Search

Recommended treatment for lymphoblastic lymphomas, a highly aggressive, relatively rare lymphoma entity predominantly seen in teenagers and young adults, includes acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)-like induction chemotherapy. Whether these patients should be consolidated with maintenance chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation (Auto-SCT) and the use of radiotherapy are matters of debate.We reviewed treatment and outcome for 25 consecutive patients above the age of 15 years with lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-lineage; T-LBL, n = 19; B-lineage; B-LBL, n = 6) seen at a single center during a 12-year period (1999-2011). Patients were given an ALL-like chemotherapy induction regimen, and responding patients were consolidated with Auto-SCT and local radiotherapy when applicable.Median age at diagnosis was 33 years (range 15-65). Seventeen of the T-LBL patients had a mediastinal mass, three patients had central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Chemotherapy with intensified CNS prophylaxis induced an overall response rate of 92% (CR 84%, PR 8%). In total 23/25 (92%) patients underwent Auto-SCT in first remission while 13 of 14 eligible patients with mediastinal involvement received local radiotherapy. Twenty percent of the patients had hepatotoxicity grade 3-4 and 32% thromboembolic events (TE). Two patients (8%) died of treatment-related toxicity. One patient had progressive disease and died of lymphoma. Three patients have relapsed, but two of these (both B-LBL) are currently alive in second CR after Allo-SCT. With a median follow-up of 98 months (range 1-163) the 5- and 8-year PFS and OS are 76% and 84%, respectively.Combined intensive ALL-like induction and early consolidation chemotherapy followed by Auto-SCT and local radiation therapy resulted in high sustained cure rates.

In recent decades, the prognosis of Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) has been significantly improved by intensified first-line regimens containing cytarabine, rituximab and consolidation with high-dose-therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. One such strategy is the Nordic MCL2 regimen, developed by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. We here present the 15-year updated results of the Nordic MCL2 study after a median follow-up of 114years: For all patients on an intent-to-treat basis, the median overall and progression-free survival was 127 and 85years, respectively. The MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI), biological MIPI, including Ki67 expression (MIPI-B) and the MIPI-B including mIR-18b expression (MIPI-B-miR), in particular, significantly divided patients into distinct risk groups. Despite very long response durations of the low and intermediate risk groups, we observed a continuous pattern of relapse and the survival curves never reached a plateau. In conclusion, despite half of the patients being still alive and 40% in first remission after more than 12years, we still see an excess disease-related mortality, even among patients experiencing long remissions. Even though we consider the Nordic regimen as a very good choice of regimen, we recommend inclusion in prospective studies to explore the benefit of novel agents in the frontline treatment of MCL.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a heterogenic non-Hodgkin lymphoma entity, with a median survival of about 5 years. In 2008 we reported the early - based on the median observation time of 4 years - results of the Nordic Lymphoma Group MCL2 study of frontline intensive induction immunochemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), with more than 60% event-free survival at 5 years, and no subsequent relapses reported. Here we present an update after a median observation time of 6·5 years. The overall results are still excellent, with median overall survival and response duration longer than 10 years, and a median event-free survival of 7·4 years. However, six patients have now progressed later than 5 years after end of treatment. The international MCL Prognostic Index (MIPI) and Ki-67-expression were the only independent prognostic factors. Subdivided by the MIPI-Biological Index (MIPI + Ki-67, MIPI-B), more than 70% of patients with low-intermediate MIPI-B were alive at 10 years, but only 23% of the patients with high MIPI-B. These results, although highly encouraging regarding the majority of the patients, underline the need of a risk-adapted treatment strategy for MCL. The study was registered at www.isrctn.org as ISRCTN 87866680.

Background: From 1999, Norwegian guidelines recommend two escalated (esc) BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisolone) followed by six standard (s) BEACOPP for patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with an international prognostic score (IPS) ‡4. We evaluated retrospectively the experience with this recommendation at the Norwegian Radium Hospital, also including all IPS 3 patients treated with the same regimen. Patients and methods: Forty-seven patients were treated between June 1999 and December 2008. IPS was 3 in 10 patients and ‡4 in 37. Results: Thirty-five patients received eight cycles of BEACOPP, 12 patients received one to six cycles only, mainly due to toxicity. Sixty percent of patients had dose reductions. With median follow-up of survivors of 89 months, 5-year progression-free and overall survival are 84% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73% to 95%] and 91% (95% CI 82% to 100%), respectively. Toxicity was considerable with grade 3 or more infections/febrile neutropenia in 66% of patients, including one death and three cases of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. Of note, 10 patients (21%) experienced symptomatic aseptic osteonecrosis, of whom 3 have had hip replacement surgery after treatment. Conclusion: Two escBEACOPP plus six sBEACOPP is efficacious in advanced-stage high-risk HL. We document a high incidence of aseptic bone necrosis, possibly related to prednisolone.

We present a prospective phase II study of patients with relapse after chemotherapy showing transformation of follicular lymphoma to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, performed before rituximab was included in standard treatment. Patients in complete (CR) or partial remission (PR) after salvage chemotherapy were eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (HDT). Forty-seven patients from five Norwegian centres were included, of whom 30 (63%) received HDT. Eighteen (60%) achieved CR, seven (23%) PR and five (10%) had progressive disease following HDT. Median follow-up for the surviving patients was 75 months; median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 26 and 47 months, respectively. Median OS for all patients was 43 months, compared to only 10 months for patients not eligible for HDT. Patients receiving CD34(+) enriched/B-cell depleted grafts had inferior PFS and a trend for inferior OS compared to patients receiving non-purged grafts (Log Rank 0·025 and 0·151, respectively). In conclusion, two thirds of patients with transformation of follicular lymphoma were eligible for HDT. The majority of patients achieved CR and a considerable number had prolonged OS. The use of in vitro purged grafts did not result in a survival benefit compared to that of non-purged grafts.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has a heterogeneous clinical course. The recently proposed Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) predicted the survival of MCL better than the International Prognostic Index in MCL patients treated with conventional chemotherapy, but its validity in MCL treated with more intensive immunochemotherapy has been questioned. Applied here to 158 patients of the Nordic MCL2 trial of first-line intensive immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, the MIPI and the simplified MIPI (s-MIPI) predicted survival significantly better (P < .001) than the International Prognostic Index (P > .004). Both the MIPI and the s-MIPI mainly identified 2 risk groups, low and intermediate versus high risk, with the more easily applied s-MIPI being just as powerful as the MIPI. The MIPIB (biological), incorporating Ki-67 expression, identified almost half of the patients as high risk. We suggest that also a simplified MIPIB is feasible. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.org as #ISRCTN 87866680.

Purpose Minimal residual disease (MRD) is predictive of clinical progression in mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). According to the Nordic MCL-2 protocol we prospectively analyzed the efficacy of pre-emptive treatment using rituximab to MCL patients in molecular relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients and Materials MCL patients enrolled onto the study, who had polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detectable molecular markers and underwent ASCT, were followed with serial PCR assessments of MRD in consecutive bone marrow and peripheral blood samples after ASCT. In case of molecular relapse with increasing MRD levels, patients were offered pre-emptive treatment with rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks. Results Of 160 MCL patients enrolled, 145 underwent ASCT, of whom 78 had a molecular marker. Of these, 74 were in complete remission (CR) and four had progressive disease after ASCT. Of the CR patients, 36 underwent a molecular relapse up to 6 years (mean, 18.5 months) after ASCT. Ten patients did not receive pre-emptive treatment mainly due to a simultaneous molecular and clinical relapse, while 26 patients underwent pre-emptive treatment leading to reinduction of molecular remission in 92%. Median molecular and clinical relapse-free survival after pre-emptive treatment were 1.5 and 3.7 years, respectively. Of the 38 patients who remain in molecular remission for now for a median of 3.3 years (range, 0.4 to 6.6 years), 33 are still in clinical CR. Conclusion Molecular relapse may occur many years after ASCT in MCL, and PCR based pre-emptive treatment using rituximab is feasible, reinduce molecular remission, and may prevent clinical relapse.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is considered incurable. Intensive immunochemotherapy with stem cell support has not been tested in large, prospective series. In the 2nd Nordic MCL trial, we treated 160 consecutive, untreated patients younger than 66 years in a phase 2 protocol with dose-intensified induction immunochemotherapy with rituximab (R) + cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone (maxi-CHOP), alternating with R + high-dose cytarabine. Responders received high-dose chemotherapy with BEAM or BEAC (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan/cyclophosphamide) with R-in vivo purged autologous stem cell support. Overall and complete response was achieved in 96% and 54%, respectively. The 6-year overall, event-free, and progression-free survival were 70%, 56%, and 66%, respectively, with no relapses occurring after 5 years. Multivariate analysis showed Ki-67 to be the sole independent predictor of event-free survival. The nonrelapse mortality was 5%. The majority of stem cell products and patients assessed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after transplantation were negative. Compared with our historical control, the Nordic MCL-1 trial, the event-free, overall, and progression-free survival, the duration of molecular remission, and the proportion of PCR-negative stem cell products were significantly increased (P < .001). Intensive immunochemotherapy with in vivo purged stem cell support can lead to long-term progression-free survival of MCL and perhaps cure. Registered at www.isrctn.org as #ISRCTN 87866680.

There is no consensus on the optimal chemotherapy regimen for Hodgkin's lymphoma patients > or = 60 years. We present our institution's results of 5 years, using CHOP-21 as standard for this patient group. Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 71 years (range, 60 - 91) were included in this cohort. Fifty-five percent had known co-morbidities. Stage I/IIA patients (38%) were treated with 2 - 4 cycles of CHOP followed by radiotherapy. Stage IIB - IV patients (62%) received 6 - 8 cycles of CHOP and for the majority (13/18 pts) no radiotherapy. Two treatment-related deaths occurred. Febrile neutropenia was the most common toxicity (31%). The complete response rate after CHOP +/- radiotherapy was 93%. With a median follow-up of 41 months, five patients have relapsed and four have died from Hodgkin's lymphoma. So far, no relapses have occurred after 2 years from the end of therapy. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 3 years were 79% and 76%, respectively. We conclude that CHOP-21 is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for elderly patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Background: Burkitt’s/Burkitt-like lymphoma (BL/BLL) are highly aggressive lymphomas mainly affecting children and young adults. We report the results in adolescent and adult patients with the use of three successive regimens. Patients and methods: Forty-nine patients aged 15 –70 years admitted to the Norwegian Radium Hospital in the period 1982– 2001 with a diagnosis of BL/BLL on histological review and who were given chemotherapy with curative intent are included in this analysis. Up to 1987 patients were given doxorubicin-based chemotherapy supplemented with intravenous and intrathecal methotrexate (MmCHOP). From 1987 to 1994, patients who obtained complete remission upon this regimen were consolidated with high-dose therapy with stem-cell support (MmCHOP + HDT). In 1995 we introduced as frontline therapy the German Berlin – Frankfurt– Munster (BFM) regimen. Results: By intention to treat analyses, the progression-free survival rates for patients who received MmCHOP (n = 13), MmCHOP + HDT (n = 17) or BFM therapy (n = 19) are 30.8%, 70.6% and 73.7%, respectively. In the groups of patients who received either the BFM regimen or MmCHOP + HDT, all patients who obtained complete remission upon induction therapy are continuously disease free. There was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: BL/BLL in adolescents and adults can successfully be treated with 5-day blocks of intensified chemotherapy such as the BFM regimen or CHOP/methotrexate-based chemotherapy consolidated with high-dose therapy. Using the BFM regimen, continuous remissions are obtained without additional myeloablative chemotherapy.

High dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HD-ASCT) is a recommended procedure for patients with transformed indolent B-cell lymphoma from the pre-rituximab era. In this retrospective single-center study, we present our experience with HD-ASCT in patients with histologically verified transformed indolent B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. Forty-two patients were included, of whom 28 with chemosensitive disease proceeded to HD-ASCT. Twenty patients (71%) achieved a complete response (CR) and five (18%) a partial response (PR) after HD-ASCT. With a median observation time of 49 months for the survivors, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with HD-ASCT were 39 months and 57 months, respectively. Patients who were rituximab-naive at transformation had a significantly better OS compared to patients previously treated with rituximab, both in the whole patient cohort and among the HD-ASCT-treated patients (p = 0.036 and p = 0.039, respectively). Furthermore, male sex influenced survival negatively, whereas time from diagnosis to transformation was positively associated with survival, both with borderline significance, in HD-ASCT-treated patients. In conclusion, HD-ASCT remains an effective treatment for transformed indolent lymphomas in the rituximab era.

The main objective of the MCL3 study was to improve outcome for patients not in complete remission (CR) before transplant by adding (90)Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan (Zevalin) to the high-dose regimen. One hundred sixty untreated, stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma patients

Abstract 3565 Enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (ETCL) is a rare lymphoma often, but not always, associated with celiac disease and characterized by poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemotherapy. In previous studies long-term survival has been achieved in only 10–20% of the patients. Limited data is available on the feasibility and efficacy of intensive induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem transplantation (ASCT) in this rare lymphoma entity. We therefore specifically analysed the outcome of ETCL patients included in a large prospective phase II study (NLG-T-01) performed by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. The NLG-T-01 study included 160 patients with systemic alk-negative peripheral T-cell lymphoma over the period 2002–2007. The patients received CHOEP-14 × 6 followed by ASCT after BEAM or BEAC in responsive patients. The study included altogether 21 patients (13 %) with ETCL. There were 16 males and 5 females with a median age of 55 years (32-65) at diagnosis. Eighteen patients (86 %) had advanced disease, three patients (14 %) had a bulky tumour, nine patients (43 %) presented with B symptoms and four (19%) with elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase. Response status after three and six courses was CR or CRu in 67 % patients. Fourteen patients (67 %) received BEAM or BEAC supported by blood stem cell graft (median number of stem cells infused 5.4 × 106/kg). Of these, 6 patients relapsed with a median of 219 days from ASCT. Of the 7 patients (33%), who did not reach ASCT because of refractory/progressive disease, 5 died early due to lymphoma. At a median follow-up of 45 months, 10 patients (45 %) are alive. The progression-free survival is 40 %. One patient (5%) died due to early transplant-related cause (disseminated candidiasis). In this prospective study, intensive induction chemotherapy followed by ASCT was feasible in the majority of younger patients with EATL. In a subset of patients, who should clinically and biologically be further characterized, long-term outcome seems promising when compared to historical controls. Whether addition of other chemotherapeutic agents, antibodies such as alemtuzumab or other biologicals may further improve long-term outcome remains to be studied. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 2395 While already tested in T-PLL, the impact of chemo-immunotherapy with alemtuzumab in combination with bi-weekly CHOP on autologous stem cell harvest (ASCH) has not yet been analysed in the context of first line treatment of primary systemic peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). We therefore evaluated the feasibility of ASCH in the first 23 patients of the ongoing international multicenter ACT-1 study, the first, and so far only, randomized trial in primary systemic PTCL. The ACT trials (ACT-1 + ACT-2) test the addition of alemtuzumab to CHOP followed, in younger patients (ACT-1), by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HDT+ASCT). The aims of the analysis were: (i) feasibility of ASCH in alemtuzumab + CHOP (A-CHOP) treated patients as compared to patients not receiving the antibody, but otherwise treated and managed in the same way, and (ii) comparison of ASCH counts in the two treatment arms. By July 2010, 20 patients, 11 in the standard treatment (arm A) and 9 in the experimental treatment (arm B) cohort, had undergone induction therapy and had been primed for subsequent ASCH according to local guidelines. Histological subtype distribution in the two treatment groups showed: PTCL not otherwise specified N=4 (arm A) and N=5 (arm B), angioimmunoblastic N=5 (arm A) and N=4 (arm B), extranodal NK/T-cell, nasal type N=1 (arm A), hepatosplenic N=1 (arm A). Pre-therapeutic evidence of bone marrow involvement was present in 4 (arm A) and 2 (arm B) patients, respectively. Of the original 23 patients, three did not undergo stem-cell harvest due to progressive disease (1 pt), patient's decision (1 pt), and pre-therapeutic CNS involvement (1 pt). Among the 20 harvested patients, ASCH failure was experienced in three patients (standard arm N=1 and experimental arm N=2; p=0.57). In two patients (one in each treatment cohort) a suboptimal stem cell yield could be optimized by the use of plerixafor according to local guidelines. A comparison of stem cell counts (CD34+ cells × 106/kg body weight) from the two treatment cohorts showed a trend towards moderately lower stem cell yields in alemtuzumab-treated patients (3.34 CD34+ cells × 106/kg body weight in arm B vs 6.54 CD34+ cells × 106/kg body weight in arm A, p=0.03). In conclusion, the addition of alemtuzumab to bi-weekly CHOP in the setting of first-line therapy of primary systemic PTCL does not significantly impair ASCH prior to upfront autologous stem cell transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 3566 Primary systemic T-cell lymphoma of anaplastic large cell type (ALCL) is an aggressive and predominantly nodal subtype of lymphoma, further subdivided based on expression of the ALK-protein, with ALK-pos ALCL occurring predominantly in younger patients and associated with a favourable prognosis. ALK-neg ALCL is believed to carry a prognosis similar to that of other nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas and previous studies have shown long-term survival rates below 50%. There is retrospective data suggesting a benefit from ASCT in first-line treatment of this lymphoma subtype. We analyzed the outcome of ALK-neg ALCL patients included in a prospective phase II trial, NLG-T-01, conducted by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. The NLG T-01 trial enrolled 160 patients aged 18–67 years from the Nordic countries with systemic ALK-neg peripheral T-cell lymphoma within the period 2002–2007. The treatment schedule consisted of 6 courses of CHOEP-14 followed by ASCT (BEAM or BEAC) in responding patients. Patients >60 years received CHOP-14 as induction. Altogether, the trial included 31 patients with ALK-neg ALCL (19% of the study population). Median age was 56 years (22-65) with a male:female ratio of 2.4. Stage III-IV was found in 18 patients (58%), B-symptoms in 19 patients (61%) and 6 patients (19%) had a bulky lesion (>10cm). Pre-therapeutic serum lactate dehydrogenase was elevated in 18 patients (58%) and performance score was 2–4 in 10 patients (32%). After 3 and 6 courses of chemotherapy, response status was CR or CRu in 29% and 58% of the patients, respectively. In total, 24 out of 31 patients (77%) underwent BEAM/BEAC therapy followed by ASCT. Four patients did not respond or had disease progression during induction chemotherapy. The remaining 3 patients did not undergo ASCT for other reasons (mobilization failure, lung insufficiency, patient decision, respectively). Overall response rate after ASCT was 74% for the entire initial population and 96% for those undergoing ASCT. Median follow-up was 45 months. Six patients relapsed after ASCT. There was a total of nine deaths (29%): six due to lymphoma, two due to toxicity and one from second malignancy (colon cancer). With a median follow-up of 45 months, 3-year overall and progression-free survival values were 73% and 64%, respectively. Intensive chemotherapy followed by ASCT was feasible in the majority of the patients included in this prospective trial. Long-term outcome appears promising when compared to previously published data, with the survival curve suggesting a plateau. In ASCT eligible patients, intensive induction chemotherapy consolidated by upfront ASCT is an effective treatment that yields outcome results at least as good as those obtained in age-comparable patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Penicillin G with an aminoglycoside is the standard initial empirical treatment in febrile neutropenia in Norway. It has been argued that giving the aminoglycoside once daily to neutropenic patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia may be hazardous when penicillin G is the beta-lactam antibiotic. We questioned this argument and hypothesized that tobramycin once daily was as efficacious as three times daily.We conducted a randomized prospective multicentre study, comparing the efficacy of tobramycin 6 mg/kg once (arm A) versus three times (arm B) daily, plus penicillin G 5 million IU x 4, in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.modification of the antibiotic regimen.One hundred and seventy-four patients were evaluable for intention-to-treat analyses. One hundred and fifty-five patients had lymphoma or leukaemia as the underlying cancer diagnosis. In arm A, 35 of 88 patients and in arm B, 34 of 86 patients, that is 40% in both arms had no modification of the antibiotic regimen. No patients died while participating in the study. Upon modification of the antibiotic regimen, all patients were successfully treated. The increase in serum creatinine was modest and similar in the two treatment groups.When administered with penicillin G, tobramycin given once daily was as efficacious and safe as tobramycin given three times daily in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia in Norway, provided the regimen was modified according to the clinical response.

8598 Background: The aim of this study was to investigate conditional survival and standardized mortality ratios (SMR) after high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT) for no...

Abstract 747 The outcome of mantle cell lympoma (MCL) has improved in recent years. The Nordic Lymphoma Group has since 1996 completed three consecutive phase II trials for front-line treatment of MCL patients < 66 years of age. The first trial (MCL1) showed that quality of response prior to transplant was the most important factor for outcome. Hence, in the second trial (MCL2) induction therapy was intensified by adding cycles of high-dose Ara-C and rituximab to the regimen. Despite significant improvement in overall and progression-free survival, patients who did not achieve CR pretransplant had a shorter time to progression. Therefore, the main objective of the MCL3 study was to improve the time to progression in patients who achieved only CRu or PR pretransplant by adding Zevalin to the high-dose regimen as a late intensification. Results of the – otherwise largely identical - MCL2 trial serve as the historic control. Methods: Newly diagnosed stage II-IV MCL patients < 66 years received induction immunochemotherapy with alternating cycles of R- (rituximab) maxi-CHOP and R-Ara-C to a total of 6 cycles. Evaluation of pretransplant response with CT scans and bone marrow was performed after 5 cycles. PET/CT pretransplant was recommended, but would not influence treatment. Responding patients by NCI criteria underwent in-vivo purged stem cell harvest after the 6th cycle (Ara-C + 2 doses of rituximab). Patients in CRu or PR received a standard dose Zevalin (0.4 mCi/kg) one week prior to high-dose therapy with BEAM or BEAC while CR patients received the high-dose chemotherapy without Zevalin. Follow-up included CT-scans, bone marrow and blood sampling for at least 5 years, including PCR for minimal residual disease or molecular relapse. Patients in solely molecular relapse received preemptive therapy with 4 weekly doses of rituximab, as in the MCL2 study. Results: 161 consecutive patients were included from 2005–2009, with characteristics similar to that of the MCL2 trial with a median age of 57 years (28–65), a male predominance and the majority in stage IV with bone marrow involvement. Only 12 out of 161 patients (7 %) did not receive a transplant, 6 due to stem cell harvest failure, 2 due to toxicity and 4 due to no response to induction treatment. Before transplant 50% were in CR, 17% in CRu, and 30% in PR. Only four out of 161 patients (2 %) did not respond to induction treatment. After a median follow-up of 3.2 years the projected 5-year overall and event free survival, and time to progression were 71, 55 and 65% respectively and the MCL2 and MCL3 curves were superimposable. Of the 69 candidates to Zevalin in CRu/PR according to protocol, 65 (94%) actually received this treatment. There was no significant difference in time to progression for patients in CRu and PR pretransplant between MCL2 and MCL3, indicating no effect of late intensification with Zevalin in MCL3 in this patient group. Interestingly, a positive pretransplant PET scan proved to be a strong negative predictor for outcome. Lack of benefit from addition of Zevalin to the high-dose regimen was shown for both PET-positive and PET-negative patients. In a multivariate analysis of the impact of clinical response, PET positivity and zevalin treatment, only PET positivity pretransplant had independent significance (p=0.0003 HR=3.412 (95% confidence limits 1.744 – 6.673). The treatment-related mortality was 3 %. Side-effects were similar to that previously reported for MCL2, and we did not find that Zevalin added any toxicity. Of the 3 patients who developed secondary MDS/AML posttransplant, two had received Zevalin and one had not. Conclusion: The MCL3 data confirm the good results and tolerability of the Nordic regimen. However, the late intensification with Zevalin, albeit non-toxic, did not prolong the time to progression for patients in only CRu or PR pretransplant. A positive PET prior to transplant was shown to be a strong negative predictor for outcome. The concept of late intensification may be too late in poor responders. In consequence, up-front intensification with increasing use of high-dose AraC for MIPI high-risk patients is used in the subsequent, now ongoing Nordic-British MCL5 study. Disclosures: Arne: Bayer Schering Pharma: Research Funding. Geisler:Roche, Schering: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract 932 The Nordic Lymphoma Group has since 1996 conducted three consecutive phase II trials for front-line treatment of MCL patients ≤ 65 years of age. The first protocol (MCL1) 1996-2000 introduced high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (unpurged or ex vivo purged) as consolidation after 4 cycles of intensified CHOP (maxi-CHOP). The results were disappointing, as the majority of patients relapsed. 1 Being in CR pre-transplant was the most important factor for outcome. Hence, in the second trial (MCL2) 2000-2006 induction therapy was intensified by adding high-dose Ara-C and rituximab to the regimen. Compared to MCL1 this led to significant improvement of event-free and overall survival, and the rate of PCR negative stem cell grafts and bone marrow samples.2 Again, responders in less than CR pre-transplant had a significantly poorer outcome. We therefore made a further intensification for the MCL3 study (2006-2009) by adding 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®) to the high-dose BEAC/BEAM to responders not in CR. Methods: As in the MCL1 and 2 studies newly diagnosed stage II-IV MCL patients ≤ 65 years were included. Induction treatment was identical to that of the MCL2 study with alternating cycles of maxi-CHOP-rituximab (3 cycles) and Ara-C-rituximab (3 cycles). Response evaluation was done after cycle 5. PET/CT was recommended, but could not influence the response evaluation, which was done according to the International Workshop criteria. Responders underwent in vivo purged harvest of stem cells after cycle 6 (Ara-C + 2 doses of rituximab). Patients in CRu or PR received a standard dose 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan (0.4 mCi/kg) one week prior to the BEAM/BEAC, CR patients received BEAM/BEAC alone. Patients are followed by CT-scans, bone marrow and blood samples, including PCR for minimal residual disease or molecular relapse. For molecular relapse preemptive treatment with 4 standard doses of rituximab, as in the MCL2 study3, is given. Results: The planned accrual of 160 patients was reached in June 2009. The patient characteristics are similar to those of the MCL2 trial with a median age of 57 years (28-65), the majority male (80%) and in stage IV (89%) with bone marrow involvement (74%). The response rates pre-transplant so far compare favorably with data from MCL2 with 50% in CR, 18% in CRu, and 28% in PR. Only 4 out of 128 evaluable patients did not respond (3%) and there was one case (1%) of treatment-related mortality during induction therapy. While it is still too early to assess the impact of the 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan on the progression-free survival, the side effects were similar to those of the MCL2 study including a treatment related mortality of 4%. Fifty-five patients in CRu or PR have so far been treated with 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan, with no indication of any added toxicity. Only 12 out of 133 patients (10%) have not undergone transplant, 5 due to stem cell harvest failure, 3 due to toxicity and 4 due to non response to induction treatment. PET-scan prior to transplant was positive in 2% of CR patients, 20% of CRu patients and 54% of PR patients. Patients with a positive PET-scan pre-transplant had a 36% chance of achieving a molecular remission post-transplant, compared to 92% of cases with a negative PET-scan (p Conclusion: The high response rates after induction treatment achieved in the MCL2 study are confirmed in the present study. Adding 90Y-Ibritumomab tiuxetan to high-dose chemotherapy for responding patients not in CR prior to transplant is feasible and does not increase toxicity. A negative PET-scan prior to transplant predicts for a molecular remission after the transplant. References: Andersen et al, Eur J Cancer, 2002, 38: 401-408 Geisler et al, Blood, 2008, 112: 2687-2693 Andersen et al J Clin Oncol 2009 epub ahead of press Disclosures: Kolstad: Bayer Schering Pharma: Research Funding. Geisler:Bayer Schering Pharma: Research Funding.

Systemic PTCL, with the exception of alk-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), have a poor prognosis. ASCT has been shown to have a favourable impact on relapsed PTCL. Therefore, the NLG designed a prospective multicenter phase II study to evaluate the impact of a dose-intensified induction schedule (6 courses of two-weekly CHOEP) consolidated in 1st PR/CR with high-dose therapy (BEAM) followed by ASCT in previously untreated systemic PTCL. This is the largest prospective PTCL-specific trial published so far. Newly diagnosed non-primary cutaneous PTCL cases aged 18–67 yrs were eligible for enrollment. Cases of alk-positive ALCL were excluded. From Oct 2001 to Feb 2006, 99 histologically confirmed PTCL cases were included in the study: PTCL unspecified (n=41), alk-neg ALCL (n=24), AILT (n=15), enteropathy-type (n=12), panniculitis-like (n=3), T/NK nasal-type (n=2), hepatosplenic (n=2). The M/F ratio was 1.8 and the median age 55 yrs (range 20–67 yrs). Although almost 2/3 of the cases presented with advanced-stage disease (62%), B-symptoms (61%) and/or elevated s-LDH (63%), the majority of them (65%) had a good performance score (WHO 0–1) at diagnosis. Of the 77 patients, where information was available for all 6 induction courses, 68 (88%) were in CR (31) or PR (37) after the 3rd and 66 (86%) after the 6th course. A total of 58 patients (75%) went through ASCT indicating that at least a fourth of this younger patient cohort has a primary refractory disease and fails therapy before reaching the transplant. Treatment-related toxicity after both induction and high-dose treatment was manageable. Of the 58 transplanted patients, 50 (86%) were still in remission at re-evaluation short after transplant. In 39 patients follow-up data one year post-transplant were available: 30 are still in CR and 9 have relapsed, suggesting that post-transplant relapses probably account for another 25% of the original patient cohort. In conclusion, the present data indicate that a time- and dose-intensified schedule is feasible and effective in previously untreated systemic PTCL. Continuous remissions are not uncommon, but a longer follow-up is needed to further characterize long-term remission rates and evaluate their impact on time-to-treatment failure and overall survival.

Abstract 4110 Background: The ACT trial (ACT-1 and −2) tests the addition of alemtuzumab (ALZ) to 6 courses of bi-weekly CHOP (A-CHOP-14) followed, in younger patients (ACT-1), by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) in newly diagnosed primary systemic peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). To date, the trial has accrued a total of 131 patients (ACT-1 n=72; ACT-2 n=59). Here, we present the first planned interim safety analysis of the ACT-1 trial based on the first 51 randomized patients. Aims: The aim of the present analysis is to report on the feasibility of a dose-dense chemo-immunotherapy schedule combining ALZ and bi-weekly CHOP followed by HDT/ASCT in ‘de novo' PTCL patients. Results: Results contain two data subsets corresponding to ALZ dose levels prior and subsequent to a dose-reduction amendment tapering ALZ dose from 360 mg (30 mg on days 1 and 2 of each CHOP course) to 120 mg (30 mg on day 1 of CHOP courses 1–4), respectively. Of the 51 randomized patients, 43 had a complete set of evaluable data and represent the background for the present set of results. Of these, 5 received the higher ALZ dose, 17 the lower and 21 belonged to the antibody-void control arm. Treatment arms were well balanced with regard to histological subtypes, IPI sub-groups, and single prognostic factors. Neither of the two treatment cohorts, and for the experimental one irrespective of ALZ dose level, showed significant treatment delay. The median duration of chemotherapy (calculated for 5 bi-weekly cycles of an expected cumulative duration of 70 days) for non-ALZ vs. ALZ-treated patients was 73 vs. 81 days, respectively. No suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) were reported. Grade 3–4 leucopenia and anemia were more frequent in ALZ-treated patients (71% vs 29% and 47% vs 14%, respectively), whereas no difference was seen in terms of thrombocytopenia (17% vs 18%). Non-hematological toxicity unrelated to infectious complications was similar in the two groups. At the higher ALZ dose level, two cases of systemic fungal infection were reported, of which one (verified as being aspergillosis) with fatal outcome in a patient with pre-existing type II diabetes and steroid-requiring chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These two events prompted the ALZ dose-reduction amendment, which led to a significant drop in the number of serious adverse events (SAEs) for ALZ-treated patients (SAE/patient pre-amendment: 2.6, post-amendment: 0.76) to a level comparable with the control arm (SAE/patient pre-amendment: 0.67, post-amendment: 0.44). With regard to the types of infection (≥grade 2), there was a similar frequency in reported fungal infections between the two treatment cohorts, bacterial infections were more often reported in the standard treatment arm (55% vs 46%), while the opposite was observed for viral infections (29% vs. 35%). Among the latter, there were 8 cases of cytomegalovirus reactivation among ALZ-treated patients, of which only two were clinically symptomatic and regressed upon specific treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, the early-on impression of a SAE decrease subsequent to the ALZ dose-reduction amendment (applied on both ACT-1 and ACT-2) has been further confirmed by a larger cohort of patients treated at the lower ALZ dose level. The number of adverse events in the two study arms is now fairly comparable and adds further useful information to the previous reports on feasibility of stem cell harvest (Blood 2010;116: 2395) and hematopoietic recovery (Ann Oncol 2011;22(s4): 476) in ‘de novo' PTCL patients treated with a dose-dense ALZ-CHOP regimen followed by HDT/ASCT. Disclosures: Walewski: 4SC AG: Consultancy. Jantunen:Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.