Search

Objectives/Hypothesis To assess safety and efficacy of a steroid-releasing implant in improving surgical outcomes when placed in the frontal sinus opening (FSO) following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Study Design Prospective, multicenter, randomized, blinded trial using an intrapatient control design. Methods Eighty adult (≥ 18 years) CRS patients who underwent successful bilateral frontal sinusotomy were randomized to receive a steroid-releasing implant in one FSO, whereas the contralateral control side received no implant. All patients received standard postoperative care. Endoscopic evaluations recorded at 30-days postendoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) were graded real time by clinical investigators and by an independent, blinded sinus surgeon to assess the need for postoperative interventions in the FSO. Results Implants were successfully placed in all 80 frontal sinuses, resulting in 100% implant delivery success. At 30-days post-ESS, steroid-releasing implants provided a statistically significant (P = 0.0070) reduction in the need for postoperative interventions compared to surgery alone by an independent reviewer, representing 38% relative reduction. Clinical investigators reported statistically significant reduction in this measure at 30 days (P < 0.0001) and 90 days (P = 0.0129). Clinical investigators also reported a 55.6% reduction in the need for oral steroid interventions (P = 0.0015), 75% reduction in the need for surgical interventions (P = 0.0225), 16.7% reduction in inflammation score, 54.3% reduction in restenosis rate (P = 0.0002), and 32.2% greater diameter of FSO (P < 0.0001) on treated sides compared to control at 30 days. No implant-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion This study demonstrates the efficacy of steroid-releasing implants in improving outcomes of frontal sinus surgery. Level of Evidence 1b. Laryngoscope, 126:2659–2664, 2016

OBJECTIVE: To define a risk profile for post-transfusion hepatitis C in patients receiving massive transfusion. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatitis C accounts for more than 90% of post-transfusion hepatitis. METHODS: Two-hundred twenty-one of 8,765 consecutive trauma admissions to a Level I trauma center received more than 20 units of erythrocytes. Sixty-nine survivors had positive viral serologic tests at least 1 year after transfusion. Surrogate testing for hepatitis C using alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (Core) began in October 1986 and January 1987, respectively. Donor blood for group 1 (pre-ALT/Core) was transfused before surrogate screening was introduced. Donor blood for group 2 (post-ALT/Core) was transfused after surrogate screening. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients received blood products from 4,987 donors (mean, 72.3 units of exposure). No patient tested positive for antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen, human immunodeficiency virus, or human T-lymphotrophic virus type 1. However 23.2% tested positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) as measured by a second-generation enzyme immunoassay (HCV 2.0) and a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA), and 21.7% tested positive by HCV 1.0. Antibodies to Core were found in 8.7% of patients. The risk for post-transfusion hepatitis C per unit of exposure is estimated to be 1.52% group 1 (pre-ALT/Core) and 0.239% for group 2 (post-ALT/Core). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of ALT/Core donor screening by a blood bank reduced the incidence of post-transfusion hepatitis C by 84%. The risk for post-transfusion hepatitis C depends on units of exposure, screening techniques, and prevalence of hepatitis C in the donor population. In our community, the risk for post-transfusion hepatitis C is less than 0.2% per unit of exposure. The population of massively transfused patients may serve as our effective resource for monitoring the safety of the blood supply.

Objective To compare the histological and ultrastructural changes in skin collagen with mechanical dermabrasion and pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing in the minipig model. Setting Academic medical center. Subjects Yucatan minipig animal skin model. Main Outcome Measures Comparison of light microscopic and ultrastructural (electron microscopic) changes in the skin following the 2 resurfacing modalities. Results No significant difference in collagen histological characteristics or ultrastructure was detected between the 2 comparison groups. Conclusions When mechanical dermabrasion or pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing is used with similar-depth injury to the dermis in this model, the histological changes seen via light microscopy and ultrastructural changes seen via electron microscopy are similar between the 2 treatment modalities.