Search

Background: There is limited evidence on the performance of emergent large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke screening tools when used by emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency department (ED) providers. We assessed the validity and predictive value of the vision, aphasia, neglect (VAN) assessment when completed by EMS and in the ED among suspected stroke patients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of VAN performed by EMS providers and VAN inferred from the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale performed by ED nurses at a single hospital. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of VAN by EMS and in the ED for LVO and a combined LVO and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) outcome., Results: From January 2018 to June 2020, 1,547 eligible patients were identified. Sensitivity and specificity of ED VAN were similar for LVO (72% and 74%, respectively), whereas EMS VAN was more sensitive (84%) than specific (68%). PPVs were low for both EMS VAN (26%) and ED VAN (21%) to detect LVO. Due to several VAN-positive ICHs, PPVs were substantially higher for both EMS VAN (44%) and ED VAN (39%) to detect LVO or ICH. EMS and ED VAN had high NPVs (97% and 96%, respectively)., Conclusions: Among suspected stroke patients, we found modest sensitivity and specificity of VAN to detect LVO for both EMS and ED providers. Moreover, the low PPV in our study suggests a significant number of patients with non-LVO ischemic stroke or ICH could be over-triaged with VAN., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Purpose: Treatment strategies in acute ischemic stroke aim to curtail ischemic progression. Emerging paradigms propose patient subselection using imaging biomarkers derived from CT, CTA, and CT perfusion. We evaluated the performance of a fully-automated computational tool, hypothesizing enhancements compared with qualitative approaches. The correlation between imaging variables and clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke is reported., Materials and Methods: Sixty-two patients with acute ischemic stroke and MCA or ICA occlusion undergoing multidetector CT, CTA, and CTP were retrospectively evaluated. CTP was processed on a fully operator-independent platform (RApid processing of PerfusIon and Diffusion [RAPID]) computing automated core estimates based on relative cerebral blood flow and relative cerebral blood volume and hypoperfused tissue volumes at varying thresholds of time-to-maximum. Qualitative analysis was assigned by 2 independent reviewers for each variable, including CT-ASPECTS, CBV-ASPECTS, CBF-ASPECTS, CTA collateral score, and CTA clot burden score. Performance as predictors of favorable clinical outcome and final infarct volume was established for each variable., Results: Both RAPID core estimates, CT-ASPECTS, CBV-ASPECTS, and clot burden score correlated with favorable clinical outcome (P < .05); CBF-ASPECTS and collateral score were not significantly associated with favorable outcome, while hypoperfusion estimates were variably associated, depending on the selected time-to-maximum thresholds. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated disparities among tested variables, with RAPID core and hypoperfusion estimates outperforming all qualitative approaches (area under the curve, relative CBV = 0.86, relative CBF = 0.81; P < .001)., Conclusions: Qualitative approaches to acute ischemic stroke imaging are subject to limitations due to their subjective nature and lack of physiologic information. These findings support the benefits of high-speed automated analysis, outperforming conventional methodologies while limiting delays in clinical management., (© 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Background and Purpose: Higher reperfusion rates have been established with endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). There are limited data on the comparative performance of mechanical thrombectomy devices., Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis was undertaken of all consecutive patients who underwent thrombectomy using Merci, Penumbra or stent retrievers (SR) from September 2010 to November 2012. Baseline characteristics, rates of successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score 2b-3), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), final infarct volume, 90-day mortality and independent functional outcomes at 90 days were compared across the three devices., Results: Our cohort included 287 patients. There were mild imbalances in baseline characteristics with trends towards higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score in patients in the Merci group (SR=18 vs Merci=21 vs Penumbra=19, p=0.06) and lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) in patients in the SR group (>7: SR=51% vs Merci=61% vs Penumbra=62%, p=0.12). On univariate analysis there were no differences in the rate of sICH (SR=7% vs Merci=7% vs Penumbra=6%, p=0.921) and infarct volume (SR=61.5 mL vs Merci=69.5 mL vs Penumbra=59.2 mL, p=0.621). Trends towards better functional outcomes were found with Penumbra and SR vs Merci (41% vs 36% vs 25%, respectively, p=0.079). Complete or near complete reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) was higher in the SR and Penumbra groups than in the Merci group (86% vs 78% vs 70%, respectively, p=0.027). Binary logistic regression showed that SR was an independent predictor of good functional outcome (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.018 to 5.048; p=0.045)., Conclusions: Although our initial data confirm the superiority of SR technology over the Merci device, there was no significant difference in near complete/complete reperfusion, final infarct volumes or clinical outcomes between SR and Penumbra thromboaspiration., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Objective: Large vessel occlusions with heavy clot burden are less likely to improve with intravenous (IV) thrombolysis alone. The purpose of this study was to show whether a combination of IV thrombolysis and endovascular therapy was superior to endovascular treatment alone., Methods: Data for 104 patients with acute large artery occlusion treated between 2005 and 2010 were reviewed. Forty-two received endovascular therapy in combination with IV thrombolysis (bridging group), and 62 received endovascular therapy only. Clinical outcome, mortality rate, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rate were compared between the two groups., Results: The two groups had similar demographic and vascular risk factor distribution, as well as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission (mean±SD: 14.8±4.7 and 16.0±5.3; P=0.23). No difference was found in Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction recanalization rates (score of 2 or 3) after combined or endovascular therapy alone (83.33% and 79.03%; P=0.585). Favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of <2 at 90 days, also did not differ between the bridging group and the endovascular-only group (37.5% and 32.76%; P=0.643). There was no difference in mortality rate (19.04% and 29.03%; P=0.5618) and sICH rate (11.9% and 9.68%; P=0.734). A significant difference was found in mean time from symptom onset to treatment in the bridging group and the endovascular-only group (227±88 min vs. 125±40 min; P<0.0001)., Conclusion: Combining IV thrombolysis with endovascular therapy resulted in similar outcome, revascularization, sICH, and mortality rates compared with endovascular therapy alone. Prospective clinical studies comparing both treatment strategies in acute ischemic stroke are warranted., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Current American Stroke Association/American Heart Association recommendations on the management of acute ischemic stroke do not recommend the early use of heparin because of an increased risk of bleeding complications. However, for select patients, such as those with strokes associated with non-occlusive intraluminal thrombus, intravenous heparin might prove to be beneficial., Methods: A retrospective analysis of acute ischemic stroke cases associated with non-occlusive intraluminal thrombus of intracranial and extracranial arteries in the corresponding vascular territories was conducted to identify patients in whom treatment with intravenous heparin resulted in near-complete or complete lysis of the thrombus. Imaging findings from CT perfusion and angiography, MRI, and/or digital subtraction angiography were used to describe the location of intraluminal thrombus immediately before and after treatment with intravenous heparin., Results: 18 patients with nonocclusive intraluminal thrombus confirmed by CT angiography (CTA) received treatment with intravenous heparin alone (median duration 3.5 days; range 1-8 days). The median National Institutes of Health stroke scale score was 2.5 (range 0-15) on admission and 1 (range 0-9) at discharge. Nine patients had complete lysis, and nine patients had partial lysis of the thrombus with improved flow distal to the location of the thrombus. None of the patients developed intracranial hemorrhage., Conclusion: For strokes associated with intraluminal thrombus, intravenous heparin might prove to be an effective treatment strategy. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with intravenous heparin in those patients.

Background: There is limited knowledge on the radiographic features of thrombolysis-induced hemorrhage. The factors that influence early hematoma expansion have not been elucidated., Methods: Patients presenting with a symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) as a result of intravenous (IV) thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for acute ischemic stroke and had noncontrast computed tomographic (CT) scans of the head were included in this retrospective study. Calculation of hematoma volumes was obtained. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate for the effect of baseline blood pressure (BP) on initial hematoma volume and further growth., Results: Of 267 patients who were treated with intravenous tPA for acute ischemic stroke at our facility between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009, 17 patients developed symptomatic ICH and were included in the final analysis. There was a positive correlation between baseline level of systolic BP after thrombolysis and initial hematoma volume (r = 0.46; P = .03) but not for the diastolic BP (r = 0.07; P = .40). There was a significant increase in mean hematoma volume expansion when comparing results between the first and second CT scans (median 9 hours, 22 minutes; 14.9 ± 19.6 cm(3) to 26.0 ± 26.7 cm(3); P = .04). There was also a negative association between the reduction of systolic BP and hematoma growth (r = -0.67; P = .02), but no correlation with change in diastolic BP (r = -0.22; P = .28)., Conclusions: Once diagnosed, thrombolysis-induced symptomatic ICH undergoes significant early expansion in size. Systolic BP may play a role in hematoma expansion., (Copyright © 2012 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Strokes secondary to acute internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion are associated with extremely poor prognosis. The best treatment approach to acute stroke in this setting is unknown. We sought to determine clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to ICA occlusion treated with intravenous (IV) systemic thrombolysis or intra-arterial endovascular therapy., Methods: Using the PubMed database, we searched for studies that included patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to ICA occlusion who received treatment with IV thrombolysis or intra-arterial endovascular interventions. Studies providing data on functional outcomes beyond 30 days and mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) rates were included in our analysis. We compared the proportions of patients with favorable functional outcomes, sICH, and mortality rates in the 2 treatment groups by calculating χ(2) and confidence intervals for odds ratios., Results: We identified 28 studies with 385 patients in the IV thrombolysis group and 584 in the endovascular group. Rates of favorable outcomes and sICH were significantly higher in the endovascular group than the IV thrombolysis-only group (33.6% vs 24.9%, P=0.004 and 11.1% vs 4.9%, P=0.001, respectively). No significant difference in mortality rate was found between the groups (27.3% in the IV thrombolysis group vs 32.0% in the endovascular group; P=0.12)., Conclusions: According to our systematic review, endovascular treatment of acute ICA occlusion results in improved clinical outcomes. A higher rate of sICH after endovascular treatment does not result in increased overall mortality rate.