Search

Background: Hospitalization for heart failure (HF) is associated with increased risk of death among patients with chronic HF. The degree to which hospitalization for HF is a distinct biologic entity with independent prognostic value versus a marker of higher risk chronic HF patients is unclear., Methods: After excluding patients with new-onset HF, the ASCEND-HF trial (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure) included 4205 patients hospitalized for worsening chronic HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. The present analysis compared patients by presence or absence of prior HF hospitalization within 12 months and by timing of prior HF hospitalization relative to index hospitalization. Associations with 180-day all-cause mortality were assessed, including adjustment for 27 prespecified clinical factors., Results: Overall, 2241 (53.3%) patients had a HF hospitalization within the prior 12 months and 1964 (46.7%) did not. Mortality rates at 180 days were 15.5% and 11.9%, respectively. In unadjusted analyses, prior HF hospitalization was associated with increased risk of 180-day mortality (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.14-1.59]; P <0.01). After adjustment, the point estimate was attenuated and the association not statistically significant (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.99-1.40]; P =0.064). Similarly, after adjustment, compared with patients without prior hospitalization, prior HF hospitalization was not associated with mortality, irrespective of timing (0-4 months: HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.87-1.39], P =0.41; 4-8 months: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.70-1.27]; P =0.72; 8-12 months: HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.74-1.51], P =0.77; >12 months: HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.63-1.06], P =0.12)., Conclusions: In this cohort of patients hospitalized for worsening HF, prior HF hospitalization was not associated with 180-day mortality after comprehensively accounting for patient characteristics measured during the index patient visit. Clinical confounders measured at the point-of-care may explain previously observed associations between prior HF hospitalization and mortality, and these clinical factors may be a more direct means of predicting patient survival. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00475852.

Background: The FIGHT (Functional Impact of GLP-1 [glucagon-like peptide-1] for Heart Failure Treatment) trial randomized 300 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and a recent hospitalization for heart failure to liraglutide versus placebo. While there was no difference in the primary outcome (rank score of time to death, time to rehospitalization for heart failure, and change in NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide]), there was a significant increase in cystatin C among patients randomized to liraglutide raising concern of adverse renal outcomes. We performed a post hoc analysis of FIGHT to investigate whether liraglutide was associated with worsening renal function (WRF)., Methods: The relationship between randomization to liraglutide and WRF was evaluated using logistic regression models. Two hundred seventy-four patients (91%) had complete data to assess for WRF defined as: increase in SCr ≥0.3 mg/dL, or ≥25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate, or an increase in cystatin C ≥0.3 mg/L from baseline to 180-days., Results: Patients with WRF (n=113, 41%), compared with those without, were older, had more comorbidities, and lower utilization of guideline-directed medical treatment. Logistic regression models showed that age and baseline cystatin C levels were associated with WRF. In adjusted models, liraglutide was not associated with excess risk of WRF compared with placebo (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.62-1.67]). There was also no difference in the rank score when WRF was added as a fourth-tier outcome., Conclusions: Liraglutide was not associated with WRF among patients with HFrEF and a recent hospitalization for heart failure. These data support the relative renal safety profile of liraglutide among patients with HFrEF. Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01800968.

Background: Patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and obesity display a number of pathophysiologic features that may render them more or less vulnerable to negative effects of decongestion on renal function, including greater right ventricular remodeling, plasma volume expansion and pericardial restraint. We aimed to contrast the renal response to decongestion in obese compared to nonobese patients with HFpEF METHODS AND RESULTS: National Institutes of Health heart failure network studies that enrolled patients with acute decompensated HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) were included (DOSE, CARRESS, ROSE, and ATHENA). Obese HFpEF was defined as a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m 2 . Compared to nonobese HFpEF (n = 118), patients with obese HFpEF (n = 214) were an average of 9 years younger (71 vs 80 years,< 0.001), were more likely to have diabetes (64% vs 31%, P< 0.001) but had less atrial fibrillation (56% vs 75%, P< 0.001). Renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) was present in 82% of patients, and there was no difference at baseline between obese and nonobese patients. Despite similar weight loss through decongestive therapies, obese patients with HFpEF demonstrated greater rise in creatinine (Cr) and decline in glomerular filtration rate, with a 2-fold higher incidence of mild worsening renal function (rise in Cr ≥ 0.3 mg/dL) (28 vs 14%, P = 0.008) and a substantially greater increase in severe worsening of renal function (rise in Cr > 0.5 mg/dL) (9 vs 0%, P = 0.002)., Conclusions: Despite being nearly a decade younger, obese patients with HFpEF experience greater deterioration in renal function during decongestion than do nonobese patients with HFpEF. Further study to elucidate the complex relationships between volume distribution, cardiorenal hemodynamics and adiposity in HFpEF is needed., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To characterize the obese heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotype in a multicenter cohort., Patients and Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the randomized clinical trial RELAX (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction) performed between October 1, 2008, and February 1, 2012. Patients with HFpEF were classified by body mass index (BMI) as obese (BMI≥35 kg/m 2 ) and nonobese (BMI<30 kg/m 2 ) for comparison., Results: Obese patients with HFpEF (n=81) were younger (median age, 64 [interquartile range (IQR), 67-79] years vs 73 [IQR, 56-70] years; P<.001) but had greater peripheral edema (31% [25] vs 9% [6]; P<.001), more orthopnea (76% [56] vs 53% [35]; P=.005), worse New York Heart Association class (P=.006), and more impaired quality of life (P<.001) as compared with nonobese patients with HFpEF (n=70). Despite more severe signs and symptoms, obese patients with HFpEF had lower N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide level (median, 481 [IQR, 176-1183] pg/mL vs 825 [IQR, 380-1679] pg/mL [to convert to pmol/L, multiply by 0.118]; P=.007) and lower left atrial volume index (median, 38 [IQR, 31-47] mL/m 2 vs 54 [IQR, 41-63] mL/m 2 ; P<.001). Serum C-reactive protein (median, 5.0 [IQR, 2.4-9.9] mg/dL vs 2.7 [IQR, 1.6-5.4] mg/dL [to convert to mg/L, multiply by 10 -3 ]; P<.001) and uric acid (median, 7.8 [IQR, 6.1-8.7] mg/dL vs 6.8 [IQR, 5.5-8.3] mg/dL; P=.03) levels were higher in obese HFpEF, indicating greater systemic inflammation, than in nonobese HFpEF. Peak oxygen consumption was impaired in obese HFpEF (median, 11.1 [IQR, 9.6-14.4] mL/kg per minute vs 13.1 [IQR, 11.3-14.7] mL/kg per minute; P=.008), as was submaximal exercise capacity (6-minute walk distance, 272 [IQR, 200-332] m vs 355 [IQR, 290-415] m; P<.0001)., Conclusion: Obese HFpEF is associated with decreased quality of life, worse symptoms of heart failure, greater systemic inflammation, worse exercise capacity, and higher metabolic cost of exertion as compared with nonobese HFpEF. Further study is required to understand the pathophysiology and potential distinct treatments for patients with the obese phenotype of HFpEF., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00763867., (Copyright © 2019 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background We sought to study the prevalence of high-sensitivity troponin and its association with cardiac structure and outcomes in ambulatory and hospitalized patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction ( HF p EF ). Methods and Results A post hoc analysis utilized data from HF p EF patients: DOSE (Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation) and CARRESS - HF (Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure) enrolled patients hospitalized with acute HF p EF , and RELAX (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) enrolled ambulatory patients with HF p EF . High-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) was measured in hospitalized patients at baseline, at 72 to 96 hours, on day 7, and on day 60. In ambulatory patients hs-TnI was measured at baseline and at week 24. In the ambulatory cohort, correlations between hs-TnI and cardiac structure and function were assessed. The association between hs-TnI and a 60-day composite of emergency room visits, readmissions, and death was assessed for hospitalized patients using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. The study population included 139 hospitalized and 212 ambulatory patients with HF p EF and hs-TnI measured at baseline. The median (25th, 75th percentiles) baseline troponin was 17.6 (11.1, 41.0) ng/L in hospitalized patients and 9.5 (5.3, 19.7) ng/L in ambulatory patients ( P<0.001). The prevalence of elevated hs-TnI (>99% percentile upper reference limit was 86% in hospitalized patients and 53% among ambulatory patients, with stable elevation in ambulatory patients during follow-up. HF p EF patients with a hs-TnI above the median were older with worse left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction. Continuously valued hs-TnI (per doubling) was associated with increased risk of composite end point (adjusted hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.43; P=0.042). Conclusions Hs-TnI is commonly elevated among both hospitalized and ambulatory patients with HF p EF . Increased hs-TnI levels are associated with worse cardiac structure and increased risk of adverse events.

Background: Heart rate and systolic blood pressure (SBP) are prognostic markers in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Their combination in rate pressure product (RPP) as well as their role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear., Hypothesis: RPP and its components are associated with HFpEF outcomes., Methods: We performed an analysis of Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Subjects With Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00475852), which studied 7141 patients with acute HF. HFpEF was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%. Outcomes were assessed by baseline heart rate, SBP, and RPP, as well as the change of these variables using adjusted Cox models., Results: After multivariable adjustment, in-hospital change but not baseline heart rate, SBP, and RPP were associated with 30-day mortality/HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.17 per 5-bpm heart rate, HR: 1.20 per 10-mm Hg SBP, and HR: 1.02 per 100 bpm × mm Hg RPP; all P < 0.05). Baseline SBP was associated with 180-day mortality (HR: 0.88 per 10-mm Hg, P = 0.028). Though change in RPP was associated with 30-day mortality/HF hospitalization, the RPP baseline variable did not provide additional associative information with regard to outcomes when compared with assessment of baseline heart rate and SBP variables alone., Conclusions: An increase in heart rate and SBP from baseline to discharge was associated with increased 30-day mortality/HF hospitalization in HFpEF patients with acute exacerbation. These findings suggest value in monitoring the trend of vital signs during HFpEF hospitalization., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Underlying inflammation has been increasingly recognized in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In this study we tested the hypothesis that pro-inflammatory biomarkers are elevated in patients with acutely decompensated HFpEF (AD-HFpEF) compared with patients with stable HFpEF (S-HFpEF)., Methods and Results: Using a post hoc analysis the serum biomarkers tumor necrosis factor-alpha, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein interleukin 6 and pentraxin 3 (PTX3) and clinical, demographic, echocardiographic-Doppler and clinical outcomes data were analyzed in HFpEF patients enrolled in NHLBI Heart Failure Research Network clinical trials which enrolled patients with either AD-HFpEF or S-HFpEF. Compared to S-HFpEF, AD-HFpEF patients had higher levels of PTX3 (3.08 ng/mL versus 1.27 ng/mL, P <0.0001), interleukin-6 (4.14 pg/mL versus 1.71 pg/mL, P <0.0001), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (11.54 pg/mL versus 8.62 pg/mL, P =0.0015), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (11.90 mg/dL versus 3.42 mg/dL, P <0.0001). Moreover, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and PTX3 levels were significantly higher in AD-HFpEF compared with S-HFpEF patients admitted for decompensated HF within the previous year. PTX3 was positively correlated with left atrial volume index ( r =0.41, P =0.0017) and left ventricular mass ( r =0.26, P =0.0415), while tumor necrosis factor-alpha was inversely correlated with E/A ratio ( r =-0.31, P =0.0395)., Conclusions: Levels of pro-inflammatory biomarkers are strikingly higher in AD-HFpEF compared with S-HFpEF patients. PTX3 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha are correlated with echocardiographic-Doppler evidence of diastolic dysfunction. Taken together these data support the concept that a heightened pro-inflammatory state has a pathophysiologic role in the development of AD-HFpEF., (© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with preserved and reduced systolic function heart failure (HF)., Background: Heart failure with preserved systolic function (PSF) is common but not well understood., Methods: This analysis of the OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure) registry compared 20,118 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and 21,149 patients with PSF (left ventricular ejection fraction [EF] > or =40%). Sixty- to 90-day follow-up was obtained in a pre-specified 10% sample of patients. Analyses of patients with PSF defined as EF >50% were also performed for comparison., Results: Patients with PSF (EF > or =40%) were more likely to be older, female, and Caucasian and to have a nonischemic etiology. Although length of hospital stay was the same in both groups, risk of in-hospital mortality was lower in patients with PSF (EF > or =40%) (2.9% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.0001). During 60- to 90-day post-discharge follow-up, patients with PSF (EF > or =40%) had a similar mortality risk (9.5% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.459) and rehospitalization rates (29.2% vs. 29.9%; p = 0.591) compared with patients with LVSD. Findings were comparable with those with PSF defined as EF >50%. In a risk- and propensity-adjusted model, there were no significant relationships between discharge use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker or beta-blocker and 60- to 90-day mortality and rehospitalization rates in patients with PSF., Conclusions: Data from the OPTIMIZE-HF registry reveal a high prevalence of HF with PSF, and these patients have a similar post-discharge mortality risk and equally high rates of rehospitalization as patients with HF and LVSD. Despite the burden to patients and health care systems, data are lacking on effective management strategies for patients with HF and PSF. (Organized Program To Initiate Lifesaving Treatment In Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure [OPTIMIZE-HF]); http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00344513?order=1; NCT00344513).

Background Many patients with heart failure (HF) have severely reduced ejection fraction but do not meet threshold for consideration of advanced therapies (ie, stage D HF). The clinical profile and health care costs associated with these patients in US practice is not well described. Methods and Results We examined patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ≤40% from 2014 to 2019 in the GWTG-HF (Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure) registry, who did not receive advanced HF therapies or have end-stage kidney disease. Patients with severely reduced EF defined as EF ≤30% were compared with those with EF 31% to 40% in terms of clinical profile and guideline-directed medical therapy. Among Medicare beneficiaries, postdischarge outcomes and health care expenditure were compared. Among 113 348 patients with EF ≤40%, 69% (78 589) had an EF ≤30%. Patients with severely reduced EF ≤30% tended to be younger and were more likely to be Black. Patients with EF ≤30% also tended to have fewer comorbidities and were more likely to be prescribed guideline-directed medical therapy ("triple therapy" 28.3% versus 18.2%, P