Search

Objective: Describe the proportion of upper lumbar bone stress injuries (LBSI; T12-L3) relative to all LBSI, and the clinical presentation and diagnosis of upper LBSI in elite cricketers. Design: Case series. Setting: Professional domestic and international cricket teams over a 9-year period. Participants: Elite Australian cricketers. Independent Variables: Symptomatic upper LBSI diagnosed based on clinical findings and medical imaging. Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence, injury history, and clinical management. Results: Twenty-four pace bowlers (22 male and 2 female) sustained 39 cases of upper LBSI (T12:2, L1:3, L2:20, L3:14). Upper lumbar vertebrae were involved in 41% (95% CI 31-51) of all LBSI in this cohort. Twenty-seven (69%, 54-81) cases had an injury that occurred only on the side contralateral to the bowling arm. Ipsilateral injuries tended to occur secondary to a contralateral nonunited defect. In all 7 cases with known radiology follow-up that had a contralateral then ipsilateral LBSI, the contralateral injury did not achieve bony union before the onset of the ipsilateral LBSI. For stress fractures with imaging follow-up, those who achieved bony union took longer to return to bowling training [median 152 days (IQR 117-188)], compared to those who achieved partial or no union [median 68 days (IQR 46-115)]. Conclusions: Upper LBSI in elite cricketers occurs in approximately 2 out of 5 cases of LBSI. Clinicians should allow sufficient time for upper LBSI to resolve and unite (if a fracture) because cases that returned to bowling training earlier were less likely to achieve bony union, and those that failed to unite commonly went on to have a recurrent LBSI. Level of Evidence: Therapy/prognosis/diagnosis level 2b. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Lumbar bone stress injuries (LBSI) are the most prevalent injury in cricket. Although fast bowling technique has been implicated in the etiology of LBSI, no previous study has attempted to prospectively analyze fast bowling technique and its relationship to LBSI. The aim of this study was to explore technique differences between elite cricket fast bowlers with and without subsequent LBSI. Methods: Kinematic and kinetic technique parameters previously associated with LBSI were determined for 50 elite male fast bowlers. Group means were compared using independent-samples t -tests to identify differences between bowlers with and without a prospective LBSI. Significant parameters were advanced as candidate variables for a binary logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the 50 bowlers, 39 sustained a prospective LBSI. Significant differences were found between injured and noninjured bowlers in rear knee angle, rear hip angle, thoracolumbar side flexion angle, and thoracolumbar rotation angle at back foot contact; the front hip angle, pelvic tilt orientation, and lumbopelvic angle at front foot contact; and the thoracolumbar side flexion angle at ball release and the maximal front hip angle and ipsilateral pelvic drop orientation. A binary logistic model, consisting of rear hip angle at back foot contact and lumbopelvic angle at front foot contact, correctly predicted 88% of fast bowlers according to injury history and significantly increased the odds of sustaining an LBSI (odds ratio, 0.88 and 1.25, respectively). Conclusions: Lumbopelvic motion is implicated in the etiology of LBSI in fast bowling, with inadequate lumbopelvifemoral complex control as a potential cause. This research will aid the identification of fast bowlers at risk of LBSI, as well as enhancing coaching and rehabilitation of fast bowlers from LBSI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Comparative reliability and prospective validity.Objective: First, to evaluate the reliability of four methods of assessing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) bone marrow edema (BMO) of the posterior vertebral arch of the lumbar vertebrae of elite junior fast bowlers. Second, to evaluate the validity of the most reliable method for the early detection of lumbar bone stress injury.Summary Of Background Data: MRI has demonstrated utility in identifying BMO in lumbar vertebrae. Methods to grade the severity of BMO may provide valuable insight to inform clinical management, particularly in elite athletes where detection of early-stage bone stress may prevent progression to more severe and costly bone stress injury.Methods: Sixty-five male elite junior fast bowlers had repeat MRI scans during a cricket season. A subset of 19 bowlers' images were reassessed by experienced musculoskeletal radiologists to determine intra- and inter-rater reliability. All images were aligned with independent medical records of lower back symptoms and diagnosed bone stress injuries to establish the relationship of BMO and lumbar bone stress injury.Results: Clinical detection of abnormal BMO, whether the pars region of the vertebra was considered in its entirety or subdivided into regions, had fair-to-moderate inter-rater reliability, and fair-to-almost perfect intra-rater reliability. Measurement of BMO signal intensity using an imaging software tool had excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.848, 0.837). BMO signal intensity was positively associated with subsequent LBSI (P < 0.001), and differentiated between asymptomatic and symptomatic bowlers (P < 0.001).Conclusion: Measurement of BMO signal intensity using an imaging software tool proved a reliable and valid measure of the severity of lumbar bone stress injury in elite junior fast bowlers.Level Of Evidence: 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]