Search

Background: Although primarily a respiratory disorder, the coronavirus pandemic has paralyzed almost all aspects of health-care delivery Emergency procedures are likely continuing in most countries, however, some of them raises certain concerns to the surgeons such as the endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries The aim of this study is to present the current situation from a developing country perspective in dealing with such cases at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic Methods: A cross-sectional analytical survey was distributed among neurosurgeons who performed emergency surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic in Cairo, Egypt, between May 8, 2020, and June 7, 2020 The survey entailed patients' information (demographics, preoperative screening, and postoperative COVID-19 symptoms), surgical team information (demographics and postoperative COVID-19 symptoms), and operative information (personal protective equipment [PPE] utilization and basal craniectomy) Results: Our survey was completed on June 7, 2020 (16 completed, 100% response rate) The patients were screened for COVID-19 preoperatively through complete blood cell (CBC) (100%), computed tomography (CT) chest (68 8%), chest examination (50%), C-reactive protein (CRP) (50%), and serological testing (6 3%) Only 18 8% of the surgical team utilized N95 mask and goggles, 12 5% utilized face shield, and none used PAPRs Regarding the basal craniectomy, 81 3% used Kerrison Rongeur and chisel, 25% used a high-speed drill, and 6 3% used a mucosal shaver None of the patients developed any COVID-19 symptoms during the first 3 weeks postsurgery and one of the surgeons developed high fever with negative nasopharyngeal swabs Conclusion: In developing countries with limited resources, preoperative screening using chest examination, CBC, and CT chest might be sufficient to replace Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction Developing countries require adequate support with screening tests, PPE, and critical care equipment such as ventilators [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Surgical Neurology International is the property of Scientific Scholar LLC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use This abstract may be abridged No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract (Copyright applies to all Abstracts )

Introduction Endoscopic transnasal approaches have been the main treatment option for most of anterior skull base and sellar diseases. Quality-of-life (QOL) assessment after skull base surgeries are now well appreciated and measured to improve medical and surgical care for those patients. Aim To assess QOL after endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery in its six main domains. Patients and methods This study was conducted on 20 patients who had endoscopic skull base surgery for various skull base lesions. QOL was assessed by modified short form health survey questionnaire 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively. A scoring system was adopted, and cases were divided into two group according to their overall score (worse and better groups). Comparison between the two groups was conducted to determine factors that worsen QOL results after endoscopic skull base surgery. Results The overall QOL showed statistical improvement 1 month postoperatively over after 1 week. One week after operation, QOL was statistically affected by age of patient, duration of nasal pack removal, and duration of ICU admission. Postoperative pain domain is worsened by superior turbinate resection or trimming during first week. Conclusion QOL after endoscopic skull base surgeries has been associated with statistically significant improvement after 4 weeks, with significant decrease in the incidence of postoperative complications.