Search

Background Several risk scores are available which predict pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), but do not differentiate between biochemical leak (BL) and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). The aim of this study was to identify factors that differentiate between BL and CR-POPF in the early postoperative period. Methods Consecutive patients diagnosed with BL and CR-POPF after PD were identified from a prospectively maintained database (2009-2019). Data were collected for demographics, intraoperative and laboratory parameters on the first five postoperative days (PODs), including drain fluid amylase (DFA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin. Independent predictors of CR-POPF were identified using a multivariable binary logistic regression model, which was subsequently converted to a risk score Results 187 patients consisted of 99 BL and 88 CR-POPF. In those with CR-POPF, the leak became clinically relevant a median of 9 days after surgery; these patients had a significantly higher length of hospital stay than those with BL (median: 24 vs. 10 days, p Conclusions In patients with a confirmed pancreatic fistula it may be possible to differentiate between BL and CR-POPF using early postoperative variables, particularly DFA, serum albumin and CRP. Early identification of CR-POPF may allow earlier intervention to improve clinical outcomes.

Background In an effort to improve postoperative recovery and reduce complications, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been introduced across a range of surgical disciplines. The demographics of patients being considered for PD have evolved over recent decades, with older patients undergoing increasingly more complex procedures. The feasibility and benefits of an ERAS protocol for elderly patients undergoing PD is debated, a recent study suggesting that age over 70 years is an independent risk factor for protocol failure . Existing studies on ERAS after PD in elderly patients are limited by small sample sizes and failure to include a pre-ERAS control. Methods 830 consecutive patients who underwent PD between January 2009 and March 2019 were divided according to age: elderly (≥75 years) vs. non-elderly patients ( Results Of the entire cohort, 577 of 830 patients (69.5%) were managed according to an ERAS protocol, and 170 patients (20.5%) were aged ≥ 75 years old. Patients treated post-ERAS were significantly more comorbid than those pre-ERAS, with a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4.6 vs. 4.1 (p Conclusions ERAS protocol can be safely applied to patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy irrespective of age. ERAS is associated with a significant reduction in postoperative LOS in elderly and non-elderly patients, despite higher comorbidity in the post-ERAS period.

This multicentric study of 17 high-volume centers presents 12 benchmark values for liver transplantation. Those values, mostly targeting markers of morbidity, were gathered from 2024 "low risk" cases, and may serve as reference to assess outcome of single or any groups of patients.To propose benchmark outcome values in liver transplantation, serving as reference for assessing individual patients or any other patient groups.Best achievable results in liver transplantation, that is, benchmarks, are unknown. Consequently, outcome comparisons within or across centers over time remain speculative.Out of 7492 liver transplantation performed in 17 international centers from 3 continents, we identified 2024 low risk adult cases with a laboratory model for end-stage liver disease score ≤20 points, a balance of risk score ≤9, and receiving a primary graft by donation after brain death. We chose clinically relevant endpoints covering intra- and postoperative course, with a focus on complications graded by severity including the complication comprehensive index (CCI). Respective benchmarks were derived from the median value in each center, and the 75 percentile was considered the benchmark cutoff.Benchmark cases represented 8% to 49% of cases per center. One-year patient-survival was 91.6% with 3.5% retransplantations. Eighty-two percent of patients developed at least 1 complication during 1-year follow-up. Biliary complications occurred in one-fifth of the patients up to 6 months after surgery. Benchmark cutoffs were ≤4 days for ICU stay, ≤18 days for hospital stay, ≤59% for patients with severe complications (≥ Grade III) and ≤42.1 for 1-year CCI. Comparisons with the next higher risk group (model for end stage liver disease 21-30) disclosed an increase in morbidity but within benchmark cutoffs for most, but not all indicators, while in patients receiving a second graft from 1 center (n = 50) outcome values were all outside of benchmark values.Despite excellent 1-year survival, morbidity in benchmark cases remains high with half of patients developing severe complications during 1-year follow-up. Benchmark cutoffs targeting morbidity parameters offer a valid tool to assess higher risk groups.