrence of HAT was independently associated with the need for retransplantation (p < .001) and biliary leakage (p = .045). Conclusion: In pLT, the use of an OM is significantly associated to reduce HAT rate, biliary complications, and graft loss and outweighs the disadvantages of delayed arterial perfusion and prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT).

Need for routine reconstruction of all arteries in grafts with multiple arterial inflows remains an unsettled debate. The aim of following article is to review an anatomical basis of a decision-making strategy to deal with multiple arteries in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). LDLT performed between August 2009–2019 were included. Grafts were classified into grafts with single artery (group 1); multiple arteries, all reconstructed (group 2); and multiple arteries, one reconstructed (group 3). Frequency of double arteries in relation to graft type, type of reconstruction, incidence of arterial and biliary complications and survival was compared. 1086 LDLT were analysed (adults: 750, paediatric: 336). 1007 grafts (92.2%) had single artery (group 1), and 79 (7.8%) grafts had multiple arteries. All arteries were reconstructed in 19 (24%) patients (group 2), while 60 grafts (75.9%) had only one artery reconstructed (group 3). Left lobe (18.8%) and left lateral segments (10.7%) grafts were more likely to have multiple arteries (p = 0.001). The likelihood of reconstructing multiple arteries was similar in all graft types, 27.3% in right and 25% and 21.4% in left lobe and left lateral segments, respectively (p > 0.05). There was no difference in biliary complications (p = 0.85), hepatic artery thrombosis (p = 0.82), and post-surgical hospital stay (p = 0.38) between the three groups. The presence of multiple arteries or their selective reconstruction did not affect survival (p = 0.73). Multiple arterial inflows are not an uncommon entity and demonstration of good hilar collateralization helps in avoiding unnecessary arterial reconstruction without adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric LT are at particular risk of HAT, and its management still constitutes a matter of debate. Our purpose was to study predisposing factors and outcome of HAT post-LT, including the impact of surgical revisions on survival and biliary complications. METHODS: Among 882 primary pediatric LT performed between 1993 and 2015, 36 HAT were encountered (4.1%, 35 fully documented). Each HAT case was retrospectively paired with a LT recipient without HAT, according to diagnosis, age at LT, type of graft, and era. RESULTS: Five-year patient survivals were 77.0% versus 83.9% in HAT and non-HAT paired groups, respectively (P = .321). Corresponding graft survivals were 20.0% versus 80.5% (P < .001), and retransplantation rates 77.7% versus 10.7%, respectively (P < .001). One-year biliary complication-free survivals were 16.6% versus 83.8% in the HAT and non-HAT groups, respectively (P < .001). Regarding chronology of surgical re-exploration, only HAT cases that occurred within 14 days post-LT were re-operated, fourteen of them being explored within 7 days post-LT (revascularization rate: 6/14), versus two beyond 7 days (no revascularization). When revascularization was achieved, graft and biliary complication-free survival rates at 1 year were 33.3% and 22.2%, respectively, both rates being 0.0% in case of failure. CONCLUSIONS: The pejorative prognosis associated with HAT in terms of graft survival is confirmed, whereas patient survival could be preserved through retransplantation. Results suggest that HAT should be re-operated if occurring within 7 days post-LT, but not beyond.

Intrahepatic recipient hepatic artery dissection caused by hepatic artery thrombosis is a lethal complication of living-liver donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We herein report a new surgical technique that avoids the ligation of the recipient hepatic arteries in LDLT. Patients undergoing LDLT between 2009 and 2019 were evaluated. In the second half of this period, a technique involving no ligation of the recipient hepatic artery was initiated and its impact on the incidence of intrahepatic recipient hepatic artery dissection was determined. The middle and left hepatic arteries were ligated in 195 cases (53.4%), and the no-ligation technique was used in 170 (46.6%). The incidence of intraoperative hepatic artery dissection was significantly lower in the no-ligation group (n = 0, 0.0%) than in the ligation group (n = 10, 5.1%) (p = 0.0021). After propensity score matching to evaluate the patient characteristics, the incidence of intraoperative hepatic artery dissection was also significantly lower in the no-ligation group (n = 0, 0.0%) than in the ligation group (n = 6, 4.5%) (p = 0.0295). As a result, this new surgical technique is highly recommended to avoid recipient hepatic artery ligation in LDLT.

Obtaining partial allografts and performing arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is technically demanding. The risk of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) remains high in LDLT due to the small caliber of the arteries. The graft and the recipient hepatic artery (HA) cannot be directly anastomosed in certain cases due to narrow diameter or short graft HA.

When the standard arterial reconstruction is not feasible during liver transplantation (LT), aorto-hepatic arterial reconstruction (AHAR) can be the only solution to save the graft. AHAR can be performed on the infrarenal (IR) or supraceliac (SC) tract of the aorta, but the possible effect on outcome of selecting SC versus IR reconstruction is still unclear. One hundred and twenty consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation with AHAR in six European centres between January 2003 and December 2018 were retrospectively analysed to ascertain whether the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was influenced by the type of AHAR (IR-AHAR vs. SC-AHAR). In 56/120 (46.6%) cases, an IR anastomosis was performed, always using an interposition arterial conduit. In the other 64/120 (53.4%) cases, an SC anastomosis was performed; an arterial conduit was used in 45/64 (70.3%) cases. Incidence of early (

AIM To review current literature of thrombosis prophylaxis in pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) as thrombosis remains a critical complication. METHODS Studies were identified by electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases until March 2018. The search was supplemented by manually reviewing the references of included studies and the references of the main published systematic reviews on thrombosis and PLT. We excluded from this review case report, small case series, commentaries, conference abstracts, papers which describing less than 10 pediatric liver transplants/year and articles published before 1990. Two reviewers performed study selection independently, with disagreements solved through discussion and by the opinion of a third reviewer when necessary. RESULTS Nine retrospective studies were included in this review. The overall quality of studies was poor. A pooled analysis of results from studies was not possible due to the retrospective design and heterogeneity of included studies. We found an incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) ranging from 2% to 10% in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and from 4% to 33% in pediatric deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was observed mostly in mixed LDLT and DDLT pediatric population with an incidence ranging from 0% to 29%. In most of the studies Doppler ultrasonography was used as a first line diagnostic screening for thrombosis. Four different surgical techniques for portal vein anastomosis were reported with similar efficacy in terms of PVT reduction. Reduced size liver transplant was associated with a low risk of both PVT (incidence 4%) and HAT (incidence 0%, P < 0.05). Similarly, aortic arterial anastomosis without graft interposition and microsurgical hepatic arterial reconstruction were associated with a significant reduced HAT incidence (6% and 0%, respectively). According to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we did not find eligible studies that evaluated pharmacological prevention of thrombosis. CONCLUSION Poor quality retrospective studies show the use of tailored surgical strategies might be useful to reduce HAT and PVT after PLT; prospective studies are urgently needed.

Objectives Liver retransplant is considered the only hope for patients with irreversible graft failure after primary transplant. In most Western centers, retransplantis done mainly from deceased donors; so far, only few published studies have reported on outcomes of liver retransplant with living donors. In this study, our aim was to analyze the outcomes of living-donor liver retransplant. Materials and methods Patients who underwent liver retransplant between February 2011 and February 2019 were included in the study. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were analyzed. Results from 2 patient groups were compared: liver retransplant with living donors and liver retransplant with deceased donors. Results Thirty-two patients underwent liver retransplant (21 adult and 11 pediatric patients). The most common indications for liver retransplant were hepatic artery thrombosis (28.5%) and primary graft nonfunction (23.8%) in adults and hepatic artery thrombosis (45.5%) and chronic rejection (36.4%) in pediatric patients. Seventeen retransplant patients (53.1%) required early retransplant (within 1 mo), mainly due to hepatic artery thrombosis (52.9%) and primary graft nonfunction (35.3%). Late retransplant was mainly due to chronic rejection (40%) and recurrence of primary disease (26.7%). Seventeen patients (53.1%) underwent living-donor retransplant, and 5 donors underwent robotic right hepatectomy. Graft and patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81.3% for living-donor and 51.4% for deceased-donor liver retransplant recipients (P = .08). On multivariate analyses, we observed significant differences between both groups in pretransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scores (P = .05), preoperative international normalized ratio (P = .012), and cold ischemia time (P = .046). Conclusions The use of living donors for liver retransplant, despite its technical demand, was shown to be a safe and feasible option, especially when there is scarcity of deceased donors.

BACKGROUND: In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) > 0.8% is perceived as the critical graft size. This lower limit of GRWR (0.8%) has been challenged over the last decade owing to the surgical refinements, especially related to inflow and outflow modulation techniques. Our aim was to compare the recipient outcome in small-for-size (GRWR 0.8) and to determine the risk factors for mortality when small-for-size grafts (SFSG) were used. METHODS: Data of 200 transplant recipients and their donors were analyzed over a period of two years. Routine practice of harvesting middle hepatic vein (MHV) or reconstructing anterior sectoral veins into neo-MHV was followed during LDLT. Outcomes were compared in terms of mortality, hospital stay, ICU stay, and occurrence of various complications such as functional small-for-size syndrome (F-SFSS), hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), early allograft dysfunction (EAD), portal vein thrombosis (PVT), and postoperative sepsis. A multivariate analysis was also done to determine the risk factors for mortality in both the groups. RESULTS: Recipient and donor characteristics, intraoperative variables, and demographical data were comparable in both the groups (GRWR 0.8. CONCLUSION: Graft survival after LDLT using a small-for-size right lobe graft (GRWR

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation, occurring in 5% of cases (Piardi et al, 2016). HAT is the second main cause of graft loss after primary nonfunction, the leading cause of graft failure in the immediate postoperative period (

Highlights • Portal vein arterialization may be a bridging treatment for retransplantation. • This case demonstrates feasible of portal vein arterialization in sick patient. • Portal hypertension usually occurs after portal vein arterialization. • Calibration of fistula after recovery of liver allograft should be considered., Objective Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is one of the most serious complications of liver transplantation that can potentially lead to loss of the allograft. Retransplantation is the only option when revascularization can’t be performed but the donor may be not available in the short period of time. We report the technique of using portal vein arterialization (PVA) for bridging before retransplantation. There are few reports in living donor setting. Case description The recipient of the liver was a 59 year old male who received an extended right lobe graft from his son. Post operative day 41, HAT was diagnosed from angiogram and liver function got rapidly worse. We decided to re-anastomose the hepatic artery but this was not possible due to a thrombosis in the distal right hepatic artery. So PVA by anastomosis of the common hepatic artery to splenic vein was performed. During the early postoperative period liver function gradually improved. Unfortunately, he died from massive GI hemorrhage one month later. Discussion PVA has previously been reported as being useful when revascularization was not successful. The surgical technique is not complicated and can be performed in sick patient. Liver graft may be salvaged with oxygenated portal flow and recover afterwards. However, portal hypertension after PVA seem to be an inevitable complication. Conclusions PVA may be a bridging treatment for retransplantation in patients whom hepatic artery reconstruction is impossible after HAT. Regards to the high morbidity after procedure, retransplantation should be performed as definite treatment as soon as possible.

Background: The graft used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) sometimes has two hepatic arteries. This study aimed to introduce arterial-blood gas (ABG) test on the decision on whether to reconstruct a single or both arteries in LDLT. Methods: Patients with a right lobe graft with two hepatic arteries were enrolled from the prospectively maintained database of our institution. After anastomosis of one of two arteries, the back-bleeding from the second hepatic artery was taken for ABG test. Depending on the results, the second artery was anastomosed or ligated. Results: Between January 2012 and December 2017, a total of 372 patients underwent LDLT, and 21 living donors had two right hepatic arteries. Based on ABG test results, a single anastomosis was created in 15 recipients while double anastomoses were performed in the remaining 6 recipients. All the patients had an uneventful recovery and were discharged in good conditions. Neither hepatic artery thrombosis nor liver dysfunction was observed during the median follow-up of 26 months (range, 6–71 months). The overall incidence of biliary complications was 9.5% (2/21). Bile leakage arose in one patient with two hepatic artery reconstructions, and the patient subsequently developed biliary stricture. Biliary stricture occurred in another patient with one hepatic artery reconstruction. The biliary complications were successfully managed with endoscopic or percutaneous intervention. Conclusions: ABG test provides a good measure for deciding whether to reconstruct single or both arteries in LDLT.

Background. Split liver transplantation (SLT) addresses donor shortages by providing 2 partial grafts from a single donor liver. Arterial reconstruction using an interposition graft facilitates the use of split grafts with difficult recipient anatomy. Its use, however, remains controversial because of a reported increased risk of complications. Methods. A retrospective review of the prospectively maintained Australian National Liver Transplantation Unit database was performed. Donor, recipient, operative, and complications data for adults receiving an SLT between July 2002 and November 2019 were extracted. Results. Arterial reconstruction required an interposition graft in 46 of 155 patients. Overall graft and patient survival were not significantly different between the groups with 1-, 3-, and 5-y graft survivals of 82%, 77%, and 69% for those with interposition grafts and 86%, 79%, and 77% for those without interposition grafts, respectively (P = 0.499). There were more cut liver bile leaks in the interposition graft group (26% versus 9%, P = 0.004), but otherwise, no significant differences in the rate of biliary complications (39% versus 29% P = 0.200), hepatic artery thrombosis (7% versus 10%, P = 0.545), or hepatic artery stenosis (13% versus 10%, P = 0.518). Conclusions. Liberal use of interposition grafts for arterial reconstruction in SLT is safe and does not result in increased complications.

Introduction Post-transplant hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) can lead serious complications of are derived from long arterial ischemic time. However, there has been few reports regarding fate of intraoperative HAT during adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). Methods From 2000 to 2019, 1,355 recipients underwent ALDLT in Seoul National University Hospital. All patients with no intraoperative arterial flow were managed by redoing hepatic artery anastomosis. Survival outcomes and the rates of biliary complication of patients with intraoperative HAT were compared with others without HAT and with postoperative HAT. Median follow-up period was 89 months. Results Intraoperative HAT was developed in 45 cases (3.3%). Hepatic artery reanastomosis was performed once in 33 cases (73.3%), for more than 2 times in 12 cases (26.6%). Among 45 patients with intraoperative HAT, postoperative HAT was detected in 6 cases (13.3%). All patients underwent redo arterial reconstruction, but technical success rate was 50.0%. Overall graft survival rates were lower in patients with intraoperative HAT (93.3%) than others without HAT (98.0%) (p = 0.026), but higher than in patients with postoperative HAT (88.9%) (p = 0.001). However, patient survival rates were similar among three groups (p = 0.269). There was no difference in biliary complication between patients with intraoperative HAT (33.3%) and the others without HAT (32.1%) (p = 0.945), lower than patients with postoperative HAT (55.5%, p = 0.011). Conclusions Intraoperative HAT after ALDLT did not affect biliary complication and patient survival, but is significantly associated with recurrent postoperative HAT and graft failure. Patients with intraoperative HAT in ALDLT should be intensively monitored for HAT and graft dysfunction.

Understanding of outcomes for patients relisted for ischemic cholangiopathy following a donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplant (LT) will help standardization of a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exception scheme for retransplantation. Early relisting (E-RL) for DCD graft failure caused by primary nonfunction (PNF) or hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was defined as relisting ≤14 days after DCD LT, and late relisting (L-RL) due to biliary complications was defined as relisting 14 days to 3 years after DCD LT. Of 3908 DCD LTs performed nationally between 2002 and 2016, 540 (13.8%) patients were relisted within 3 years of transplant (168 [4.3%] in the E-RL group, 372 [9.5%] in the L-RL group). The E-RL and L-RL groups had waitlist mortality rates of 15.4% and 10.5%, respectively, at 3 mo and 16.1% and 14.3%, respectively, at 1 year. Waitlist mortality in the L-RL group was higher than mortality and delisted rates for patients with exception points for both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) at 3- to 12-mo time points (p < 0.001). Waitlist outcomes differed in patients with early DCD graft failure caused by PNF or HAT compared with those with late DCD graft failure attributed to biliary complications. In L-RL, higher rates of waitlist mortality were noted compared with patients listed with exception points for HCC or HPS.

Background: The reconstruction of hepatic artery (HA) is most complex step in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to smaller diameter of the artery and increased risk of HA related complications. Due to smaller diameter of the HA, many centres use microsurgical technique with interrupted sutures for arterial anastomosis. Aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes after HA reconstruction performed under magnifying loupes using “parachute technique”. Materials and Methods: From August 2002 to 31st August 2016, LDLT was performed in 766 recipients. HA reconstruction for initial 25 LDLT surgeries was performed using microsurgery technique (Era I). From May 2007 till date, HA reconstruction was performed in 741 recipients by a “parachute technique” under surgical loupes (Era II). Results: HA reconstruction was performed using surgical loupes in 737 adults (Male:Female, 526:211) and 4 pediatric patients (Male:Female, 3:1). Average diameter of the donor graft HA was 2.8 mm (range,1 to 6.5 mm). The most notable factor in this era was quick HA anastomosis procedure with a mean time of 10 ± 5 minutes (range, 5-30 minutes). In Era II, nine patients (1.21%) developed hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) whereas 2 patients developed non-thrombotic HA related complications. Extra-anatomic HA reconstruction was performed in 14 patients due to either primary HA anastomosis failure or poor caliber recipient HA. Conclusions: Use of magnifying surgical loupes to perform HA reconstruction is safe, feasible, and yields low incidence of HA related complications. The “Parachute Technique” for HA reconstruction can achieve a speedy reconstruction without increasing risk of HAT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The successful outcome in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is critically dependent on the uncompromised hepatic graft blood inflow. Arterial conduits represent a good solution in cases where conventional revascularisation is not possible. The purpose of this systematic review is to analyse the published evidence on the use of arterial conduits in adult OLT. After review of the Pubmed and EMBASE databases, 19 relevant studies were identified and analysed. Even though patient survival was comparable, most large studies reported worse 1-, 3- and 5-year graft survival rates compared to grafts with standard arterial revascularisation. Primary grafts were more commonly affected than re-grafts. Early and late hepatic artery thrombosis occurred more commonly, while the use of an arterial conduit was identified as an independent risk factor. The overall biliary complications were comparable, however, ischaemic cholangiopathy was encountered about 3 times more in patients with arterial conduits and strongly correlated with the occurrence of late HAT. In conclusion, the use of arterial conduit is a useful option in adult OLT in cases that the conventional revascularisation technique cannot be used or results in suboptimal arterial inflow. More studies directly addressing issues such as pre-operative evaluation regarding the need for arterial conduit, the types of vessels used, positioning of the conduit and post-operative management are required.

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of under 0.8 is recognized as the critical graft size. Our aim was to compare the survival rates of recipients with small-for-size grafts (SFSG: GRWR 0.8), normal-sized grafts (NSG), and large-for-size grafts (LFSG: GRWR ≥ 3.5) and to investigate the mortality risk with SFSG.Between 1991 and April 2019, we performed 188 LDLT surgeries. Recently, we added splenectomy when portal vein pressure is high (17 mm Hg) to interrupt the splenic bloodstream. We divided all LDLT cases retrospectively into 3 groups: an SFSG group (n = 22), NSG group (n = 154), and LFSG group (n = 12). We investigated the survival rates in these groups. Furthermore, we divided the SFSG group into 2 subgroups: an SFSG with splenectomy (SFSG+S) group (n = 7) and an SFSG without splenectomy group. We investigated the occurrence rates of lethal complications such as portal vein thrombosis, hepatic artery thrombosis, and hepatic vein thrombosis.The 5-year survival rate in the SFSG group was significantly lower (52.8%) than in the other groups (NSG: 84.5%; LFSG: 83.3%), but that of the SFSG+S group was similar (80.0%) to that of other groups. There was no difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications such as portal vein thrombosis, hepatic artery thrombosis, or hepatic vein thrombosis between the SFSG+S group and other groups.Graft survival of LDLT using SFSG+S was as good as that of normal-sized grafts. Reducing portal vein pressure was important for SFSG.

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) following pediatric liver transplantation increases morbidity and risk of graft failure. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent deceased-donor liver transplantation from August 2002 to July 2016. Multi-organ transplant recipients were excluded. We examined the incidence of HAT at our institution and sought to identify associated donor or recipient risk factors. A total of 127 deceased-donor liver transplant patients with a median age of 1.7 years (IQR 0.67-6.7) were identified. Of those, 14 developed HAT, all weighing under 25 kg. Among 100 patients under 25 kg, whole-liver graft recipients had an odds ratio of 3.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 15.34; P = .045) for developing HAT compared with split-liver graft recipients. Within the whole-liver recipient group under 25 kg, 11 patients developed HAT with a median donor-to-recipient ratio (DRWR) of 0.9 (IQR: 0.7-1.2) compared with a median DRWR of 1.4 (IQR: 1.1-1.9) for those who did not develop HAT. Multivariate analysis showed DRWR to be an independent risk factor for HAT in patients weighing under 25 kg who received whole organ grafts, with an odds ratio of 3.89 (95% CI: 1.43, 10.54; P = .008) for each 0.5 unit decrease in DRWR. Our results suggest that in recipients under 25 kg 1) split-liver grafts may have a lower rate of HAT and 2) selecting whole organ donors with a higher DRWR may decrease the incidence of HAT.

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) remains a life-threatening complication in liver transplantation. We aim to investigate the risk factors of HAT in deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation. 104 recipients from 2014 to 2016 were enrolled; donor and recipient characteristics, surgical variables, graft and recipient survival rate were compared between recipients with or without HAT. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to identify the risk factors of HAT. The recipient survival rate was 87.0% and 96.3% at 1 year, and 87.0% and 96.3% at 3 years in HAT and non-HAT groups without significant difference. The graft survival rate was 73.9% and 96.3% at 1 year, and 73.9% and 95.1% at 3 years in HAT and non-HAT groups; significant difference was observed between two groups at both 1 and 3 years. Donor age less than 8.5 months, graft weight less than 190 g and GRWR less than 2.2% were identified as independent risk factors for HAT. Recipients with HAT were associated with higher incidence of post-operative biliary complications. Young donor age and small liver graft are risk factors for HAT in deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation.

Background The national protocol for the handling of high-urgency (HU) liver organ procurement for transplant is administered by the Italian National Transplant Center. In recent years, we have witnessed a change in requests to access the program. We have therefore evaluated their temporal trend, the need to change the access criteria, the percentage of transplants performed, the time of request satisfaction, and the follow-up. Methods We analyzed all the liver requests for the HU program received during the 4-year period of 2014 to 2017 for adult recipients (≥18 years of age): all the variables linked to the recipient or to the donor and the organ transplants are registered in the Informative Transplant System as established by the law 91/99. In addition, intention to treat (ITT) survival rates were compared among 4 different groups: (1) patients on standard waiting lists vs (2) patients on urgency waiting lists, and (3) patients with a history of transplant in urgency vs (4) patients with a history of transplant not in urgency. Results Out of the 370 requests included in the study, 291 (78.7%) were satisfied with liver transplantation. Seventy-nine requests (21.3%) have not been processed, but if we consider only the real failures, this percentage falls to 13.1% and the percentage of satisfied requests rises to 86.9%. The average waiting period for liver transplantation (LT) is 1.7 days and most requests (74%) are met in less than 24 hours, if we consider the hours between the registration of the request and the donor reporting . The percentage of late retransplantations is 2.1%. The clinical indication for HU-LT that appears to improve over time is hepatic artery thrombosis (82.5%). The overall 1-year patient survival is 68.3%. The overall 1-year graft survival, performed on all the patients, is 89% and all the indications for HU-LT appear to go well over time with an average survival rate greater than 85%. Conclusions The indications for HU-LT are changing according to the changes in the hepatologic field in recent years. The centralized management of requests has proven to be successful in optimizing responses. Urgent LT is confirmed to be lifesaving in its timeliness.

Variations of the anatomy of donor hepatic arteries increase the number of arterial anastomoses during liver transplantation and, possibly, the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT). In this study, we describe the arterial anatomic variations in liver grafts procured and transplanted by a single center in Greece, the techniques of arterial anastomosis, and their effect on the incidence of early HAT.From January 2013 to December 2017, the arterial anatomy of 116 grafts procured for liver transplantation were recorded, as well as the technique of arterial anastomosis and the incidence of early hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT 30 days).A single hepatic artery was recorded in 72.41% of the procured grafts, an aberrant left hepatic artery (accessory or replaced) in 18 grafts (15.52%), and an aberrant right hepatic artery (accessory or replaced) in 17 grafts (14.66%), while other variations were observed in less than 1% of the procured livers. Of the 116 primary liver transplantations, 6 patients (5.17%) developed early HAT 30 days. Two of these patients (1.72%) had 1 anastomosis of the hepatic artery and 4 (3.45%) had 2 anastomoses due to anatomic variations.Anatomic variations of the hepatic artery in liver grafts is a common finding and increase the incidence of early HAT but not to a degree to make these grafts unusable.

Objectives Vascular complications after liver trans-plant can be lethal. High levels of suspicion and aggressive use of diagnostic tools may help with early diagnosis and treatment. Here, we share our experiences regarding this topic. Materials and methods Adult and pediatric patients who had liver transplant between February 1997 and June 2018 in our clinic were included in the study. Patients were grouped according to age (pediatric patients were those under 18 years old), male versus female, indication for transplant, type of liver transplant, type of vascular complication, treatment, and survival after treatment. We analyzed the statistical incidence of vascular complications according to age, male versus female, and type of liver transplant. Results Our analyses included 607 liver transplant procedures, including 7 retransplants, with 349 (57.4%) from living donors and 258 (42.6%) from deceased donors. Of total patients, 539 were adults (89.8%) and 61 were children (10.2%). Vascular complications occurred in 25 patients (4.1%), with hepatic artery complications seen in 13 patients (2.1%) (10 adults [1.8%] and 3 children [4.9%]), portal vein com-plications seen in 9 patients (1.5%) (6 adults [1.1%] and 3 children [4.9%]), and hepatic vein complications seen in 3 patients (0.5%) (2 adults [0.36%] and 1 child [1.6%]). Rate of vascular complications was statistically higher in pediatric patients (11.4% vs 3.3%; P = .007) and higher but not statistically in recipients of livers from living donors (5.2% vs 2.7%; P = .19). Twelve patients (48.8%) were treated with endovascular approach, and 11 (0.44%) required surgical treatment. Two patients underwent immediate retransplant due to hepatic artery thrombosis. Conclusions Because vascular complications are the most severe complications after liver transplant, there must be close follow-up of vascular anastomoses, particularly early postoperatively, with radiologic methods. In cases of vascular complications, emergent treatment, including endovascular interventions, surgery, and retransplant, must be performed.

Purpose Many types of preservation fluid were used in liver procurement. Undoubtedly, the gold standard is the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. But the solution is expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of combined acetated Ringer solution, Euro-Collins solution, and UW solution. Materials and Methods All patients undergoing adult liver transplantation from cadaveric donor during January 2013 to December 2017 in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were included in this study. Donor and recipient characteristics, preservation fluid, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Results A total of 102 patients receiving liver transplants were enrolled into the study. The mean age of donors was 34.2 years. The mean total ischemic time was 420.93 minutes. In recipients, posttransplantation complications were the following: (1) primary nonfunction in 1 patient (0.98%); (2) early allograft dysfunction in 23 patients (22.5%); (3) hepatic artery thrombosis in 3 patients (2.7%); (4) hepatic venous outflow obstruction in 2 patients (1.96%); (5) biliary leakage in 1 patient (0.98%); (6) biliary anastomosis stenosis in 4 patients (3.92%); and (7) biliary nonanastomosis stenosis in 1 patient (0.98%). No inhospital mortality was occurred. Overall mortality rate is 7.8% (8/102). One-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 95.9%, 91.5%, and 88.4%, respectively. Conclusions The combination of acetated Ringer solution, Euro-Collins solution, and UW solution is effective and economic for liver preservation. Further study should be conducted.

The management of late hepatic artery thrombosis (LHAT) after liver transplantation (LT) is not codified. The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate outcomes after LHAT. All patients with HAT diagnosed 3 months or later after LT on computed tomography between 1993 and 2017 were included. Our policy was to apply a conservative management for asymptomatic or mild symptomatic patients and reserve retransplantation to symptomatic patients with diffuse cholangitis or liver abscess. A total of 56 patients were analyzed. LHAT diagnosis was made after a median interval of 48 months from LT (ranging from 3 to 368.3). At diagnosis, 28 (50%) patients were asymptomatic, 10 (17.8%) had mild symptoms (transient acute cholangitis), and 18 (32.1%) had severe complications. Asymptomatic patients experienced a 5-year graft survival of 57% vs. 40% in those with mild symptoms and 11% in those with severe complications (P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in overall patient survival between groups. Our results suggest that conservative management of LHAT for asymptomatic patients or patients with mild complications is safe. Retransplantation should be reserved to patients with severe biliary complications.

Hepatic artery thrombosis is the most frequent vascular complication following orthotopic liver transplantation, and often results in biliary complications, early graft loss and death. Surgical revascularization and retransplantation are considered the mainstay of treatment. However, intraarterial endovascular therapy is an alternative that has shown low morbidity and mortality, thereby avoiding the need for retransplantation. We describe a case of orthotopic liver transplantation complicated with hepatic artery thrombosis that was successfully treated with endovascular therapy.

Vascular complications after liver transplantation may lead to graft dysfunction and liver failure, which in turn results in need for retransplantation and death risk. Therefore, their early diagnosis is critical. Major vascular complications include hepatic artery thrombosis, stenosis and aneurysms; portal vein thrombosis and stenosis; and potential additional complications in hepatic veins and vena cava. Of all these vascular complications hepatic arterial thrombosis, which involves approximately 5% of transplant recipients, is most significant. Portal complications, which are second in significance, are less common (2%).