Search

Background: Bone or cartilage anomalies with affection of brain supplying arteries are a potential structural cause for ischemic stroke. In the following, we termed this entity bony stroke. Due to rarity of their description, there is no standardized workup and therapy for bony strokes., Methods: Retrospectively, we extracted diagnostic and therapeutic workup of all patients considered to have had a bony stroke between January 2017 to March 2022 at our comprehensive care center., Results: In total, 6 patients classified as a bony stroke were identified among 4200 acute patients with ischemic stroke treated during the study period. Each patient had recurrent ischemic strokes in the dependent vascular territory before diagnosis. Diagnosis was achieved by a combination of imaging devices, including sonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. In addition to conventional static imaging, the application of dynamic imaging modalities with the patients' head in rotation or reclination confirmed a vessel affection following head movements in 3 patients (50%). Treatment options were interdisciplinary assessed and included the following: conservative treatment (n=1), endovascular stenting (n=2) or occlusion (n=2), surgical removal of bone/ cartilage (n=2), and surgical bypass treatment (n=1). In follow-up (mean 11.7 months), no patient experienced further ischemia., Conclusions: As a differential diagnosis, bony strokes may be considered in patients with recurrent ischemic stroke of unknown cause in one dependent vascular territory. Interdisciplinary evaluation and treatment may eliminate risk of stroke recurrence.

Background: Lesions of the extracranial carotid artery are the cause of 10-15 % of all cases of cerebral ischemia. The aims of the updated S3 guidelines are evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for action on comprehensive care of patients with extracranial carotid stenosis in Germany and Austria., Methods: A systematic literature search (1990-2019) and methodical assessment of existing guidelines and systematic reviews were carried out. Consensus answers to 37 key questions with evidence-based recommendations., Results: The prevalence of extracranial carotid stenosis is approximately 4% and increases after the age of 65 years. The most important examination method is duplex sonography. Randomized controlled studies (RCT) have shown that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) of an asymptomatic 60-99% carotid artery stenosis reduces the absolute risk of stroke (absolute risk reduction, ARR) within 5 years in comparison to drug treatment alone by 4.1%. Due to an improved pharmaceutical prevention of arteriosclerosis, the S3 guidelines recommend a prophylactic CEA of a 60-99% stenosis only for patients without an increased surgical risk. Additionally, one or more clinical or imaging results should be present, which indicate an increased risk of carotid-related stroke in the follow-up. For medium-grade (50-69 %) and high-grade (70-99 %) symptomatic stenoses the ARRs after 5 years are 4.6% and 15.6%, respectively. Systematic reviews of RCTs have shown that CEA is associated with a ca. 50% lower periprocedural risk of stroke compared to carotid artery stenting (CAS). There are no differences in the long-term course. The CEA is recommended for high-grade asymptomatic, medium-grade and high-grade symptomatic carotid stenosis as a standard procedure, alternatively CAS can be considered. For both procedures the periprocedural stroke rate/mortality during hospitalization should be a maximum of 2% (asymptomatic stenosis) or 4% (symptomatic stenosis)., Conclusion: Both CEA and CAS necessitate a critical evaluation of the indications and strict quality criteria. Future studies should evaluate even better selection criteria for an individual, optimal, conservative, operative or endovascular treatment., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) may cause future stroke and therefore patients with ACAS require best medical treatment. Patients at high risk for stroke may opt for additional revascularization (either surgery or stenting) but the future stroke risk should outweigh the risk for peri/post-operative stroke/death. Current risk stratification for patients with ACAS is largely based on outdated randomized-controlled trials that lack the integration of improved medical therapies and risk factor control. Furthermore, recent circulating and imaging biomarkers for stroke have never been included in a risk stratification model. The TAXINOMISIS Project aims to develop a new risk stratification model for cerebrovascular complications in patients with ACAS and this will be tested through a prospective observational multicentre clinical trial performed in six major European vascular surgery centres., Methods and Analysis: The risk stratification model will compromise clinical, circulating, plaque and imaging biomarkers. The prospective multicentre observational study will include 300 patients with 50%-99% ACAS. The primary endpoint is the three-year incidence of cerebrovascular complications. Biomarkers will be retrieved from plasma samples, brain MRI, carotid MRA and duplex ultrasound. The TAXINOMISIS Project will serve as a platform for the development of new computer tools that assess plaque progression based on radiology images and a lab-on-chip with genetic variants that could predict medication response in individual patients., Conclusion: Results from the TAXINOMISIS study could potentially improve future risk stratification in patients with ACAS to assist personalized evidence-based treatment decision-making., (© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Clinical Investigation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.)

Objective: We sought to analyze the association between last neurologic event and the risk of stroke or death among patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) under routine conditions in Germany., Methods: Secondary data analysis was performed based on the German statutory quality assurance database for carotid procedures. A total of 144,347 patients treated by CEA and 14,794 patients treated by CAS were included in the analysis. Primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death. To analyze the association between the last neurologic event and outcome, multilevel multivariable regression analysis was performed., Results: In patients treated by CEA, raw risk for any in-hospital stroke or death was 2.0% (2923/144,347), with a risk of 1.4% in asymptomatic and 3.0% in symptomatic patients. In patients treated by CAS, raw risk for any in-hospital stroke or death was 3.6% (538/14,794), with a risk of 1.7% in asymptomatic and 6.1% in symptomatic patients. Regression analysis revealed that increasing severity of last neurologic event was significantly associated with an increasing risk of any in-hospital stroke or death in patients treated by both CEA and CAS (P < .004). However, the risk of any stroke or death did not significantly differ between asymptomatic patients and patients with amaurosis fugax before CEA or CAS (P = .219 for CEA, P = .124 for CAS)., Conclusions: Increasing severity of last neurologic event is associated with an increasing risk of any in-hospital stroke or death in patients treated by CEA and CAS. The risk of any stroke or death did not differ between asymptomatic patients and patients with amaurosis fugax., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation of age and sex with the outcome after carotid artery stenting (CAS). We used the statutory nationwide quality assurance database in Germany, in which, among others, all endovascular procedures on the extracranial carotid artery are filed., Methods: We performed a secondary data analysis of all CAS procedures (N = 13,086) between 2012 and 2014 in Germany. The primary outcome was defined as any in-hospital stroke or death; the secondary outcomes were defined as in-hospital stroke (alone) and in-hospital death (alone). Descriptive analyses as well as multilevel multivariable analyses were applied., Results: About 70% of the patients were male, and the mean age of all patients was 69.7 ± 9.3 years. Carotid stenosis was symptomatic in 36% of all patients. The primary outcome occurred in 2.4% (n = 317) of patients (2.5% of women, 2.4% in men, 1.7% of asymptomatic patients, and 3.7% of symptomatic patients). Multivariable regression analysis indicated that age (linear effect per 10-year increase) was significantly correlated with a higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death after CAS (risk ratio [RR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.75). The risks of stroke alone (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.72) and death alone (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01-2.58) were also significantly associated with age in CAS patients. Sex did not significantly alter the age effect and was not associated with the primary outcome rate (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.78-1.26)., Conclusions: Age but not sex is correlated with a higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients after CAS under routine conditions. The primary outcome rate was fueled to a comparable magnitude by both components of the composite outcome., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: There is currently no clear consensus regarding the optimal perioperative antiplatelet therapy regimen for carotid surgery. Therefore, associations between different antiplatelet therapies and the risk of stroke or death and perioperative complications after carotid endarterectomy on a national level in Germany were analyzed., Methods: Overall, 117,973 elective carotid endarterectomies for asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis between 2010 and 2014 were included. Data were extracted from the statutory nationwide quality assurance database. The primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death until discharge from the hospital. Secondary outcomes were any major stroke or death, death alone, stroke, myocardial infarction, local bleeding, and any local complications (cranial nerve palsy, severe bleeding, acute occlusion). Descriptive statistics and multilevel multivariable regression analyses were applied. Single-agent therapy with aspirin was used as reference., Results: Patients were predominantly male (68%), with a mean age of 71 years. Carotid stenosis was symptomatic in 40%. Of all patients, 82.8% were treated perioperatively by monotherapy with aspirin alone, 2.7% received other platelet inhibitors, and 4.8% of the patients were operated on under dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome occurred in 1.8% of all patients. Multilevel multivariable regression analysis revealed that the combined stroke and death rate of patients with no perioperative antiplatelet therapy was significantly higher (risk ratio [RR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.42) compared with the group of patients receiving monotherapy. The same was true for the major stroke and death rate (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.48). In contrast, dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower risk of death alone (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.88) but with a significantly higher rate of secondary bleeding requiring reoperation (RR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.88-2.50)., Conclusions: This study shows that the risk of stroke or death was significantly higher in patients without any perioperative antiplatelet therapy. In contrast, dual antiplatelet therapy vs aspirin monotherapy was associated with a lower risk only of perioperative death but with a higher risk of neck bleeding until discharge. Perioperative antiplatelet therapy was significantly associated with a decreased in-hospital stroke and death risk. Further studies are needed to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of single vs dual antiplatelet therapy., (Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for stroke in evolution (SIE) under routine conditions in Germany., Methods: This secondary data analysis is based on the German statutory quality assurance database for carotid revascularization procedures. Patients with SIE who had undergone CEA or CAS were included. The primary outcome was any new stroke or all-cause death until hospital discharge. Descriptive statistics were calculated using statistical standard methods. To identify factors that are associated with the primary or secondary outcomes, a multilevel multivariable regression analysis was performed (exploratory approach)., Results: Between 2009 and 2014, a total of 5058 patients (mean age, 70 ± 11 years; 68% male) with SIE were treated with CEA (n = 3176) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/CAS (n = 1882). The primary outcome occurred in 9.0% and 11.7% after CEA and CAS, respectively. The multivariable regression analysis revealed that age (per 10-year increase: risk ratio [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.50), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (ASA class 4 and 5 vs ASA class 3: RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.65-3.32), ipsilateral degree of stenosis (occlusion vs severe stenosis: RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.29-2.79; low grade vs severe stenosis: RR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.55-6.02), and neurologic deficit on admission (modified Rankin scale score of 3-5 vs 0-2: RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.04-2.10) are significantly associated with the risk of stroke or death after emergency CEA for SIE. In patients treated with CAS, only age (per 10-year increase: RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.37-1.82), ASA class (ASA class 1 and 2 vs ASA class 3: RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95; ASA class 4 and class 5 vs ASA class 3: RR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.31-2.78), and ipsilateral degree of stenosis (moderate vs severe stenosis: RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77; occlusion vs severe stenosis: RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.18-2.25) were significantly associated with the primary outcome rate., Conclusions: Emergency carotid revascularization is associated with a combined stroke or death rate of about 10% under routine conditions in Germany. Lower age, lower ASA class, moderate to high-grade stenosis, and less severe neurologic deficit preceding CEA potentially serve as protective factors., (Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Subgroup analyses from randomized trials indicate that the time interval between the neurologic index event and carotid artery stenting is associated with periprocedural stroke and death rates in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. The aim of this article is to analyze whether this observation holds true under routine conditions in Germany., Methods and Results: Secondary data analysis was done on 4717 elective carotid artery stenting procedures that were performed for symptomatic carotid stenosis. The patient cohort was divided into 4 groups according to the time interval between the index event and intervention (group I 0-2, II 3-7, III 8-14, and IV 15-180 days). Primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death. For risk-adjusted analyses, a multilevel multivariable regression model was used. The in-hospital stroke or death rate was 3.7% in total and 6.0%, 4.4%, 2.4%, and 3.0% in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Adjusted analysis showed a decreased risk for any stroke or death in group III, a decreased risk for any major stroke or death in groups III and IV, and a decreased risk for any death in groups II and III compared to the reference group I., Conclusions: A short time interval between the neurologic index event and carotid artery stenting of up to 7 days is associated with an increased risk for stroke or death under routine conditions in Germany. Although results cannot prove causal relationships, carotid artery stenting may be accompanied by an increased risk of stroke or death during the early period after the index event., (© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the association between intraprocedural and periprocedural variables and in-hospital stroke or death rate after carotid artery stenting., Background: In Germany, all open surgical and endovascular procedures on the extracranial carotid artery must be documented in a statutory nationwide quality assurance database., Methods: A total of 13,086 carotid artery stenting procedures for asymptomatic (63.9%) or symptomatic carotid stenosis (mean age 69.7 years, 69.7% men) between 2009 and 2014 were recorded. The following variables were analyzed: stent design, stent material, neurophysiological monitoring, periprocedural antiplatelet medication, and use of an embolic protection device. The primary outcome was in-hospital stroke or death. Major stroke or death, any stroke, and death, all until discharge, were secondary outcomes. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) were assessed using multilevel multivariable regression analyses., Results: The primary outcome occurred in 2.4% of the population (1.7% in asymptomatic and 3.7% in symptomatic patients). The multivariable analysis showed an independent association between the use of an embolic protection device and lower in-hospital rates of stroke or death (adjusted RR: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50 to 0.85), major stroke or death (adjusted RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.84), and stroke (adjusted RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.77). Regarding the occurrence of in-hospital death, there was no significant association (adjusted RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.35). None of the outcomes was associated with stent design, stent material, neurophysiological monitoring, or antiplatelet medication., Conclusions: The use of an embolic protection device was independently associated with lower in-hospital risk for stroke or death, major stroke or death, and stroke., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: In Germany, all surgical and endovascular procedures on the carotid bifurcation must be documented in a statutory nationwide quality assurance database. We aimed to analyze the association between procedural and perioperative variables and in-hospital stroke or death rates after carotid endarterectomy., Methods: Between 2009 and 2014, overall 142 074 elective carotid endarterectomy procedures for asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were documented in the database. The primary outcome of this secondary data analysis was in-hospital stroke or death. Major stroke or death, stroke, and death, each until discharge were secondary outcomes. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) were assessed by multivariable multilevel regression analyses., Results: The primary outcome occurred in 1.8% of patients, with a rate of 1.4% in asymptomatic and 2.5% in symptomatic patients, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, lower risks of stroke or death were independently associated with local anesthesia (versus general anesthesia: RR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.95), carotid endarterectomy with patch plasty compared with primary closure (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.97), intraoperative completion studies by duplex ultrasound (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.88) or angiography (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90), and perioperative antiplatelet medication (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97). No shunting and a short cross-clamp time were also associated with lower risks; however, these are suspected to be confounded., Conclusions: Local anesthesia, patch plasty compared with primary closure, intraoperative completion studies by duplex ultrasound or angiography, and perioperative antiplatelet medication were independently associated with lower in-hospital stroke or death rates after carotid endarterectomy., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background: Guideline recommendations on carotid endarterectomy are based predominantly on randomized, controlled trials, in which women or elderly patients are often under-represented. This study analyzed the association of age and sex with the risk of in-hospital stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy under routine conditions in Germany., Methods and Results: Secondary data analysis using the Statutory German Quality Assurance Database on all carotid endarterectomy procedures (n=142 074) performed between 2009 and 2014. Primary outcome was any stroke or death until discharge; secondary outcomes were any in-hospital stroke (alone), and death (alone). Descriptive statistics and multilevel multivariable regression analyses were applied. Patients were predominately male (68%), with mean age 71 years. Carotid stenosis was symptomatic in 40%. Primary outcome occurred in 1.8% of women and 1.9% of men. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that more-advanced age was associated with a higher primary outcome rate (relative risk [RR] per 10-year increase: 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.24). Risk of death (alone) was associated with age (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.54-1.84). Age was associated with the risk of stroke (alone; RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.11). Sex was not associated with primary outcome rate (1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10), nor did it significantly modify the age effect., Conclusions: This study shows that increasing age, but not sex, is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy under everyday conditions in Germany. Whereas the risk of death (alone) is significantly associated with age, the association between age and the risk of stroke (alone) can be considered of minor importance., (© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.)

Objective: Current guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) be performed as early as possible after the neurologic index event in patients with 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis. However, recent registry data showed that patients treated ≤48 hours had a significantly increased perioperative risk. Therefore, the aim of this single-center study was to determine the effect of the time interval between the neurologic index event and CEA on the periprocedural complication rate at our institution., Methods: Prospectively collected data for 401 CEAs performed between 2004 and 2014 for symptomatic carotid stenosis were analyzed. Patients were divided into four groups according to the interval between the last neurologic event and surgery: group I, 0 to 2 days; group II, 3 to 7 days; group III, 8 to 14 days; and group IV, 15 to 180 days. The primary end point was the combined rate of in-hospital stroke or mortality. Data were analyzed by way of χ 2 tests and multivariable regression analysis., Results: The patients (68% men) had a median age of 70 years (interquartile range, 63-76 years). The index events included transient ischemic attack in 43.4%, amaurosis fugax in 25.4%, and an ipsilateral stroke in 31.2%. CEA was performed using the eversion technique in 61.1% of patients, and 50.1% were treated under locoregional anesthesia. The perioperative combined stroke and mortality rate was 2.5% (10 of 401), representing a perioperative mortality rate of 1.0% and stroke rate of 1.5%. Overall, myocardial infarction, cranial nerve injuries, and postoperative bleeding occurred in 0.7%, 2.2%, and 1.7%, respectively. We detected no significant differences for the combined stroke and mortality rate by time interval: 3% in group I, 3% in group II, 2% in group III, and 2% in group IV. Multivariable regression analysis showed no significant effect of the time interval on the primary end point., Conclusions: The combined mortality and stroke rate was 2.5% and did not differ significantly between the four different time interval groups. CEA was safe in our cohort, even when performed as soon as possible after the index event., (Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy should be performed within 2 weeks in patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis. Because a Swedish register study indicated that patients treated within the first days after a stroke or transient ischemic attack might have an increased perioperative stroke and mortality risk, this study aimed to find out whether these findings are also true under everyday conditions in Germany., Methods: Secondary data analysis including 56 336 elective carotid endarterectomy procedures performed for symptomatic carotid stenosis under everyday conditions between 2009 and 2014. The patient cohort was divided into 4 groups according to time interval between index event and surgery (I: 0-2, II: 3-7, III: 8-14, and IV: 14-180 days). Primary outcome was any in-hospital stroke or death. For risk-adjusted analyses, a multilevel multivariable regression model was used., Results: Mean patients' age was 71.1±9.6 years; 67.5% were men. Overall rate of any stroke or death was 2.5% (n=1434). Risk of any in-hospital stroke or death was 3.0% in group I, 2.5% in group II, 2.6% in group III, and 2.3% in group IV. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the time interval was not significantly associated with the primary outcome., Conclusions: The time interval between the index event and carotid endarterectomy was not associated with the risk of any in-hospital stroke or death in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis in Germany. In clinically stable patients, carotid endarterectomy might, therefore, be performed safely as soon as possible after the neurological index event., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Current guidelines recommend performing carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid disease as soon as possible after the neurological index event. However, early stroke risk has not been well documented for this patient group. We therefore conducted a systematic analysis of the current literature on the recurrent risk of ischemic events in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE® database from 1950 until June 8, 2015 (key words: cerebral ischemia, transient ischemic attack, amaurosis fugax, stroke, symptomatic carotid stenosis, recurrent risk, outcome, prognosis, follow-up, cohort and natural history). All studies reporting stroke risks in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis after neurologic index events within a period of 7 days were included. Cumulative stroke risks with 95% confidence intervals after a neurologic index event were recalculated at 2-3, 7, 14 and 30 days and a meta-analysis including an analysis of heterogeneity were performed using the statistical package R and Excel for Mac 2003. Ten studies with a total number of 2634 patients were included. Results of an overall stroke risk were as follows: 2.0-17.2% at 2-3 days, 0-22.1% at 7 days, 0-29.6% at 14 days and 0-11.1% at 30 days in patients with a symptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis. The pooled stroke risk in the six studies with active follow-up was 6.0% (95% CI 2.4-14.4) at 2-3 days, 10.9% (6.1-18.7) at 7 days and 17.6% (9.7-29.9) at 14 days. Pooled stroke risk in the three studies with uncensored populations was even higher with 6.4% (1.5-23.8%) at 2-3 days, 19.5% (12.7-28.7) at 7 days and 26.1% (20.6-32.5%) at 14 days. Significant heterogeneity (P<0.001) could be explained by the different inclusion criteria and the study's design. Retrospective studies with passive follow-up had the lowest stroke risk whereas prospective studies with active follow-up and without bias through early intervention by carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting had the highest stroke risk. The risk of recurrence of cerebrovascular events in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis within the first days after a neurologic index event is as high as 6.4% (1.5-23.8), 19.5% (12.7-28.7) and 26.1% (20.6-32.5) after 2-3, 7 and 14 days respectively. Patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis are therefore at a very high risk of a definitive stroke. Recommendations by current guidelines to perform carotid endarterectomy as soon as possible after the neurologic index event are therefore justified.