Search

Objective: The role of heparin in acute ischemic stroke is controversial. We investigated the effect of heparin on ischemic lesion growth., Methods: Data were analyzed on nonthrombolyzed ischemic stroke patients in whom diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)/perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) MRI was performed less than 12 hours of last known well and showed a PWI-DWI lesion mismatch, and who underwent follow-up neuroimaging at least 4 days after admission. Lesion growth was assessed by (1) absolute lesion growth and (2) percentage mismatch lost (PML). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis, and propensity score matching, were used to determine the effects of heparin on ischemic lesion growth., Results: Of the 113 patients meeting study criteria, 59 received heparin within 24 hours. Heparin use was associated with ∼5-fold reductions in PML (3.5% versus 19.2%, P = .002) and absolute lesion growth (4.7 versus 20.5 mL, P = .009). In multivariate regression models, heparin independently predicted reduced PML (P = .04) and absolute lesion growth (P = .04) in the entire cohort, and in multiple subgroups (patients with and without proximal artery occlusion; DWI volume greater than 5 mL; cardio-embolic mechanism; DEFUSE-3 target mismatch). In propensity score matching analysis where patients were matched by admission NIHSS, DWI volume and proximal artery occlusion, heparin remained an independent predictor of PML (P = .048) and tended to predict absolute lesion growth (P = .06). Heparin treatment did not predict functional outcome at discharge or 90 days., Conclusion: Early heparin treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients with PWI-DWI mismatch attenuates ischemic lesion growth. Clinical trials with careful patient selection are warranted to investigate the potential ischemic protective effects of heparin., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Post-stroke recrudescence (PSR) usually occurs in the setting of infection, hypotension, hyponatremia, insomnia or stress, and benzodiazepine use. Animal studies have suggested an infection-related immunologic mechanism for PSR. This retrospective study was designed to assess whether infection-triggered PSR is related to a prior infection during the index stroke. We identified 95 patients admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital from 2000 to 2015 with post-stroke recrudescence who had adequate medical record information concerning the index stroke. The frequency of infections, as well as other triggers such as hypotension, hyponatremia, insomnia/stress, and benzodiazepine use, was compared between the index stroke and the PSR episode. Independent predictors of infection-related PSR were identified using a logistic regression model. The mean age was 66 ± 17 years (53% female); 29 (31%) had infections during the index stroke as compared to 40 (42%) during the PSR episode. The frequency of PSR triggered by infection was higher in patients with infections during the index stroke (65% vs 32%, p = 0.003). The same relationship occurred with benzodiazepine-triggered PSR (41% vs 12%, p = 0.008). The frequencies of other triggers such as hypotension, hyponatremia and insomnia/stress were not significantly different between the index stroke and the PSR episode. In a logistic regression model, infection during the index stroke was an independent predictor of infection-triggered PSR (odds ratio 4.85, 95% C.I. 1.7, 13.7). The association between infection during index stroke and infection-triggered PSR supports the immunologic mechanism postulated in animal models.

Objective: To characterize isolated upper extremity (UE) weakness from stroke., Methods: In our Get with the Guidelines-Stroke dataset (n = 7643), 87 patients (1.14%) had isolated UE weakness and underwent thorough stroke evaluation with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and good-quality arterial imaging. We analyzed clinical-imaging features, etiology, management, and outcome. Since isolated UE weakness is typically associated with contralateral hand-knob area infarcts, patients were classified into Group-A (motor strip infarct) or Group-B (non-motor strip infarct)., Results: The mean age was 68 years; 66% were male, 72% had hypertension, 22% diabetes, 53% hyperlipidemia, and 16% were smokers. In Group-A (n = 71), 18 patients had single and 53 had multiple infarcts involving the contralateral motor strip. In Group-B (n = 16), 6 patients had contralateral subcortical white matter infarcts, 9 had bihemispheric infarcts and 1 had a brainstem infarct. Compared to Group-B, patients in Group-A more often had carotid artery stenosis or irregular plaque (84.5% versus 50%, P = .006) and large-artery atherosclerosis mechanism (46% versus 19%, P = .05), and less often cardioembolic mechanism (13% versus 44%, P = .008). Among 36 patients with large-artery mechanism, 27 had less than 70% stenosis including 19 with plaque ulceration/thrombus. Recurrent strokes occurred in 10 patients (11.5%), including 5 with mild-moderate carotid stenosis and plaque ulceration/thrombosis, over 1515 days follow-up., Conclusion: Stroke mechanism in acute isolated UE weakness is variable. Contralateral motor-strip infarcts are associated with carotid stenosis, often with plaque ulceration ("vulnerable carotid plaque"), and infarcts in other locations with cardioembolism. Recurrent stroke risk is high especially with mild-moderate carotid artery stenosis and plaque ulceration/thrombus., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)