Search

OBJECTIVE To evaluate S1 transsacral (TS) corridors on reformatted and non-reformatted computed tomography (CT) images to determine which most reliably identifies narrow corridors. DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS 245 patients with operative pelvic ring injuries. INTERVENTION CT scan review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Preoperative CT scans were evaluated to determine the width of the S1 TS corridor on standard axial non-reformatted (ANR), axial reformatted (AR), and coronal reformatted (CR) images. Sensitivity and specificity of each format to detect a narrow corridor (

Background The introduction of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) could improve the surgical results of C1-C2 stabilization by Goel-Harms, especially in patients with complex deformities. This study aims to investigate the impact of iCT on the accuracy of C1-C2 screw positioning and to develop a score based on multiparametric analysis of imaging data (Cervical Screw Placement Accuracy score [CSPAs]). Methods Twenty-one patients were retrospectively evaluated. The data obtained with the use of an iCT were compared with the incidence of cases of malpositioning in the literature. Multiparametric imaging criteria were developed: the 82 screw positions were evaluated using the CSPA criteria and 2 additional variables. The CSPAs was obtained from the aggregation of the CSPAs criteria: optimal (CSPAs ≥8), suboptimal (CSPAs = 6–7), malpositioned (CSPAs ≤5). Results The average incidence of malpositioning in C1-C2 arthrodesis decreased from 13% without iCT to 1.2% with the aid of iCT, considering a monoparametric value. The CSPAs analysis shows a greater discretion and higher number of well-defined categories of the accuracy of C1-C2 screw position: optimal, 80.3%; suboptimal, 17.1%; and malposition, 2.6%. A correlation was observed between the accuracy of the positioning of both right and left screws in C2. Furthermore, the anatomic site of C2 screws was found to be a predictor of cortical invasion. Conclusions The results suggest that the introduction of the iCT is associated with a consistent improvement of the accuracy in the positioning of the screws. A multiparametric score (CSPAs) could improve the assessment of screw placement.

The study design is retrospective, multi-surgeon, single-center review. The objective is to evaluate complication rates, revision rates, and accuracy grading for robotic-guided S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws. Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent S2AI fixation (118 screws) as part of a posterior spine fusion using robotic-guidance. Screws were placed percutaneously in 14 cases and 51 were placed in an open fashion by three board-certified spine surgeons using the Mazor core technology robotic systems (Mazor X, n = 42; Mazor XSE, n = 23). Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for revisions and complications. All patients were followed for 90 days or greater. Postoperative CT scans were obtained in 22 of the 51 patients, allowing for 46 screws to be reviewed by an independent neuroradiologist who graded the screws for accuracy. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications associated with S2AI screw placement. There were no revisions found to be related to the S2AI screw placement. All 46 screws evaluated with postoperative CT scans were reported as being at the highest level of accuracy, grade A, with a breach distance of 0 mm (no breach). The robotic-guided technique for S2AI screw placement is a reliable method to achieving pelvic fixation with low complication and revision rates. In addition, a high degree of accuracy can be achieved without relying on visible and tactile landmarks needed for the freehand technique or the additional radiation associated with fluoroscopic-guidance.

CASE DESCRIPTION A 2.5-month-old 17.5-kg female alpaca cria was presented for evaluation and treatment of severe bilateral carpal varus deformities. CLINICAL FINDINGS No lameness was evident at a walk, and neither carpal varus deformity could be corrected by means of manipulation. Radiography revealed severe varus of the left (27°) and right (21°) carpal regions. No additional conformational abnormalities were detected. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME A single 2.7-mm transphyseal cortical screw was placed in the distolateral aspect of the radius in each limb. On reexamination 8 weeks after screw placement, the left carpal varus deformity had corrected from 27° to 2.6°, and the left transphyseal screw was removed. The right carpal varus deformity had improved but was still present (18°), and hemicircumferential periosteal transection and elevation was performed on the mediodistal aspect of the right radius. Five weeks after the second surgery, the right carpal varus deformity had corrected to 2.4°, and the right transphyseal screw was removed. Six months after the second screw removal, both thoracic limbs remained straight, the cria had a normal gait, and the owner was happy with the cosmetic result. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Placement of a single transphyseal cortical screw with or without the addition of hemicircumferential periosteal transection and elevation can provide a favorable outcome in skeletally immature alpacas with severe carpal varus deformities.

Little information exists regarding the benefit of computer navigation in shoulder arthroplasty in the clinical setting. This study aimed to quantify how computer navigation affects the number and length of screws used during in vivo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) placement.We performed a retrospective review of a research database to identify patients who underwent primary RSA before and after the use of computer navigation between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. One hundred consecutive RSAs were selected from the computer navigation implantation date; then, 100 consecutive sex-matched RSAs were chosen prior to navigation implantation in reverse chronologic order. Baseplate augmentations were chosen based on surgeon discretion, with the goal of restoring version to within 10° of neutral and inclination to neutral or slightly inferior with removal of the smallest amount of subchondral bone possible. Screws were placed with the goal of ≥3 screws with good purchase and were added as needed, with up to 5 screws used. We compared demographic factors, comorbidities, preoperative diagnosis, number of screws, screw length, number of wasted screws, and number of cases with bone graft used behind the baseplate between the 2 groups. We used the χA total of 200 RSAs were included, with 100 primary RSAs (mean age, 69.3 years) performed prior to computer navigation compared with 100 primary RSAs (mean age, 69.7 years) performed using computer navigation. The total number of screws used in RSAs without computer navigation was 414; the total used in the computer navigation cases was 344. RSAs placed with computer navigation used significantly fewer screws per case (3.4 screws vs. 4.1 screws, P.001) and had a significantly greater average screw length (35.0 mm vs. 32.6 mm, P.001). Three screws were implanted in 61% of computer navigation cases vs. 1% of cases without computer navigation (P.001). Screws ≥ 30 mm in length were more commonly used in patients undergoing RSA using computer navigation (84.6% vs. 73.7%, P.001).This study shows that computer navigation in RSA leads to longer and fewer glenoid baseplate screws being implanted. Computer navigation appears to assist with better screw placement, which may have similar clinical benefits of better glenoid fixation. Additionally, using fewer screws can save glenoid bone stock, avoid added glenoid stress risers, and decrease operative time.

Outcomes for adult spinal deformity continue to improve as new technologies become integrated into clinical practice. Machine learning, robot-guided spinal surgery, and patientspecific rods are tools that are being used to improve preoperative planning and patient satisfaction. Machine learning can be used to predict complications, readmissions, and generate postoperative radiographs which can be shown to patients to guide discussions about surgery. Robot-guided spinal surgery is a rapidly growing field showing signs of greater accuracy in screw placement during surgery. Patient-specific rods offer improved outcomes through higher correction rates and decreased rates of rod breakage while decreasing operative time. The objective of this review is to evaluate trends in the literature about machine learning, robot-guided spinal surgery, and patient-specific rods in the treatment of adult spinal deformity.

BACKGROUND To show a novel modified technique to perform minimally invasive anterior odontoid screw fixation. METHODS Twenty-nine patients with a mean age of 45 years were treated with a modified percutaneous anterior odontoid screw fixation. All patients were affected by Type II or rostral shallow Type III odontoid fractures. A modified guide tube was used in all these patients, with reduction of soft tissue dissection for percutaneous approach. RESULTS There were no complications related to the modified technique. Good results and optimal screw placement were achieved in 28 out of 29 patients. Only in 1 patient we observed, after mobilization, screw displacement, probably due to severe osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS In our opinion, this modified percutaneous minimally invasive technique for anterior odontoid screw fixation, along with the use of a soft tissue dilator not fixed to the spine, has not yet been reported in literature and is strongly recommended to reduce invasiveness of odontoid screw placement.

To report our experience using the scan-and-plan workflow and review current literature on surgical efficiency, safety, and accuracy of next-generation robot-assisted (RA) spine surgery.The records of patients who underwent RA pedicle screw fixation were reviewed. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was determined based on the Ravi classification system. To evaluate workflow efficiency, 3 demographically matched cohorts were created to analyze differences in time per screw placement (defined as operating room [OR] time divided by number of screws placed). Group A had4 screws placed, Group B had 4 screws placed, and Group C had4 screws placed. Intraoperative errors and postoperative complications were collected to elucidate safety.Eighty-four RA cases (306 pedicle screws) were included for analysis. The mean number of screws placed was 2.1 ± 0.3 in Group A and 6.4 ± 1.2 in Group C; 4 screws were placed in Group B patients. The accuracy rate (Ravi grade I) was 98.4%. Screw placement time was significantly longer in Group A (101 ± 37.7 minutes) than Group B (50.5 ± 25.4 minutes) or C (43.6 ± 14.7 minutes). There were no intraoperative complications, robot failures, or in-hospital complications requiring a return to the OR.The scan-and-plan workflow allowed for a high degree of accuracy. It was a safe method that provided a smooth and efficient OR workflow without registration errors or robotic failures. After the placement of 4 pedicle screws, the per-screw time remained constant. Further studies regarding efficiency and utility in multilevel procedures are necessary.

Study Design: Retrospective matched-pair analysis. Objectives: Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) have a reported prevalence of 4-36% in the population. The safe zones for screw placement for spinopelvic fusion in adult spinal deformity surgery for patients with LSTV have not been described in the literature. Our study aimed to assess the safety of S1-pedicle screw (S1PS), S2-alar screw (S2AS), S2-alar-iliac screw (S2AIS), and iliac screw (IS) placement in patients with LSTV. Methods: Out of the 819 examined patients, 49 patients with LSTV were included in our retrospective analysis with a matched pair control group. We used the 3-dimensional planning tool mediCAD for screw placement of S1PS, S2AS, S2AIS, IS with different angles, length and diameters. Results: We evaluated a total of 10 192 screw trajectories. No serious complications occurred due to the trajectories used for S1PS. LSTV increased the risk of vessel injury for S2AS trajectories ( P = .001) but not for S2AIS ( P = .526). Besides the presence of an LSTV, the screw trajectory had a major influence on the frequency of serious complications. Conclusions: Sacral anchoring of long spinal constructions using S1PS, S2AS, S2AIS and IS is also possible in the presence of LSTV. For S2AS the trajectory with 30° lateral and caudal angulation of 10° showed the least vascular injuries and the least sacro-iliac-joint violations in patients with LSTV. S2AIS trajectories with 40° lateral and 0° sagittal angulation reduced the risk of serious complications in our patients collective with LSTV.

Background The preoperative assessment of C2 morphology is important for safe instrumentation. Sclerotic changes are often seen in C2 pedicles. Evaluating the diameter measurements solely might not accurately assess the safety of screw insertion. We have proposed a novel grading system of the C2 pedicle that includes sclerosis and evaluated the predictive value of this grading system with the surgeon's safety evaluation. Methods We reviewed and measured the dimensional values in 220 cervical computed tomography angiograms. Additionally, we used a grading system that divides the findings into 5 grades according to the width measurement and degree of sclerosis in the C2 pedicle. Two spine surgeons independently classified the pedicles as follows: safe (minimal risk of pedicle violation), caution needed (caution to minimize pedicle violation), or dangerous (a high risk of pedicle violation). Finally, we compared the measurements and the surgeons' safety assessments. Results A total of 411 pedicles of 203 patients (mean age, 69.5 years; 49.5% women) were included. Of the 411 C2 pedicles, 170 were classified as high risk by ≥1 surgeon. Between the dimensional measurements and grading system, the sclerotic grade showed the best predictive value. Conclusions We have introduced a novel tool to evaluate the safety of C2 pedicle screw placement. Our results suggest that our pedicle width–sclerosis grading system is reproducible and predicts the surgeon's assessment of safe screw placement better than C2 pedicle diametrical measurements alone.

The objectives of this in vivo experimental study were to evaluate the feasibility of cortical screw insertion into the intact distal phalanx in standing sedated horses and to document potential postoperative complications. One cortical screw was randomly inserted in lag fashion into each distal phalanx in 9 horses. The second surgery on the contralateral limbs was performed 2–3 weeks after the first operation, when a 4.5-mm cortical screw was inserted in lag fashion into the distal phalanx of sedated horses following perineural analgesia. Following surgery, the drill hole was filled with an antibiotic-soaked swab, which was changed every 48 h. The horses were euthanised 8 weeks after the second surgery. The hooves were disarticulated and evaluated macroscopically and by computed tomography. The surgery time was 13.9 ± 4.8 min (mean ± SD). Pain scores and lameness gradually decreased after 7 days. Solar canal penetration (SCP) was detected in 10 out of the 18 distal phalanges (55.5%). In 7 out of the 10 penetrations intraoperative bleeding was obvious. No postoperative infection was observed. Screw insertion into the distal phalanx was easily and quickly accomplished in standing horses, but its advantages in horses with sagittal fractures should be investigated further. SCP had no impact on postoperative lameness.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the accuracy, biomechanical profile, and learning curve of the transverse process trajectory technique (TPT) compared to the straightforward (SF) and in-out-in (IOI) techniques. SF and IOI have been used for fixation in the thoracic spine. Although widely used, there are associated learning curves and symptomatic pedicular breaches. We have found the transverse process to be a reproducible pathway into the pedicle. METHODS: Three surgeons with varying experience (experienced [E] with 20 years in practice, surgeon [S] with less than 10 years in practice, and senior resident trainee [T] with no experience with TPT) operated on 8 cadavers. In phase 1, each surgeon instrumented 2 cadavers, alternating between TPT and SF from T1 to T12 (n = 48 total levels). In phase 2, the E and T surgeons instrumented 1 cadaver each, alternating between TPT and IOI. Computed tomography scans were analyzed for accuracy of screw placement, defined as the percentage of placements without critical breaches. Axial pullout and derotational force testing were performed. Statistical analyses include paired t test and analysis of variance with Tukey correction. RESULTS: Overall accuracy of screw placement was comparable between techniques (TPT: 92.7%; SF: 97.2%; IOI: 95.8%; P = .4151). Accuracy by technique did not differ for each individual surgeon (E: P = .7733; S: P = .3475; T: P = .4191) or by experience level by technique (TPT: P = .1127; FH: P = .5979; IOI: P = .5935). Pullout strength was comparable between TPT and SF (571 vs 442 N, P = .3164) but was greater for TPT versus IOI (454 vs 215 N, P = .0156). There was a trend toward improved derotational force for TPT versus SF (1.06 vs 0.93 Nm/degrees, P = .0728) but not for TPT versus IOI (1.36 vs 1.16 Nm/degrees, P = .74). Screw placement time was shortest for E and longest for T for TPT and SF and not different for IOI (TPT: P = .0349; SF: P < .0001; IOI: P = .1787) but did not vary by technique. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the TPT, which uses the transverse process as a corridor through the pedicle. TPT is an accurate method of thoracic pedicle screw placement with potential biomechanical advantages and with acceptable learning curve characteristics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides the surgeon with a new trajectory for pedicle screw placement that can be used in clinical practice.

Introduction The purpose of this investigation was to determine the impact of simulator practice on task completion time, radiation use, success rate, and overall quality in a simulation of placing a distal locking screw. Methods This was a prospective, randomized control trial with one-to-one randomization and parallel group design. Twenty-eight volunteer novice trainees (medical and premedical students) participated. Using the TraumaVision Virtual Reality Simulator (Swemac, Sweden), subjects performed locking screw placement using the "perfect circle" technique. All subjects underwent a pretest and posttest on the simulator. The simulator group completed three additional simulator training sessions. The primary outcome variables were simulator-collected task completion time, success rate, radiation exposure time, and overall score. Results No notable difference existed between groups for pretest completion time, radiation use, success rate, or overall score. No notable difference in posttest radiation use or overall procedure score was found between groups. A significant difference existed in posttest total completion time (trained = 251.2 ± 103.4; control = 497.3 ± 223.1; P = 0.001) and success rate (64.3% versus 100%; P = 0.041) between groups. In addition, a significant difference existed in variance between groups for completion time (P = 0.029). Conclusions These findings suggest that independent simulator practice leads to improved speed and success rates; however, radiation use and overall score do not improve in the same manner. The design of simulator-based curriculum must be tailored to specific educational objectives and ultimately validated in the clinical setting.

Objective. To assess the correctness of transpedicular screw insertion in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae using two-level navigation templates for narrow pedicles.Material and Methods. Two-level navigation templates were used in surgical treatment of four patients aged 14–17 years with scoliotic deformity and multiple pedicles of small width (less than 4.35 mm). In each patient, the least favorable zones were selected for implantation using navigation templates. The rest of planned pedicle screws were inserted using free-hand technique. All patients underwent CT scanning postoperatively. Screws inserted to pedicles less than 4.35 mm in width were classified as correctly placed if they did not extend beyond the medial cortical layer by more than 2 mm.Results. Out of 68 pedicles planned for screw placement, 42 were narrower than 4.35 mm. In the pedicles difficult for implantation, 29 screws were inserted using navigation templates and 13 by free-hand technique. Screws classified as correctly placed were 28 from those inserted with navigation templates and 9 from those implanted by free-hand technique. Difference in results of screw placement in narrow pedicles with navigation templates and by free-hand technique was statistically significant (exact Fisher test, p < 0.05).Conclusion. Transpedicular screw placement with two-level navigation templates in narrow pedicles is more correct than insertion by free hand technique.

The purpose of this study was to determine the angular tolerance of the S1 and S2 segments to accommodate a transiliosacral screw across both sacroiliac joints. We hypothesized that the angular tolerance for transiliosacral screw placement would be more constrained than the angular tolerance for iliosacral fixation in pelves where a safe osseous corridor was measured. The cortical boundaries of the S1 and S2 sacral segments in 433 pelvic CTs were digitally mapped. A straight-line path was placed within each osseous corridor and extended across both SI joints past the outer iliac cortices. The diameter of the path was increased until it breached the cortex, geometrically determining maximum diameter (Dmax). Angular tolerance for screw placement was calculated with trigonometric analysis of the Dmax value of the corridor, and the average distance from the termination of the osseous corridor to the site of percutaneous insertion. Gender, age, and BMI were evaluated as independent predictors using binomial logistic regression. The transiliosacral angular tolerance for the S1 and S2 osseous corridors was 1.53 ± 0.57 degrees and 1.02 ± 0.33 degrees, respectively. 68.9% of S1 corridors and 81.1% of S2 corridors had a safe zone (corridor diameter ≥ 10 mm) for transiliosacral placement, 48.3% of the pelves had a safe zone for both corridors, while 5.1% had no safe zones. Females had a less frequent Dmax ≥ 10 mm at S1, 52% vs 67% (p = 0.001), and at S2, 64% vs 86% (p

Objectives The purpose of this study is to design a radiographic map of the femoral neck showing proportion-based locations of the safe zones for screw placement with widest bony extents in anteroposterior and lateral radiographs using normal computed tomography-based data. Methods We analyzed computed tomography-based studies of 50 intact normal proximal femora equally from male and female subjects. Using software-developed radiographs, the proportionate locations of the maximal anteroposterior and cephalocaudal extents in both constricted zones were measured. The width of the femoral neck in the measurement zone was taken as the reference for calculation of proportions. Results For anteroposterior radiographs, the anteroposterior safe zones in the femoral neck are located at the gradients of 34.21% and 34.33% from the superior border in midcervical and basicervical regions, respectively. In lateral radiographs, they correlate with the visible anterior extent of femoral neck and lie at a gradient of 7.16% and 11.79% from the visible posterior border in midcervical and basicervical regions, respectively. In lateral radiographs, the calcar-based cephalocaudal safe zone was located at the gradients of 43.49% and 39.53% from the visible posterior border in midcervical and basicervical regions, respectively. In anteroposterior radiographs, cephalic limit of the calcar-based safe zone is located at the gradients of 9.63% and 17.82% from the superior border in midcervical and basicervical regions, respectively. Conclusions Radiographic margins cannot be reliably trusted for screw fixation of femoral neck fractures. The proportionate locations of the anteroposterior and calcar-based cephalocaudal safe zones with widest bone stock in anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic projections can help in the safe placement of screws for fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Study Design: This is an observational study of computed tomography (CT) data.Purpose: The C1 and C2 laminas in the Malaysian Malay population were analyzed for the feasibility of fitting 3.5-mm laminar screws in a cross configuration.Overview of Literature: Morphometric analysis of the C1 and C2 laminas has been performed for various populations but not for the Malaysian Malay population.Methods: A total of 330 CT cervical images were measured to establish the bicortical diameter of the C1 and C2 laminas as well as their height and length. The C1 posterior tubercle bicortical diameter and height were also determined from these images. All parameters were measured up to 0.1 mm, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). An independent t -test and the Pearson chi-square test were used to determine the mean difference and screw acceptance.Results: The means of the C1 lamina measurements were 5.79±1.19 mm in diameter, 9.76±1.51 mm in height, and 20.70±1.86 mm in length. The means of the measurements of the posterior tubercle were 7.20±1.88 mm in diameter and 10.51±1.68 mm in height. The means of the C2 lamina measurements were 5.74±1.31 mm in diameter, 11.76±1.69 mm in height, and 24.96±2.56 mm in length. Overall 65.5% of C1 and 80.3% of C2 laminas are able to accept 3.5-mm screws in a cross configuration. Screw acceptability is similar between the right and left sides (p >0.05). However, males have a higher screw acceptability compared with females (p

BackgroundHigh-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) and narrow C2 pedicles (C2P) pose a great risk of injuring the vessel during C2 pedicle or transarticular screw placement. Recent meta-analysis revealed a paucity of European studies regarding measurements and prevalence of these anatomical variants.Methods383 consecutive cervical spine CT scans with 766 potential screw insertion sites were analyzed independently by two trained observers. C2 internal height (C2InH), C2 isthmus height (C2IsH), and C2P width were measured. Kappa statistics for inter- and intraobserver reliability as well as for inter-software agreement were calculated. HRVA was defined as C2IsH of ≤ 5 mm and/or C2InH of ≤ 2 mm. Narrow C2P was defined as C2P width ≤ 4 mm. STROBE checklist was followed.ResultsAt least 1 HRVA was found in 25,3% (95% CI 21,1-29,8) of patients (16,7% of potential sites). At least 1 narrow C2P was seen in 36,8% (95% CI 32,1-41,7) of patients (23,8% of potential sites). Among those with HRVA, unilateral HRVA was present in 68,0% (95% CI 58,4-77,0), whereas bilateral HRVA in 32,0% (95% CI 23,0-41,6). No difference in terms of laterality (right or left) was seen neither for HRVA nor narrow C2P. Significant differences were found between females and males for all measurements. Each parameter showed either good or excellent inter- or intraobserver, and inter-software agreement coefficients. Conclusions HRVA and narrow C2P are common findings in Central-European population and should be appreciated at the planning stage before craniocervical instrumentation. Measurements can be consistently reproduced by various observers at varying intervals using different software.

Objective To evaluate the safety and accuracy of S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement guided by a three-dimensional (3D)-printed surgical guide template. Methods The data of 27 patients treated with S2AI screws were analyzed. S2AI surgical guide templates were designed and printed, and S2AI screw placement was completed intraoperatively with the guide templates. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) was performed to measure screw path parameters, namely, the sagittal angle (SA), the transverse angle (TA), the horizontal distance (HD) between the entry point of the screw and the median sacral crest, and the vertical distance (VD) between the entry point of the screw and the lower edge of the first posterior sacral foramen. Screw placement was graded according to the Oh grading criteria. Results A total of 54 S2AI screws were placed. The screw grades were as follows: 52 screws were considered grade 0, two were grade 1, none were grade 2, and none were grade 3. Thus, grade 0 accounted for 96.3% of the screws. When the preoperatively planned SA (32.3° ± 2.0°), TA (42.1° ± 3.9°), HD (5.1 ± 1.1) mm, and VD (19.0 ± 2.4) mm were compared with the corresponding postoperative SA (31.9° ± 3.8°), TA (42.5° ± 4.0°), HD (4.9 ± 1.1) mm, and VD (19.1 ± 2.3) mm, no significant differences were identified (P > 0.05). Conclusions S2AI screw placement assisted by a 3D-printed surgical guide is safe and accurate.

The occipital condyle (OC) screw is an alternative technique for occipitocervical fixation that is especially suitable for revision surgery in patients with Chiari malformation type I (CMI). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of this technique in patients with CMI. The CT data of 73 CMI patients and 73 healthy controls were retrospectively analyzed. The dimensions of OCs, including length, width, height, sagittal angle, and screw length, were measured in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes using CT images. The OC available height was measured in the reconstructed oblique parasagittal plane of the trajectory. The mean length, width, and height of OCs in CMI patients were 17.79 ± 2.31 mm, 11.20 ± 1.28 mm, and 5.87 ± 1.29 mm, respectively. All OC dimensions were significantly smaller in CMI patients compared with healthy controls. The mean screw length and sagittal angle were 19.13 ± 1.97 mm and 33.94° ± 5.43°, respectively. The mean OC available height was 6.36 ± 1.59 mm. According to criteria based on OC available height and width, 52.1% (76/146) of OCs in CMI patients could safely accommodate a 3.5-mm-diameter screw. The OC screw is feasible in approximately half of OCs in CMI patients. Careful morphometric analyses and personalized surgical plans are necessary for the success of this operation in CMI patients.

Purpose Instrumentation in spinal revision surgery is considered challenging. Altered or missing anatomical landmarks hinder the surgeons' intraoperative orientation. In recent history, the importance of navigated approaches to spinal screw placement is constantly increasing. A growing number of medical centers have introduced intraoperative CT (iCT) navigation as a new clinical standard. In this study, we compare the accuracy of dorsal iCT-navigated instrumentation in revision surgery versus primary interventions. Methods Between September 2017 and January 2019, we prospectively analyzed a consecutive series of dorsal instrumentation using iCT. Patients with previous operative interventions in the relevant spinal segments were included in the revision group and compared with a previously assessed group of primary interventions (nonrevision group). Each screw was assessed individually by an independent observer, making use of a modified Gertzbein and Robbins classification. Results In this period, 39 patients were treated in the revision group with a total amount of 269 implanted screws. We achieved an overall accuracy of 95.91% compared with 95.12% in the nonrevision group (46 patients, 287 screws). We found no significant difference in accuracy between the two groups or any anatomical region of the spine. Conclusion In summary, iCT-navigated screw placement yields a good accuracy in spinal revision surgery, without significant difference to primary interventions.

Aim Guide wire displacement in spinal pedicle screw implantation was analyzed in order to reduce or avoid the occurrence of this phenomenon and to reduce the complications associated with robot-assisted pedicle screw implantation surgery. Material and methods From April 2017 to December 2019, a retrospective study was conducted with 398 patients who underwent robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw implantation. The causes of guide wire displacement in 60 punctures were analyzed. Results There were 2,408 robot-assisted wire punctures of the pedicle, of which 2,348 wire punctures were located well within the pedicle, and 60 wire displacements occurred during robot-assisted wire puncture, with a displacement rate of 2.49%. There was 1 case of thoracic segmental artery injury and 1 case of spinal cord incomplete injury. Conclusions As it is a rare phenomenon in robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw implantation, guide wire displacement should be avoided as much as possible to improve the accuracy of screw placement and reduce surgical complications during the operation.

Background and Objective Learning a new technique in neurosurgery is a big challenge especially for trainees. In recent years, simulations and simulators got into the focus as a teaching tool. Our objective is to propose a simulator for placement of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws to improve results and reduce complications.Methods We have created a platform consisting of a sawbone navigated with a 3D fluoroscope to familiarize our trainees and consultants with CBT technique and later implement it in our department. Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and Physician Performance Diagnostic Inventory Scale (PPDI) were obtained before and after the use of the simulator by the five participants in the study. Patients who were operated on after the implementation of the technique were retrospectively reviewed.Results During the simulation, there were 4 cases of pedicle breach out of 24 screws inserted (16.6%). After having completed simulation, participants demonstrated an improvement in OSATS and PPDI (p = 0.039 and 0.042, respectively). Analyzing the answers to the different items of the tests, participants mainly improved in the knowledge (p = 0.038), the performance (p = 0.041), and understanding of the procedure (p = 0.034). In our retrospective series, eight patients with L4–L5 instability were operated on using CBT, improving their Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (preoperative ODI 58.5 [SD 16.7] vs. postoperative ODI 31 [SD 13.4]; p = 0.028). One intraoperative complication due to a dural tear was observed. In the follow-up, we found a case of pseudoarthrosis and a facet joint violation, but no other complications related to misplacement, pedicle fracture, or hardware failure.Conclusion The simulation we have created is useful for the implementation of CBT. In our study, consultants and trainees have valued very positively the learning obtained using the system. Moreover, simulation facilitated the learning of the technique and the understanding of surgical anatomy. We hope that simulation helps reducing complications in the future.

Objectives: This study aims to determine the secure location and angle of the most distal screw during posterior malleolar (PM) fracture fixation. Materials and methods: This prospective study was performed on September 15, 2019. Distal tibial concave articular depth and PM inclination angle were measured on 100 (50 male and 50 female) dry tibia bones using a digital caliper. A comparative analysis between male and female tibias was performed. Results: Anteroposterior width of male tibia (38.3±3.1 mm) was wider than female tibia (35.3±3.2 mm) (p

Pelvic fractures are often caused by high-energy injuries and accompanied by hemodynamic instability. Traditional open surgery has a large amount of bleeding, which is not suitable for patients with acute pelvic fracture. Navigation-guided, percutaneous puncture-screw implantation has gradually become a preferred procedure due to its advantages, which include less trauma, faster recovery times, and less bleeding. However, due to the complexity of pelvic anatomy, doctors often encounter some problems when using navigation to treat pelvic fractures. This article reviews the indications, contraindications, surgical procedures, and related complications of this procedure for the treatment of sacral fractures, sacroiliac joint injuries, pelvic ring injuries, and acetabular fractures. We also analyze the causes of inaccurate screw placement. Percutaneous screw placement under navigational guidance has the advantages of high accuracy, low incidence of complications and small soft-tissue damage, minimal blood loss, short hospital stays, and quick recovery. There is no difference in the incidence of complications between surgeries performed by new doctors and experienced ones. However, computer navigation technology requires extensive training, and attention should be given to avoid complications such as screw misplacement, intestinal injury, and serious blood vessel and nerve injuries caused by navigational drift.

Background/Objective Atlantoaxial fusion procedures may be difficult in situations such as high-riding vertebral artery, a narrow C2 pedicle, and the presence of ponticulus posticus–arcuate foramen. With respect to vertebral artery (VA) anomalies, persistent first intersegmental artery, extracranial origin of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery at the C1–C2 level, and fenestration of the VA are all major risk factors for VA injury in C1–C2 fusion surgeries. Methods To safeguard the VA, we designed the unilateral fusion procedure (all screws lie in the ipsilateral side, either the right side or left side): a unilateral transarticular screw combined with an ipsilateral-side C1 posterior arch screw and a C2 laminar screw (LS), with both C1–C2 screws inserted from opposite side, although the trajectory will be on the same side. In addition to atlantoaxial stabilization with screws and rod, autograft bony fusion was performed on the same side as modified Brook's procedure and augmented with sublaminar tapping. Results We present a series of 3 cases operated for odontoid fracture with associated high risk for fusion on one side alone. The fact that the chance of VA injury is high in transarticular screw, in lateral mass screw, less in pars screw, and pedicle screw is well known. Alternate screw placement to avoid VA injury would be a posterior arch screw for C1 and laminar screw for C2, which was adopted in our technique. Conclusions We combined a unilateral transarticular screw and modified Brook's procedure with sublaminar tapping for additional augmentation of fusion. We would like to highlight this C1 posterior arch screw as an alternative procedure for atlantoaxial fusion.

Many patients receive magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) scans post-operatively to review screw placement. Traditionally, CT is diagnostic but as metal artefact reduction sequences are advancing in MR, the necessity for both MR and CT scans is questionable. The objective is to establish the statistical agreeability of MR and CT for evaluation of adequate screw placement in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. This opportunistic retrospective study of 58 patients investigated 297 images of 296 implanted screws. Post-operative MR and CT images were scrutinised for depiction of lumbar pedicle screw position using a 5-point scale. Kappa value for statistical agreeability tested MR against CT. The 297 images of screws resulted in strong to near-perfect agreement between MR and CT (n = 297 k = 0.8042 p

Objective The clinical outcomes, radiological parameters, complication rate and the cost of implants in two-level ACDF with and without screws in the intervening segment were compared. Methods A retrospective study of 68 patients who underwent 2-level ACDF from January 2014 to June 2016 was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: ACDF with screws in the intervening vertebra and those without screws in the intervening vertebra. Perioperative factors, clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, radiological parameters, and cost of the implants were evaluated in both groups. Results No statistical differences in clinical outcomes, operative blood loss, hospital stay, restoration of cervical lordosis or segment height, postoperative complications, and fusion rate were found between the ACDF (middle vertebra with screw) and ACDF (middle vertebra without screw) groups (P > 0.05). But the operative time of added screw placement and cost of implants in the ACDF (middle vertebra without screw) group were significantly less than the ACDF (middle vertebra with screw) group (P Conclusion Two kinds of screw placement with ACDF were found to be similar in terms of clinical outcomes. However, ACDF (middle vertebra without screw) was found to be superior to ACDF (middle vertebra with screw) in terms of the screw placement time and cost of implants.

Objective Patients who undergo decompression surgery for Chiari malformation frequently require occipitocervical fixation. This is typically performed with occipital plates, which may cause intracranial injuries due to multiple fixation points. We undertook this study to assess the feasibility of occipital condyle (OC) screw placement as an alternative method of occipitocervical fixation in this patient population. Methods Using a cadaveric model with navigational assistance, we performed the complete surgical procedure for occipitocervical fixation with OC screws. We then performed a morphometric analysis using measurements from computed tomography scans of 49 patients (32 adult, 17 pediatric) who had undergone occipitocervical fusion with instrumentation following decompression surgery for Chiari malformation. Bilateral morphometric data were analyzed for the adult and pediatric subgroups separately, as well as for the overall group. Results The surgical procedure was successfully performed in the cadaveric model, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed method. Ninety-eight OCs were studied in the morphometric analysis, and 80 (81.6%) met our eligibility criteria for OC screw placement. However, in 14.1% of adult OCs and 26.5% of pediatric OCs studied, placement of condylar screws would have been challenging or unsafe, according to our criteria. Conclusions Our findings suggest that OC screws provide a useful option for occipitocervical fixation in a substantial proportion of patients with Chiari malformation. However, rigorous preoperative analysis would be essential to identify appropriate candidates for this technique and exclude those in whom it should not be attempted. Additional study is warranted.

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome caused by slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) can be successfully treated arthroscopically and with the minimally invasive, outside-in surgical technique. The advantages of the technique are that the residual cam-type deformity caused by the slippage can be corrected and reconstructed reliably and reproducibly before distracting the hip joint; and radiation with fluoroscopy is used for only definitive reduction and reconstruction, which is obtained with cannulated screws. In addition, this safe technique allows distraction of the hip after screw placement, without affecting the reconstruction, to address labral tears and chondrolabral delaminations caused by the impingement.

Background This study describes a modified iliac screw technique and compares it with the traditional iliac screw in regard to neurovascular structures at risk. Few studies have detailed the insertion point's surrounding anatomy and its relationship to vulnerable neurovascular structures when this modified technique is used. Therefore we describe our modified iliac screw entry and trajectory and detail the surrounding anatomy and neurovascular structures at risk with this technique in comparison with the “gold standard” trajectory. Methods The traditional iliac screw (TS) and modified iliac screw (MS) were placed into 12 fresh-frozen adult cadavers (3 female, 9 male). We measured the screw-to−supragluteal artery, vein, and nerve (SGANV) bundle and screw-to−sciatic notch distances. Further, we dissected the medial cortical border of the iliac screw to identify its final position with respect to the surrounding anatomy. Results No medial or lateral cortical breaches were visualized after screw placement. The MS was 18.31 mm from the greater sciatic foramen compared with 18.65 mm with the TS. The smallest distance from the MS to the greater sciatic foramen was 13.9 mm compared with 14.8 mm with the TS, an insignificant difference. The SGANV bundle−to-MS distance was 20.6 mm, and SGANV bundle−to-TS distance was 20.77 mm, again an insignificant difference. Conclusions Using the modified iliac screw technique does not change the intraosseous pathway (and thus bone purchase) with respect to the distance between the screw and neurovascular structures at risk.

Objective To compare the incidence and risk factors of superior facet joint violation (FJV) during cortical bone trajectory screw placement in robot‐assisted approach versus conventional technique. Methods A retrospective study, including 69 patients having cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw instrumentation for symptomatic degenerated diseases or trauma, was conducted between June 2015 to January 2019. All patients underwent CBT surgery performed by the same team of experienced surgeons. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: a conventional group (CG, 46 cases) and a robot group (RG, 23 cases). The surgical robotic system was used for screw instrumentation in the robot group and the traditional screw instrumentation with fluoroscopic guidance was used in the conventional group. Cortical screws followed a medio‐to‐lateral path in the transverse plane and a caudal‐to‐cephalad path in the sagittal plane. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained to determine the degree and incidence of FJV. The violation status of facet joint was evaluated according to the modified classification: grade 0, no violation; grade 1, screw shaft, screw head or rod within 1 mm of or abutting the facet joint, but did not enter the articular facet joint; grade 2, screw shaft, screw head or rod clearly in the facet joint. The following factors that may contribute to the occurrence of FJV were analyzed: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), proximal fusion level, fusion length, the side of screw, preoperative vertebral slip, superior facet angle, and degenerative scoliosis. The chi‐squared test and Student's t‐test were used for analysis of the variables for significance (P

Objectives To map the proximal ulnar articular margins and ensure safe extraarticular placement of implants. Methods Ten fresh frozen adult elbow cadaver specimens were obtained. Radiopaque wire was applied to the articular margin of the articular facets and the central trochlear ridge of the proximal ulna. Fluoroscopic images were obtained demonstrating the articular facet margins. Radiographic measurements were performed and used to identify relative safe screw zones. Results All specimens demonstrated marked extension of the ulnar and radial facets dorsal to the central trochlear ridge. The dorsal extent of the ulnar facets from the central trochlear ridge averaged 9.7 mm (range, 7.9-13 mm; SD, 1.5 mm) and 6.2 mm (range, 3.4-9.4 mm; SD, 1.9 mm), respectively. The average footprint of the posterior ulnar facet occupied 44% (±4.9%) of the total ulnar height from the dorsal cortex to the trochlear ridge. Conclusions The articular margins of the anterior and posterior facets of the proximal ulna are challenging to identify radiographically. A surgical "at-risk zone" exists within 9.7 mm from the radiographic margin of the central trochlear ridge. Implants placed within this zone have the potential to violate the articular surface.

Spine surgery has evolved from the advent of imaging and navigation guidance, particularly with the rise of robotic surgical assistance. Navigation guidance has demonstrated potential for increased accuracy of transpedicular screw placement and resecting primary and metastatic spinal tumors. Robotic surgery is widely accepted in other surgical fields because laparoscopic techniques applied to robots can increase operator dexterity and improve visualization. Robotic assistance with spinal tumors has enjoyed rising interest owing to the potential for safe and minimally traumatic resection. We discuss available robots used for navigation-guided transpedicular screw placement and state-of-the-art robotic techniques for spinal or paraspinal tumor resection.

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (modified MIS-TLIF) versus conventional TLIF in the lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. Materials and methods: Forty patients with 1-level lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis were enrolled in the study. Perioperative indexes including operation time, intraoperative bleeding, bed rest time, time of hospitalisation stay and the accuracy rate of screw placement were analysed. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were assessed. Results: The operation time in the modified MIS-TLIF group was longer than the conventional TLIF group (p ​ ​0.05). Conclusion: Navigation and microscope-assisted MIS-TLIF is safe and reliable for treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis (Meyerding degree I or II) with potential advantages including less injury, less blood loss, higher screw accuracy and faster recovery after operation. The translational potential of this article: Compared with conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion has a huge advantage in surgery treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. Hence, this article provided a better surgery method to deal with lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis, and robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion will be adopted in the future. Keywords: Microscope, O-arm, Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Navigation, Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, Lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis

Background The subcutaneous screw rod system, commonly known as the internal pelvic fixator (INFIX), is useful in managing unstable pelvic ring fractures. Conventional INFIX and transiliac–transsacral (TITS) screw techniques are performed using C-arm fluoroscopy. There have been problems with medical exposure and screw insertion accuracy with these techniques. This work describes new INFIX and TITS techniques using intraoperative computed tomography (CT) navigation and C-arm fluoroscopy for pelvic ring fracture. Methods A typical case is presented in this study. An 86-year-old woman suffered from an unstable pelvic ring fracture due to a fall from a height. INFIX and TITS screw fixation with intraoperative CT navigation were selected to optimize surgical invasiveness and proper implant placement. Results The patient was placed in a supine position on a Jackson table. An intraoperative CT navigation was imaged, and screws were inserted under the navigation. Postoperative X-rays and CT confirmed that the screw was inserted correctly. This technique was less invasive to the patient and had little radiation exposure to the surgeon. Rehabilitation of walking practice was started early after the surgery, and she was able to walk with the assistance of a walker by the time of transfer. Conclusions The technique employed in our case study has the cumulative advantages of safety, accuracy, and reduced radiation exposure, together with the inherent advantages of functional outcomes of previously reported INFIX and TITS screw techniques. Further experience with this approach will refine this technique to overcome its limitations and facilitate its wider use.

Background: Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws have been recently described as a method of lumbosacral fixation. These screws are typically inserted under fluoroscopic guidance with a medial-to-lateral trajectory in the axial plane and a caudal-to-cephalad trajectory in the sagittal plane. In an effort to reduce surgeon radiation exposure and improve accuracy, CBT screws may be inserted under navigation with intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CT). However, the accuracy of CBT screw placement under intraoperative navigation has yet to be assessed in the literature. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of CBT screw placement using intraoperative cone beam CT navigation. Methods: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent CBT fixation with 618 screws under intraoperative navigation were analyzed from May 2016 through May 2018. Screws were placed by one of three senior spine surgeons using the Medtronic O-Arm Stealth Navigation. Screw position and accuracy were assessed on intraoperative and postoperative CT scans using 2D and 3D reconstructions with VitreaCore software. Results: The majority of surgeries were primary cases (73.1%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 61.5±10.0 years and the majority of patients were female (61.2%). Most patients underwent surgery for a diagnosis of degenerative spondylolisthesis (47.8%) followed by mechanical collapse with foraminal stenosis (22.4%). Ten violations of the vertebral cortex were noted with an average breach distance of 1.0±0.7 mm. Three breaches were lateral (0.5%) and seven were medial (1.1%). The overall navigated screw accuracy rate was 98.3%. The accuracy to within 1 mm of error was 99.2%. There were no intra-operative neurologic, vascular, or visceral complications related to the placement of the CBT screws. Conclusions: CBT screw fixation under an intraoperative cone beam CT navigated insertion technique is safe and reliable. Despite five breaches greater than 1mm, there were no complications related to the placement of the CBT screws in this series.

Background Exact knowledge of the sacral anatomy is crucial for the percutaneous insertion of iliosacral screws. However, dysplastic anatomical patterns are common. In addition to a preoperative computed tomography (CT) analysis, conventional radiographic measures may help to identify upper sacral dysplasia and to avoid damage to surrounding structures. Aiming to further increase safety in percutaneous iliosacral screw placement in the presence of sacral dysmorphism, this study examined the prevalence of previously established radiographic signs and, in addition, defined the “critical SI angle” as a new radiographic criterion. Methods Pelvic CT scans of 98 consecutive trauma patients were analysed. Next to assessment of established signs indicating upper sacral dysplasia, the critical sacroiliac (SI) angle was defined in standardized pelvic outlet views. Results The critical SI angle significantly correlates with the presence of mammillary bodies and an intraarticular vacuum phenomenon. With a cut-off value of − 14.2°, the critical SI angle detects the feasibility of a safe iliosacral screw insertion in pelvic outlet views with a sensitivity of 85.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. Conclusions The critical SI angle can support the decision-making when planning iliosacral screw fixation. The clinical value of the established signs of upper sacral dysplasia remains uncertain.

Objective. To perform comparative analysis of safety and accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the cervical and thoracic vertebrae using custom-made 3D-printed navigation templates of various designs. Material and Methods . The study was performed on three cadaver preparations. A total of 60 pedicle screws were placed in C2–T4 using navigation templates of different designs. Three types of templates were used to install 20 screws in each group: monolateral templates in group A, bilateral templates in group B, and bilateral three-point templates supported by the spinous process in group C. The safety and accuracy of screw placement were evaluated by CT with following comparative evaluation. Results. Three-point templates (group C) demonstrated the highest implantation safety, only one screw (5 %) perforated pedicle’s wall with grade 1, 19 screws (95 %) were completely surrounded by bone tissue. In group A, three screws (15%) were placed with grade 1, two screws (10 %) with grade 2, and one screw (5 %) with grade 3. In group B, two screws (10 %) were placed with grade 1, and one screw (5 %) – with grade 2.The average deviation at the screw entry point was 5.0 ± 0.5 mm in group A, 1.7 ± 0.3 mm in group B, and 0.35 ± 0.05 mm in group C. The average deviation at the end point was 5.1 ± 0.7 mm in group A, 3.5 ± 0.6 mm in group B, and 0.53 ± 0.05 mm in group C. Differences between groups in terms of implantation safety and accuracy are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Bilateral three-point navigation templates supported by spinous process are recommended for pedicle screw placement in the cervical and thoracic spine.

Since pseudoarthrosis or screw loosening is frequently seen in lumbosacral stabilizations ending in S1, S2 screws are used more frequently to support S1 screws. This study aims to describe a new screw placement technique and location from S2. Revision surgery was applied to the patient who had previously undergone surgery with the rigid instrumentation system and encountered pseudoarthrosis during the follow-up period. Instrumentation was performed from S2 to the promontorium. The patient’s chronic low back pain arising due to pseudoarthrosis was reduced and a strong lumbosacral dynamic instrumentation was performed to the patient. Dual screw placement from S2 and/or screw placement in the S2-promontorium direction is a new alternative to provide a powerful instrumentation.

Background Infra-acetabular screws enhance the fixation strength in acetabular fractures with separation of both columns. Placement without iatrogenic femoral head violation is challenging. Purpose To assess the impact of the acetabular configuration, the patients’ age and gender on safe infra-acetabulum screw insertion. Methods In 112 patients (69 females; mean age: 34 years, range 17–88; n = 200 hips), the lateral center–edge angle (LCE) was measured on radiographs. Using corresponding axial CT scans the residual distance from (the lateral border) of the screw to (the medial border of) the femoral head (“Screw-to-Femoral Head distance”; “RD_SFH”) was determined. Statistical analysis was carried out using linear regression, multiple linear regression and normal distribution estimation. Results The mean (range) LCE angle was 30° (7°–51°) and the mean (range) “RD_SFH” was 5 mm (1–14 mm). The linear regression model shows a significant linear relation between LCE and “RD_SFH” with a slope parameter of − 0.15 (p value p value 0.85). Compared to male patients, in females, the intercept is 4.62 mm (p value 0.0005) less, the slope parameter is 0.09 (p value 0.029) larger. Conclusion The virtual possibility to place an infra-acetabular screw was given in all patients. An increasing depth of the acetabulum correlated with a decrease in residual distances. As hip joint cartilage thickness was not considered in measurements, intraoperative rule-out of screw mispositioning especially in deep acetabular sockets and females is still of utmost importance.

Introduction: Current high-accuracy image-guided systems for otologic surgery use fiducial screws for patient-to-image registration. Thus far, these systems have only been used in adults, and the safety and efficacy of the fiducial screw placement has not yet been investigated in the pediatric population.Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study, CT image data of the temporal region from 11 subjects meeting inclusion criteria (8–48 months at the time of surgery) were selected, resulting in n = 20 sides. These datasets were investigated with respect to screw stability efficacy in terms of the cortical layer thickness, and safety in terms of the distance of potential fiducial screws to the dura mater or venous sinuses. All of these results are presented as distributions, thickness color maps, and with descriptive statistics. Seven regions within the temporal bone were analyzed individually. In addition, four fiducial screws per case with 4 mm thread-length were placed in an additively manufactured model according to the guidelines for robotic cochlear implantation surgery. For all these screws, the minimal distance to the dura mater or venous sinuses was measured, or if applicable how much they penetrated these structures.Results: The cortical layer has been found to be mostly between 0.7–3.3 mm thick (from the 5th to the 95th percentile), while even thinner areas exist. The distance from the surface of the temporal bone to the dura mater or the venous sinuses varied considerably between the subjects and ranged mostly from 1.1–9.3 mm (from the 5th to the 95th percentile). From all 80 placed fiducial screws of 4 mm thread length in the pediatric subject younger than two years old, 22 touched or penetrated either the dura or the sigmoid sinus. The best regions for fiducial placement would be the mastoid area and along the petrous pyramid in terms of safety. In terms of efficacy, the parietal followed by the petrous pyramid, and retrosigmoid regions are most suited.Conclusion: The current fiducial screws and the screw placement guidelines for adults are insufficiently safe or effective for pediatric patients.

Robotic-navigated screw placement has potential for higher precision and accuracy. Robotic assistance is well-described in the lumbar spine, however only few studies have evaluated its use in the cervical spine. Surgical treatment for hangman’s fractures after nonunion typically involves C2-3 anterior fusion or posterior occipito-cervical fusion. However, occipito-cervical fusion involves loss of mobility in the cervical spine with associated morbidity. We have previously described a minimally invasive approach using percutaneous screw fixation with X-ray navigation. Robotic assistance is ideally suited for cervical fusion given smaller bony anatomy and adjacent critical structures. We describe a young healthy patient who presented with a hangman’s fracture initially managed conservatively with immobilization. She presented with nonunion and persistent symptoms. Surgical options considered included anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, or posterior cervical fusion with or without extension to the occiput. These options would have involved some loss of flexion/extension and rotational motion with associated morbidity. We performed percutaneous screw fixation of the hangman’s fracture using MAZOR-X robotic navigation and achieved good radiographic fracture reduction with accurate screw placement. To our knowledge this is the first case of a robotic-assisted percutaneous screw fixation for a hangman’s fracture. Robotic-navigated screw placement can be used safely and accurately for cervical spine fractures.

BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques of C1 lateral mass screw placement have been described. We sought to delineate the radiographic angle of safety medially and laterally and describe a novel surgical technique of C1 lateral mass screw placement. We sought to (I) determine the angle of safety medially and laterally of the C1 lateral mass; (II) assess the size available of the lateral mass in the AP and coronal planes; (III) describe novel technique of insertion of a C1 lateral mass screw utilizing navigation and a novel start point. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cervical computed tomography (CT) images of normal adults. Radiographic measurements were then obtained using these images including the angle (degrees) of safety medially and lateral of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally, as well as the length and width (mm) of the C1 lateral masses. A novel surgical technique was used by identifying the confluence of the medial aspect of the posterior arch and the lateral mass. This confluence is then marked out as the C1 screw start point. Under navigation guidance, lateral mass screws were placed with 0 degrees of medial-lateral angulation from posterior to anterior. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with a mean age of 52.6±25.6 years (33% female) were included. The mean medial and lateral angle of safety of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally was 23±3.8 degrees and 32±5 degrees, respectively. Average length and width of the lateral mass was 17.7 and 13.3 mm respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the radiographic window of safety medially and laterally for safe and reproducible placement of C1 lateral mass screws. Further, a novel technique using a medial start point and navigation guidance with 0 degrees of angulation in the coronal plane is described. Further research is required to assess outcomes of patients utilizing this method as well as biomechanical studies to assess this construct strength compared to others that are frequently used.