Search

It has been shown that CorTemp TM telemetric pills (CTTPs) provide valid measures of rectal temperature when used as suppositories. While encapsulated into a condom linked to a thread, CTTPs can be inserted in and extracted from the rectum and be reused. The validity and reliability of the CTTP throughout repeated use remains to be demonstrated. Three CTTPs were compared to a YSI 401 wired rectal probe inside a circulating water bath (temperatures varying from 36.5 to 39.4 °C) during 50 h of intermittent use. Each CTTP underwent 20 trials comprising 6 protocols of varying duration: 6 · 1 h, 5 · 2 h, 4 · 3 h, 3 · 4 h and 2 · 5 h. All CTTPs were washed, switched off and disinfected after each trial to reproduce real-life use. Acceptable agreement between sensors was taken as a mean bias within ±0.27 °C. None of the pills showed signs of deterioration following 50 h of reuse. As for relative validity, where all CTTPs showed robust coefficients of determination ranging from 0.98 to 0.99, absolute validity was excellent with each CTTP showing mean biases and typical errors of the estimate (TEE) within ±0.27 °C. Comparisons between the first and last trial each CTTP underwent resulted in means biases and TEEs within ±0.27 °C and coefficients of determination ranging from 0.97 to 0.99, which indicates strong absolute and relative reliability. The present results show that CTTPs can provide valid and reliable measurements of temperature when reused up to 50 h., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Wireless measurement of rectal temperature during exercise may circumvent some limitations associated with the use of a conventional wired probe. We determined, for the first time, whether temperatures provided in vivo by wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pills and a rectal probe compare favorably under conditions producing slow and rapid increases and decreases in rectal temperature. While wearing a rectal probe linked to a wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pill, 13 participants completed the following phases: 1) 30 min sitting; 2) 45 min passive heat exposure (40–42 °C); 3) 45 min sitting while ingesting 7.5 g of ice slurry · kg body mass−1; 4) running exercise (38 °C) at 68% V ˙ O 2 m a x until a 39.5 °C increase in rectal probe temperature and; 5) cold-water (10 °C) immersion until a 1.5 °C decrease in rectal probe temperature. Acceptable differences between devices were taken as ≤ 0.3 °C. Mean differences within phases were all < 0.3 °C, whereas 95% limits of agreement ranged from ±0.2 °C to ±0.4 °C, coefficient of variations from ±0.3% to ±0.6% and typical error of measurements from ±0.1 °C to ±0.2°. Of the 14881 rectal temperature values measured over the experiment with the wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pills and rectal probe, 91% of the differences between devices were found to be ≤ 0.3 °C. Results suggest that rectal temperatures provided by a wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pill used as a suppository agree with those of a conventional wired probe. Hence, rectal temperature can reliably be measured using a wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pill as a suppository. • Acceptable differences between devices were taken as ≤ 0.3 °C. • Mean differences between devices were <0.3 °C for all 5 phases. • 95% limits of agreement between devices ranged from ±0.2 °C to ±0.4 °C. • Typical error of measurements between devices ranged from ±0.1 °C to ±0.2 °C. • Coefficient of variations between devices ranged from ±0.3% to ±0.6%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]