Search

Background: Positive bone margins have been shown to be associated with worse locoregional control and survival performance in oral oncology patients. With the application of computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific surgical guides, the authors can accurately execute the preoperative osteotomy plan. However, how well the authors can predict the margin distance in the final histopathology with a preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, the factors associated with it, and how much leeway CT should spare when designing the osteotomy planes during virtual surgical planning (VSP) remain to be investigated., Materials and Methods: Patients from January 2021 to December 2022 with benign or malignant jaw tumors and with signs of bone marrow involvement in the preoperative CT scan in our center were prospectively recruited to the study. VSP and measurement of the closest margin distance in the CT scan were performed by the single team of surgeons. The resection specimen was processed, and the margin distances were measured by a dedicated senior pathologist with the knowledge of orientation of the osteotomy planes., Results: A total of 35 patients were recruited, with 21 malignant and 14 benign cases. Sixty-eight bone margins were quantitatively analyzed. No significant difference in margin distances measured from the CT scan and final histopathology was detected ( P =0.19), and there was a strong correlation between the two (r s =0.74, P <0.01). A considerable amount of variance was detected in the level of discrepancy between margin distances measured in the CT scan and final histopathology (overall SD=6.26 mm, malignancy SD=7.44 mm, benign SD=4.40 mm). No significant correlation existed between the two margin distances when only maxilla tumor margins were assessed ( P =0.16)., Conclusion: The bone margin distance in VSP is reliably correlated to the final pathological margin distance. A leeway distance of 15mm and 9mm should be considered when designing the osteotomy planes for malignancy and benign cases, respectively. Extra attention should be paid to maxilla cases when predetermining the osteotomy planes during VSP., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Computer-assisted surgery has become the mainstream in mandibular reconstruction, but the lack of a standard measuring approach for spatial deviations of mandible hinders postoperative verification and the comparison of different subjects. This study aims to set up a comprehensive approach for measuring spatial deviations of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction., Methods: A systematic review was conducted to extract all measurements for computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction. Thereafter, eligible measurements were included in the authors' comprehensive approach, which categorized the measurements according to different anatomical structures and landmarks., Results: A total of 80 studies were included in the authors' systematic review, and 31 measurements were extracted. The authors established a comprehensive panel of anatomical landmarks to facilitate measurement, including parts, points, lines, planes, and angles. These measurements encompassed spatial deviations of the overall mandible, condyle, gonial angle, bone grafts, midline, surgical plate, osteotomy, and miscellaneous indicators. A calculation spreadsheet was developed to collect landmarks and compute deviations automatically with built-in formulas. Finally, a simplified panel of measurements was recommended for spatial deviations of mandibular reconstruction., Conclusions: A comprehensive approach for measuring spatial deviations of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction was established. Future studies will confirm this approach as an effective and scientific system for postoperative verification of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Objectives: Computer assisted head and neck reconstruction has gained popularity over the past few years. In computer assisted surgery (CAS), surgical margins are predetermined in virtual surgery and resection guides are designed to be fitted intra-operatively. However, concerns have been raised regarding the oncological safety of predetermined surgical margins. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare surgical margins, recurrence and survival outcomes in patients underwent CAS and non-CAS in head and neck reconstruction., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patients underwent oral and maxillofacial malignancies surgical excision and free flap reconstruction from October 2014 to December 2019 by the same chief surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether CAS and predetermined surgical margins were adopted. The primary outcome was surgical resection margin and the secondary outcomes included recurrence and survival., Results: A total of 66 subjects were recruited with 37 in the CAS group and 29 in the non-CAS group. The follow-up rate was 100%. The average follow-up time was 24.5 months. No significant difference in resection margin was identified between the groups (p = 0.387). Tumor staging, margin status, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion and extranodal extension were identified as significant factors influencing survival. Both before and after adjustment for these prognostic factors identified, CAS and non-CAS group showed no significant difference in survival outcome., Conclusion: Predetermined surgical margins do not compromise oncological safety in terms of resection margin, disease recurrence and patient survival., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)