1. Comparative study of outcomes of Roux-en-Y reconstruction and Billroth Ⅰ reconstruction performed after radical distal gastrectomy.
- Author
-
Wu JZ, Fukunaga T, Oka S, Kanda S, Ishibashi Y, Yube Y, and Shen GH
- Subjects
- Aged, Bile Reflux prevention & control, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Operative Time, Postoperative Complications prevention & control, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y methods, Digestive System Surgical Procedures methods, Gastrectomy methods, Plastic Surgery Procedures methods, Stomach Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Background: Billroth Ⅰ (BⅠ) reconstruction and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction are both commonly performed after distal gastrectomy (DG). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate which is the better option., Methods: Included in our study were 162 patients who, between April 2011 and October 2015, underwent DG followed by BⅠ reconstruction (n = 93) or RY reconstruction (n = 69). All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. We compared perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, endoscopic findings, and nutritional status between the 2 groups of patients., Results: Patient characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, with the exception of the incidence of gastric body tumors, which was significantly higher in the RY group (73.9% vs. 19.4%; p < 0.001). Operation time was significantly longer in the RY reconstruction group (p < 0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in the grades of GI dysfunction (p = 0.122).The endoscopically determined RGB (Residual food, Gastritis, Bile reflux)scores were significantly better in the RY reconstruction group than in the BI reconstruction group (p = 0.027, p < 0.001,p < 0.001,respectively).There was also no significant between-group difference in the change (1-year postoperative value/preoperative value) in body weight, body mass index, serum albumin concentration, or total cholesterol concentration (p = 0.484,p = 0.613,p = 0.760,p = 0.890, respectively)., Conclusions: RY reconstruction appears not to be advantageous over BⅠ reconstruction in terms of GI function or nutritional status 1 year after surgery. RY reconstruction does appear to be superior in terms of preventing bile reflux but takes more operation time., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF