Search

The concept of structural reserve in stroke reorganization assumes that the relevance of the contralesional hemisphere strongly depends on the brain tissue spared by the lesion in the affected hemisphere. Recent studies, however, have indicated that the contralesional hemisphere's impact exhibits region-specific variability with concurrently existing maladaptive and supportive influences. This challenges traditional views, necessitating a nuanced investigation of contralesional motor areas and their interaction with ipsilesional networks. Our study focused on the functional role of contralesional key motor areas and lesion-induced connectome disruption early after stroke. Online TMS data of twenty-five stroke patients was analyzed to disentangle interindividual differences in the functional roles of contralesional primary motor cortex (M1), dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), and anterior interparietal sulcus (aIPS) for motor function. Connectome-based lesion symptom mapping and corticospinal tract lesion quantification were used to investigate how TMS effects depend on ipsilesional structural network properties. At group and individual levels, TMS interference with contralesional M1 and aIPS but not dPMC led to improved performance early after stroke. At the connectome level, a more disturbing role of contralesional M1 was related to a more severe disruption of the structural integrity of ipsilesional M1 in the affected motor network. In contrast, a detrimental influence of contralesional aIPS was linked to less disruption of the ipsilesional M1 connectivity. Our findings indicate that contralesional areas distinctively interfere with motor performance early after stroke depending on ipsilesional structural integrity, extending the concept of structural reserve to regional specificity in recovery of function., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Acute cerebral ischemia triggers a number of cellular mechanisms not only leading to excitotoxic cell death but also to enhanced neuroplasticity, facilitating neuronal reorganization and functional recovery., Objective: Transferring these cellular mechanisms to neurophysiological correlates adaptable to patients is crucial to promote recovery post-stroke. The combination of TMS and EEG constitutes a promising readout of neuronal network activity in stroke patients., Methods: We used the combination of TMS and EEG to investigate the development of local signal processing and global network alterations in 40 stroke patients with motor deficits alongside neural reorganization from the acute to the chronic phase., Results: We show that the TMS-EEG response reflects information about reorganization and signal alterations associated with persistent motor deficits throughout the entire post-stroke period. In the early post-stroke phase and in a subgroup of patients with severe motor deficits, TMS applied to the lesioned motor cortex evoked a sleep-like slow wave response associated with a cortical off-period, a manifestation of cortical bistability, as well as a rapid disruption of the TMS-induced formation of causal network effects. Mechanistically, these phenomena were linked to lesions affecting ascending activating brainstem fibers. Of note, slow waves invariably vanished in the chronic phase, but were highly indicative of a poor functional outcome., Conclusion: In summary, we found evidence that transient effects of sleep-like slow waves and cortical bistability within ipsilesional M1 resulting in excessive inhibition may interfere with functional reorganization, leading to a less favorable functional outcome post-stroke, pointing to a new therapeutic target to improve recovery of function., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Although ample evidence highlights that the ipsilesional corticospinal tract (CST) plays a crucial role in motor recovery after stroke, studies on cortico-cortical motor connections remain scarce and provide inconclusive results. Given their unique potential to serve as structural reserve enabling motor network reorganization, the question arises whether cortico-cortical connections may facilitate motor control depending on CST damage., Methods: Diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) and a novel compartment-wise analysis approach were used to quantify structural connectivity between bilateral cortical core motor regions in chronic stroke patients. Basal and complex motor control were differentially assessed., Results: Both basal and complex motor performance were correlated with structural connectivity between bilateral premotor areas and ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) as well as interhemispheric M1 to M1 connectivity. Whereas complex motor skills depended on CST integrity, a strong association between M1 to M1 connectivity and basal motor control was observed independent of CST integrity especially in patients who underwent substantial motor recovery. Harnessing the informational wealth of cortico-cortical connectivity facilitated the explanation of both basal and complex motor control., Interpretation: We demonstrate for the first time that distinct aspects of cortical structural reserve enable basal and complex motor control after stroke. In particular, recovery of basal motor control may be supported via an alternative route through contralesional M1 and non-crossing fibers of the contralesional CST. Our findings help to explain previous conflicting interpretations regarding the functional role of the contralesional M1 and highlight the potential of cortico-cortical structural connectivity as a future biomarker for motor recovery post-stroke. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:785-797., (© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Activity changes in the ipsi- and contralesional parietal cortex and abnormal interhemispheric connectivity between these regions are commonly observed after stroke, however, their significance for motor recovery remains poorly understood. We here assessed the contribution of ipsilesional and contralesional anterior intraparietal cortex (aIPS) for hand motor function in 18 recovered chronic stroke patients and 18 healthy control subjects using a multimodal assessment consisting of resting-state functional MRI, motor task functional MRI, online-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) interference, and 3D movement kinematics. Effects were compared against two control stimulation sites, i.e. contralesional M1 and a sham stimulation condition. We found that patients with good motor outcome compared to patients with more substantial residual deficits featured increased resting-state connectivity between ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional aIPS as well as between ipsilesional aIPS and dorsal premotor cortex. Moreover, interhemispheric connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional M1 as well as ipsilesional aIPS and contralesional M1 correlated with better motor performance across tasks. TMS interference at individual aIPS and M1 coordinates led to differential effects depending on the motor task that was tested, i.e. index finger-tapping, rapid pointing movements, or a reach-grasp-lift task. Interfering with contralesional aIPS deteriorated the accuracy of grasping, especially in patients featuring higher connectivity between ipsi- and contralesional aIPS. In contrast, interference with the contralesional M1 led to impaired grasping speed in patients featuring higher connectivity between bilateral M1. These findings suggest differential roles of contralesional M1 and aIPS for distinct aspects of recovered hand motor function, depending on the reorganization of interhemispheric connectivity., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Background and Purpose: The translational roadblock has long impeded the implementation of experimental therapeutic approaches for stroke into clinical routine. Considerable interspecies differences, for example, in brain anatomy and function, render comparisons between rodents and humans tricky, especially concerning brain reorganization and recovery of function. We tested whether stroke-evoked changes in neural networks follow similar patterns in mice and patients using a systems-level perspective., Methods: We acquired resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data during the early poststroke phase in a sample of human patients and compared the observed network changes with data from 2 mouse stroke models, that is, photothrombosis and distal middle cerebral artery occlusion. Importantly, data were subjected to the same processing steps, allowing a direct comparison of global network changes using graph theory., Results: We found that network parameters computed for both mouse models of stroke and humans follow a similar pattern in the postacute stroke phase. Parameters indicating the global communication structure’s facilitation, such as small worldness and characteristic path length, were similarly changed in humans and mice in the first days after stroke. Additionally, small worldness correlated with concurrent motor impairment in humans. Longitudinal observation in the subacute phase revealed a negative correlation between initial small worldness and motor recovery in mice., Conclusions: We show that network measures based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data after stroke obtained in mice and humans share notable features. The observed network alterations could serve as therapeutic readout parameters for future translational studies in stroke research.

Hemiparesis after stroke is associated with increased neural activity not only in the lesioned but also in the contralesional hemisphere. While most studies have focused on the role of contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) activity for motor performance, data on other areas within the unaffected hemisphere are scarce, especially early after stroke. We here combined functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to elucidate the contribution of contralesional M1, dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), and anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) for the stroke-affected hand within the first 10 days after stroke. We used "online" TMS to interfere with neural activity at subject-specific fMRI coordinates while recording 3D movement kinematics. Interfering with aIPS activity improved tapping performance in patients, but not healthy controls, suggesting a maladaptive role of this region early poststroke. Analyzing effective connectivity parameters using a Lasso prediction model revealed that behavioral TMS effects were predicted by the coupling of the stimulated aIPS with dPMC and ipsilesional M1. In conclusion, we found a strong link between patterns of frontoparietal connectivity and TMS effects, indicating a detrimental influence of the contralesional aIPS on motor performance early after stroke., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.)

Promoting the recovery of motor function and optimizing rehabilitation strategies for stroke patients is closely associated with the challenge of individual prediction. To date, stroke research has identified critical pathophysiological neural underpinnings at the cellular level as well as with regard to network reorganization. However, in order to generate reliable readouts at the level of individual patients and thereby realize translation from bench to bedside, we are still in a need for innovative methods. The combined use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and EEG has proven powerful to record both local and network responses at an individual's level. To elucidate the potential of TMS-EEG to assess motor recovery after stroke, we used neuronavigated TMS-EEG over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) in 28 stroke patients in the first days after stroke. Twenty-five of these patients were reassessed after >3 months post-stroke. In the early post-stroke phase (6.7 ± 2.5 days), the TMS-evoked EEG responses featured two markedly different response morphologies upon TMS to ipsilesional M1. In the first group of patients, TMS elicited a differentiated and sustained EEG response with a series of deflections sequentially involving both hemispheres. This response type resembled the patterns of bilateral activation as observed in the healthy comparison group. By contrast, in a subgroup of severely affected patients, TMS evoked a slow and simplified local response. Quantifying the TMS-EEG responses in the time and time-frequency domain revealed that stroke patients exhibited slower and simple responses with higher amplitudes compared to healthy controls. Importantly, these patterns of activity changes after stroke were not only linked to the initial motor deficit, but also to motor recovery after >3 months post-stroke. Thus, the data revealed a substantial impairment of local effects as well as causal interactions within the motor network early after stroke. Additionally, for severely affected patients with absent motor evoked potentials and identical clinical phenotype, TMS-EEG provided differential response patterns indicative of the individual potential for recovery of function. Thereby, TMS-EEG extends the methodological repertoire in stroke research by allowing the assessment of individual response profiles., (© The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Background: Studies examining the contribution of contralesional brain regions to motor recovery after stroke have revealed conflicting results comprising both supporting and disturbing influences. Especially the relevance of contralesional brain regions beyond primary motor cortex (M1) has rarely been studied, particularly concerning the temporal dynamics post-stroke., Methods: We, therefore, used online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interference to longitudinally assess the role of contralesional (right) frontoparietal areas for recovery of hand motor function after left hemispheric stroke: contralesional M1, contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), and contralesional anterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS). Fourteen stroke patients and sixteen age-matched healthy subjects performed motor tasks of varying complexity with their (paretic) right hand. Motor performance was quantified using three-dimensional kinematic data. All patients were assessed twice, (i) in the first week, and (ii) after more than three months post-stroke., Results: While we did not observe a significant effect of TMS interference on movement kinematics following the stimulation of contralesional M1 and dPMC in the first week post-stroke, we found improvements of motor performance upon interference with contralesional IPS across motor tasks early after stroke, an effect that persisted into the later phase. By contrast, for dPMC, TMS-induced deterioration of motor performance was only evident three months post-stroke, suggesting that a supportive role of contralesional premotor cortex might evolve with reorganization., Conclusion: We here highlight time-sensitive and region-specific effects of contralesional frontoparietal areas after left hemisphere stroke, which may influence on neuromodulation regimes aiming at supporting recovery of motor function post-stroke., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this publication. Furthermore, there has been no significant financial support for this work., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Functional recovery of stroke-related deficits is mainly achieved through neural reorganization. Neurorehabilitative approaches, therefore, aim at supporting positive processes while suppressing maladaptive neuronal processes. This review summarizes the main findings of studies using non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation with respect to the benefits of the treatment for motor deficits after stroke. In addition, the article discusses possible approaches to enhance the effectiveness of neuromodulatory approaches and thus improve the outcome of patients.

Promoting the recovery of motor function and optimizing rehabilitation strategies for stroke patients is closely associated with the challenge of individual prediction. To date, stroke research has identified critical pathophysiological neural underpinnings at the cellular level as well as with regard to network reorganization. However, in order to generate reliable readouts at the level of individual patients and thereby realize translation from bench to bedside, we are still in a need for innovative methods. The combined use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and EEG has proven powerful to record both local and network responses at an individual's level. To elucidate the potential of TMS-EEG to assess motor recovery after stroke, we used neuronavigated TMS-EEG over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) in 28 stroke patients in the first days after stroke. Twenty-five of these patients were reassessed after >3 months post-stroke. In the early post-stroke phase (6.7 ± 2.5 days), the TMS-evoked EEG responses featured two markedly different response morphologies upon TMS to ipsilesional M1. In the first group of patients, TMS elicited a differentiated and sustained EEG response with a series of deflections sequentially involving both hemispheres. This response type resembled the patterns of bilateral activation as observed in the healthy comparison group. By contrast, in a subgroup of severely affected patients, TMS evoked a slow and simplified local response. Quantifying the TMS-EEG responses in the time and time-frequency domain revealed that stroke patients exhibited slower and simple responses with higher amplitudes compared to healthy controls. Importantly, these patterns of activity changes after stroke were not only linked to the initial motor deficit, but also to motor recovery after >3 months post-stroke. Thus, the data revealed a substantial impairment of local effects as well as causal interactions within the motor network early after stroke. Additionally, for severely affected patients with absent motor evoked potentials and identical clinical phenotype, TMS-EEG provided differential response patterns indicative of the individual potential for recovery of function. Thereby, TMS-EEG extends the methodological repertoire in stroke research by allowing the assessment of individual response profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Methods Results Interpretation The corticospinal tract (CST) is considered the most important motor output pathway comprising fibers from the primary motor cortex (M1) and various premotor areas. Damage to its descending fibers after stroke commonly leads to motor impairment. While premotor areas are thought to critically support motor recovery after stroke, the functional role of their corticospinal output for different aspects of post‐stroke motor control remains poorly understood.We assessed the differential role of CST fibers originating from premotor areas and M1 in the control of basal (single‐joint muscle synergies and strength) and complex motor control (involving inter‐joint coordination and visuomotor integration) using a novel diffusion imaging approach in chronic stroke patients.While M1 sub‐tract anisotropy was positively correlated with basal and complex motor skills, anisotropy of PMd, PMv, and SMA sub‐tracts was exclusively associated with complex motor tasks. Interestingly, patients featuring persistent motor deficits showed an additional positive association between premotor sub‐tract integrity and basal motor control.While descending M1 output seems to be a prerequisite for any form of upper limb movements, complex motor skills critically depend on output from premotor areas after stroke. The additional involvement of premotor tracts in basal motor control in patients with persistent deficits emphasizes their compensatory capacity in post‐stroke motor control. In summary, our findings highlight the pivotal role of descending corticospinal output from premotor areas for motor control after stroke, which thus serve as prime candidates for future interventions to amplify motor recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]