Search

The purpose of this study was to estimate the bone strength after plate removal over time and to investigate the progression of bone strength recovery.A consecutive series of 31 patients was investigated to evaluate bone strength before and after forearm plate removal. Patients who were included underwent plate fixation for forearm diaphyseal fractures and were scheduled for plate removal. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the entire length of the bilateral forearms were taken before plate removal and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Patient-specific CT-based finite element analysis was used to predict the forearm bone fracture strength against an axial load (N), defined as the bone strength. Bone strength was estimated by patient-specific CT-based finite element analysis at each time point.The mean age of the patients was 40.4 years. The mean time between plate fixation and removal was 27.5 months. Bone strength before the removal was estimated as reduced to 47% of that of the uninjured side. This was constant regardless of age group, involvement of the radius or ulna, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification, open fracture, or type of plate. Bone strength at 1, 3, and 6 months after removal was estimated to be 66%, 85%, and 97%, respectively. The bone strength of the distal ulna was weaker than that at the other sites in the forearm and showed delayed recovery.Bone strength after plate removal showed recovery within 3-6 months and was fully recovered by 6 months. The degree of recovery of bone atrophy varies from site to site, and patients should be careful about refracture after removal.Clinicians should be aware that bone strength may not be sufficiently restored even 6 months after plate removal of forearm fractures.

Purpose To determine the optimal timing of plate removal in patients with forearm diaphyseal fractures fixed with a locking plate via the analysis of bone atrophy over time. Methods The study subject was a 56-year-old man. Computed tomography was performed at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after plate fixation. Finite element analysis was performed to measure the fracture load of the radius and ulna. The fracture loads of the affected and healthy sides were compared, and their ratio was calculated by dividing the value of the affected side by that of the healthy side at each time point. Results The strength of the radius and ulna was 40.9% and 29.3%, respectively, on the healthy side at 1 year after surgery. The fracture load increased from the second to the third postoperative year; the strength of the radius and ulna was 62.2% and 37.3%, respectively, on the healthy side after the third year. However, after the third year, the fracture load declined and reached 38.8% and 18.9% for the radius and ulna, respectively, on the healthy side by the fifth postoperative year. Conclusions The long-term fixation of forearm diaphyseal fractures using a locking plate leads to progressive bone atrophy. Future bone atrophy during long-term locking plate fixation without removal should be monitored. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

Orthopedic trauma surgeons often encounter Smith's fracture in patients who report that they have fallen on the palms of their hands. The aim of this study was to clarify the pathogenesis of Smith's fracture in basic clinical aspects. First, a survey was conducted for investigating the mechanism of injury and arm position at the time of injury among patients with Smith's fractures who consulted at our outpatient clinic. Second, we created three-dimensional finite element models (FEMs) to predict the influence of arm position on the type of injury resulting from a fall. These predictions were then used in ten freshly frozen cadavers to provide experimental proof of Smith's fractures resulting from the impact on the palmar side. Twenty-six patients (5 males and 21 females) with Smith's fractures were enrolled in this study. Injury resulting from a fall on the palm of the hand, the dorsum, or ulno-dorsum of the hand, and fisting handle was observed in 16 cases (61%), 3 cases (12%), and 1 case (4%), respectively. Six patients were uncertain of their arm position at the time of injury. FEM analysis showed that Smith's fractures occurred when the angle between the long axis of the forearm and the ground was 30°-45° in the sagittal plane and 75°-90° in the coronal plane. Smith's fractures occurred in 7 of 10 wrists in the experimental study, whereas no Colles' fractures were observed. This study demonstrated that Smith's fracture results from falling on the palm of the hand. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2435-2441, 2017.

Background: The extensile extensor digitorum communis (EDC) splitting approach can access the ulnar coronoid process (UCP), which can be used to treat terrible triad injuries. The present study anatomically examined the extensile EDC splitting approach for exposing the UCP. Methods: Twenty fresh frozen cadaveric upper limbs were dissected. The splitting length of the EDC and detachment length of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB)–extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL)–brachioradialis (BR) origin were measured to expose the UCP. The distance between the most distal site of the EDC splitting and the point at which the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) crosses the anterior aspect of the radial shaft, and the distance between the most proximal site of the ECRB-ECRL-BR origin detachment and the point at which the radial nerve crosses the anterior aspect of the humeral shaft were measured. Results: The splitting length of the EDC was 45.4 ± 4.8 mm, the detachment length of the ECRB-ECRL-BR origin was 30.2 ± 4.7 mm, the distance between the distal site of the EDC splitting and PIN was 10.6 ± 6.1 mm (minimum distance, 1.1 mm), and the distance between the proximal site of the ECRB-ECRL-BR origin detachment and the radial nerve was 49.5 ± 9.7 mm (minimum distance, 31.7 mm). Conclusions: The extensile EDC splitting approach can sufficiently expose the UCP. However, splitting must be performed carefully because the most distal site of the EDC splitting is close to the point at which the PIN crosses the anterior aspect of the radial shaft (average distance, 10 mm; minimum distance, 1 mm).

Fractures of the axis are considered to be one of the most common injuries to the cervical spine, accounting for more than 20% of all cervical spine fractures. Multiple fractures of the axis are much rarer, accounting for 1% of all cervical fractures. Management of such complex fractures is still challenging, and there is no strong consensus for the treatment. The authors describe the cases of 2 patients who presented with 3-part fractures of the axis consisting of an odontoid Type II fracture and a Levine-Edwards Type IA fracture, which were treated with concurrent insertion of an anterior odontoid screw and bilateral posterior pedicle screws. The cases presented were characterized by 1) a Type II odontoid fracture; 2) a Type IA traumatic spondylolisthesis with no or a little translation and angulation of C-2 on C-3 in a ring fracture of the axis; and 3) no disorders at the C2–3 disc on MR images. Therefore, the authors performed surgery confined to the axis by concurrently inserting an anterior odontoid screw and posterior bilateral pedicle screws without arthrodesis of C2–3. This was followed with cervical soft collar fixation for only 1–2 weeks. The outcomes were favorable, including good osteosynthesis, high primary stability, early patient mobilization, and preserved range of motion of the cervical spine at C2–3 as well as at C1–2.