1. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NERVE BLOCK V/S SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN LICHTENSTEIN TENSION FREE MESH INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR.
- Author
-
KHATRI, HITESH, GUPTA, AKHIL KUMAR, SANGAL, VIPUL, and MAURYA, A. K.
- Subjects
- *
NERVE block , *HERNIA surgery , *SURGERY , *SPINAL anesthesia , *CONDUCTION anesthesia , *INGUINAL hernia - Abstract
Introduction Inguinal hernia most frequent problem in human being adult as well as children suffer with it. Inguinal hernia repair done under “anesthesia” {such as local anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, nerve block, epidural anesthesia, & general anesthesia}, depending upon number of variables i.e. patient’s acceptance, surgeon’s preference, safety, practicality and cost effectiveness. Objectives To compare nerve block versus spinal Anesthesia in Lichtenstein tension-free mesh inguinal hernia repair Methods The Present study, conducted as a hospital-based comparative prospective study at the Department of General Surgery, Muzaffarnagar Medical College & Hospital, Muzaffarnagar, U.P., aimed to investigate the efficacy of two different anesthesia techniques in inguinal hernia repair. Over an 18-month period, 100 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The study utilized a combination of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks alongside field blocks for anesthesia administration, ensuring proper analgesia and relaxation. Cases were grouped based upon fitness for spinal anesthesia, comorbidities, and patient preference. Group A underwent mesh repair under spinal anesthesia, while Group B received nerve block via inguinal field block technique. Results In the <40 year group, Nerve Block accounts for 2.0% of cases while Spinal Anaesthesia accounts for 10.0%. In the 41-50year group, Nerve Block represents 64.0% of cases, whereas Spinal Anaesthesia represents 60.0%. In the >50 age group, Nerve Block represents 34.0% of cases, and Spinal Anesthesia represents 30.0%. On comparison of seroma occurrence between Group A and Group B revealed interesting insights. In Group A, comprising 50 cases, 45 cases (90.0%) exhibited seroma, while 5 cases (10.0%) did not. Similarly, in Group B, consisting of another 50 cases, 47 cases (94.0%) showed seroma, with 3 cases (6.0%) without it. When considering both groups collectively, out of 100 cases, 92 cases (92.0%) had seroma, while 8 cases (8.0%) did not. Conclusion We came to the conclusion that all patients with primary inguinal hernias benefit from Lichtenstein mesh repair performed under local anesthesia for a number of reasons. Simpleness, dependability, efficacy, safety, a smooth recovery period marked by easily managed pain, a prompt return to full range of activities, and high patient satisfaction are a few of these. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024