1. Using three-dimensional nasal forms to compare definitive unilateral cleft lip nose correction with/without a cross-lap joint cartilage graft technique
- Author
-
Norifumi Nakamura, Etsuro Nozoe, Kiyohide Ishihata, Masahiro Tezuka, Takako Okawachi, Yuhei Kamikuri, and Namiko Nomoto
- Subjects
Cleft Lip ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Nose ,Cartilage graft ,Rhinoplasty ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cleft lip nose ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,Orthodontics ,business.industry ,030206 dentistry ,Nasal tip ,Cartilage ,Treatment Outcome ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Lap joint ,Otorhinolaryngology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Joint cartilage ,Surgery ,Oral Surgery ,business - Abstract
To compare three-dimensional (3D) nasal forms after definitive correction of unilateral cleft lip (UCL)-nose using an extended spreader cartilage graft with/without a cross-lap joint cartilage graft technique. Twenty-four patients with UCL who underwent definitive nose correction using an extended spreader cartilage graft with a cross-lap joint technique (CLJ group) and fifteen patients with UCL who underwent nose correction without a cross-lap joint technique (non-CLJ group) were enrolled in this study. Pre- and postoperative 3D nasal forms were compared between the two groups. The CLJ group demonstrated more successful recovery of the nasal tip and anterior nasal ridge in the center of the face (P 0.01), and the higher nasal tip was maintained for more than 1 year (P = 0.008). The differences in the cephalo-caudal heights of the nasal alar groove and curvatures of the alar groove arch were successfully improved in both CLJ and non-CLJ groups. The nasal angles on lateral profiles did not change in either group. An extended spreader cartilage graft with a cross-lap joint technique facilitates satisfactory recovery of the nasal tip in the center of the face and a higher nasal tip, avoiding over-projection in the definitive correction of UCL-nose.
- Published
- 2020