Search

Managing patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysms is demanding yet fascinating, and requires a team effort. This invited talk presents lessons learned as our history with open and endovascular procedures evolved for 2578 descending and thoracoabdominal repairs over the past 20 years.Beginning in 1985 with an analysis of 596 traumatic aortic ruptures and the risk of spinal cord ischemia, the evolution of research and procedures for thoracoabdominal aneurysms progressed. The focus of these studies, medication trials, and procedure adjustments was on lowering the risk of spinal cord ischemia.Between January 2002 and December 2021, 2578 aneurysm repairs were performed. The respective mortality rates were 6.8% and 4.0% for all patients treated. The permanent spinal cord ischemia rates were 1.3% for open descending thoracic aortas and 4.9% for open thoracoabdominal aneurysms. A detailed analysis of open and thoracoabdominal repairs showed better long-term outcomes with open repairs.Through multiple randomized trials and innovations with procedures and techniques, the risk of death and spinal cord ischemia have been reduced. Long-term survival has also been improved. The pursuit of reducing the risks of descending and ascending thoracoabdominal repairs is a fascinating endeavor that has resulted in better patient outcomes. Nevertheless, this is a journey, and there will always be more room to achieve even better results.

Despite living closer to high-performing centers, minority patients reportedly receive care at lower-quality hospitals. Investigating opportunities for improvement at minority-serving hospitals may help attenuate disparities in care among cardiothoracic surgery patients. We sought to investigate the relationship between hospital quality and failure to rescue (FTR).Over 451,000 cardiac surgery patients from 2000 to 2011 at minority-serving hospitals (MSHs) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. After stratifying patients by hospital mortality quartile, outcomes at poorly performing MSHs were compared with those at high-performing MSHs. Propensity score matching was used for comparisons.Though patients at poorly performing centers were more likely Black, there were no significant differences in admission status (urgent vs elective), income, insurance, or risk before matching. There were no differences in comorbidities between low-performing and high-performing MSHs including chronic lung disease, coagulopathy, hypertension, and renal failure. While complications remained similar across mortality quartiles (29%, 32%, 31%, and 36%, respectively; P.0001), FTR increased in a stepwise manner (5.4%, 8.7%, 11.2%, and 15.5%, respectively; P.0001). The same was true after propensity score matching-FTR nearly tripled in the highest-mortality centers (14.4% vs 5.3%; P.0001), while complications only increased 1.2-fold from 31.1% to 36.7% (P = .0058). This finding persisted even when stratified by procedure type and by complication.Improving timely management of complications after cardiac surgery may serve as a promising opportunity for increasing quality of care at MSHs. When considering centralization of care in cardiac surgery, equal emphasis should be placed on collaboration between tertiary care centers and low-quality MSHs to mitigate disparities in care.

Owing to the opioid epidemic, more cardiac surgery patients present with opioid use disorder (OUD). A better understanding of national readmissions among these patients is necessary to improve outcomes and optimize resource utilization. We sought to examine the effect of OUD on readmission after cardiac surgery.Of 555 394 cardiac surgery patients from 2016 to 2017 in the Nationwide Readmissions Database, 6082 (1.1%) presented with OUD. These patients were assessed at 30, 90, and 180 days after discharge. The OUD patients and non-OUD patients were propensity score matched for patient- and procedure-level characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using the log rank test.First-time readmissions were significantly higher among patients with OUD (30 days 19.7% vs 15.7%, P = .04; 90 days 31.8% vs 24.2%, P.0001; and 180 days 42.3% vs 30.6%, P.0001). There was a trend toward higher reoperation by 180 days, with 90% of those being isolated valve surgery. By 180 days, significantly more OUD patients had three or more readmissions (7.8% vs 4.5%) compared with non-OUD patients. Yet, only 2.4% of OUD patients received any counseling or treatment for substance abuse during the index admission. The most common readmitting diagnosis was infection (55% vs 41%, P.0001) including endocarditis, prosthetic infections, and skin or subcutaneous infections. Respiratory failure, opioid overdose, and acute pain were also more common among patients with OUD.Cardiac surgery patients with OUD have multiple readmissions but are rarely provided adequate addiction management during their index admission. Greater emphasis on multidisciplinary management is necessary to limit costs and morbidity associated with readmission or reoperation.

Objective: Patients with thoracic aortic disease commonly present with concomitant multisegment pathology. We describe the patient population, analyze outcomes, and define the patient selection strategy for valve-preserving aortic root reimplantation (VPARR) combined with the arch procedure. Methods: From 2008 to 2018, 98 patients underwent VPARR combined with the aortic arch procedure (hemi-arch, 50% [ n = 49, limited repair]; total arch, 50% [ n = 49, complete repair] including 39 with elephant trunk). Indications for surgery were aneurysmal disease (61%) and aortic dissection (39%). The median follow-up was 17 months (IQR, 8 to 60 months). Results: There were no operative deaths or paraplegia, and 5 patients underwent re-exploration for bleeding. During follow-up, 2 patients required aortic valve replacement for severe aortic insufficiency at 1 and 5 years, and 4 patients died. In the limited repair group, 1 patient underwent reintervention for aortic arch replacement, whereas 4 patients underwent planned intervention (1 endovascular and 3 open thoracoabdominal aortic repair). In the complete repair group, 23 patients underwent planned intervention (15 endovascular and 8 open thoracoabdominal repair). Conclusions: Single-stage, complete, proximal aortic repair including VPARR combined with total aortic arch replacement is as safe and feasible to perform as limited arch repair and facilitates further intervention in carefully selected patients with diffuse aortic pathology at centers of expertise.

The COMMENCE trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of aortic valve replacement using a bioprosthesis with novel RESILIA tissue (Edwards Lifesciences). RESILIA tissue is incorporated in the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve (Edwards Lifesciences).Patients underwent clinically indicated surgical aortic valve replacement with a bovine pericardial bioprosthesis (model 11000A; Edwards Lifesciences) in a prospective, multinational, multicenter (n = 27), US Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial. Events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee, and echocardiograms were analyzed by an independent core laboratory. Outcomes through an observational period of 5 years are reported.Between January 2013 and March 2016, 689 patients received the study valve. Mean patient age was 66.9 ± 11.6 years; Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 2.0% ± 1.8%; and 23.8%, 49.9%, and 24.4% of patients were New York Heart Association functional class I, II, and III at baseline, respectively. Through December 11, 2020 the follow-up duration was 4.3 ± 1.4 years, and the completeness of follow-up over the observational period was 95.5%. Early (30 days) all-cause mortality was 1.2%, stroke 1.6%, and major paravalvular leak 0.1%. Five-year actuarial freedom from all-cause mortality, structural valve deterioration, and all-cause reintervention were 89.2%, 100%, and 98.7%, respectively. At 5 years the effective orifice area was 1.6 ± 0.5 cmThe safety and hemodynamic performance of this aortic bioprosthesis with RESILIA tissue through 5 years are encouraging, with clinically stable hemodynamics, minimal regurgitation, and no evidence of structural valve deterioration.

Background Transfemoral access is the most common approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, a subset of patients require alternative access. This study describes the evolution and outcomes of alternative-access TAVR at Cleveland Clinic. Methods From January 2006 to January 2019, 2446 patients underwent TAVR, 414 (17%) through alternative access (247 transapical, 95 transaortic, 56 transaxillary, 2 transcarotid, 10 transiliac, 4 transcaval). Patients undergoing alternative-access TAVR had high preoperative risk. Propensity-matched comparisons were targeted at comparing transfemoral versus transaxillary approaches since 2012. Results Over time, the favored alternative-access approach shifted from transapical and transaortic to transaxillary. Pacemaker requirement was similar for alternative-access and transfemoral approaches. Compared with transfemoral access, major vascular injuries were higher in the alternative-access group (12 [2.9%] vs 27 [1.3%], P = .02), but minor vascular injuries were lower (13 [3.1%] vs 198 [9.8%], P Conclusions The transaxillary approach has emerged as our preferred alternative-access strategy for TAVR. It is associated with superior operative outcomes compared with transthoracic approaches, and results are comparable with those of the transfemoral approach.

Objectives The COMMENCE trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an aortic bioprosthesis with novel RESILIA tissue (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif). Reports of early noncalcific valve failure resulting from thrombosis or leaflet tears in other valves warrant careful evaluation of early valve performance. Methods Patients underwent clinically indicated surgical aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Pericardial Aortic Bioprosthesis, Model 11000A (Edwards Lifesciences) in a prospective, multinational, multicenter (n = 27), single-arm, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial. Events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee; echocardiograms were analyzed by an independent core laboratory. Results Between January 2013 and March 2016, 689 patients received the study valve. Mean age was 67.0 ± 11.6 years. Mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was 2.0% ± 1.8%. Follow-up duration was 3.7 ± 1.2 years, with a total of 2533 patient years of follow-up and a median follow-up of 4 years. Early all-cause mortality was 1.2%, thromboembolism 2.3%, all bleeding 1.0%, and major paravalvular leak 0.1%. One- and 4-year actuarial freedom from all-cause mortality was 97.7% (95% confidence interval, 96.5%-98.8%) and 91.9% (95% confidence interval, 89.7%-94.1%), respectively. At 4 years, New York Heart Association functional class improved compared with baseline in 63.0%, effective orifice area was 1.5 ± 0.5 cm2, and mean gradient was 11.0 ± 5.6 mm Hg. Freedom from moderate or greater transvalvular insufficiency was 99.7%. There were no events of structural valve deterioration. Conclusions Safety and hemodynamic performance of this aortic bioprosthesis with RESILIA tissue at 4 years are favorable. This novel tissue does not appear to result in unexpected early thrombosis events or noncalcific structural valve deterioration.

Background A bioprosthesis- or mechanical-prosthesis–containing polyester graft (composite graft) is standard surgical management for aortic root aneurysms (Bentall procedure), but particularly in the young patient in whom a bioprosthesis is likely to deteriorate and a mechanical prosthesis mandates life-long anticoagulation, valve-sparing procedures have been devised. One such procedure involves reimplantation of the native aortic valve in the polyester graft. With focus on selecting the optimum procedure for young relatively asymptomatic patients, we compared outcomes of reimplantation of the aortic valve versus the Bentall procedure and identified factors influencing outcomes. Methods From January 2000 to January 2017, 643 adults age ≤ 70 with tricuspid aortic valves underwent elective aortic root replacement with either reimplantation (n = 448/70%) or a composite valve graft (Bentall) procedure (n = 195/30%). Outcomes were compared in 100 propensity-matched pairs. Results Patients with fewer symptoms, less aortic regurgitation (AR), higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and smaller cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio had a higher likelihood of valve repair with reimplantation (all p Conclusion Excellent aortic valve reimplantation results versus Bentall lead us to recommend reimplantation more often in patients who present with even moderately severe or severe AR and significantly enlarged aortic roots.

Objectives The study aims to investigate aortic histopathologic differences among patients undergoing aortic valve reimplantation, suggest different mechanisms of aortic root aneurysm pathogenesis, and identify factors associated with long-term success of reimplantation. Methods From 2006 to 2017, 568 adults who underwent reimplantation for repair of aortic root aneurysm, including patients with tricuspid aortic valves with no connective tissue disease (TAV/NoCTD, n = 314/568; 55.3%), bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs, n = 86/568; 15.1%), or connective tissue disease (CTD, n = 177/568; 31.2%), were compiled into three comparison groups. Patients with both BAV and CTD (n = 9/568; 1.6%) were omitted to increase study power. Patient records were analyzed retrospectively, focusing on pathology reports, which were available for 98.42% of patients, and were classified based on their descriptions of aortic tissue samples, primarily from the noncoronary sinus. Mean follow-up time available for patients was 2.97 years. Results Aortitis, medial fibrosis, and smooth muscle loss were more common histopathologic findings in patients with TAV/NoCTD than in patients with BAV and CTD (p Conclusion Despite some common histopathologic features among patients undergoing aortic valve reimplantation, there were enough distinguishing features among aortic tissue samples of TAV/NoCTD, BAV, and CTD patients to suggest that these groups develop root aneurysms by different mechanisms. No histopathologic features were able to predict the need for late reintervention on the aortic valve.

Background The value of allografts for aortic root replacement is controversial, with recent concern about limited durability. Currently, we prefer allografts for invasive infective endocarditis. Purposes of this study were to assess allograft performance and durability in our cumulative experience with aortic allografts. Methods From January 1987 to January 2017, 2042 adults received 2110 aortic allograft root replacements at our institution: 986 (47%) for infective endocarditis (669 [68%] for prosthetic valve endocarditis) and 1124 (53%) for other indications. Mean recipient age was 54 ± 15 years, and mean allograft donor age was 35 ± 13 years. Follow-up was 85% complete and comprised 17,253 patient-years of data. Longitudinal allograft performance was extracted from 6339 available echocardiographic studies. Durability was assessed by explant for allograft structural failure. Results Allograft mean gradient at hospital discharge was 6 mm Hg and 9, 13, and 15 mm Hg at 5, 10, and 15 years post-implant, respectively. Severe aortic regurgitation was 0% at hospital discharge, but 14%, 25%, and 35% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. A total of 405 allografts were explanted for structural failure, actuarially 2%, 14%, 34%, and 51% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Risk factors for structural failure were younger recipient age, larger body surface area, hypertension, and thoracic aorta disease; donor factors were older age and larger allograft size. Implant for infective endocarditis was not associated with accelerated structural failure. Conclusions This study affirms allografts’ long-term acceptable hemodynamic performance and durability. Concern about structural failure should not limit allograft use. Recipient hypertension, allograft size, and donor age are modifiable risk factors.

Reports of early failure of the Trifecta externally wrapped, bovine pericardial aortic valve prosthesis (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) raise concerns about its durability. This study evaluated the hemodynamic performance and explant of Trifecta valves compared with the PERIMOUNT bovine pericardial prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA).From October 2007 to July 2017, 2305 patients received a Trifecta bioprosthesis during aortic valve replacement at Cleveland Clinic. Trends in postoperative valve hemodynamics were assessed from 4971 transthoracic echocardiograms and valve explants by systemic follow-up. To compare outcomes, 2298 patients receiving a Trifecta valve were 1:1 propensity matched from 17,281 patients receiving a PERIMOUNT bioprosthesis.Mean age at implant was 69 years in both matched groups. Compared with PERIMOUNT valves, early transvalvular mean gradient of Trifecta valves was lower (11 vs 15 mm Hg at 1 year, P.001); however, its longitudinal rate of rise was greater (P.001), resulting in 5-year mean gradients of 17 vs 16 mm Hg, and more patients experienced severe aortic regurgitation (2.4% vs 0.81%; P.001). At 5 years, 35 Trifecta valves had been explanted vs 14 PERIMOUNT valves; freedom from explant at 1, 3, and 5 years was 98.9%, 98.0%, and 95.9%, respectively, for the Trifecta group vs 99.3%, 99.0%, and 98.7% for the PERIMOUNT group (P.001).Compared with an older-generation internally mounted bovine pericardial valve, the Trifecta externally wrapped bioprosthesis exhibits superior early hemodynamic performance, but has a rapid increase in transvalvular gradient and more aortic regurgitation, with lower freedom from explant at 5 years. These findings raise concern regarding long-term Trifecta durability despite favorable early hemodynamics.

Background This study compares outcomes of conventional and less-invasive (LI) approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR) using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Methods Between 2011 and 2017, we identified 122,474 patients undergoing isolated primary AVR. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: (1) full sternotomy (FS) (n = 98,549; 78%), (2) partial sternotomy (PS) (n = 17,306; 15%), and (3) right thoracotomy (RT) (n = 6619; 7%). Results The rate of LI-AVR increased from 17% in 2011 to 23% in 2016 (P Conclusions Less-invasive AVR is associated with an operative mortality and postoperative stroke rate similar to that of FS. Less-invasive AVRs should serve as a benchmark for comparison between transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical AVR in low-risk patients.

This study sought to identify the optimal temperature for moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest in patients undergoing elective hemiarch replacement with antegrade brain perfusion.The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database was queried for elective hemiarch replacements using antegrade brain perfusion for aneurysmal disease (2014-2019). Generalized estimating equations and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the risk-adjusted relationships between temperature as a continuous variable and outcomes.Elective hemiarch replacement with antegrade brain perfusion occurred in 3898 patients at 374 centers with a median nadir temperature of 24.9 °C (first quartile, third quartile = 22.0 °C, 27.5 °C) and median circulatory arrest time of 19 minutes (first quartile, third quartile = 14.0 minutes, 27.0 minutes). After adjustment for comorbidities, circulatory arrest time, and individual surgeon, patients cooled between 25 and 28 °C had an early survival advantage compared with 24 °C, whereas those cooled between 21 and 23 °C had higher risks of mortality compared with 24 °C. A nadir temperature of 27 °C was associated with the lowest risk-adjusted odds of mortality (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.91). A nadir temperature of 21 °C had the highest risk of mortality (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.73). Risk of experiencing a major morbidity was elevated in patients cooled between 21 and 23 °C, with the highest risk occurring in patients cooled to 21 °C (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.24).For patients with aneurysmal disease undergoing elective hemiarch with antegrade brain perfusion, circulatory arrest with a nadir temperature of 27 °C confers the greatest early survival benefit and smallest risk of postoperative morbidity.

Failure to rescue (FTR) is gaining popularity as a quality metric. The relationship between patient frailty and FTR after cardiovascular surgery has not been fully explored. This study aimed to utilize a national database to examine the impact of patient frailty on FTR.Of 5,199,534 patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery between 2000 and 2014, 75,851 (1.5%) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database as frail based on the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnoses indicator. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust for patient- and hospital-level characteristics and comorbidities when comparing frail and nonfrail patients.Frail patients were on average older (68 ± 12 years vs 65 ± 12 years; P.001) and had more comorbidities including heart failure, and chronic lung, liver, or renal disease. Among 68,472 matched pairs, frail patients had significantly higher rates of FTR (13.4% vs 11.9%; P .001). This contributed to a $39,796 increase in cost per hospitalization (P.001). Renal failure, respiratory failure, pneumonia, and sepsis were most commonly associated with FTR in frail patients. When hospitals were stratified by risk-adjusted mortality, low-mortality (1st quintile) centers had significantly lower FTR rates and costs among frail patients when compared to high-mortality (5th quintile) centers.Frailty contributes significantly to FTR after cardiovascular surgery. Frail patients can expect better outcomes with lower costs at cardiac surgical centers of excellence that can adequately manage postoperative outcomes. Preoperative assessment of frailty may better guide risk estimation and identification of patients who would benefit from appropriate prehabilitative interventions to optimize outcomes.

The ascending aorta has a unique microstructure and biomechanical properties that allow it to absorb energy during systole and return energy during diastole (Windkessel effect). Derangements in aortic architecture can result in changes to biomechanics and inefficiencies in function. Ultimately biomechanical failure may occur resulting in aortic dissection or rupture. By measuring aortic biomechanics with either in vivo or ex vivo methods, one may be able to predict tissue failure in patients with aortic disease such as aneurysms. An understanding of the biomechanical changes that lead to these tissue-level failures may help guide therapy, disease surveillance, surgical intervention, and aid in the development of new treatments for this deadly condition.

To determine mechanisms of early and late failure after mitral valve repair for degenerative disease, identify factors associated with re-repair, and evaluate durability of re-repair.From January 2008 to July 2020, 330 reoperations were performed for recurrent mitral valve dysfunction after initial valve repair for degenerative disease. Mechanisms of repair failure were determined by review of preoperative imaging and operative reports. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with likelihood of re-repair or replacement. Durability of re-repair was assessed using longitudinal analysis of postoperative echo data.Eighty-five of 330 (26%) reoperations were performed for early repair failure within 1 year and 245/330 (74%) for late failure thereafter. Suture/annuloplasty dehiscence, systolic anterior motion, hemolysis, and ventricular remodeling were more common mechanisms of early failure and disease progression and fibrosis late failure. Forty percent (34/85) of early failures were re-repaired versus 24% (59/245) of late failures. Re-repair was more common than replacement in recent years and was associated with earlier reoperation (median 1.5 vs 3.9 years; P = .0001). No in-hospital deaths occurred after re-repair; 2 patients (0.8%) died after valve replacement. Freedom from severe mitral regurgitation after re-repair was 93% at 7 years.Mitral valve re-repair can be performed with low rates of mortality and morbidity for early and late valve dysfunction. Mechanisms of early repair failure differ from those of late failure and are generally more amenable to re-repair. In selected patients who present after failed repair, we prefer mitral re-repair to valve replacement whenever technically feasible.

OBJECTIVESRepair outcomes of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) associated with ischaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) are inferior to functional TR in terms of TR recurrence and right ventricular (RV) reverse remodelling. Our objective is to analyse right versus left heart reverse remodelling after surgery for IMR-associated TR.METHODSFrom 2001 to 2011, 568 patients with severe IMR underwent mitral valve surgery (repair 87%, replacement 13%), and 131 had concomitant tricuspid valve repair. Median follow-up was 3.0 years; 25% of living patients were followed up for 6.3 years. Longitudinal analysis of 1527 follow-up echocardiograms was performed to assess ventricular reverse remodelling and function.RESULTSUnlike the left heart, the right heart failed to reverse remodel (failed to recover ventricular function or halt dilatation). During follow-up after surgery, the right ventricle continued to dilate while the left ventricle regressed in size. RV ejection fraction decreased (46% at 1 month and 44% at 5 years), while left ventricular ejection fraction increased (33% and 37%, respectively). RV strain showed early (−11% at 1 month) and late (−12% at 5 years) dysfunction. Patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair had worse RV function. Mitral regurgitation remained stable after surgical intervention, and TR gradually recurred (37% moderate, 20% severe at 7 years).CONCLUSIONSSurgical treatment of IMR and TR along with revascularization failed to induce reverse remodelling of the right heart. These findings warrant further investigations to identify optimal timing and approach of intervention for IMR-associated TR with respect to RV remodelling.

Primary tricuspid valve (TV) disease is rare and associated with high operative mortality. Optimal surgical planning requires a precise understanding of the pathological features; however, detailed imaging of the TV can be challenging. We present 4 cases of primary TV disease where 3-dimensional printing was pivotal to operative planning and success. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.), Graphical abstract

Background Little is known about graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed in patients on dialysis. Our aim was to assess patency of internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) in these patients. Methods From 1/1997 to 1/2018, 500 patients on dialysis underwent primary CABG with or without concomitant procedures at Cleveland Clinic, 40 of whom had 48 postoperative angiograms for recurrent ischemic symptoms. Complete follow-up was obtained on all but 1 patient lost to follow-up 1 y after CABG. Thirty-six ITA grafts and 65 SVGs were evaluable for stenosis and occlusion. Results Two of 40 patients (5%) had emergency CABG; 3 (7.5%) with calcified aortas had a change in operative strategy to avoid ascending aortic manipulation, 2 (5%) had poor conduit quality, and 12 (30%) had severe diffuse atherosclerotic disease with calcification of the coronary targets causing technical difficulties. Thirty-three patients (82%) were bypassed with an in situ ITA and 3 (7.5%) had a free ITA graft. Three of 36 ITA grafts were occluded at 0.78, 1.8, and 9.4 y (too few to model). SVG patency was 52% and 37% at 1 and 2 y, respectively. Conclusions Among patients on dialysis who underwent CABG, coronary angiography for ischemic symptoms in a select subset revealed that SVG patency was lower than expected from published reports in the general CABG population and may contribute to the poor prognosis of this cohort. Further work is needed to guide graft selection and improve graft patency in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND Cardiac surgery accounts for 10-15% of blood transfusions in the US, despite benefits and calls of limiting its use. We sought to evaluate the impact of a restrictive transfusion protocol on blood use and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing isolated primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS Blood conservation measures, instituted in 2012, include preoperative optimization, intraoperative anesthesia, and pump fluid restriction with retrograde autologous priming and vacuum-assisted drainage, use of aminocaproic acid and cell saver, intra- and postoperative permissive anemia, and administration of iron and low-dose vasopressors if needed. Medical records of patients who underwent isolated primary CABG from 2009 to 2012 (group A; n = 375) and 2013 to 2016 (group B; n = 322) were compared. RESULTS CABG with grafting to three or four coronary arteries was performed in 262 (70%) and 222 (69%) patients and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in 202 (54%) and 196 (61%) patients in groups A and B, respectively. Mean preoperative and intraoperative hematocrit was 40.3% and 40.7%, 28.9% and 29.4% in groups A and B, respectively. Total blood transfusion was 24% and 6.5%, intraoperative transfusion 11% and 1.2%, and postoperative transfusion 20% and 5.6% (P

Staphylococcus aureus remains the most common cause of sternal surgical site infections (SSIs). Opinions on the postoperative implications of preoperative methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) colonization currently differ. This study aimed to investigate whether MRSA carriage affects postoperative outcomes and safety of operation.A total of 1,774,811 cardiac surgical patients from 2009 to 2014 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database. Among these patients, 5798 (0.33%) were MRSA carriers. Propensity-score matching was used to determine the effect of MRSA colonization on outcomes.MRSA carriers did not differ in age or sex from noncarriers, but they more often presented for urgent surgery (P .001). Among matched pairs, there was no difference in mortality (P = .76), stroke, SSIs, pneumonia, renal failure, cardiac complications, respiratory failure, or prolonged mechanical ventilation. MRSA infection (P.001), MRSA septicemia (P = 0.03), and blood transfusion (P = .003) occurred more often among MRSA carriers. There was no increase in cost (P = .12), but the hospital length of stay was longer (P = .005). Predictors of MRSA infection among carriers included age older than 85 years, rural hospital location, and diabetes. Carriers with endocarditis and drug abuse were at highest risk for MRSA infection.MRSA carriers undergoing cardiac surgery are not at higher risk for mortality or SSIs and can expect outcomes similar to those of noncarriers. Higher rates of postoperative MRSA infection and septicemia among carriers, although still very low, support the need for selective preoperative screening and prophylaxis when possible.

Background The "weekend effect" is a purported phenomenon whereby patients admitted for time-sensitive medical and surgical conditions on a weekend suffer worse outcomes than those admitted on a weekday. There are limited data on the weekend effect for nonelective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods We studied outcomes for weekend vs weekday operations for all adult patients in the 2013 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) undergoing nonelective CABG. Results Of 101,510 patients undergoing nonelective CABG, 12,795 patients (12.6%) underwent CABG on the day of admission (n = 1230 for weekend and 11,565 for weekday admission, respectively). Patients undergoing surgical procedures on a weekend were more likely to have a diagnosis of ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (47.2% vs 20.2%, P Conclusions Patients undergoing CABG on a weekend had higher crude mortality but similar risk-adjusted mortality compared with their weekday counterparts. Some of the excess mortality observed for weekend operations is likely attributable to a sicker cohort of patients undergoing CABG on the weekend.

Background There are scant data on long-term clinical outcomes and bioprosthetic-valve function after transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) as compared with surgical aortic-valve r...

Increasing use of bioprostheses for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in younger patients, together with wider use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, necessitates understanding risks associated with surgical valve reintervention. Therefore, we sought to identify risks of reoperative SAVR compared with those of primary isolated SAVR.From January 1980 to July 2017, 7037 patients underwent nonemergency isolated SAVR, with 753 reoperations and 6284 primary isolated operations. These 2 groups were propensity score-matched on 46 preoperative variables, yielding 581 patient pairs for comparing outcomes.Among propensity score-matched patients, aortic clamp time (median 63 vs 52 minutes; P .0001), cardiopulmonary bypass time (median 88 vs 67 minutes; P .0001), and postoperative stay (median 7.1 vs 6.9 days; P = .003) were longer for reoperative SAVR than primary isolated SAVR. Hospital mortality after reoperative SAVR decreased from 3.4% in 1985 to 1.3% in 2011, similar to that of primary isolated SAVR. Occurrence of stroke, deep sternal wound infection, and new renal dialysis was similar. Blood transfusion (67% vs 36%; P .0001) and reoperations for bleeding/tamponade (6.4% vs 3.1%; P = .009) were more common after reoperative SAVR. Survival at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years was 94%, 82%, 64%, and 33% after reoperative SAVR and 95%, 86%, 72%, and 46% after elective primary isolated SAVR.Risk of mortality and morbidity after reoperative SAVR has declined and is now similar to that of primary isolated SAVR. Decisions regarding prosthesis choice and SAVR versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement should be made in the context of lifelong disease management rather than avoidance of reoperation.

Consensus has not been reached on whether or not to replace or preserve a well-functioning bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) in patients undergoing aortic replacement for the ascending phenotype of BAV aortopathy. We characterize morphology, evaluate progression of aortic regurgitation or aortic stenosis, and investigate the need for aortic valve replacement in patients whose well-functioning BAV was preserved during ascending aortic replacement ≥10 years prior.From January 1991 to August 2011, 191 patients with a well-functioning BAV underwent supracoronary aortic replacement (113 valves were minimally repaired). Aortic morphology was evaluated, aortic regurgitation grade and transvalvular aortic gradient modeled parametrically, and survival assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up was 10 years.Mean aortic diameter was 2.9 ± 0.53 cm at the annulus and 4.2 ± 0.55 cm at the sinuses. Mean maximum ascending diameter was 5.1 ± 0.49 cm. All patients exhibited a cusp-fusion BAV phenotype. Fifteen-year progression to severe aortic regurgitation was 3.2%. Mean aortic valve gradient began to rise 5 years postoperatively to 27 mm Hg by 14 years. Freedom from aortic valve replacement at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 100%, 95%, 83%, and 63%, respectively. Minimal valve repair was not associated with late aortic valve replacement. Fifteen-year survival was 74%.Preserving a well-functioning BAV should be considered in carefully selected patients undergoing aortic replacement for the ascending phenotype of BAV aortopathy. The valves remain durable in the long term, with slow progression of regurgitation or stenosis, and low probability of aortic valve replacement through 10 years.

Improved durability and preference to avoid anticoagulation have led to increasing use of bioprostheses in younger patients despite the need for eventual reoperation. Therefore, we compared in-hospital complications, reoperation, and survival after bioprosthetic and mechanical aortic valve replacement.From January 1990 to January 2020, 6143 patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement at Cleveland Clinic; 637 patients received a mechanical prosthesis and 5506 a bioprosthesis. Propensity matching identified 527 well-matched pairs (83% of possible matches) for comparison of perioperative outcomes. The average age of patients was 54 years in the bioprosthesis group and 55 years in the mechanical prosthesis group. Random Forest machine-learning analysis was performed to compare survival using the entire cohort of 6143 patients.Among matched patients, major in-hospital complications, including stroke, deep sternal wound infection, and reoperation for bleeding, were similar, as was in-hospital mortality (2 in the bioprosthesis group [0.38%] vs 3 in the mechanical prosthesis group [0.57%]; P .9). Patients receiving a bioprosthesis had shorter hospital stays (median 6 vs 7 days, P .0001). Fifty-one patients (32% at 14 years) in the bioprosthesis group and 17 patients in the mechanical prosthesis group (8% at 14 years) underwent reoperation (P [log-rank] .0001); 5-year survival after reoperation was 85% versus 82% (P = .6). Risk-adjusted Random Forest prediction of 18-year survival was 60% in the bioprosthetic group and 58% in the mechanical prosthesis group.Aortic valve bioprostheses are associated with excellent short-term outcomes and 18-year survival similar to that of patients receiving mechanical valves. Reoperation does not adversely affect survival. These results suggest that risk for reoperation alone should not deter the use of bioprostheses in younger patients.

Background Emergency surgery, blood transfusion, and reoperation for bleeding have been associated with increased operative morbidity and mortality. The recent increased use of direct oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet medications has made the above more challenging. In addition, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), with its associated hemodilution, fibrinolysis, and platelet consumption, may exacerbate the pre-existing coagulopathy and increase the risk of bleeding. Aim The aim of this study was to examine available literature with regard to treating patients who are on the above medications and require emergency cardiac surgery. Results Management decisions are typically made on a case-by-case basis. Surgery is delayed when possible, and less invasive percutaneous options should be considered if feasible. Attention is paid to exercising meticulous techniques, avoiding excessive hypothermia, and treating coexisting issues such as sepsis. Ensuring a dry operative field upon entry by correcting the coagulopathy with reversal agents is offset by the concern of potentially hindering efforts to anticoagulate the patient (heparin resistance) in preparation for CPB, in addition to possibly increasing the risk of thromboembolism. Conclusion Proper knowledge of anticoagulants, their reversal agents, and the usefulness of laboratory testing are all essential. Platelet transfusion remains the mainstay for antiplatelet medications. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is considered in patients on oral anticoagulants if CPB needs to be instituted quickly. Specific reversal agents such as idarucizumab and andexanet alfa can be considered if significant tissue dissection is anticipated, such as redo sternotomy, but are costly and may lead to heparin resistance and anticoagulant rebound.

To assess and compare patient-reported long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after combined proximal aortic (arch ± ascending, root) and distal aortic (descending thoracic ± abdominal) replacement using open vs multimodal/endovascular (hybrid) approaches. From 2010 to 2016, 146 adults underwent single- or multi-stage aortic arch plus descending thoracic aorta replacement, 31 open and 115 hybrid. The 2 surgical approach groups had similar preoperative characteristics and extent of surgery. Cross-sectional follow-up revealed 49 deaths (7 open, 42 hybrid). Of the 97 survivors, 72 (74%) responded to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 survey (18 open, 54 hybrid) a median 6.2 years (15th, 85th percentiles: 3.1, 7.9) after their last aortic surgery. Predictors of HRQoL scores were identified by random forest regression. Overall physical HRQoL T-score was lower than that of population norms (46 vs 50, P0.0001); mental HRQoL T-score was similar (50 vs 50, P0.9). Neither T-score was significantly different according to surgical approach (P ≥ 0.3). Greater number of postoperative complications and history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were the most important predictors of lower physical HRQoL, and prior myocardial infarction was the most important predictor of lower mental HRQoL. Although extensive aortic replacement had a small long-term effect on patient-reported physical HRQoL, both physical and mental HRQoL can be preserved in survivors with both surgical approaches. Surgeons should recommend the approach they believe will yield the best long-term survival, but lifelong follow-up is crucial, and patients should understand that they may require multiple operations.

Kommerell diverticulum (KD) is an uncommon congenital vascular anomaly. This study assessed outcomes of open and endovascular repair of this disorder.Between 1997 and 2016, 152 adult patients presented with KD at Cleveland Clinic (Cleveland, OH), 87 had no intervention, and 65 underwent open repair (n = 55; 19 elephant trunk [ET] procedures [9 with aortic dissection], including 7 frozen ET, and completions with 5 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs, 2 open, and 5 lost to follow-up) or endovascular procedures (n = 10). Non-ET open KD repairs consisted of resection (n = 15), interposition graft (n = 16), patch (n = 4), or aortopexy (n = 1). Maximum KD diameter was 2.1 cm for nonsurgical patients and 3.2 cm for surgical patients. Among surgical patients, 51 of 65 had dysphagia or dyspnea. A total of 608 patient-years of follow-up were available.For patients who underwent open and endovascular procedures, after multivariable adjustment, symptoms of dysphagia and hypertension predicted the likelihood of surgery (P.05, all). There was no operative mortality. Complications included nondisabling stroke (n = 5; 8%), tracheostomy (n = 3; 4.6%), vocal cord paralysis (n = 2; 3%), and reoperation for bleeding (n = 3; 4.6%). During follow-up, 3 of 10 patients treated with hybrid or endovascular procedures required reinterventions for endoleaks. One patient had residual symptoms after aortopexy. Among nonsurgical patients, 2 patients refused surgery, and 1 died of aortic rupture, with a 4.7-cm descending aorta and a 3.4-cm KD. Seven additional patients died of nonaortic comorbidities. The remaining patients were asymptomatic, with an aortic diameter smaller than 4.5 cm.Open and endovascular approaches have a high success rate and low mortality risk. Selection of the specific type of intervention should be based on patient anatomy, additional needed procedures, and comorbid conditions.

BACKGROUND AND AIM To compare outcomes of patients treated with inhaled epoprostenol and low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass with those who did not receive this medication in the operating room at all, and those who received it as a rescue therapy at the end of the case. METHODS Retrospective chart review between 2014 and 2017, follow-up included the entire hospital stay. RESULTS Seventy-one patients were included, and mean age was 54 years. 78.9% of the patients were male. Procedures included 96% (n = 68) aortic valve replacement, 28% (n = 20) reconstruction of the intravalvular fibrosa, and 13% (n = 9) repair of an endocarditis-related intracardiac fistula. Patients who received epoprostenol (iEpo) (treatment and rescue groups), when compared with the control group had more intra-aortic balloon pump placement (23% vs 2.5%, P = .018), open chest after surgery (32% vs 7.5%, P = .012), and duration of mechanical ventilation (8.3 ± 2.7 vs. 2.4 ± 0.4 days, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of extracorporeal circulatory support (6.5% vs 2.5%, P = .577) and hospital death (13% vs 10%, P = .72). In a subanalysis, hospital death and duration of mechanical ventilation were higher in the recue group when compared with the treatment group (P = .004 and .056, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic application of iEpo with low tidal volume ventilation for an anticipated complex endocarditis operation may contribute to favorable outcome when compared with postoperative epoprostenol rescue.