Search

There are conflicting reports in the literature comparing outcomes after open Ravitch and minimally invasive Nuss procedures for pectus excavatum repair, and there is relatively little data available comparing the outcomes of these procedures performed by thoracic surgeons.The 2010 to 2018 Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was queried for patients age 12 or greater undergoing open or minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Patients were stratified by operative approach. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with a composite outcome of 30-day complications.A total of 1,767 patients met inclusion criteria, including 1,017 and 750 patients who underwent minimally invasive pectus repair and open repair, respectively. Open repair patients were more likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or greater (24% vs 14%; P.001), have a history of prior cardiothoracic surgery (26% vs 14%; P.001), and require longer operations (median 268 vs 185 minutes; P.001). Open repair patients were more likely to require greater than 6 days of hospitalization (18% vs 7%; P.001), undergo transfusion (7% vs 2%; P.001), and be readmitted (8% vs 5%; P = .004). After adjustment, open repair was not associated with an increased risk of a composite of postoperative complications (odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.67-1.46). This finding persisted after propensity score matching (odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.67).Pectus excavatum repair procedure type was not associated with the risk of postoperative complications after adjustment. Further investigation is necessary to determine the impact of pectus excavatum repair type on recurrence and patient reported outcomes, including satisfaction, quality of life, and pain control.

Objective Hybrid arch procedures (arch vessel debranching with thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair [TEVAR] coverage of arch pathology) have been presented as an alternative to total arch replacement (TAR). But multicenter-based analyses of these two procedures are needed to benchmark the field and establish areas of improvement. Methods The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database from July 2014 to December 2015 was queried for elective TAR and hybrid arch procedures. Demographics and operative characteristics were compared and stepwise variable selection was used to create a risk-set used for adjustment of all multivariable models. Results A total of 1,011 patients met inclusion criteria, 884 underwent TAR, and 127 had hybrid arch procedures. TAR patients were younger (mean age: 62.7 ± 13.3 vs. 66.7 ± 11.9 years; p = 0.001) and had less peripheral vascular disease (34.0 vs. 49.6%; p Conclusion TAR remains the gold standard for elective aortic arch pathologies. Despite risk adjustment, hybrid arch procedures were associated with increased risk of mortality and stroke, advocating for careful adoption of these strategies.

Background This study describes the impact of organism and valve type on surgically managed infective endocarditis (IE) from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. We developed a risk model for surgically managed endocarditis that includes the microbiological organism. Methods The STS database was queried for adult patients with surgically managed endocarditis from July 1, 2011, to June 30, 2016. Outcomes were compared based on (1) causative microbiological organism, (2) valve type (native vs prosthetic), and (3) endocarditis on the right (tricuspid) vs left (mitral, aortic) sides. Univariate and risk adjusted models were developed with odds ratios for mortality for each organism type referenced against Streptococcus. Results The study population included 21,388 operations (93%) for left-sided IE and 1698 (7%) for right-sided IE. Streptococcus (28%) and Staphylococcus (27%) were the most common infecting organisms, followed by Enterococcus (11%). After multivariate adjustment, microbiological organism type was significantly associated with operative mortality for patients with left-sided endocarditis, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.9 for fungal, 1.4 for Staphylococcus, and 1.3 for culture-negative vs Streptococcus. For right-sided endocarditis, there were no differences in outcomes by organism type. Left-sided prosthetic valve endocarditis had a higher operative mortality than left-sided native valve endocarditis (12% vs 8%, P Conclusions Organism type influences the operative mortality for left-sided endocarditis. Surgery for left-sided and prosthetic valve endocarditis is associated with higher operative mortality. Risk adjustment for operative outcomes in endocarditis may need to account for microbiological organism type.

Objective:To investigate trends in long-term graft and patient outcomes following liver transplantation using grafts from donors ≥60 years old.Summary Background Data:The scarcity of donor livers has led to increased utilization of organs from donors ≥60 years old. However, few studies have examined

Background Unlike coronary artery bypass and aortic and mitral valve procedures, there is no predictive risk model for aortic root replacement procedures. As a first step toward development of a risk model, this study analyzed The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to determine factors predictive of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing elective aortic root replacement (ARR). Methods The STS database was queried (from July 2011 to June 2016) for elective ARR with the following exclusion criteria: urgent or salvage cases, endocarditis, redo cardiac surgery, circulatory arrest, and aortic arch surgery. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression models for outcomes of mortality and composite STS morbidity were performed using covariates of the STS aortic valve risk set (expressed as odds ratios [ORs]). Results Of 24,244 patients undergoing ARR, 8,807 (77.6% male) met inclusion criteria in 808 centers; 33.7% (n = 2,965) had a bicuspid aortic valve, and 3.7% (n = 327) had Marfan syndrome. The median age was 58.0 years (interquartile range, 49 to 67 years). Median intensive care unit and hospital stays were 46 hours and 6 days, respectively. Significant predictors for mortality included: atrial fibrillation (OR, 2.06), body surface area (OR, 0.14), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.2), New York Heart Association class IV (OR, 2.53), diabetes (OR, 2.48), coronary artery bypass grafting (OR, 2.77), mitral valve surgery (OR, ≥2.18), and Bentall operation (OR, 2.08). Regression analysis for risk factors for STS morbidity yielded 14 significant factors. A glomerular filtration rate increase of 20 units was predictive of improved mortality (OR, 0.85) and morbidity (OR, 0.91). Conclusions Elective ARR is performed with excellent postoperative outcomes. Analysis of the STS database reveals several significant risk factors that are independently associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The investigators anticipate that future studies inclusive of the nonelective ARR cases in the database will facilitate development of a risk model for root replacement procedures.

Background Subclavian artery revascularization is frequently performed in the setting of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). However, there is little information on the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing carotid to subclavian artery bypass in this clinical setting. As such, this study sought to define the early and late outcomes associated with this procedure. Methods Patients undergoing carotid-subclavian bypass in conjunction with TEVAR between June 2005 and September 2016 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained, single-center aortic surgery database. The 30-day outcomes specific to the carotid-subclavian bypass procedure were analyzed, including cervical plexus nerve injury, bleeding complications, and local vascular complications. All preoperative and postoperative chest radiographs were carefully analyzed to assess for hemidiaphragm elevation indicative of phrenic nerve palsy. Long-term outcomes included primary graft patency and anastomotic complications. Results Of 579 consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR during this time interval, 112 patients (19%) underwent concomitant carotid-subclavian bypass. The cohort was 38% female (n = 43), with a mean age of 65 ± 14 years. The majority of conduits were 8-mm polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (n = 107 [95.5%]), with a minority being reversed saphenous vein (n = 4 [3.6%]) or Dacron (n = 1 [0.9%]) grafts. The bypass procedure was done concurrently at the time of TEVAR in 91% (n = 102) of cases. The short-term complication rate attributed specifically to the carotid-subclavian bypass was 29% (n = 33). These complications included phrenic nerve palsy in 25% (n = 27), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in 5% (n = 6), axillary nerve palsy in 2% (n = 2), and neck hematoma requiring re-exploration in 1% (n = 1) of patients. The 30-day in-hospital all-cause mortality rate was 5% (n = 6), and the rate of permanent paraparesis or paraplegia was 0.9% (n = 1). Of the operative survivors (n = 106), follow-up imaging of the bypass graft was available in 87% (n = 92) of patients. Actuarial primary graft patency was 97% at 5 years. There were three patients (3%) with bypass graft occlusions, two of which were clinically silent and detected on follow-up imaging. The third was detected because of symptoms of subclavian steal and required repeated revascularization. Two patients (2%) developed a late anastomotic pseudoaneurysm requiring either endovascular (n = 1) or surgical (n = 1) intervention. Conclusions Carotid-subclavian bypass for revascularization of the subclavian artery performed in the setting of TEVAR is durable, although the true complication rate is likely higher than is generally reported in the literature because of a not insignificant rate of phrenic nerve palsy. These data should serve well as “gold standard” comparison data for emerging branch graft devices.

Background The primary surgical therapy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with obstruction is septal myectomy (SM). The current outcomes of SM with and without concomitant mitral operations in the United States was examined using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Methods From July 2014 through June 2017, 4,274 SM operations were performed. Emergent status, endocarditis, aortic stenosis, and planned aortic valve operations were excluded. In the final cohort of 2,382 patients, 1,581 (66.4%) received SM alone (group 1), and 801 (33.6%) had SM with mitral valve repair or replacement (group 2). Group 2 was subdivided into mitral valve repair (MVr [n = 500]) and mitral valve replacement (MVR [n = 301]). Baseline characteristics were compared and risk-adjusted operative mortality and major morbidity were evaluated between treatment groups. Results Baseline comorbidity was lower in group 1 versus group 2 and for MVr versus MVR. Operative mortality and major morbidity was lower for group 1 versus 2 (1.6% versus 2.8%, p = 0.046, and 10.9% versus 20.0%, p Conclusions Septal myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is safe. Septal myectomy alone may have risk-adjusted outcome advantages over SM with mitral valve repair or replacement. Septal myectomy and SM with MVr provide similar reduction in mitral regurgitation. Further longitudinal analyses are required to define technical efficacy and outcomes in selected pathoanatomic groups.

Objective:To determine whether surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy offers a survival advantage over concurrent chemoradiation for patients with cT1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC).Background:Although surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy is the recommended treatment for patients with cT1-2N0M0 SCLC

BACKGROUND. Lobar resection is the gold standard therapy for medically fit patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, considerable variability exists in the use of surgical therapy. This study tested the hypothesis that center-based variation in the use of surgical therapy affects survival in NSCLC. METHODS. We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with stage I NSCLC. Mixed-effects multivariable models were developed to establish the percenter adjusted rate of surgical therapy. Patients were stratified into quartiles based on the treating center’s adjusted rate of surgical therapy. Survival was estimated and then tested by using Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were developed to estimate the effect of rate of surgical therapy on overall survival. RESULTS. A total of 139,802 patients met the criteria. There was wide variation in the per-center rate of surgical resection in the highest (80.8%) versus lowest (41.4%, p < 0.001) quartile. Across cohorts, patients were similar in age (mean 68.8 years in the highest quartile versus 69.7 in the lowest quartile) and Charlson-Deyo Score of 2 or greater (15.1% in the highest quartile versus 14.4% in the lowest quartile). Five-year survival was higher for patients treated at high-use centers (52.7% versus 36.7%, p < 0.001). After adjustment, an adjusted rate of surgical therapy in the lowest 25th percentile was associated with lower survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.37 to 1.40, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Treatment at a center with a higher rate of surgical therapy confers a considerable survival advantage, even after adjustment for hospital volume, surgical approach, and other confounders. Targeted efforts to improve adherence to guidelines about provision of surgical therapy in early-stage NSCLC may represent a meaningful opportunity to improve outcomes.

Revascularization is standard therapy for patients who present with acute myocardial infarction. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains a critical option for revascularization specifically in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Certain clinical or patient factors should help in deciding whether coronary artery bypass graft surgery is appropriate for an individual case as supported by international guidelines. Where coronary artery bypass graft surgery is indicated, perioperative management of the patient should be optimized to ensure the best outcomes while minimizing risk. This chapter discusses the surgical management of patients with acute myocardial infarction, specifically, perioperative management and indications for revascularization.

Objective The best method of aortic root repair in older patients remains unknown given a lack of comparative effectiveness of long-term outcomes data. The objective of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of different surgical approaches for aortic root repair in Medicare patients using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database-Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services–linked data. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed by querying the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database for patients aged 65 years or more who underwent elective aortic root repair with or without aortic valve replacement. Primary long-term end points were mortality, any stroke, and aortic valve reintervention. Short-term outcomes and long-term survival were compared among each root repair strategy. Additional risk factors for mortality after aortic root repair were assessed with a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 4173 patients aged 65 years or more underwent elective aortic root repair. Patients were stratified by operative strategy: mechanical Bentall, stented bioprosthetic Bentall, stentless bioprosthetic Bentall, or valve-sparing root replacement. Mean follow-up was 5.0 (±4.6) years. Relative to mechanical Bentall, stented bioprosthetic Bentall (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; confidence interval, 0.66-0.97) and stentless bioprosthetic Bentall (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.59-0.84) were associated with better long-term survival. In addition, stentless bioprosthetic Bentall (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.64; confidence interval, 0.47-0.80) and valve-sparing root replacement (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.51; confidence interval, 0.29-0.90) were associated with lower long-term risk of stroke. Aortic valve reintervention risk was 2-fold higher after valve-sparing root replacement compared with other operative strategies. Conclusions In the Medicare population, there was poorer late survival and greater late stroke risk for patients undergoing mechanical Bentall and a higher rate of reintervention for valve-sparing root replacement. Bioprosthetic Bentall may be the procedure of choice in older patients undergoing aortic root repair, particularly in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Background Results of hybrid arch repair (HAR) using the native zone 0 proximal landing zone (PLZ) have been unsatisfactory in many series, especially in the setting of ascending aortic dilation (>4.0 cm). This study reports early and late outcomes of planned two-stage HAR with open first-stage proximal aortic replacement, followed by second-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with PLZ within the Dacron-replaced zone 0. Methods Between January 2006 and August 2017, 34 patients underwent planned two-stage HAR. The first-stage proximal aortic replacement included ascending aorta (with or without valve, with or without root) and total arch replacement, which was performed with creation of an elephant trunk in 22 patients (65%) and without an elephant trunk in 12 (35%). Primary outcomes included 30-day/in-hospital results and Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall/aorta-specific survival and freedom from reintervention. Results Mean age was 59 ± 12 years. Both stages of repair were completed in a single hospitalization in 53% of patients, including operations done since January 2012. The 30-day/in-hospital rates of mortality, stroke, permanent paraparesis/plegia, and new dialysis were 6%, 3%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier overall and aorta-specific survivals at 5 years were 63% and 94%, respectively, with 5-year freedom from reintervention of 78%. Conclusions Planned two-stage HAR with open first-stage proximal aortic replacement, followed by second-stage TEVAR with Dacron-replaced PLZ yields excellent short-term and long-term results, including low rates of reintervention likely due to the long-segment PLZ within the Dacron-replaced aorta. The technique should be considered in patients with even mild (>4.0 cm) ascending aortic dilation in whom HAR is otherwise the preferred treatment option.

After pediatric heart operations, we sought to determine the incidence of unplanned cardiac reinterventions during the same hospitalization, assess risk factors for these reinterventions, and explore associations between reinterventions and outcomes. We hypothesized that younger patients undergoing more complex operations would be at greater risk for unplanned cardiac reinterventions and that operative mortality and postoperative length of stay (PLOS) would be greater in patients who undergo reintervention than in those who do not.Patients aged 18 years or younger in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (January 2010 to June 2015) were included. We used multivariable regression to evaluate risk factors for unplanned cardiac reintervention (operation or therapeutic catheterization) and associations of reintervention with operative mortality and PLOS.Of 84,404 patients (117 centers), 21% were neonates and 36% infants. An unplanned cardiac reintervention was performed in 5.4% of patients, including 11.8% of neonates, 5.2% of infants, and 2.8% of children. Independent risk factors for unplanned reintervention included presence of noncardiac anomalies/genetic syndromes, nonwhite race, younger age, lower weight among neonates and infants, prior cardiothoracic operations, preoperative mechanical ventilation, other Society of Thoracic Surgeons preoperative risk factors, and higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Mortality Category (adjusted p0.001 for all). Unplanned reintervention was a risk factor for operative mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 4.8 to 5.8; p0.001) and longer PLOS (adjusted relative risk, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.2 to 2.4; p0.001).Unplanned cardiac reinterventions are not rare, particularly in neonates, and are independently associated with operative mortality and increased PLOS. Patients at greater risk may be identified preoperatively, presenting opportunities for quality improvement.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is employed to rescue patients with early graft dysfunction after lung transplantation (LTx). Rates of post-LTx ECMO and subsequent outcomes have been limited to single-center reports.UNOS registry was queried for LTx recipients from March 2015 to March 2016; 2,001 recipients were identified and stratified by need for post-LTx ECMO. Logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with post-LTx ECMO. Cox proportional hazards modeling identified factors associated with survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing was employed for survival analysis.Of 2,001 recipients identified, 107 required post-LTx ECMO (5.1%). Recipients requiring ECMO were younger (56 vs 60 years, p = 0.007) and had higher body mass index (27.2 vs 25.8, p = 0.012). Recipients requiring post-LTx ECMO were more likely to have required mechanical ventilation before transplant (9.3% vs 4.9%, p = 0.049) and were more likely to have required pre-transplant ECMO (15% vs 3.7%, p0.001). On multivariable analysis, pre-transplant ECMO and increasing ischemic time were associated with post-LTx ECMO. Six-month survival for recipients requiring ECMO was 62.2%. On multivariable analysis, need for post-transplant dialysis was associated with mortality. Six-month survival for recipients requiring ECMO with and without dialysis was 25.8% and 86.7% (p0.001).In a nationally representative database, ischemic time and pre-transplant ECMO and/or ventilator requirement were associated with need for post-LTx ECMO. Need for post-transplant dialysis was associated with mortality in patients requiring post-LTx ECMO. These data may permit improved prediction of graft dysfunction. Strategies to minimize renal toxicity in the perioperative phase may lead to improved early survival post-LTx.

Treatment guidelines recommend surgical resection in select cases of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but are based on limited evidence. This study evaluated outcomes associated with surgery in stage IV disease.Factors associated with survival of stage IV NSCLC patients treated with surgery in the National Cancer Date Base (2004-2013) were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Outcomes of the subset of patients with cT1-2, N0-1, M1 and cT3, N0, M1 disease treated with surgery or chemoradiation were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses.The five-year survival of all stage IV NSCLC patients who underwent surgical resection (n=3098) was 21.1%. Outcomes were related to the locoregional extent of the primary tumor, as both increasing T status (T2 HR 1.30 [p0.001], T3 HR 1.28 [p0.001], and T4 HR 1.28 [p0.001], respectively, compared to T1) and nodal involvement (N1 HR 1.34 [p0.001], N2 HR 1.50 [p0.001], and N3 HR 1.49 [p0.001], respectively, compared to N0) were associated with worse survival. Outcomes were also related to the extent of surgical resection, as pneumonectomy (HR 1.58, p0.001), segmentectomy (HR 1.36, p=0.009), and wedge resection (HR 1.70, p0.001) were all associated with decreased survival when compared to lobectomy. The five-year survival of cT1-2, N0-1, M1 and cT3, N0, M1 patients was 25.1% (95% CI: 22.8-27.5) after surgical resection (n=1761) and 5.8% (95% CI: 5.2-6.5) after chemoradiation (n=8180).Surgery for cT1-2, N0-1, M1 or cT3, N0, M1 disease is associated with a 5-year survival of 25% and does not appear to compromise outcomes when compared to non-operative therapy, supporting guidelines that recommend surgery for very select patients with stage IV disease. However, surgery provides less benefit and should be considered much less often for stage IV patients with mediastinal nodal disease or more locally advanced tumors.

To determine the frequency and risk factors for non-home discharge (NHD) and its association with clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) at 1 year following cardiac surgery in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR).Discharge disposition was evaluated in 552 patients enrolled in trials of severe or moderate IMR. Patient and in-hospital factors associated with NHD were identified using logistic regression. Subsequently, association of NHD with 1-year mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs), and QOL was assessed.NHD was observed in 30% (154/522) with 25% (n = 71/289) in moderate and 36% (n = 83/233) in patients with severe IMR (unadjusted P = .006), a difference not significant after including age (5-year change: adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.72; P .001), diabetes (adjOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.27-2.94; P = .002), and previous heart failure (adjOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.06-2.52; P = .03). Odds of NHD were increased for patients with postoperative SAEs (adjOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.19-2.86; P = .01) but not based on type of cardiac surgery. Greater rates of death and SAEs were observed in NHD patients at 1 year: adjusted hazard ratio, 4.29 (95% CI, 2.14-8.59; P .001) and adjusted rate ratio, 1.45 (95% CI, 1.03-2.02; P = .03), respectively. QOL did not differ significantly between groups.NHD is common following surgery for IMR, influenced by older age, diabetes, previous heart failure, and postoperative SAEs. These patients may be at greater risk of death and subsequent SAEs after discharge. Discussion of NHD with patients may have important implications for decision-making and guiding expectations following cardiac surgery.

Lung cancer ranks as the top cancer killer in the United States. Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (GTSD), the geographic variability of lung cancer lobectomy for operative mortality and major morbidity were examined.From January 2009 to June 2015, the GTSD lung cancer lobectomy records (excluding robotic procedures) were assigned to a US Census region using hospital location. Surgeons performing fewer than seven lung cancer lobectomies per year were categorized as "low volume." The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group criteria were used to classify patients as "high risk." Applying the published GTSD risk algorithms, regional unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were computed using univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression. Across geographic regions, patient risk factors and outcomes were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and χFrom 2009 to 2015, there were 39,078 lung cancer lobectomies that met study inclusion criteria (31.5% Northeast, 23.5% Midwest, 31.1% South, and 14.0% West). Fewer high-risk cases were seen in the West region (18.9% Northeast, 19.6% Midwest, 19.9% South, and 15.9% West; p 0.001). Across geographic regions, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of low-volume surgeons (39.8% Northeast, 44.8% Midwest, 45.8% South, and 56.3% West; p = 0.0512). Adjusted odds ratios for operative mortality and major perioperative morbidity did not show statistically significant differences across regions (p = 0.761 and p = 0.600, respectively).Despite geographic variations in the proportion of high-risk lobectomies, the risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity outcomes did not vary by region.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal timing of surgical resection of oesophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS nCRT before resection of oesophageal adenocarcinoma yields improved overall and progression-free survival. Despite the wide acceptance of tri-modal therapy, the optimal timing of surgical resection after nCRT is not well defined and existing studies are limited. Adults with Stage II/III oesophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing nCRT before surgery were identified from the National Cancer Database. Multivariable analysis using restricted cubic splines was used to identify an inflection point in clinical outcomes as a function of time between nCRT and surgery, dividing the cohort into short- and long-interval treatment groups, which were then compared. Adjusted rates of survival and margin status were compared between groups using multivariable analysis. RESULTS Among 2444 patients, restricted cubic splines identified an inflection point at 56 days, dividing our cohort into 1533 short-interval and 911 long-interval patients. Long-interval patients had a higher adjusted incidence of pathologic downstaging (odds ratio 1.38, confidence interval 1.02-1.85, P = 0.04) but no difference in margin positivity compared with short-interval patients (odds ratio 0.91, confidence interval 0.56-1.47, P = 0.69). Worse overall survival was noted in the long-interval subgroup (hazard ratio 1.44, confidence interval 1.22-1.71, P

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors and outcome implications for 30-day hospital readmission in lung transplant recipients.We conducted a retrospective cohort study of lung transplant cases from a single, high-volume lung transplant program between January 2000 and March 2012. Demographic and health data were reviewed for all patients. Risk factors for 30-day readmission (defined as readmission within 30 days of discharge from index lung transplant hospitalization) were modeled using logistic regression, with selection of parameters by backward elimination.The sample comprised 795 patients after excluding scheduled readmissions and in-hospital deaths. Overall 30-day readmission rate was 45.4% (n = 361). Readmission rates were similar across different diagnosis categories and procedure types. By univariate analysis, post-operative complications that predisposed to 30-day readmission included pneumonia, any infection, and atrial fibrillation (all p0.05). In the final multivariate model, occurrence of any post-transplant complication was the most significant risk factor for 30-day readmission (odds ratio = 1.764; 95% confidence interval, 1.259-2.470). Even for patients with no documented perioperative complication, readmission rates were still35%. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multi-variate regression modeling to assess readmission as a predictor of long-term outcomes showed that 30-day readmission was not a significant predictor of worse survival in lung recipients.Occurrence of at least 1 post-transplant complication increases risk for 30-day readmission in lung transplant recipients. In this patient population, 30-day readmission does not predispose to adverse long-term survival. Quality indicators other than 30-day readmission may be needed to assess hospitals that perform lung transplantation.

Objective:To determine the impact of race and insurance on use of minimally invasive (MIS) compared with open techniques for rectal cancer in the United States.Background:Race and socioeconomic status have been implicated in disparities of rectal cancer treatment.Methods:Adults undergoing MIS (lapar

The timing of operative revascularization for patients with concomitant carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease remains controversial. We examined the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to evaluate the association of combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with postoperative outcomes.All patients undergoing CABG with known carotid stenosis of80% were identified from 2011 to 2016. Individuals were stratified by use of cardiopulmonary bypass and whether a concomitant CEA was performed at the time of CABG. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the probability of combined CABG and CEA. The resulting propensity scores were used to match individuals on the basis of clinical and operative characteristics to evaluate primary (30-day mortality and in-hospital transient ischemic attack and stroke) and secondary (STS morbidity composite events and length of stay) end points, with P .05 required to declare statistical significance.After propensity score matching, 994 off-pump CABG patients (497 CABG only and 497 CABG-CEA) and 5952 on-pump CABG patients (2976 CABG only and 2976 CABG-CEA) were identified. For patients who received on-pump operations, those undergoing CABG-CEA had no observed difference in rate of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.21; P = .6), higher incidence of STS morbidity composite events (OR, 1.15, 95% CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03), longer length of stay (7.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days vs 6.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-9.0] days; P .005), and no observed difference in 30-day mortality (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.97-1.69; P = .08) compared with those undergoing CABG only. For off-pump procedures, CABG-CEA patients had no observed difference in rate of in-hospital stroke (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.69; P = .56) compared with those undergoing CABG only.Whereas the differences are relatively small, these data suggest that a combined CABG-CEA approach is unlikely to provide significant stroke reduction benefit compared with CABG only. However, comparison with staged approaches merits further investigation.

BACKGROUND Lung transplantation offers a survival benefit for patients with end-stage lung disease. When suitable donors are identified, centers must accept or decline the offer for a matched candidate on their waitlist. The degree to which variability in per-center offer acceptance practices impacts candidate survival is not established. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of variability in per-center rates of lung transplantation offer acceptance and to ascertain the associated contribution to observed differences in per-center waitlist mortality. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of candidates waitlisted for lung transplantation in the US using registry data. Logistic regression was fit to assess the relationship of offer acceptance with donor, candidate, and geographic factors. Listing center was evaluated as a fixed effect to determine the adjusted per-center acceptance rate. Competing risks analysis employing the Fine-Gray model was undertaken to establish the relationship between adjusted per-center acceptance and waitlist mortality. RESULTS Of 15,847 unique organ offers, 4,735 (29.9%) were accepted for first-ranked candidates. After adjustment for important covariates, transplant centers varied markedly in acceptance rate (9%–67%). Higher cumulative incidence of 1-year waitlist mortality was associated with lower acceptance rate. For every 10% increase in adjusted center acceptance rate, the risk of waitlist mortality decreased by 36.3% (sub-distribution hazard ratio 0.637; 95% confidence interval 0.592–0.685). CONCLUSIONS Variability in center-level behavior represents a modifiable risk factor for waitlist mortality in lung transplantation. Further intervention is needed to standardize center-level offer acceptance practices and minimize waitlist mortality.

A 68-year-old man presented with back pain after falling from a ladder and was found to have anterolisthesis of thoracic vertebrae T11-12 with secondary focal aortic injury and disruption of the aortic wall. This was successfully repaired using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) followed by spinal fusion with excellent result.

Background. Simultaneous heart-liver (SHL) transplantation is an efficacious therapeutic modality for patients with combined heart and liver failure. However, the extent to which heart transplantation followed by sequential liver transplantation (LAH) can match the benefit of simultaneous transplantation has not previously been examined. Our objective was to determine if LAH offers comparable survival to SHL. Methods. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research file was queried for adult recipients waitlisted for both heart and liver transplantation. The United Network for Organ Sharing thoracic and liver databases were linked to facilitate examination of waitlist and transplant characteristics for simultaneously listed patients. Univariate survival analysis was used to determine overall survival. Results. Of the 236 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 200 underwent SHL, 7 sequentially underwent LAH, and 29 received heart transplantation only (isolated orthotopic heart transplantation [iOHT]). Recipients of SHL were less likely to have an episode of acute rejection before discharge (LAH, 14.2%; SHL, 2.4%; iOHT, 3.6%; P = .019) or be treated for acute rejection within 1 year after transplantation (LAH, 14.3%; SHL, 2.5%; iOHT, 13.8%; P = .007). Otherwise, postoperative hospital length of stay, stroke, need for dialysis, and need for pacemaker placement were comparable across groups. Ten-year survival similarly favored both LAH and SHL over iOHT (LAH: 100%, 71.4%, 53.6%; SHL: 87.1%, 80.4%, 52.1%, iOHT: 70.1%, 51.6%, 27.5% for 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals, respectively, P = .003). However, median time between heart and liver transplant was 302 days in patients undergoing sequential transplantation. Conclusions. Although transplantation in a simultaneous or sequential fashion yields equivalent outcomes, a high fraction of patients undergoing initial heart transplant alone fail to proceed to subsequent liver transplantation. Therefore, in patients with combined heart and liver failure with a projected need for 2 allografts, simultaneous transplantation is associated with maximum benefit.

Foramen of Winslow hernia (FWH) is an extremely rare entity accounting for up to 8% of internal hernias and 0.08% of all hernias. Only 150 cases of FWH have been described in the literature to date with a peak incidence between the third and sixth decades of life. Three main mechanisms seem to be implicated in the FWH pathogenesis: (a) excessive viscera mobility, (b) abnormal enlargement of the foramen of Winslow, and (c) changes in the intra-abdominal pressure. The presence of an abnormally long bowel, enlargement of the right liver lobe or cholecystectomy, a "wandering cecum," and defects of the gastrohepatic ligaments are some reported predisposing factors. Timely diagnosis through computed tomography facilitates the appropriate treatment before complications are evident. Although open repair has been mostly utilized, recently laparoscopic approach seems to gain ground due to the encouraging preliminary results. To date, the debate continues as to whether prophylactic measures to prevent recurrence of the FWH need to be undertaken: closure of the foramen, fixation of the highly mobilized viscera, or both.

National outcomes of robotic mitral valve repair (rMVr) compared with sternotomy (sMVr) in older patients are currently unknown.From 2011 to 2014, all patients aged 65 years and older undergoing MVr in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database linked to Medicare claims data were identified. Patients who underwent rMVr were propensity matched to patients who underwent sMVr. Standard differences and falsification outcome of baseline characteristics were tested to ensure a balanced match. Cox models were used to calculate 3-year mortality, heart failure readmission, and mitral valve reintervention, adjusting for competing risks where appropriate.After matching, 503 rMVr patients from 65 centers and 503 sMVr from 251 centers were included. There were no significant differences in comorbidities or falsification outcome. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were longer with rMVr versus sMVr at 125 versus 102 minutes (p0.0001) and 85 versus 75 minutes (p0.0001), respectively. The rMVr patients had shorter intensive care unit (27 vs 47 hours, p0.0001) and hospital stay (5 vs 6 days, p0.0001), less frequent transfusion (21% vs 35%, p0.0001), and less atrial fibrillation (28% vs 40%, p0.0001). Three-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 2.16; p = 0.52), heart failure readmission (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 2.52, p = 0.10), and mitral valve reintervention (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 1.18; p = 0.22) did not differ between the groups.The rMVr procedure was associated with less atrial fibrillation, less frequent transfusion requirement, and shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay, without a significant difference in 3-year mortality, heart failure readmission, or mitral valve reintervention. In older patients, rMVr confers short-term advantages without a detriment to midterm outcomes.

Purpose Lung transplantation (LTx) offers a survival benefit for patients with end-stage lung disease. When suitable donors are identified, centers must accept or decline the offer for a matched candidate on their waitlist. The degree to which center-level variability in organ acceptance impacts candidate survival is not established. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of candidates aged ≥ 12 waitlisted for isolated LTx in the US using UNOS/OPTN data from May 2007 to May 2017. Centers that never had candidates ranked first on a match run >10 times in a year were excluded. Logistic regression was fit to assess the relationship of offer acceptance with donor-, candidate-, and geographic factors. Listing center was evaluated as a fixed effect to determine the adjusted per-center acceptance rate. Competing risks analysis employing the Fine-Gray model was undertaken to ascertain the relationship between the adjusted per-center acceptance rate and waitlist mortality. Results Of 15,847 unique organ offers, 4,735 (29.9%) were accepted for the first-ranked patients. After adjustment for important covariates, transplant centers varied markedly in acceptance rate practices (9% to 67%). Higher cumulative incidence of 1-year waitlist mortality was associated with lower acceptance rate (Figure 1). For every 10% increase in adjusted center acceptance rate, the risk of waitlist mortality decreased by 36.3% (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.637; CI 0.592, 0.685). Importantly, high-acceptance centers that accepted ≥ 40% of their first-ranked offers had improved 1-year post-transplant survival compared to centers with adjusted organ acceptance rates Conclusion Variability in center-level behavior potentially represents the largest modifiable risk factor for prolonged waitlist times and mortality in LTx. Further intervention is needed to standardize center-level organ offer acceptance practices and minimize waitlist mortality at the national level.

Background The optimal surgical approach for management of acute type A aortic dissection remains controversial. This study aimed to assess outcomes of reoperation after acute type A dissection repair to help guide decision making around index operative strategy. Methods and Results All aortic reoperations (n=129) at a single referral institution from August 2005 to April 2016 after prior acute type A dissection repair were reviewed. The primary outcome was 30‐day or in‐hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included organ‐specific morbidity and 1‐ and 5‐year outcomes as estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The majority of initial reoperations were proximal aortic (aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending) or aortic arch procedures (62.5%, n=55); most initial reoperations were performed in the elective setting (83.1%, n=74). Additional nonstaged second or more reoperations were required in 21 patients (23.6%) after the initial reoperation, during a median follow‐up of 2.5 years after the initial reoperation. Thirty‐day or in‐hospital mortality for all reoperations was 7.0% (elective: 6.3%; nonelective: 11.1%) with acceptable rates of organ‐specific morbidity, given the procedural complexity. One‐ and 5‐year overall survival after initial reoperation was 85.9% and 64.9%, respectively, with aorta‐specific survival of 88% at 5 years. Conclusions Reoperation after acute type A aortic dissection repair is associated with low rates of mortality and morbidity. These data support more limited index repair for acute type A dissection, especially for patients undergoing index repair in lower volume centers without expertise in extensive repair, because reoperations, if needed, can be performed safely in referral aortic centers.

Background Although the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pathologically node-positive (pN+) atypical carcinoid tumor of the lung is an accepted practice, controversy exists about its use in pathologically node-negative (pN0) patients. Our aim was to determine whether a survival advantage exists in patients receiving chemotherapy postoperatively for pN0 or pN+ atypical carcinoid tumors of the lung. Methods Adult patients treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy for pulmonary atypical carcinoid tumor were identified using the National Cancer Data Base, 2006 to 2011. Propensity scoring (4:1 nearest neighbor algorithm) and survival analysis were used to examine the association between adjuvant chemotherapy and pN+ versus pN0 atypical carcinoid tumors. Results Of the total 581 patients identified with a diagnosis of atypical carcinoid of the lung, 363 (62.5%) were found to be node negative at the time of operation and 218 (37.5%) had node-positive disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used in 15 patients (4.1%) with pN0 disease and 89 patients (40.8%) with pN+ disease. Unadjusted survival, at 12 and 60 months, was similar between pN+ patients who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy versus patients who received operation alone (adjuvant chemotherapy: 98.9% at 12 months and 47.9% at 60 months versus operation alone: 98.4% and 12 months and 67.1% at 60 months, p = 0.46) and for propensity-matched pN0 (adjuvant chemotherapy: 86.7% at 12 months and 73.3% at 60 months versus operation alone: 87.9% at 12 months and 72.3% at 60 months, p = 0.54). Conclusions In a national-level analysis, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy postoperatively in patients with pN+ and pN0 disease conferred no survival advantage; further study is needed to determine proper chemotherapy use for these patients.

Objective Since thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of descending thoracic aneurysms in March 2005, excellent 30-day and midterm outcomes have been described. However, data on long-term outcomes are lacking with Medicare data suggesting that TEVAR has worse late survival compared with open descending repair. As such, the purpose of this study was to examine the long-term outcomes for on-label use of TEVAR for repair of descending thoracic aneurysms. Methods Of 579 patients undergoing TEVAR between March 2005 and April 2016 at a single referral center for aortic surgery, 192 (33.2%) were performed for a descending thoracic aneurysm indication in accordance with the device instructions for use, including 106 fusiform (55.2%), 80 saccular (41.7%), and 6 with both saccular and fusiform (3.1%) aneurysms. All aneurysms were located distal to the left subclavian artery and proximal to the celiac axis, and hybrid procedures including arch or visceral debranching were excluded with the exception of left carotid-subclavian artery bypass. Aortic dissection and intramural hematoma as indications for TEVAR were also excluded. Primary 30-day and in-hospital outcomes included mortality, stroke, need for new permanent dialysis, and permanent paraparesis or paraplegia. Primary long-term outcomes included survival and rate of reintervention secondary to endoleak. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate long-term overall and aorta-specific survivals. Results The mean age was 71.1 ± 10.4 years. All aneurysms in this series were degenerative in nature and no patients with a connective tissue disorder were included. The mean aortic diameter was 5.9 ± 1.5 cm at time of intervention. Rates of 30-day and in-hospital mortality, stroke, permanent dialysis, and permanent paraparesis and paraplegia were 4.7%, 2.1%, 0.5%, and 0.5%, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 69 ± 44 months (range, 3-141 months), there were 68 late deaths (35.4%), two of which were due to aortic rupture. Overall and aorta-specific survivals at 141 months (11.8 years) were 45.7% and 96.2%, respectively. Endovascular reintervention was required in 14 patients (7.3%) owing to type I (n = 10), type II (n = 2), and type III (n = 2) endoleak, all of which subsequently resolved. No patient required open reintervention for any cause. Conclusions Long-term (12-year) aorta-specific survival after on-label endovascular repair of degenerative descending thoracic aneurysms in nonsyndromic patients is excellent (96%) with sustained protection from rupture, and a low rate of reintervention owing to endoleak (7%). Endovascular repair should be considered the treatment of choice for this pathology.

Background The lung allocation score (LAS) has led to improved organ allocation for transplant candidates. At present, the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) is treated as a binary categorical variable of whether or not a candidate can walk more than 150 feet in 6 minutes. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that 6MWD is presently under-utilized with respect to discriminatory power, and that, as a continuous variable, could better prognosticate risk of waitlist mortality. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) transplant database. Candidates listed for isolated lung transplant between May 2005 and December 2011 were included. The population was stratified by 6MWD quartiles and unadjusted survival rates were estimated. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the effect of 6MWD on risk of death. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) Waitlist Risk Model was used to adjust for confounders. The optimal 6MWD for discriminative accuracy in predicting waitlist mortality was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Analysis was performed on 12,298 recipients. Recipients were segregated into quartiles by distance walked. Waitlist mortality decreased as 6MWD increased. In the multivariable model, significant variables included 6MWD, male gender, non-white ethnicity and restrictive lung diseases. ROC curves discriminated 6-month mortality was best at 655 feet. Conclusions The 6MWD is a significant predictor of waitlist mortality. A cut-off of 150 feet sub-optimally identifies candidates with increased risk of mortality. A cut-off between 550 and 655 feet is more optimal if 6MWD is to be treated as a dichotomous variable. Utilization of the LAS as a continuous variable could further enhance predictive capabilities.

Background The number of adults referred to high-volume centers for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasing. Outcomes of patients requiring transport are not well characterized, and referral guidelines are lacking. This study describes the experience and outcomes of a single high-volume center. Methods A retrospective study was performed that included adults undergoing ECMO between June 2009 and December 2015. Patient characteristics and outcomes were acquired from the medical record. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of survival to hospital discharge. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to depict rates of survival. Results Of 133 patients, 77 (57.9%) underwent venoarterial (VA) ECMO and 56 (42.1%) underwent venovenous (VV) ECMO. Median transport distance was 88.8 miles (range 0.2–1,434 miles). Median duration of support was 6 days (range, 1–32.5 days). Age older than 60 years, pulmonary hypertension, and body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 were associated with worse survival to discharge for VA ECMO; a history of hypertension and presence of left ventricular (LV) vent were associated with better survival. Age older than 60 years and diabetes were associated with worse survival to hospital discharge for VV ECMO. Survival to decannulation was 66.2% and 76.8%, and to hospital discharge it was 48.1% and 69.6% for VA and VV ECMO, respectively. Of hospital survivors, Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year survival were 82.4% and 95.5% for VA and VV, respectively. Conclusions Outcomes are favorable after transport to high-volume ECMO centers. Guidelines and infrastructure for short- and long-distance ECMO transport is imperative for the efficient and successful management of these patients.

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of induction therapy prior to an operation in patients with cT3 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Patients diagnosed with cT3N0M0 NSCLC from 2006 to 2011 in the National Cancer Database who were treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy were stratified by treatment strategy: an operation first versus induction chemotherapy. Propensity scores were developed and matched cohorts were generated. Short-term outcomes included margin status, 30- and 90-day mortality rates, readmission and length of stay. Survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier methods were performed on both the unadjusted and propensity matched cohorts. RESULTS A total of 3791 cT3N0M0 patients were identified for inclusion, of which 580 (15%) were treated with induction chemotherapy. Prior to adjustment, patients treated with induction chemotherapy were younger, had a higher comorbidity burden and were more likely to have private insurance (all P

Background The long-term survival benefit of lobectomy over sublobar resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer must be weighed against a potentially increased risk of perioperative mortality. The objective of the current study was to create a risk score to identify patients with favorable short-term outcomes following lobectomy. Methods The 2005–2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing a lobectomy or sublobar resection (either segmentectomy or wedge resection) for lung cancer. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to determine factors associated with 30-day mortality among the lobectomy group and to develop an associated risk score to predict perioperative mortality. Results Of the 5,749 patients who met study criteria, 4,424 (77%) underwent lobectomy, 1,098 (19%) underwent wedge resection, and 227 (4%) underwent segmentectomy. Age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous cerebrovascular event, functional status, recent smoking status, and surgical approach (minimally invasive versus open) were utilized to develop the risk score. Patients with a risk score of 5 or lower had no significant difference in perioperative mortality by surgical procedure. Patients with a risk score greater than 5 had significantly higher perioperative mortality after lobectomy (4.9%) as compared to segmentectomy (3.6%) or wedge resection (0.8%, p Conclusions In this study, we have developed a risk model that predicts relative operative mortality from a sublobar resection as compared to a lobectomy. Among patients with a risk score of 5 or less, lobectomy confers no additional perioperative risk over sublobar resection.

For patients with a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), guideline recommendations and treatment pathways focus on revascularization for definitive treatment if the patient is an appropriate candidate. Despite the widespread use of revascularization for NSTE-ACS, most patients undergo a percutaneous coronary intervention, whereas a minority of patients undergo coronary artery bypass grafting. Focusing specifically on the USA, the contemporary utilization, preoperative and perioperative considerations, and outcomes of NSTE-ACS patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting have not been comprehensively reviewed.

To maximize the benefit of lung transplantation, the effect of size mismatch on survival in lung transplant recipients with restrictive lung disease (RLD) was examined. All single and bilateral RLD lung transplants from 1987 to 2011 in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database were identified. Donor predicted total lung capacity (pTLC):Recipient pTLC ratio (pTLCr) quantified mismatch. pTLCr was segregated into five strata. A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the association of pTLCr with mortality hazard. To identify a critical pTLCr, a Cox model using a restricted cubic spline for pTLCr was used. A total of 6656 transplants for RLD were identified. Median pTLCr for single orthotopic lung transplant (SOLT) and bilateral orthotopic lung transplant (BOLT) was 1.0 (0.69-1.47) and 0.98 (0.66-1.45). Examination of pTLCr as a categorical variable revealed that undersizing (pTLCr

Limited data exist regarding the effect of conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy on perioperative and oncologic outcomes in colon cancer.The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients who underwent colectomy for non-metastatic colon cancer (2010-2012). Patients were stratified into three groups: laparoscopic/robotic-assisted colectomy (MIC), converted colectomy (CC), and open colectomy (OC). Multivariable modeling was applied to compare outcomes from CC and MIC to OC while adjusting for patient, clinical, and tumor characteristics.Of 104,400 patients, 40,328 (38.6 %) underwent MIC, 57,928 (55.5 %) OC, and 6144 (5.9 %) CC. After adjustment, the rate of positive surgical margins was not significantly different between CC and OC (p = 0.44). However, with adjustment, CC versus OC was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (4 % decrease, 95 % CI 2-5 %, p 0.0001) and lower odds of 30-day mortality (OR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.64-0.94, p = 0.0112). Adjusted overall survival was similar between CC and OC (p = 0.34).Conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy was not associated with compromised oncologic outcomes, while maintaining improved short-term outcomes despite being attempted in only 45 % of patients. This data suggests that utilization of laparoscopic colectomy should be attempted for patients with colon cancer.

Background The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of minimally invasive approaches to esophagectomy using population-level data. Methods Multivariable regression modeling was used to determine predictors associated with the use of minimally invasive approaches for patients in the National Cancer Data Base who underwent resection of middle and distal clinical T13N03M0 esophageal cancers from 2010 to 2012. Perioperative outcomes and 3-year survival were compared between propensity-matched groups of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) or open esophagectomy (OE). A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of using robotic-assisted operations as part of the minimally invasive approach. Results Among 4,266 patients included, 1,308 (30.6%) underwent MIE. It was more likely to be used in patients treated at academic (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 10.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2–33.1) or comprehensive cancer facilities (adjusted OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.6–21.1). Compared with propensity-matched patients who underwent OE, patients who underwent MIE had significantly more lymph nodes examined (15 versus 13; p = 0.016) and shorter hospital lengths of stay (10 days versus 11 days; p = 0.046) but similar resection margin positivity, readmission, and 30-day mortality (all p > 0.05). Survival was similar between the matched groups at 3 years for both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma ( p > 0.05). Compared with MIE without robotic assistance, use of a robotic approach was not associated with any significant differences in perioperative outcomes ( p > 0.05). Conclusions The use of minimally invasive techniques to perform esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is associated with modestly improved perioperative outcomes without compromising survival.

Determining the optimal timing of surgical resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy has proven to be a challenging task, and the clinical implications for patients undergoing surgery at various time intervals remain elusive. In an effort to fill a gap in the current retrospective literature pertaining to this clinical question, we utilized the method of restricted cubic splines (RCS) to investigate the balance in this timing from a unique statistical perspective. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we determined an inflection point of 56 days wherein an increased incidence of pathologic complete response was balanced with a decreased rate of overall survival (1).

Objective Lobectomy is considered optimal therapy for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer, but sublobar wedge resection and stereotactic body radiation therapy are alternative treatments. This study compared outcomes between wedge resection and stereotactic body radiotherapy. Methods Overall survival of patients with cT1N0 and tumors ≤2 cm who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy or wedge resection in the National Cancer Data Base from 2008 to 2011 was assessed via a Kaplan-Meier and propensity score–matched analysis. A center-level sensitivity analysis that used observed/expected mortality ratios was conducted to identify an association between center use of stereotactic body radiotherapy and mortality. Results Of the 6295 patients included, 1778 (28.2%) underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy, and 4517 (71.8%) underwent wedge resection. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was associated with significantly reduced 5-year survival compared with wedge resection in both unmatched analysis (30.9% vs 55.2%, P P P 1 for 3-year mortality ( P = .034). Conclusions In this national analysis, wedge resection was associated with better survival for stage IA non–small cell lung cancer than stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Recipients of liver allografts from diabetic donors have decreased graft survival. However, limited data exist on the effects of donor HbA1c. We hypothesized that allografts from non-diabetic donors with elevated HbA1c would be associated with decreased survival. Liver transplant recipients from the UNOS database from non-diabetic donors were stratified into two groups: euglycemic (HbA1c < 6.5) and hyperglycemic (HbA1c ≥ 6.5). Propensity score matching (10:1) was used to adjust for donor and recipient characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survival. Donors of hyperglycemic allografts were older (49 vs. 36, p < 0.001), were more likely to be non-white, had a higher BMI (29.8 vs. 26.2, p < 0.001), were more likely to engage in heavy cigarette use (1.5 vs. 1.3%, p = 0.004), had higher serum creatinine levels (1.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.002), and were more likely to be an expanded-criteria donor (35.8 vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001). After propensity matching to account for these differences, allograft survival was significantly decreased in the recipients of hyperglycemic allografts (p = 0.049), and patient survival showed a trend towards reduction (p = 0.082). These findings suggest that HbA1c may be a simple and inexpensive test with potential utility for better organ risk stratification.