Search

Background The surgical management of concomitant occurrence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversial. Conversely, benefits from a minimally invasive approach are well known concerning the treatment of both AAA and CRC. The aim of this study is to assess safety and feasibility of a sequential 2-staged minimally invasive during the same recovery by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) technique and laparoscopic colorectal resection. Methods From January 2008 to December 2020, all patients with concomitant AAA and CRC were consecutively treated by EVAR and laparoscopic colorectal resection. Perioperative data were retrospectively collected in order to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes following the sequential 2-staged procedures. Results A total of 24 patients were included. The localization of the aneurysm was infrarenal abdominal aortic in 23 cases and in one case of common iliac artery. EVAR procedure has always been performed first. In 18 patients, a percutaneous access has been used while in 6 patients a surgical access has been adopted. Twelve patients had cancer in the left colon, 9 in the right colon, and 3 patients had rectal cancer. No conversions or intraoperative complications had occurred during laparoscopic surgery. The major complications rate after EVAR and CRC surgery was 8.3% and 12.5%, respectively. The mean interval between EVAR and CRC treatment was 7.8 ± 1 and the mean length of stay was 15.4 ± 3.6. No deaths occurred during hospitalization and between the procedures. Overall mortality was 20.8% with a mean follow-up of 39.41 ± 19.2 months. Conclusion Elective sequential 2-staged minimally invasive treatment is a safe and feasible approach with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and it should be adopted in current clinical practice to manage concomitant AAA and CRC.

Highlights • Multilevel peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients is cause of amputation. • Herein we report a case of critic limb ischemia addressed by hybrid procedure. • Hybrid procedure outcomes seem to be as good as with open revascularization. • Hybrid procedure show less morbidity and shorter intensive care and hospital stay., Introduction Multilevel peripheral arterial disease (MPAD) is the main cause of critic limb ischemia (CLI). Vascular interventions are required to increase distal blood flow and reduce the risk of lower limb amputation. Presentation of case We report a case of complex hybrid revascularization in a patient presenting a Rutherford V MPAD involving the infrarenal aorta, iliac, femoral and popliteal segments. The simultaneous hybrid intervention consisted of an endovascular aortic stent-graft placement and a surgical above-the-knee prosthetic femoro-popliteal bypass. In the same operation a renal stenting was performed due to a significant renal artery stenosis associated to a systemic hypertension non-responder to medical management. Discussion Hybrid interventions can be performed simultaneously or staged with benefit given by the complementary role of endovascular and surgical treatments allowing the correction of eventually inadequate results of both approaches. Reports of simultaneous hybrid treatments are limited but, despite the complexity of such procedures, primary success rate is reported high. Also in the reported case, a complex simultaneous treatment in a patient presenting MPAD in association to a significant and symptomatic renal artery disease was feasible in the same operation. Conclusion Hybrid procedure are safe with high degree of efficacy in terms of revascularization procedure, reduced morbidity and shorter intensive care and hospital stay. In our experience, the use of hybrid procedure is technically feasible and allowed the treatment of MPAD with a good outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) should be considered as the preferred treatment modality for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm for patients with suitable anatomy and reasonable life expectancy. Surgical cut-down of both femoral arteries during EVAR procedure is associated with an increased risk of local complications. Therefore, nowadays most EVAR procedures are performed with a totally percutaneous approach. METHODS: Based on the evaluation of the Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) variation, the purpose of this study was to evaluate possible hemodynamic alterations on arterial perfusion of the lower limbs in two different types of access for EVAR procedures: totally percutaneous (p-EVAR) and EVAR with surgical access (s-EVAR). RESULTS: Our study considered 38 patients (36 men, mean age of 70.6±8.3 years) subjected to EVAR procedure between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. The variation in pre- and postoperative ABI values (∆ ABI) and procedure-related complications rate were considered as primary outcomes. The p-EVAR group consisted of 27 patients (92.6% males, mean age of 72.3±8.6) while the s-EVAR group was composed by 11 patients (100% males, mean age of 69±8.1). The follow-up period was ranged from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 12.3 months. In particular, the pre- and postoperative Δ ABI and the procedure-related complications rate, both considered as primary outcomes, did not show any significant difference between two groups, and in both groups, the technical success rate was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Pre- and postoperative Δ ABI and the procedure-related complications rate, did not show any significant difference between two groups. We can confirm that percutaneous access is safe, and its use should be encouraged when any contraindication on his employment does not exist.

The Mediterranean Federation for the Advancing of Vascular Surgery (MeFAVS) was founded in 2018, with the aim to promote cooperation among vascular professionals within Mediterranean countries. Due to its prominent social and economic impact on national health systems, diabetic peripheral artery was selected as the very first topic to be investigated by the federation. In this second paper, different experiences from delegates of participating countries were shared to define common strategies to harmonize, standardize, and optimize education and training in the Vascular Surgery specialty.