1. The Israeli Experience: Using Older Donors in Lung Transplant; Are Old Lungs Better Than No Lungs?
- Author
-
Yuri Peysakhovich, Yaron D. Barac, R. Toledano, I. Baroch, Milton Saute, M.R. Kramer, R. Sharoni, A. Neymark, and Dan Aravot
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Transplantation ,Lung transplants ,Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Lung ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Post transplant ,Donor lungs ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,medicine ,Lung transplantation ,Surgery ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Donor pool ,Survival rate - Abstract
Purpose The state of Israel represents a unique transplant environment; deprived from neighboring countries organ sharing, and operating under a distinctive religious limitation. Furthermore, as the single Israeli Lung transplant center our center is required to provide transplant solutions to a verity of recipients which may be considered in many transplant centers as sub-optimal candidates. Hence, the usage of the extremely limited donor pool is in constant debate. In recent years we have been using in increasing frequency lungs from older donors (> 60), and thus we have been deliberating whether these organs should be transplanted in older Vs younger recipients. Hence, our goal was to review Israel's Lung transplant data base to evaluate the longevity of old Vs. young donor lungs transplanted in young Vs. old recipients. Methods Israel's Lung transplant data base was reviewed from January 2012to December 2017. Both clinical and demographic characteristics were extracted. Short and long-term survival were evaluated. Results 247 donor lungs were used to preform 262 lung transplants; 167 donors were younger than 60 years (67.1%) and 80 donors were older than 60 years (22.39%). We choose to focus on the 1-year survival of the Bi-lateral orthotopic lung transplantation patients. We found a statistically significant survival difference one-year post transplant between the 4 groups (0.02): While the survival rate was ∼81% when both the donors and the recipients were younger than 60 years, it dropped to ∼ 57%-63% once the donors were older than 60 years (Figure 1). Conclusion In this unique environment of both recipients and donors’; young donors transplanted into young recipients had the best survival at 1-year post-transplant. Once, using older donors the survival at 1-year post-transplant was reduced regardless if transplanted into young or old recipients. Future analysis, should address the concept claiming that using old lungs is better than no lungs in a large scale multi center studies.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF