Search

Background: Since 2013, we have offered a robust "Introduction to Surgery" elective (ITS) for preclinical medical students. The present study investigates whether participants of the ITS elective were more likely to match into surgical residencies than non-ITS participants., Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study of medical students from two medical schools in Southern California who participated in the ITS elective and those who did not. Descriptive results and univariate analysis using STATA were utilized to analyze the de-identified data who matched between 2016 and 2021 were included., Results: Overall, 87 (8.9%) of the 982 matched students participated in the ITS elective, with an increase in participation from 1.2% in 2016 to 13.9% in 2021 ( P < .001). Among ITS participants, 49.4% matched into a surgical specialty compared to only 22.9% for non-ITS students ( P < .001). There was no difference between ITS and non-ITS students with regards to procedural specialty match (14.9% vs 12.6%, P = .537)., Conclusion: ITS participants were more than twice as likely to match into a surgical specialty than non-participants. Future qualitative research will help discern the relative impact of the ITS course versus a student's baseline predisposition to surgery.

Introduction: The wellbeing of sexual and gender minority (SGM) medical students and the impact of their experiences on career trajectory remain poorly understood. The present study aimed to characterize the incidence of mistreatment in SGM trainees as well as general perspectives on the acceptance of SGM individuals across medical and surgical specialties., Methods: This was a cross sectional survey study of all actively enrolled medical students within the six University of California campuses conducted in March 2021. An online, survey tool captured incidence of bullying, discrimination, and suicidal ideation as well as perceived acceptance of SGM identities across specialties measured by slider scale. Differences between SGM and non-SGM respondents were assessed with two-tailed and chi-square tests. Qualitative responses were evaluated utilizing a multi-stage, cutting-and-sorting technique., Results: Of approximately 3,205 students eligible for participation, 383 submitted completed surveys, representing a response rate of 12.0%. Of these respondents, 26.9% (n = 103) identified as a sexual or gender minority. Overall, SGM trainees reported higher slider scale scores when asked about being bullied by other students (20.0 vs. 13.9, P = 0.012) and contemplating suicide (14.8 vs. 8.8, P = 0.005). Compared to all other specialties, general surgery and surgical subspecialties had the lowest mean slider scale score (52.8) in perceived acceptance of SGM identities (All P < 0.001). In qualitative responses, students frequently cited lack of diversity as contributing to this perception. Additionally, 67.0% of SGM students had concerns that disclosure of identity would affect their future career with 18.5% planning to not disclose during the residency application process., Conclusions: Overall, SGM respondents reported higher incidences of bullying and suicidal ideation as well as increased self-censorship stemming from concerns regarding career advancement, most prominently in surgery. To address such barriers, institutions must actively promote diversity in sexual preference and gender identity regardless of specialty., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.