Search

Cerebral vasospasm remains a significant source of morbidity and mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Dantrolene has shown promise in several animal studies in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm. The present study seeks to critically review the evidence of its use in human subjects, aiming to 1) describe the forms and dosages used, 2) describe its safety profile, and 3) describe its effectiveness in treating cerebral vasospasm.A systematic review of intra-arterial dantrolene use in cerebral vasospasm was performed. A total of 86 articles were identified across all databases, 6 of which were ultimately included in the present study. Primary outcomes included a description of the form and dosage of dantrolene prescribed, the incidence of adverse effects after dantrolene use, and its efficacy for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm.Study designs included 2 randomized controlled trials (33.3%), 2 case series (33.3%), and 2 case reports (33.3%). Both the intra-arterial and intravenous administration of dantrolene has been performed with varying dose regimens. Although there exists limited clinical information regarding side effects, a case of liver toxicity was reported. All existing studies reported benefit in vasospasm measured either by transcranial Doppler or digital subtraction angiography. The level of evidence was low, consisting largely of retrospective studies that had a high likelihood of bias.Dantrolene is a promising new therapeutic agent in the treatment of cerebral vasospasm. Although existing reports of its use are encouraging, high-quality prospective randomized trials are necessary for recommendations pertaining to dose, route, indications, and efficacy.

BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy (DAP) is necessary to prevent thromboembolic events during carotid stenting, stent-assisted coil embolization, and implant of flow diverters (FD). However, DAP in the acute phase may be challenging. An intravenous alternative, cangrelor, has rapid onset, short plasma half-life, and more reliable antiplatelet action for acute interventions. The study objective was to evaluate feasibility and safety of IV cangrelor during acute neuroendovascular surgery procedures.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of our database of patients treated with stent-assisted coil embolization, FD placement for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), or stenting for acute internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion where IV cangrelor was used. Morbidity, mortality, incidence of thromboembolic events, hemorrhages, and 90-day outcomes were reported.ResultsTen patients were found in our database from June 2018 through January 2019. Four patients had aSAH, four had middle cerebral artery strokes with tandem lesions, one had an ICA occlusion, and one had a vertebral artery aneurysm. One of the ten patients experienced a thrombotic event. One patient developed new post-procedural bleeding and two had worsening intracranial hemorrhage. Five patients were discharged home in stable condition, two to acute rehabilitation, one to a nursing facility, and two others expired (likely the result of the severe and evolving strokes). Of the eight who were discharged, six (75%) had a good 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–2).ConclusionAcute administration of IV cangrelor with or without oral ticagrelor is a feasible antiplatelet treatment option for acute neuroendovascular procedures.