Search

River restoration enhances not only habitat diversity in the stream channel and riparian zone, but also retention of organic matter, which together are expected to enhance aquatic-terrestrial linkages, and the range of autochthonous and allochthonous resources. Consequently, alterations of food-web structure and trophic relationships can be expected. We applied stable isotope analysis (δC, δN) to characterize changes in the trophic structure of benthic invertebrate communities between paired restored and unrestored river reaches across 16 European catchments. We sampled dominant taxa of invertebrate assemblages belonging to different functional feeding groups and calculated δC range to estimate the diversity of basal resources assimilated, δN range as an indicator of the trophic length and standard ellipse area corrected for small samples as a measure of isotopic niche width. We analysed (1) if restoration influences the trophic structure of invertebrates, (2) if effects of restoration depend on the extent of restoration effort, and (3) if effects of restoration depend on restoration measures applied. Our European-scale comparison indicates that river habitat restoration effects trophic structure, primarily by increasing the breadth of resources assimilated by consumers; this effect increases with restoration effort and it depends on restoration measure type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

1. Restoration of river hydromorphology often has limited detected effects on river biota. One frequently discussed reason is that the restored river length is insufficient to allow populations to develop and give the room for geomorphological processes to occur. 2. We investigated ten pairs of restored river sections of which one was a large project involving a long, intensively restored river section and one represented a smaller restoration effort. The restoration effect was quantified by comparing each restored river section to an upstream nonrestored section. We sampled the following response variables: habitat composition in the river and its floodplain, three aquatic organism groups (aquatic macrophytes, benthic invertebrates and fish), two floodplain-inhabiting organism groups (floodplain vegetation, ground beetles), as well as food web composition and land-water interactions reflected by stable isotopes. 3. For each response variable, we compared the difference in dissimilarity of the restored and nearby non-restored section between the larger and the smaller restoration projects. In a second step, we regrouped the pairs and compared restored sections with large changes in substrate composition to those with small changes. 4. When comparing all restored to all non-restored sections, ground beetles were most strongly responding to restoration, followed by fish, floodplain vegetation, benthic invertebrates and aquatic macrophytes. Aquatic habitats and stable isotope signatures responded less strongly. 5. When grouping the restored sections by project size, there was no difference in the response to restoration between the projects targeting long and short river sections with regard to any of the measured response variables except nitrogen isotopic composition. In contrast, when grouping the restored sections by substrate composition, the responses of fish, benthic invertebrates, aquatic macrophytes, floodplain vegetation and nitrogen isotopic composition were greater in sections with larger changes in substrate composition as compared to those with smaller changes. 6. Synthesis and applications. The effects of hydromorphological restoration measures on aquatic and floodplain biota strongly depend on the creation of habitat for aquatic organisms, which were limited or not present prior to restoration. These positive effects on habitats are not necessarily related to the restored river length. Therefore, we recommend a focus on habitat enhancement in river restoration projects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction is presented in which the editors discuss articles in the issue on topics including floodplain and river restoration, effects on floodplain inundation, and hydrologic alteration in rivers with diversion hydropower production in China.

We evaluated the restoration of physical habitats and its influence on macroinvertebrate community structure in 18 Danish lowland streams comprising six restored streams, six streams with little physical alteration and six channelized streams. We hypothesized that physical habitats and macroinvertebrate communities of restored streams would resemble those of natural streams, while those of the channelized streams would differ from both restored and near-natural streams. Physical habitats were surveyed for substrate composition, depth, width and current velocity. Macroinvertebrates were sampled along 100 m reaches in each stream, in edge habitats and in riffle/run habitats located in the center of the stream. Restoration significantly altered the physical conditions and affected the interactions between stream habitat heterogeneity and macroinvertebrate diversity. The substrate in the restored streams was dominated by pebble, whereas the substrate in the channelized and natural streams was dominated by sand. In the natural streams a relationship was identified between slope and pebble/gravel coverage, indicating a coupling of energy and substrate characteristics. Such a relationship did not occur in the channelized or in the restored streams where placement of large amounts of pebble/gravel distorted the natural relationship. The analyses revealed, a direct link between substrate heterogeneity and macroinvertebrate diversity in the natural streams. A similar relationship was not found in either the channelized or the restored streams, which we attribute to a de-coupling of the natural relationship between benthic community diversity and physical habitat diversity. Our study results suggest that restoration schemes should aim at restoring the natural physical structural complexity in the streams and at the same time enhance the possibility of re-generating the natural geomorphological processes sustaining the habitats in streams and rivers. Documentation of restoration efforts should be intensified with continuous monitoring of geomorphological and ecological changes including surveys of reference river systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Restorations have been conducted in Danish lowland streams for almost 30 years to combat the poor physical conditions resulting from decades of channelisation, flood plain drainage and other impacts. Despite this effort, the recently drafted River Basin Management Plans show that physical improvements are still required in more than 7000km of stream in order to comply with the Water Framework Directive. In this study we used published studies and expert knowledge to describe the restoration approaches most likely to achieve the environmental goals. In addition, we collected information about the economic costs of the different restoration approaches based on Danish experiences. For heavily impacted lowland streams (channelised and deeply incised streams) we described only two different restoration methods, both of which are relatively expensive. For lesser impacted streams (channelised but not deeply incised streams) we described six different options for improving ecological quality, varying significantly in cost. Our analysis showed that the cost may increase dramatically if several remedial actions are required or if land owners are entitled to large monetary compensations. Consequently, stream managers face an important challenge in the future prioritisation of restoration efforts aimed to obtain ecological improvements within tight budgets. The information presented in this paper can help the decision-making of managers. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The lower 19km of the Skjern River was restored and transformed into a 26km long meandering river. Three survey reaches and one control reach upstream of the restoration area were surveyed to assess the short-term effects of the restoration on river habitats, macrophytes and macroinvertebrates. The reaches were surveyed before the restoration in 2000 and again after the restoration in 2003. Morphological adjustments were evident in the re-meandered river and the habitat structure (depth, current velocity and substratum) became more diverse. The macrophyte coverage was 34% before the restoration. Restoration included removal of dense near bank vegetation stands of Glyceria maxima, and in 2003 re-colonization of the restored reaches had resulted in 24% macrophyte coverage. Species composition and growth patterns changed significantly in the edge habitat and the dominant macrophyte G. maxima was replaced by Elodea canadensis and Sparganium sp. Macroinvertebrates rapidly colonized the restored reaches and increased the community diversity. Only one taxon, Heptageniidae, significantly increased in abundance after the restoration and a more even distribution of taxa developed on the restored reaches. Biological communities will continue to develop over the coming years as the river becomes more physically stable. Hence the macroinvertebrate and macrophyte communities will adjust and colonization from upstream sources and other systems will probably increase biodiversity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Restoration has been increasingly applied over the last decades as a way to improve the ecological conditions in stream ecosystems, but documentation of the impact of restoration on ecosystem functions is sparse. Here, we applied a space-for-time approach to explore effects of stream restoration on metabolism and organic matter decomposition in lowland agricultural streams. We included stream reaches that were restored >10 years ago and compared ecosystem functioning in these streams with those in channelized and naturally meandering stream reaches from the same geographical region. Specifically, we tested the following hypotheses: 1) rates of stream metabolism (gross primary production, GPP, and ecosystem respiration, ER) and organic matter decomposition in restored reaches resemble rates in naturally meandering reaches more than rates in channelized stream reaches and 2) higher resemblance in ecosystem metabolism and organic matter decomposition between restored reaches and meandering reaches can be attributed to the improved physical habitat conditions in the restored stream reaches. Overall, we did not find that stream metabolism or organic matter decomposition differed among restored, channelized and naturally meandering stream reaches even though habitat conditions differed among the three stream types. Instead, we found a large variation in ecosystem function characteristics across all sites. When analyzing all stream types combined, we found that GPP increased with increasing plant coverage and that ER increased with increasing stream size and with the coverage of coarse substratum on the stream bottom. Organic matter decomposition, on the other hand, only slightly increased with the number of plant species and declined with increasing concentrations of nutrients. Overall, our findings suggest that physical habitat improvements in restored stream reaches can affect ecosystem functions, but also that the restoration outcome is context-dependent since many of the physical characteristics playing a role for the measured functions were only to some extent affected by the restoration and/or clouded by interference with factors operating at a larger-scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• δ13C, δ15N were analyzed for invertebrates from the river, the shoreline and habitats adjacent to the riparian zone. • River restoration enhances trophic linkages between stream food webs and riparian consumers. • Indicated especially by the elevated trophic position of riparian consumers. • Aquatic-terrestrial linkages are promoted by the diversification of riparian habitats. Hydromorphological river restoration can significantly alter habitat configuration and modify invertebrate assemblages of rivers and floodplains. However, the consequences of these changes for ecosystem functioning and aquatic-terrestrial interactions are not known. As a restored shoreline has a more heterogeneous structure compared to a straightened river, restoration is likely to impact aquatic-terrestrial linkages in multiple ways, which might be captured based on biomarker indicators to characterize changes in food web functioning. We conducted a large scale comparative study targeting eleven river restoration projects in central and northern Europe to assess effects of river restoration on trophic patterns across the aquatic-terrestrial interface. We investigated the isotopic composition (δ13C, δ15N) of prey and of invertebrate consumers stratifying between the aquatic, riparian and terrestrial zones. The isotopic distance of riparian arthropods to instream macroinvertebrates and terrestrial arthropods was used as a measure of trophic linkage, and its variation with riparian habitat composition was quantified. Restoration enhanced aquatic-terrestrial linkages, indicated especially by differentiation in the δ15N isotopic signatures between aquatic, riparian and terrestrial consumers, rather than by δ13C signatures. The δ15N isotopic signatures of riparian arthropods revealed a higher relative trophic position in restored sections (δ15N Restored : 8.64‰, n = 11) as compared to non-restored sections (δ15N Degraded : 8.05‰, n = 11), lending support to the conjecture that restoration increased the proportion of more highly enriched aquatic prey (δ15N Restored : 10.01‰; δ15N Degraded : 10.38‰) while simultaneously reducing the share of lower enriched terrestrial prey (δ15N Restored : 4.88‰; δ15N Degraded : 5.53‰). Riparian habitat diversity and the share of exposed sand and gravel bars were positively related to the strength of aquatic-terrestrial linkages (R2 = 0.28 and R2 = 0.31, respectively), pointing to the importance of habitat diversification in the riparian zone in promoting trophic linkages between river and floodplain. These findings expand our understanding of the multifaceted outcomes of hydromorphological restoration, beyond biodiversity in the aquatic environment. It highlights the need to expand our current set of indicators in order to mechanistic understand restoration effects on ecological networks spanning across boundaries. This knowledge is highly relevant for the large restoration efforts driven by legislative frameworks such as the Water Framework Directive in Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]