Search

Linitis Plastica (LP) is a rare and aggressive tumor with a distinctive development pattern, leading to the infiltration of the gastric wall, the thickening of the gastric folds and a "leather bottle appearance". LP is an extremely heterogeneous tumor caused by mutations in oncogenic and tumor suppressive genes, as well as molecular pathways, along with mutations in stromal cells and proteins related to tight junctions. Elucidating the molecular background of tumorigenesis and clarifying the correlation between cancerous cells and stromal cells are crucial steps toward discovering novel diagnostic methods, biomarkers and therapeutic targets/agents. Surgery plays a pivotal role in LP management, serving both as a palliative and curative procedure. In this comprehensive review, we aim to present all recent data on the molecular background of LP and the novel approaches to its management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Somatotroph adenomas (SAs) exhibit a variable responsiveness to somatostatin analogue (SS-a) treatment, a process that is not well understood. We investigated established and novel histological markers as predictors of SS-a responsiveness. Methods. We retrospectively investigated pathology samples from 36 acromegalic patients that underwent transsphenoidal surgery. Clinical, hormonal, and imaging data were available in 24/36 patients, before and after SS-a treatment. Specimens were semiquantitatively analyzed with immunocytochemistry for Ki-67, KER, SSTR-2, SSTR-5, ZAC-1, E-cadherin, and AIP. Results. Collectively, 18 (50%) adenomas were each classified as densely/sparsely granulated somatotroph adenomas (DGSAs/SGSAs), respectively. Patients that received preoperative SS-a had lower expression of SSTR-2 compared to those that did not (2.0 (1.0, 3.0) vs. 3.0 (3.0, 3.0), p = 0.042). Compared with DGSAs, SGSAs had higher Ki-67 labeling index (LI) (1.0 (0.5, 1.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0, 3.5), p = 0.013), and a higher proportion of high MR T2 signal (1 (6%) vs. 6 (33%), p = 0.035), and tended to express less ZAC-1 (p = 0.061) and E-cadherin (p = 0.067). In linear regression corrected for baseline growth hormone (GH), ZAC-1 immunostaining was significantly associated with a decrease in GH levels after SS-a treatment (beta (95% confidence interval): −1.53 (−2.80, −0.26), p = 0.021). No markers were associated with changes in circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) after treatment with SS-a. Conclusion. The novel marker ZAC-1 was associated with GH response to medical treatment with SS-a. The SGSA cases were characterized by higher Ki-67 values and MR T2 signals indicative of an inferior response to SS-a. These findings improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying SA response to medical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]