Search

In post-stroke patients, muscle synergy (the coordination of motor modules during walking) is impaired. In some patients, the muscle synergy termed module 1 (hip/knee extensors) is merged with module 2 (ankle plantar flexors), and in other cases, module 1 is merged with module 4 (knee flexors). However, post-stroke individuals with a merging pattern of module 3 (hip flexor and ankle dorsiflexor) and module 4, which is the swing-muscle synergy, have not been reported. This study aimed to determine the muscle-synergy merging subtypes of post-stroke during comfortable walking speed (cws). We also examined the effect of experimental lower-limb angle modulation on the muscle synergy patterns of walking in each subtype. Forty-one participants were assessed under three conditions: cws, long stepping on the paretic side (p-long), and long stepping on the non-paretic side (np-long). Lower-limb flexion and extension angles and the electromyogram were measured during walking. Subtype classification was based on the merging pattern of the muscle synergies, and we examined the effect of different lower-limb angles on the muscle synergies. We identified three merging subtypes: module 1 with module 2 (subtype 1), module 1 with module 4 (subtype 2), and module 3 with module 4 (subtype 3). In the cws condition, the lower-limb flexion angle was reduced in subtype 3, and the lower-limb extension angle was decreased in subtype 1. A more complex muscle synergy was observed only in subtype 3 in the p-long condition versus cws (p = 0.036). This subtype classification of walking impairments based on the merging pattern of the muscle synergies could be useful for the selection of a rehabilitation strategy according to the individual’s particular neurological condition. Rehabilitation with increased lower-limb flexion may be effective for the training of patients with merging of modules 3 and 4 in comfortable walking.

Walking speed is strongly influenced by the severity of motor paralysis in post-stroke patients. Nevertheless, some patients with mild motor paralysis still walk slowly. Factors associated with this difference in walking speed have not been elucidated. To confirm walking characteristics of patients with mild motor paralysis and slow walking speed, this study identified patient subgroups based on the association between the severity of motor paralysis and walking speed. Fugl-Meyer assessment synergy score (FMS) and the walking speed were measured (n = 42), and cluster analysis was performed based on the association between FMS and walking speed to identify the subgroups. FMS and walking speed were associated (ρ = 0.50); however, some patients walked slowly despite only mild motor paralysis. Cluster analysis using FMS and walking speed as the main variables classified patients into subgroups. Patients with mild motor paralysis (FMS: 18.4 ± 2.09 points) and slow walking speed (0.28 ± 0.14 m/s) exhibited poorer trunk stability, increased co-contraction of the shank muscle, and increased intramuscular coherence in walking compared to other clusters. This group was identified by their inability to fully utilize the residual potential of motor function. In walking training, intervention in instability and excessive cortical control may be effective.