Search

Objective: The surgical strategy for falcotentorial junction tumors remains complex. Different approaches are selected according to the location and growth pattern of the tumor and the operator's experience. This report reviews our single-institution experience in the surgical management of falcotentorial junction tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging data, surgical strategy, and follow-up outcomes of 49 patients treated from 2007 to 2020. Result: All 49 patients (12 male, 37 female, mean age: 56.3 ± 11.3 years) underwent safe tumor resection. The most common complaints were headache (43%), dizziness (39%), and unstable gait (16%). Thirty percent of the tumors showed calcification, and the computed tomography scans revealed hydrocephalus in 36% of the patients. On magnetic resonance imaging, 43% of the tumors were unilateral. According to the Asari classification, the tumors were divided into inferior (16%), superior (29%), anterior (22%), and posterior (33%) types. The occipital interhemispheric approach (88%) and supracerebellar–infratentorial approach (10%) were primarily used to reach the tumors. The pathology examination results revealed that 85.7% of the tumors were meningioma and 14.3% were hemangiopericytoma. Of the 49 patients, 15 achieved a Simpson grade I resection, and 29 achieved a Simpson grade II resection. The follow-up rate was 77.6% (38/45); 94.7% of patients (36/38) achieved a favorable outcome, and 9 experienced tumor recurrences. Conclusion: Surgical approach selection depends on the growth characteristics of the tumor and the degree of venous or sinus involvement. The occipital interhemispheric approach is the most commonly used and safest approach for falcotentorial junction tumors with multiple brain pressure control assistance techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring has been widely used in brain or spine surgery to recognize potential damage of the pyramidal motor system. However, its ability to detect ischemic injury during middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm surgery remains unclear. A prospective cohort study was designed to evaluate MEP changes during MCA aneurysm surgery. Methods From January 2009 to August 2011, 89 patients underwent MCA aneurysm surgery and were prospectively divided into 2 groups: MEP monitoring group and control group. Based on an amplitude decrement of >50% or loss, a 2-stage warning criterion of MEP changes was established. Concomitant somatosensory evoked potential changes were also recorded. MEP changes occurred in 15 patients, and various methods were used to avoid continued brain ischemia. Indocyanine green angiography and Doppler ultrasonography were performed if needed. A head computed tomography scan was performed immediately and the day after the operation. Results At discharge, neither motor status nor Glasgow Coma Scale score was significantly different between the 2 groups. However, at the latest follow-up (mean, 31.9 months), motor status of the patients in the monitoring group was better ( P = 0.037). MEP monitoring was identified as an independent prognostic factor for motor outcome in long-term results by multivariate analysis ( P = 0.042). Both wave loss and >50% amplitude decrement of MEP monitoring showed good predictive value when used as part of a 2-stage warning criterion. Conclusions MEP monitoring is reliable for evaluation of the ischemic status of the pyramidal motor system during MCA aneurysm surgery and can improve surgical outcomes when used appropriately. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]