Search

Background Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, but data comparing LAAO with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) are sparse. Methods and Results This cohort study compared LAAO (with or without prior anticoagulation) with a switch of one DOAC to another DOAC by 1:2 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding. A total of 2350 patients (874 in the LAAO group and 1476 in the DOAC switch group) were included. After a mean follow-up of 1052±694 days, the primary outcome developed in 215 (24.6%) patients in the LAAO group and in 335 (22.7%) patients in the DOAC switch group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94 [95% CI, 0.80-1.12]; P =0.516). The LAAO group had a lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.39-0.60]; P <0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.32-0.73]; P <0.001) but similar risk of ischemic stroke (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63-1.10]; P =0.194). The major bleeding risk was similar overall (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.94-1.48], P =0.150) but was lower in the LAAO group after 6 months (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.51-0.97]; P =0.032). Conclusions LAAO conferred a similar risk of composite outcome of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding, as compared with DOAC switch. The risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were lower with LAAO.

Aims: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) play passive roles in disease management. This study aimed to examine the feasibility and preliminary effects of an empowerment-based care model, titled 'the nurse-led multi-component behavioural activation (N-MBA) programme', on health-related quality of life, AF knowledge, psychological outcomes, medication adherence, and treatment decision-making in patients with AF., Methods and Results: This mixed-methods study comprised a pilot randomized controlled trial and a qualitative study. Patients with AF who had a moderate-to-high risk of stroke but were not prescribed oral anticoagulants were recruited. Forty participants were recruited and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the N-MBA programme or standard care. The 13-week programme comprised care components that prepared patients for shared decision-making, an empowerment-based educational module on AF self-care, and continuous support through telephone calls. The programme was feasible, and the overall attendance rate was 82.5%. The participants gave excellent ratings in the satisfaction survey. The N-MBA group showed greater improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and AF knowledge than the standard care group at the immediate post intervention and 6-month follow-up time points. No significant between-group changes in medication adherence, anxiety, and depression were detected. Participants in the N-MBA group actively raised concerns about AF and its treatment with their attending doctors. The qualitative data were consistent with the quantitative data, indicating that the programme built a comprehensive knowledge base of AF and self-care behaviours., Conclusion: The N-MBA programme is feasible and acceptable to patients with AF. It improved patients' AF knowledge, treatment-related decision-making, and HRQoL., Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03924739., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Current international guidelines recommend ECG monitoring after an ischaemic stroke to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) in order to prevent stroke recurrence. However, optimal strategies to detect AF and the downstream management to prevent stroke recurrence remain to be established. The objective of the study was to explore the use of long-term home-based ECG monitoring for AF detection and stroke prevention in patients with a history of stroke., Methods and Analysis: This prospective, randomised, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication aimed to evaluate the efficacy of long-term home-based ECG monitoring for AF detection and stroke prevention in a 24-month period. Patients aged >18 years with a history of ischaemic stroke will be stratified according to the time from the index ischaemic stroke: <1, 1-3 and >3 years and then randomised in 1:1 to (1) home-based AF screening and (2) control. The home-based AF screening system comprises (1) a handheld single-lead ECG recorder (Comfit Healthcare Devices, Hong Kong SAR, China) and (2) a patient-facing smartphone application specially designed for the study. Patients randomised to the home-based AF group will record a 30 s single-lead ECG using a specially designed handheld ECG device every morning or when symptomatic. All remotely obtained data will be automatically transmitted in real-time through the study smartphone application to a secured cloud hosting and analysed using an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic system. When a diagnosis of AF is made with the system, the patients will be called back for a formal cardiology consultation within 1 week. The primary endpoint is the time to first detection of AF at 24 months of follow-up. Secondary endpoints include recurrent stroke or transient ischaemic attack, initiation of long-term anticoagulation therapy, hospitalisation for heart failure, cardiovascular death and all-cause death., Ethics and Dissemination: The study protocol has been approved by the institutional review board of The University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals., Trial Registration Number: NCT04523649., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Current international guidelines recommend non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) at significant ischaemic stroke risk given the superior safety and comparable efficacy of NOACs over warfarin. Nonetheless, the safety and effectiveness of NOACs have not been evaluated in patients with AF with underlying moderate or severe mitral stenosis (MS), hence the recommended stroke prevention strategy remains warfarin therapy., Method and Analysis: MS remains disproportionately prevalent in Asian countries compared with the developed countries. This prospective, randomised, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dabigatran for stroke prevention in AF patients with moderate or severe MS. Patients with AF aged ≥18 years with moderate or severe MS not planned for valvular intervention in the coming 12 months will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg two times per day or warfarin with international normalised ratio 2-3 in an open-label design. Patients with estimated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, or with a concomitant indication for antiplatelet therapy will be excluded. The primary outcome is a composite of stroke and systemic embolism. Secondary outcomes are ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, haemorrhagic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, major bleeding and death. The estimated required sample size is approximately 686 participants., Ethics and Dissemination: The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong and Hong Kong West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong for Fung Yiu King Hospital, Grantham Hospital, Queen Mary Hospital and Tung Wah Hospital in Hong Kong. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04045093); pre-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The precise age distribution and calculated stroke risk of screen-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) is not known. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the number needed to screen (NNS) to identify one treatable new AF case (NNS-Rx) (i.e., Class-1 oral anticoagulation [OAC] treatment recommendation) in each age stratum. If the NNS-Rx is known for each age stratum, precise cost-effectiveness and sensitivity simulations can be performed based on the age distribution of the population/region to be screened. Such calculations are required by national authorities and organisations responsible for health system budgets to determine the best age cutoffs for screening programs and decide whether programs of screening should be funded. Therefore, we aimed to determine the exact yield and calculated stroke-risk profile of screen-detected AF and NNS-Rx in 5-year age strata., Methods and Findings: A systematic review of Medline, Pubmed, and Embase was performed (January 2007 to February 2018), and AF-SCREEN international collaboration members were contacted to identify additional studies. Twenty-four eligible studies were identified that performed a single time point screen for AF in a general ambulant population, including people ≥65 years. Authors from eligible studies were invited to collaborate and share patient-level data. Statistical analysis was performed using random effects logistic regression for AF detection rate, and Poisson regression modelling for CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Nineteen studies (14 countries from a mix of low- to middle- and high-income countries) collaborated, with 141,220 participants screened and 1,539 new AF cases. Pooled yield of screening was greater in males across all age strata. The age/sex-adjusted detection rate for screen-detected AF in ≥65-year-olds was 1.44% (95% CI, 1.13%-1.82%) and 0.41% (95% CI, 0.31%-0.53%) for <65-year-olds. New AF detection rate increased progressively with age from 0.34% (<60 years) to 2.73% (≥85 years). Neither the choice of screening methodology or device, the geographical region, nor the screening setting influenced the detection rate of AF. Mean CHA2DS2-VASc scores (n = 1,369) increased with age from 1.1 (<60 years) to 3.9 (≥85 years); 72% of ≥65 years had ≥1 additional stroke risk factor other than age/sex. All new AF ≥75 years and 66% between 65 and 74 years had a Class-1 OAC recommendation. The NNS-Rx is 83 for ≥65 years, 926 for 60-64 years; and 1,089 for <60 years. The main limitation of this study is there are insufficient data on sociodemographic variables of the populations and possible ascertainment biases to explain the variance in the samples., Conclusions: People with screen-detected AF are at elevated calculated stroke risk: above age 65, the majority have a Class-1 OAC recommendation for stroke prevention, and >70% have ≥1 additional stroke risk factor other than age/sex. Our data, based on the largest number of screen-detected AF collected to date, show the precise relationship between yield and estimated stroke risk profile with age, and strong dependence for NNS-RX on the age distribution of the population to be screened: essential information for precise cost-effectiveness calculations., Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: GYHL reports consultancy and speaker fees from Bayer, Bayer/Janssen, BMS/Pfizer, Biotronik, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Microlife, Roche, and Daiichi-Sankyo outside the submitted work. No fees were received personally. YC reports grants from Bayer during the conduct of the study. DDM reports grants from National Institutes of Health, grants and other research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, grants, personal fees and other from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer, other research support from Apple, Samsung Electronics, grants from National Science Foundation during the conduct of the study; other from Mobile Sense Technologies and grants from Philips outside the submitted work. MP reports consultancy activity for Boehringer Ingelheim. JJO reports grants from Pfizer, nonfinancial support from Alivecor, outside the submitted work. JW reports grants from Bayer during the conduct of the study. GHM reports grants from Belgian Heart Rhythm Association during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, BMS/Pfizer, St Jude Medical outside the submitted work. RBS reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Pharma outside the submitted work. JSH reports grants from Medtronic, grants from Bristol-Meyers-Squibb/Pfizer outside the submitted work. FDRH reports personal fees from BMS/Pfizer, BI, and Bayer outside the submitted work. FRQ reports personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Servier, grants from Bayer, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from BMS outside the submitted work. BF reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bayer, grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from BMS-Pfizer, personal fees and non-financial support from Daiichi-Sankyo outside the submitted work. PSW reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Philips Medical Systems, grants and personal fees from Sanofi-Aventis, grants and personal fees from Bayer Vital, grants from Daiichi Sankyo Europe, personal fees from Bayer HealthCare, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees and nonfinancial support from DiaSorin, nonfinancial support from I.E.M., grants from Evonik, outside the submitted work. FK reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. RT reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim during the conduct of the study. In addition, RT has a patent as a co-inventor of the MyDiagnostick with royalties paid. The following authors have declared that no competing interests exist: VWL, AD, JH, NL, JO, LAPDT, AKR, RKS, SAC, TFC, JN, EMR, WK, JM, JM, LN, JWM, BPY, TM, JJGD, AS, BS, JSL, and DAF.

Background: Randomized trials have shown that optimal adherence to antihypertensive agents could protect against cardiovascular diseases, but whether adherence reduces cardiovascular deaths in community settings has not been explored so fully. This study evaluates the association between antihypertensive adherence and cardiovascular (coronary heart disease and stroke) mortality in the primary care settings., Methods: From a territory-wide database in Hong Kong, we included all patients who were prescribed their first-ever antihypertensive agents in the years between 2001 and 2005 from the public healthcare sector. All patients were followed up for five years, and assigned as having poor (Proportion of Days Covered [PDC]<40%), intermediate (40-79%), and high (≥ 80%) adherence to antihypertensive agents. The association between antihypertensive adherence and cardiovascular mortality was evaluated by using the Cox proportional hazard models., Results: From a total of 218,047 eligible patients, 3825 patients (1.75%) died of cardiovascular disease within five years after having received their first-ever antihypertensive agents. The proportions of patients having poor, intermediate, and high medication adherence were 32.9%, 12.1%, and 55.0%, respectively. Higher adherence levels at PDC 40%-79% (HR=0.46, 95% C.I. 0.41-0.52, p<0.001) and ≥ 80% (HR=0.91, 95% C.I. 0.85-0.98, p=0.012) were significantly less likely to be associated with mortality than the poor adherence (PDC0.040) group., Conclusions: Better antihypertensive adherence was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality. This highlights the need to promote adherence through strategies which have been proved to be effective in clinical settings., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: To compare the management cost and cost-effectiveness of dabigatran with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) from the hospital's and patients' perspectives., Hypothesis: Dabigatran is more cost-effective than warfarin for stroke prevention of AF in Hong Kong., Methods: The analysis was performed in conjunction with a drug utilization evaluation of dabigatran study in a teaching hospital in Hong Kong. The study recruited 244 patients who received either dabigatran or warfarin for stroke prevention of AF. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed and was expressed as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in averting a cardiac event or a bleeding event. A sensitivity analysis was used on all relevant variables to test the robustness., Results: From the hospital's perspective, the dabigatran group had a lower total cost of management than that of the warfarin group (median: US$421 vs US$1306, P < 0.001) (US$1 = HK$7.75) and was dominant over warfarin. From the patients' perspective, the total cost of management in the dabigatran group was higher than that in warfarin group (median: US$1751 vs US$70, P < 0.001), and the ICER in preventing a cardiac or bleeding event of dabigatran vs warfarin was estimated at US$68,333 and US$20,500, respectively. If dabigatran was subsidized by the hospital, a higher cost would be incurred by the hospital (median: US$1679 vs US$1306, ICER (cardiac and bleeding events): US$15,163 and US$4549, respectively)., Conclusions: The study favored dabigatran for stroke prophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular AF in Hong Kong under the current hospital's perspective and provided a reference for further comparisons under patient and subsidization perspectives., (© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Oral anticoagulation medications such as warfarin reduce the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) but have been underutilized. This study aimed to investigate physicians' perceptions of stroke prevention management and patients' knowledge of AF and warfarin therapy in Hong Kong (HK)., Hypothesis: Both physician and patient's knowledge on warfarin use were the barriers for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in Hong Kong., Methods: This prospective survey-based study was conducted between February 2011 and April 2011 to assess physicians' perceptions of stroke prevention management, patients' knowledge of AF, and patients' knowledge of warfarin therapy. The results were scored and compared with those in foreign countries., Results: Sixty-two physicians and 114 warfarin users were recruited in the study. The average score of HK physicians in the knowledge of stroke prevention therapy in AF patients was lower than that of Australian (AUS) family physicians (HK 2.48 vs AUS 4.02 out of 7). The mean scores of AF patients in Hong Kong regarding the knowledge of AF were lower than that of United Kingdom (UK) (HK 1.16 vs UK 2.24 out of 4) (P < 0.001) and that of Finland (FIN) (HK 2.77 vs FIN 5.94 out of 8) (P < 0.001), respectively. The mean score of AF patients in Hong Kong regarding the knowledge of warfarin therapy was lower than that of AF patients in the United States (US) (HK 2.39 vs US 3.92)., Conclusions: The barriers of warfarin use for AF patients in Hong Kong were related to both physicians and patients. Many Hong Kong physicians did not comply with international recommendations of stroke prevention in AF patients, and AF patients had a low knowledge level about the disease and warfarin therapy., (© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors and oral direct thrombin inhibitors are new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We systematically reviewed their risk of major bleeding and efficacy in thromboembolism reduction in AF., Methods: Eligible randomized controlled trials evaluating NOACs for stroke prevention in AF patients were identified from a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a Mantel-Haenzel random-effects model., Results: A total of 13 studies (n = 61,406) were included. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors were more effective in reducing stroke and systemic embolism compared to controls (RR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.54-0.92, P = 0.009) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (RR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.74-0.94, P = 0.002), with no significant difference in major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding (against controls: RR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.75-1.18, P = 0.60; against VKAs: RR 0.90, 95 % 0.69-1.17, P = 0.44). Oral direct thrombin inhibitors were associated with an improved major and CRNM bleeding profile (both comparisons: RR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.78-0.98, P = 0.02) and a significant reduction in stroke and systemic embolism (against controls: RR 0.79, 95 % CI 0.66-0.93, P = 0.006; against VKAs: RR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.66-0.93, P = 0.006)., Conclusions: Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors and oral direct thrombin inhibitors are more effective in reducing stroke and systemic embolism without increasing the risk of major bleeding compared to traditional oral anticoagulants. This favorable risk-benefit balance should be further confirmed by long-term, large-scale safety studies.

Background: Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor recently approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) as an alternative to warfarin. The primary advantages of dabigatran are freedom from monitoring and less interaction with other drugs and food. It is ideal for patients who are unwilling to adhere to regular coagulation monitoring or whose therapeutic effect using warfarin is not optimal despite adequate monitoring and management. However, the impact of dabigatran on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and drug compliance has been less evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and humanistic outcomes of dabigatran use in Hong Kong., Hypothesis: Dabigatran 110 mg twice daily was non-inferior in stroke prophylaxis in AF patients compared to adjusted-dose warfarin; while dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was superior to adjusted-dose warfarin in the real world data in Hong Kong., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 244 patients with newly diagnosed AF and prescribed dabigatran (n = 122) or warfarin (n = 122) for stroke prophylaxis from the Prince of Wales Hospital between January 2010 to November 2011. Clinical outcomes including death, stroke, bleeding, and HRQoL using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L were compared between patients on dabigatran and warfarin., Results: The median duration of follow-up was 310 days. Stroke occurred in 2 patients (1.64%) in the dabigatran group and 4 in the warfarin group (3.28%) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53, P = 0.47). Bleeding of any degree occurred in 28 patients on dabigatran and 38 patients on warfarin (adjusted HR: 0.76, P = 0.28), with age over 70 years and renal impairment being significant positive predictors of bleeding (P = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Dyspepsia was the most common adverse event of dabigatran over warfarin (19.7% vs 8.2%, P = 0.01). Rate of discontinuation of dabigatran was 25.4%, with dyspepsia being the most common cause for discontinuation (6 patients, 4.92%). There was no significant difference in drug compliance or HRQoL at 1 year between the 2 groups (utility score 0.77 [dabigatran] vs 0.74 [warfarin], P = 0.28)., Conclusions: In Hong Kong, the clinical efficacy and safety of dabigatran were comparable to that of warfarin, and drug compliance and HRQoL of using dabigatran and warfarin were similar after 1 year of use., (© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of left atrial thrombus that causes stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This study reported the initial safety, feasibility, and 1-yr clinical outcomes following AMPLATZER cardiac plug (ACP) implantation in Asia-Pacific region., Methods: Twenty NVAF patients (16 males, age 68 ± 9 yr) with high risk for developing cardioembolic stroke (CHADS(2) score: 2.3 ± 1.3) and contraindications to warfarin received ACP implants from June 2009 to May 2010. Patients received general anesthesia (n = 9) or controlled propofol sedation (n = 11) and the procedures were guided by fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Clinical follow-up was arranged at 1 month and then every 3 months after implantation, whereas, a TEE was scheduled at 1 month upon completion of dual anti-platelet therapy., Results: The LAA was successfully occluded in 19/20 patients (95%) at two Asian centers. One procedure was abandoned because of catheter-related thrombus formation. Other complications included coronary artery air embolism (n = 1) and TEE-attributed esophageal injury (n = 1). The median procedural and fluoroscopic times were 79 (IQR: 59-100) and 18 (IQR 12-27) minutes, respectively. The mean size of implant was 23.6 ± 3.1 mm. The average hospital stay was 1.8 ± 1.1 days. Follow-up TEE showed all the LAA orifices were sealed without device-related thrombus formation. No stroke or death occurred at a mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 3.1 months., Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggested LAA closure with ACP is safe, feasible with encouraging 1-yr clinical outcomes. Further large-scaled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of this device., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a fivefold increased risk for stroke due to thromboembolic events. Warfarin remains the standard medical therapy for decades in these patients but is difficult to use safely and conveniently. Chronic warfarin therapy is contraindicated in 14% to 44% of patients with AF who are at risk for stroke. In clinical practice, warfarin is prescribed to only 15% to 60% of patients with AF who are at high risk for thromboembolic events and have no clear contraindication to their use. Alternatives to warfarin include (i) antiplatelet therapy; (ii) new oral anticoagulants; and (iii) exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) as a major embolic source. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel was superior to aspirin alone in reducing the risk of stroke in patients unsuitable to warfarin. Furthermore, a number of newer oral anticoagulants are currently under investigation for stroke prevention in AF. Oral direct thrombin or factor Xa inhibitors are in the most advanced stages of development. Given that about 90% of the source of thromboembolism occurs in the LAA in patients with non-valvular AF, occlusion of flow into the LAA may prevent thrombus formation in the appendage and hence reduction of stroke. Recently, several devices have been employed percutaneously with encouraging results in selected patients. Current review summarizes the latest clinical trial data pertinent to dual-antiplatelet therapy, several newer antithrombotic agents and LAA occlusion., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

For many years, warfarin was the only effective oral anticoagulant to prevent and treat thromboembolism. Nevertheless, its clinical use is limited by a narrow therapeutic window, extensive drug interactions, need of strict dietary control and frequent monitoring. The pharmacological response is also unpredictable and highly variable among patients. Suboptimal anticoagulation can lead to detrimental thromboembolic events or life-threatening bleeding. Direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) activity represents a new class of anticoagulant activity that was intended to replace warfarin. Ximelagatran was the first DTI shown to have similar efficacy to warfarin, but failed to replace it because of a high incidence of liver toxicity. Dabigatran etexilate is another novel DTI with a more predictable pharmacokinetic profile and fewer drug interactions compared with warfarin. Recent large-scaled, randomized studies have shown that it does not share ximelagatran's hepatotoxicity, and is as effective as conventional anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF). These findings led to the approval of dabigatran etexilate for thromboprophylaxis following hip or knee replacement surgery in Europe, Canada and the United Kingdom. Here we summarize the latest evidence concerning the use of dabigatran etexilate in VTE (BISTRO, RE-MODEL, RE-NOVATE, RE-MOBILIZE and RECOVER) and AF (PETRO and RELY). Potential problems related to dabigatran use are also discussed to examine whether it can truly replace warfarin as the gold standard., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Atrial fibrillation is associated with a fivefold increased risk for stroke, mostly secondary to thromboembolic events. Anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist is the standard medical therapy for these patients but is difficult to maintain within the therapeutic range and requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustments. Approximately 90% of thromboembolism occurs in the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Occlusion of flow into the LAA may prevent thrombus formation in the appendage and, hence, reduction of stroke. Recently, several percutaneous transcatheter techniques of LAA exclusion using the Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion device, the WATCHMAN device, and AMPLATZER septal occluder and cardiac plug have been employed, with encouraging results. Occlusion of the LAA may be an alternative to vitamin K antagonist therapy for selected patients.

There is increasing interest in the evaluation and treatment of patent foramen ovale, which has been associated with various pathologic conditions, such as cryptogenic stroke, platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome and migraine. However, optimal treatment of patients with patent foramen ovale has not been established. This article aims to review the clinical manifestation and current therapeutic options for patent foramen ovale.

Background and Purpose: We aimed to investigate the incidence of May-Thurner syndrome in patients with cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale., Methods: This was a retrospective study. All consecutive patients with cryptogenic stroke having undergone patent foramen ovale closure from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2007, at our institute were included in this study. Pelvic magnetic resonance venography studies of all patients were reviewed to determine if features of May-Thurner syndrome were present. Medical records and invasive venography studies of all patients were reviewed when available. All patients with May-Thurner syndrome features on magnetic resonance venography were reviewed by a vascular medicine specialist to define any previous incidence of deep vein thrombosis or any signs of chronic venous insufficiency. All patients also had lower limb venous duplex performed to rule out lower limb venous thrombosis., Results: A total of 470 patients from January 1, 2002, until December 31, 2007, with cryptogenic stroke underwent patent foramen ovale closure at our institute. Thirty patients (6.3%) had features consistent with May-Thurner syndrome on magnetic resonance venography. These patients were predominantly female (80%) with a mean age of 43.6+/-11.9 years. Twelve patients (40%) had abnormalities in their laboratory thrombophilia evaluation and 13 females (54.1%) were taking hormone-related birth control pills. Only 2 patients had a history and signs of chronic venous insufficiency. All patent foramen ovales demonstrated right-to-left shunting on transesophageal echocardiography. Atrial septal aneurysms/hypermobile atrial septa were present in 70% of patients with May-Thurner syndrome., Conclusions: May-Thurner syndrome has an important clinical association with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale.

Objectives: The study evaluated the feasibility and safety of a novel left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder (LAmbre™, Lifetech Scientific Corp., China) in canines. Background: Transcatheter LAA occlusion is comparable to warfarin in preventing atrial fibrillation-related strokes. Methods: Twenty-two healthy dogs (28±3kg) received LAmbre implants. The device is delivered by an 8–10French sheath and has full recapture and repositioning capabilities. All dogs received 1-week antibiotics and 4-week aspirin (80mg daily) after implants and they were sacrificed in groups at Days 1–3 (n=5), 1- (n=7), 3- (n=4) and 6-months (n=6) for pathological examinations. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed immediately after implant, at Day 3 and before sacrifice. Results: The LAmbre was successfully implanted, retrieved, repositioned and re-implanted in all dogs. The mean implant size was 24±3mm and the device chosen was 36±7% larger than the measured landing zone diameter. Improper device selection (only 21% oversizing) resulted in dislodgement and death of 1 dog on Day 3. Post-implant angiography and TTE showed well-positioned device without pericardial effusion or impingement on surrounding structures. Late complications included device-related thrombus at 1month (n=1) and clinically insignificant pericardial effusion at Day 3 (n=1). Complete healing on the atrial facing surface with optimal LAA obliteration was confirmed by gross and microscopic examinations in dogs that have been followed up ≥3months (n=10). No infarct was detected in major organs. Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggested the LAmbre™ device is feasible with high success rate in canines. Further studies are needed to evaluate its safety and efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Marantic endocarditis is a non-infective cause of valvular masses. It is most commonly associated with advanced malignancy. We report a case of rapidly progressive marantic endocarditis, complicated by valve destruction and recurrent systemic embolisation, in a patient whose cancer was occult. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]