Search

Background Unplanned emergency department visits are often overlooked as an indicator of care quality. The authors' objectives were to (1) determine the rate of 30-day emergency department visits following mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction, (2) perform a risk analysis of potential factors associated with emergency department return, and (3) assess for potentially preventable visits with a focus on returns for pain. Methods Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project data, the authors identified adult women who underwent mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate risk of unplanned emergency department visits. The authors identified and sorted diagnostic codes to investigate why patients were seeking emergency department care. In addition, the authors performed a subgroup analysis on patients returning with a pain-related diagnosis to evaluate risk. Results Of 159,275 cases of mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction, 4917 (3.1 percent) experienced an unplanned return to the emergency department within 30 days of operation. A substantial proportion of those who returned (23 percent) presented with a pain-related diagnosis. Only 0.9 percent of cases with a 30-day emergency department return were readmitted. Conclusions Numerous patients return to the emergency department within 30 days of mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction. There is a need for policy makers and physicians to implement strategies to reduce discretionary emergency department use, specifically among younger or publicly insured patients. Combining unplanned emergency department visits with readmission rates as a care quality indicator warrants consideration. Clinical question/level of evidence Risk, III.

BACKGROUND Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are useful alternatives to narcotics for analgesia. However, concerns remain regarding their safety. The authors evaluated ketorolac use and complications. We hypothesized that no association between ketorolac and morbidity exists in patients undergoing body contouring. METHODS Truven MarketScan claims database was analyzed for patients undergoing breast and body contouring surgery. Patients selected received ketorolac and were enrolled a minimum of 90 days. The authors performed a multivariable logistic regression to calculate risk of morbidity, adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors. RESULTS Among the 106,279 patients enrolled, 4924 (4.6 percent) received postoperative ketorolac. In multivariable regression analysis, ketorolac was not associated with hematoma (OR, 1.20; 95 percent CI, 0.99 to 1.46; p > 0.05). There was an increased rate of reoperation within 72 hours (OR, 1.22; 95 percent CI, 1.00 to 1.49; p < 0.05; number needed to harm, 262 patients). Ketorolac was associated with fewer readmissions (OR, 0.76; 95 percent CI, 0.62 to 0.93; p < 0.05; number needed to treat, 87 patients), with a reduction in the rate of pain as a readmission diagnosis (0.6 percent versus 4.3 percent; p = 0.021). Ketorolac was associated with seroma, but this association may not be causal (OR, 1.28; 95 percent CI, 1.05 to 1.57; p < 0.05; number needed to harm, 247 patients). Ketorolac provided an estimated savings of $157 per patient. CONCLUSIONS The benefits of ketorolac likely outweigh the risks after surgery. Absolute differences in reoperation rates were low, and improved rates of hospital admission impact cost savings. The authors advocate postoperative ketorolac once the wound is hemostatic. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.

Background Following publication of high-level evidence demonstrating that it is not an effective treatment for lateral epicondylitis, a reduction in the corticosteroid injection rate would be expected. The authors aimed to clarify current clinical practice pattern for lateral epicondylitis and identify factors that influence the introduction of evidence into clinical practice. Methods In this administrative claims analysis, the authors used 2009 to 2015 Truven MarketScan data to extract claims for corticosteroid injection, physical therapy, platelet-rich plasma injection, and surgery for lateral epicondylitis. The authors performed multivariable analysis using a generalized estimating equation model to identify the variables that potentially affect the odds of receiving a given treatment. Results Among 711,726 claims, the authors found that the odds of receiving a corticosteroid injection increased slightly after publication of contradictory evidence (OR, 1.7; 95 percent CI, 1.04 to 1.11 in 2015). Being male (OR, 1.21; 95 percent CI, 1.19 to 1.23), older (OR, 1.16; 95 percent CI, 1.13 to 1.19), and having managed care insurance (OR, 1.15; 95 percent CI, 1.13 to 1.18) significantly contributed to increased odds of receiving corticosteroid injections. Patients seen at facilities in the South (OR, 1.33; 95 percent CI, 1.30 to 1.36 compared with the Northeast) and by plastic/orthopedic surgeons (OR, 2.48; 95 percent CI, 2.43 to 2.52) also had increased odds of receiving corticosteroid injection. Conclusions Corticosteroid injection use did not decrease after publication of impactful articles, regardless of provider specialty or other patient-related factors. This finding emphasizes that there are various barriers for even high-level evidence to overcome the inertia of current practice.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to measure the use of pathology evaluation of breast specimens among patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty and assess rates of new diagnoses of breast disease and associated cost. METHODS: We analyzed the Truven MarketScan Databases from 2009–2015 to identify adult female patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty for macromastia. We recorded patient age, rates of obtaining pathology evaluation, new diagnoses of benign or malignant breast disease after pathology evaluation, and total cost for the surgery encounter. RESULTS: Among 17,738 macromastia patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty, 91.3% (n=16,193) received pathology evaluation. Pathology evaluation rates were clinically similar across age groups

BACKGROUND Economic conditions affect surgical volumes, particularly for elective procedures. In this study, the authors aimed to identify the effects of the 2008 U.S. economic downturn on hand surgery volumes to guide surgeons and managers when facing future economic crises. METHODS The authors used the California State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database from January of 2005 to December of 2011, which includes the entire period of the Great Recession (December of 2007 to June of 2009). The authors abstracted the monthly volume of five common hand procedures using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Pearson statistics were used to identify the correlation between unemployment rate and surgical volume for each procedure. RESULTS The total number of operative cases was 345,583 during the 7-year study period. Most common elective hand procedures, such as carpal tunnel release and trigger finger release, had a negative correlation with unemployment rate, but the volume of distal radius fracture surgery did not show any correlation. Compared with carpal tunnel release (r = -0.88) or trigger finger release volumes (r = -0.85), thumb arthroplasty/arthrodesis volumes (r = -0.45) showed only a moderate correlation. CONCLUSIONS The economic downturn decreased elective hand procedure surgical volumes. This may be detrimental to small surgical practices that rely on revenue from elective procedures. Taking advantage of the principle that increased volume reduces unit cost may mitigate the lost revenue from these elective procedures. In addition, consolidating hand surgery services at larger, regional centers may reduce the effect of the economic environment on individual hand surgeons.

BACKGROUND: It remains unknown whether treatment trends for distal radius fracture (DRF) have changed in light of value-based care initiatives during recent years. We aimed to characterize modern practice patterns for DRF management. METHODS: We used 2009–2015 Truven MarketScan databases to extract data on several variables comprising of demographic characteristics, geographic location, and comorbidities for patients receiving treatment for a DRF. Regression analysis and Joinpoint analysis were used to assess trends over the study period. We analyzed the association of patient factors with type of treatment provided using logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Among all 499,766 eligible encounters, the rate of internal fixation fluctuated around 13%. Casting/splinting remained the most frequent treatment across all populations. Treatment trends varied by age; children and adolescents were treated almost exclusively with closed treatment (mean: 97%), yet rates of internal fixation increased among adults and elderly patients. Patients age 55 to 64 were most likely to undergo internal fixation (OR: 1.89; 95%CI:1.82–1.96). Higher median household income also significantly increased one’s odds of receiving internal fixation (p

Objective The role of maxillofacial trauma in dementia risk is not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between craniofacial trauma, including facial bone fracture and traumatic brain injury (TBI), and dementia. Methods Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 501,889 adults who had had ≥1 medical record of craniofacial trauma between 2000 and 2010 and did not have a dementia diagnosis at baseline. Diagnoses of craniofacial trauma, including facial bone fracture and TBI, and dementia were made using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. The standardized incidence ratio was used to determine whether craniofacial trauma was associated with a greater risk of incident dementia compared with the general population. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to predict the risk of dementia among the trauma cohort by comparing the patients with and without comorbidities. Results A total of 501,889 patients with craniofacial trauma were included, of which 1.5% (n = 7804) developed dementia. Facial bone fracture (standardized incidence ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.25–2.00) was shown to be associated with an increased dementia risk compared with the general population. In addition, craniofacial trauma accompanied with postinjury comorbidities was associated with an increased risk of dementia during follow-up periods compared with the group without comorbidities. Conclusions Craniofacial traumas, especially facial bone fracture, were associated with an increased risk of subsequent dementia. Maintaining a high index of suspicion for associated TBIs in all patients with facial trauma is crucial, even if no obvious initial signs and symptoms of brain injury are observed.

BACKGROUND Posthospital syndrome (PHS) is a transient condition after acute hospitalizations when patients are physiologically deconditioned. The objective of this study was to determine if having PHS at the time of abdominal contouring surgery increased the incidence of postoperative adverse medical events. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the MarketScan Databases who underwent outpatient functional or cosmetic abdominal contouring surgery (ie, abdominoplasty, liposuction, or panniculectomy) from April 2010 to August 2015. Patients were separated into 2 groups based upon PHS exposure, defined by hospitalization within 90 days before surgery. Differential health care utilization within 30 days after surgery was compared between cohorts. RESULTS Among the 18,947 patients included in the final cohort, 1045 patients (6%) had PHS at the time of abdominal contouring surgery. Patients with PHS experienced more emergency department visits (0.16 vs 0.08 visits; adjusted odds ratio, 1.60; P < 0.001) and more episodes of hospitalization (0.11 vs 0.04 episodes; adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; P < 0.001) within 30 days postoperatively. The mean unadjusted health care utilization after abdominal contouring surgery for patients with PHS was US $7888 (SD, 17,659) versus US $2943 (SD, 9096) in patients without PHS. After controlling for confounders, such as comorbidity burden, PHS was associated with US $3944 greater cost than patients without PHS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing outpatient abdominal contouring surgery, having PHS increased the incidence of adverse medical events requiring medical attention in the 30-day postoperative period. These findings support the inclusion of PHS in preoperative evaluation and preparation for patients seeking abdominal contouring surgery.

Having posthospital syndrome (PHS) at the time of an elective surgery increases the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes. The purpose of this article was to identify incidence and risk factors for having PHS at the time of abdominal contouring surgeries.Insurance claims from the Truven MarketScan Databases were used to identify patients who underwent outpatient abdominoplasty, liposuction, or panniculectomy between April 2010 and August 2015. Patients were presumed to have PHS if they were hospitalized within 90 d before surgery. Incidence rates of having PHS were calculated for patient groups defined by demographic data and comorbidities. Statistical inference based on adjusted odds ratios was used to evaluate the association of potential risk factors with PHS. A nonparametric regression method was used to demonstrate nonlinear effects of patient covariates on the risk of PHS.This study included 18,947 patients who underwent abdominal contouring; 77% were female, and the mean age was 48.7 y (SD = 14.7). Six percent (n = 1045) of patients had PHS at the time of surgery. A significantly stronger association with PHS (P 0.001) was observed in patients with deep venous thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio = 3.56), Elixhauser score 8 (3.28), and smokers (2.16). Age was found to have a piecewise linear effect on PHS, with odds increasing by 2.1% per year over the age of 45 y.Older patients have an increased risk of undergoing abdominal contouring surgery in a deconditioned state. Screening at-risk populations for PHS would help identify patients who need rehabilitation before operative intervention.

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the use of pre- and post-referral advanced diagnostic testing among patients with three common hand conditions, rates of subsequent tests, and differences in wait time to see a hand surgeon. METHODS: We analyzed a single academic tertiary care center administrative database of encounters from 2006 – 2015 to identify adult patients who were referred to a hand surgeon for three hand conditions (carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS], soft tissue masses [STM], and joint pain [JP]). We recorded patient characteristics, use and timing of diagnostic tests, and wait time for the initial hand surgeon evaluation. RESULTS: Among patients who received advanced diagnostic tests prior to the surgeon evaluation, CTS patients had the highest rate of receiving pre-referral advanced testing (53.4%) compared to 10.6% of JP patients and 5.8% of STM patients. CTS patients had the highest rates of repeat testing (19.5%) compared to patients with JP (1.4%) and STM (0%). Across all three conditions, patients who received pre-referral advanced testing waited an additional 19–94 days to see a surgeon compared to patients who received only post-referral testing or no testing. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pre-referral advanced diagnostic tests is associated with an increased time to see a hand surgeon for common hand conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Hand surgeons should play a role in identifying patients who do and do not benefit from advanced testing prior to referral to ensure that tests ordered prior to consultation are useful to both patients and treating surgeons.

This population-based study assesses the use of preoperative mammography and subsequent rates of diagnostic tests and breast disease among women undergoing evaluation for macromastia.