Search

We aimed to identify the effect of suction pressure and catheter size on change in lung volume during open and closed endotracheal suction. Anesthetized piglets (n = 12) were intubated with a 4.0-mm endotracheal tube. Lung injury was induced with saline lavage. Three suction methods (open, closed in-line, and closed with a side-port adaptor) were performed in random order using 6, 7, and 8 French gauge (FG) catheters, at vacuum pressures of 80, 140, and 200 mm Hg. Lung volume change was measured with respiratory inductive plethysmography. Overall, open suction resulted in greater lung volume loss during and at 60-s postsuction than either closed method (p < 0.001). When open and closed methods were analyzed separately, volume change was independent of catheter size and suction pressure with open suction. With closed suction, volume loss increased with larger catheter sizes and higher suction pressures (p < 0.001). With an 8-FG catheter and suction pressure of 140 or 200 mm Hg, volume loss was equivalent with open and closed suction. Lung volume changes are influenced by catheter size and suction pressure, as well as suction method. With commonly used suction pressures and catheter sizes, closed suction has no advantage in preventing loss of volume in this animal model.

In newborn infants, closed endotracheal tube (ETT) suction may reduce associated adverse effects, but it is not clear whether ventilation is maintained during the procedure. We aimed to determine the effect of ETT size, catheter size, and suction pressure on ventilation parameters measured distal to the ETT. Suction was performed on a test lung, ventilated with conventional (CMV) and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) using ETT sizes 2.5-4.0 mm, catheter sizes 5-8 French gauge (Fr), and suction pressures 80-200 mm Hg. Tracheal and circuit peak inspiratory pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure, and tracheal tidal volume (VT) were recorded for each suction episode. During both CMV and HFOV, tracheal pressures and VT were considerably reduced by suctioning; this reduction was dependent on the combination of ETT, catheter, and suction pressure. Loss of VT, inflation pressure (CMV), and pressure amplitude (HFOV) occurred primarily with insertion of the catheter, and loss of end-expiratory pressure (CMV) and mean tracheal pressure (HFOV) occurred with the application of suction. Circuit pressures were reduced to lesser degree. We conclude that airway pressures and VT are not maintained during closed endotracheal suction with either CMV or HFOV, and choice of equipment and settings will affect the degree of interruption to ventilation.

Endotracheal tube (ETT) suction is the most frequently performed invasive procedure in ventilated newborn infants and is associated with adverse effects related to negative tracheal pressure. We aimed to measure suction catheter gas flow and intratracheal pressure during ETT suction of a test lung and develop a mathematical model to predict tracheal pressure from catheter and ETT dimensions and applied pressure. Tracheal pressure and catheter flow were recorded during suction of ETT sizes 2.5-4.0 mm connected to a test lung with catheters 5-8 French Gauge and applied pressures of 80-200 mm Hg. The fraction of applied pressure transmitted to the trachea was calculated for each combination, and data fitted to three nonlinear models for analysis. Tracheal pressure was directly proportional to applied pressure (r = 0.82-0.99), and catheter flow fitted a turbulent flow model (R = 0.85-0.96). With each ETT, increasing catheter size resulted in greater catheter flow (p < 0.0001) and thus lower intratracheal pressure (p < 0.0001). The fraction of applied pressure transmitted to the trachea was accurately modeled using ETT and catheter dimensions (R = 0.98-0.99). Negative tracheal pressure during in vitro ETT suction is directly proportional to applied pressure. This relationship is determined by ETT and catheter dimensions.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of open and closed endotracheal suction in recovering thin and thick secretions in normal and injured lungs during conventional and high frequency ventilation., Design and Setting: Randomised study in a paediatric intensive care model in the animal research laboratory of a tertiary paediatric hospital., Subjects: 16 New Zealand White rabbits., Interventions: Anaesthetised animals were intubated with a 3.5-mm endotracheal tube. Simulated thin and thick secretions (iopamidol 2 ml, a watery radio-opaque fluid, and fluorescent mucin 1 ml) were instilled in turn 1 cm below the tube tip through a catheter placed via a tracheostomy. Open or closed suction, randomly assigned, was applied for 6s at -140 mmHg using a 6-F gauge catheter. Following lung injury with repeated saline lavage the procedure was repeated on conventional and high frequency ventilation., Measurements and Results: Iopamidol recovery was determined by digitally subtracting the post-contrast and post-suction radiographic images. Mucin recovery was determined by fluorescence assay of the aspirate. In the normal lung similar amounts were recovered by both suction methods. In the lavaged lung closed suction recovered less iopamidol during conventional (22 +/- 7.5%) and high frequency ventilation (11 +/- 2.4%) than open suction (36 +/- 2% and 22 +/- 8.1%, respectively). Mucin recovery was less with closed suction during conventional 32 +/- 28 microl) and high frequency ventilation (30 +/- 31 microl) than with open suction (382 +/- 235 microl and 24 +/- 153 microl)., Conclusions: In the injured lung closed suction was less effective than open suction at recovering thin and thick simulated secretions, irrespective of ventilation mode.