Search

Although metallic coronary stents significantly reduce angina pectoris compared with optimal medical therapy, angina after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains frequent. We, therefore, sought to compare the incidence of any angina during the 1 year after PCI among the spectrum of commercially available metallic stents. Metallic stent type was classified as bare metal stent, Cypher, Taxus Express, Xience V, Promus Element, and Resolute. The primary end point was patient-reported angina within 1 year of PCI. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the independent association of stent type with any angina at 1 year. Overall, 8,804 patients were queried in regard to angina symptoms; 32.3% experienced angina at some point in the first year after PCI. Major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of all-cause mortality, target vessel revascularization, and Q-wave myocardial infarction, increased with angina severity: 6.8% for patients without angina, 10.0% for patients with class 1 or 2 angina, and 19.7% for patients with class 3 or 4 angina (p <0.001 for trend). After multivariable adjustment, there was no significant association between stent type and angina at 1 year after PCI. Baseline Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3 or 4 angina, history of coronary artery bypass grafting, and history of PCI were associated with a higher likelihood of angina at 1 year; increasing age, male gender, presentation with acute coronary syndrome, and higher stented length were associated with less angina. In conclusion, metallic stent type is not associated with the occurrence of angina at up to 1 year after PCI., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical presentation of bare metal stent in-stent restenosis (ISR) in patients undergoing target lesion revascularization is well characterized and negatively affects on outcomes, whereas the presentation and outcomes of first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) remains under-reported., Methods and Results: The study included 909 patients (1077 ISR lesions) distributed as follows: bare metal stent (n=388), first-generation DES (n=425), and second-generation DES (n=96), categorized into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or non-ACS presentation mode at the time of first target lesion revascularization. ACS was further classified as myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina. For bare metal stent, first-generation DES and second-generation DES, ACS was the clinical presentation in 67.8%, 71.0%, and 66.7% of patients, respectively (P=0.470), whereas MI occurred in 10.6%, 10.1%, and 5.2% of patients, respectively (P=0.273). The correlates for MI as ISR presentation were current smokers (odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-5.13; P<0.001), and chronic renal failure (odds ratio, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.60-4.70; P<0.001), with a protective trend for the second-generation DES ISR (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12-1.03; P=0.060). ACS presentations had an independent effect on major adverse cardiac events (death, MI, and re-target lesion revascularization) at 6 months (MI versus non-ACS: adjusted hazard ratio, 4.06; 95% CI, 1.84-8.94; P<0.001; unstable angina versus non-ACS: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.01-3.87; P=0.046)., Conclusions: ISR clinical presentation is similar irrespective of stent type. MI as ISR presentation seems to be associated with patient and not device-related factors. ACS as ISR presentation has an independent effect on major adverse cardiac events, suggesting that ISR remains a hazard and should be minimized., (© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) has been shown to be associated with adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but the effect of baseline hematologic parameters upon platelet reactivity remains controversial., Objective: The present study aims to evaluate the impact of hematocrit on 2 different assay methods used to assess on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel., Methods: We tested clopidogrel on-treatment platelet reactivity in 466 consecutive patients using VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA) with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 5 and 20 μM assays 6 to 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were categorized into 4 groups according to baseline hematocrit. One-year major adverse cardiac events, including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and definite stent thrombosis, were collected., Results: Lower hematocrit was associated with higher P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) and a higher rate of HTPR (P < .001) as measured by VN assay. No differences were seen among the 4 groups in platelet reactivity measured by LTA using ADP 5 μM (P = .23) and ADP 20 μM (P = .21). In a multivariable logistic regression model, baseline hematocrit was independently associated with PRU ≥208 (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.97, P = .005) but had no correlation with LTA ADP 5 μM ≥46% (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.95-1.06, P = .88) or LTA ADP 20 μM ≥59% (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.09, P = .39). In a logistic regression model, the addition of VN assay results, hematocrit, and interaction between the hematocrit and assay results had shown a significant influence on the area under curve for prediction of 1-year major adverse cardiac events compared with baseline clinical variables only for PRU (0.63 vs 0.76, P = .006) but not with LTA (0.64 vs 0.74, P = .13)., Conclusion: Baseline hematocrit has a differential influence on results of the ex vivo platelet functional assays. Lower baseline hematocrit was independently associated with HTPR by VN but not LTA. This may affect the interpretation of platelet function testing in patients with significant anemia., (Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of acute myocardial infarction is known to predict stent thrombosis (ST). This study aims to compare the ST rates across different coronary subsets. This was an observational cohort study from a large, single-center registry. Included were 12,198 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting. Patients were categorized according to their clinical presentation: stable angina pectoris (SAP, n = 3,700), unstable angina pectoris (UAP, n = 2,845), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI, n = 4,083), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, n = 1,570). The study end points were ST rates at 1 year. Patients with STEMI were younger with a lower prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, except for smoking. More type C lesions were treated in STEMI, whereas drug-eluting stents were used less frequently in patients with STEMI compared with the other groups. Definite ST at 1 year was highest in patients with STEMI (1.4%; vs SAP, 0.4%; UAP, 0.5%; NSTEMI, 0.5%; p <0.001). One-year definite/probable ST rates were SAP, 0.8%; UAP, 1.1%; NSTEMI, 1.4%; and STEMI, 3.2% (p <0.001). On multivariable analysis, STEMI independently predicts definite ST (hazards ratio [HR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32 to 7.10), whereas both STEMI (HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.84 to 6.12) and NSTEMI (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.07) were independent predictors of definite/probable ST. Clopidogrel cessation was the strongest predictor of ST (definite ST, HR 17.00, 95% CI 7.54 to 38.31; definite/probable ST, HR 4.69, 95% CI 2.39 to 9.20). In conclusion, in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, the acuity of clinical presentation corresponds to an increase in ST incidence. Adherence to clopidogrel is critical to prevent ST in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, especially in STEMI., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We aimed to compare neointimal tissue characteristics between bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) at long-term follow-up using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS)., Background: Neoatherosclerosis in neointima has been reported in BMS and in DES., Methods: Thirty patients with 36 stented lesions [BMS (n=17) or DES (n=19)] >3years after implantation were prospectively enrolled. OCT and VH-IVUS were performed and analyzed independently. Stents with ≥70% diameter stenosis were excluded., Results: The median duration from implantation was 126.0months in the BMS group and 60.0months in the DES group (p <0.001). Lipid-laden intima (58.8% vs. 42.1%, p=0.317), thrombus (17.6% vs. 5.3%, p=0.326), and calcification (35.3% vs. 26.3%, p=0.559) did not show significant differences between BMS and DES. When divided into 3 time periods, the cumulative incidence of lipid-laden neointima from >3years to <9years was similar between BMS and DES (42.9% vs. 42.1%, p=1.000). Furthermore, it continued to gradually increase over time in both groups. OCT-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) was observed in 17.6% of BMS- and 5.3% of DES-treated lesions (p=0.326). No stents had evidence of intimal disruption. The percentage volume of necrotic core (16.1% [9.7, 20.3] vs. 9.7% [7.0, 16.5], p=0.062) and dense calcium (9.5% [3.8, 13.6] vs. 2.7% [0.4, 4.9], p=0.080) in neointima tended to be greater in BMS-treated lesions. Intra-stent VH-TCFA (BMS vs. DES 45.5% vs. 18.2%, p=0.361) did not differ significantly., Conclusion: At long-term follow-up beyond 3 years after implantation, the intra-stent neointimal tissue characteristics appeared similar for both BMS and DES., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Implantation of coronary stents should be performed with high precision to ensure optimal clinical results. In some clinical conditions, during the cardiac cycle, significant movement of the predeployed stent may impact its implantation accuracy. We describe a case in which a patient had a short ostial left anterior descending artery stenosis and hyperkinetic left ventricle, resulting in significant movement of the stent inside the vessel lumen during the cardiac cycle. Intracoronary adenosine was used to create temporary heart block to enable accurate stent implantation., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: This study aimed to compare percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with direct stenting (DS) to balloon predilatation (PD) for patients undergoing elective PCI to determine whether there is an independent value for DS with regard to clinical outcomes., Background: The safety of PCI with DS has been established, but the independent advantages of this technique are not entirely clear., Methods: Patients undergoing elective PCI from January 2000 to December 2010 were included. The postprocedural and late clinical outcomes of 444 patients who underwent PCI with DS were compared with a propensity-matched population of 444 subjects treated with PD., Results: The two groups were well matched to 27 baseline clinical, procedural, and angiographic characteristics, thus allowing for a more accurate evaluation of the independent value of the stenting technique. Intravascular ultrasound was used in more than 60% of interventions in both groups. PCI performed with PD were longer (DS 45 ± 19.28 vs. PD 56 ± 23.72 minutes, P = 0.001), used more contrast (DS 154 ± 65.88 vs. PD 186 ± 92.84 cc, P = 0.001), and more frequently used balloon postdilation (DS 0% vs. PD 27.3%, P = 0.001). The incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction (PPMI) was similar between DS- and PD patients (5.3% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.91). Likewise, the 1-year rates of major adverse cardiac events (8.4% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.25), target lesion revascularization (3.9% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.24), and definite stent thrombosis (0.2% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.37) were similar among DS and PD patients, respectively., Conclusion: During elective PCI, DS decreases overall procedure time and resource utilization, but fails to reveal an independent clinical advantage as there is no demonstrable benefit in regard to the incidence of PPMI, restenosis, or overall clinical outcomes up to 1-year of follow-up., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Percutaneous coronary intervention of degenerated saphenous vein grafts remains relatively high risk when compared to native vessel interventions, despite advances in pharmacotherapy and embolic protection. This article discusses the phenomenon of distal embolization that seems to plague saphenous vein graft interventions, reviews device-based strategies for embolic protection, and offers a perspective on the utility of percutaneous saphenous vein graft intervention in both elective and acute settings.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a novel, catheter-based, invasive imaging system based on near-infrared light with high image resolution (15-20 μm). The system allows for unparalleled imaging of the coronary artery lumen, plaque characterization, assessment of coronary stent strut apposition, neointimal coverage, vascular proliferative response, complications such as focal dissection or thrombus formation, and insight into the time course of stent endothelization. This review will describe the currently available developments in OCT technology and its application in both the clinical and research arenas., (©2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: This study aimed to examine the strategy of hybrid percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) -bare metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES)- versus exclusive DES implantation for patients undergoing multivessel PCI., Methods and Results: A cohort of 2,065 patients who underwent PCI (698 hybrid, 1,367 exclusive DES) were followed clinically up to one year. The primary outcome was target vessel revascularisation-major adverse cardiac events (TVR-MACE). Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, anaemia (haematocrit <25), and bypass graft PCI were excluded. Only patients with ≥ 2 stents in two different lesions were analysed for this study. Baseline and procedural characteristics were similar. Major in-hospital complications and subacute stent thrombosis rates were similar. At one year, there was no difference in TVR-MACE (hybrid 17.2% vs. DES 14.6%, p=0.128). On multivariable analysis, hybrid PCI was not a predictor of TVR-MACE. The strongest predictors of TVR-MACE at one year were hypertension and African American race. Cumulative stent thrombosis rates at one year were similar in both groups., Conclusions: Patients who undergo hybrid PCI have similar composite in-hospital and 1-year outcomes as those who undergo exclusive DES PCI. The hybrid stent approach should be considered for patients with multivessel PCI since it can lower the procedure cost without increasing adverse events.

Performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at centers without cardiothoracic surgery is a contentious issue. Although this practice allows greater access to care, there are safety concerns. The aim was to assess the requirement for emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after PCI and characterize patients at highest risk using independent predictors. The study population consisted of 21,957 unselected patients who underwent PCI from August 1994 (Food and Drug Administration stent approval) to January 2008 at a single medical center. Patients requiring emergent CABG (defined as within 24 hours of the index procedure) were identified. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for independent correlates of emergent CABG. Emergent CABG was required in 90 patients (cumulative incidence 0.41%). Indications for CABG included triple-vessel disease, dissection, acute closure, perforation, and failure to cross. These patients had significantly higher in-hospital cardiac death rates (7.8% vs 0.7%; p <0.01) and higher rates of Q-wave myocardial infarction, neurologic events, and renal insufficiency. Independent correlates of emergent CABG after PCI were acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presentation, cardiogenic shock, triple-vessel disease, and type C lesion. Risk assessment based on these predictors identified 0.3% of the patient population to have a 9.3% cumulative incidence of emergent CABG. In conclusion, the need for emergent CABG after PCI in the stent era was low and was associated with poor in-hospital outcomes. Risk was nonuniform, with 0.3% of the study population, characterized by acute presentation and complex coronary disease, at heightened risk of emergent surgery.

Background: In-stent restenosis remains the major limitation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. Drug-eluting stents (DES) decrease in-stent restenosis, which is thought to have minimal clinical consequences, but may increase the risk of stent thrombosis and its attendant high mortality rate., Aims: To assess the clinical consequences of in-stent restenosis, including severity of associated illness and acute and 1-year outcomes and to compare DES and BMS in-stent restenosis., Methods: Using our prospective PCI registry, we compared data from 1958 consecutive patients hospitalized with BMS in-stent restenosis between January 2000 and April 2003 and all 190 patients with DES in-stent restenosis admitted between April 2003 and September 2006. Risk-adjusted outcomes were calculated using propensity-score matching., Results: An unstable presentation was noted in 78.1% of 2148 patients. Patients with DES in-stent restenosis presented more often with acute myocardial infarction (4.3% versus 1.6%, p<0.001). At 1 year, mortality for all patients was 5.7% and target-vessel revascularization was 21.5%. After risk adjustment, target-vessel revascularization and target-vessel revascularization-major adverse cardiac events were greater in patients with DES in-stent restenosis (respectively, 27.8% versus 19.7%, p=0.05; 32.5% versus 24.3%, p=0.06)., Conclusion: In-stent restenosis is associated with unstable presentation and a higher 1-year adverse events rate than expected in patients undergoing elective PCI. For an identical level of cardiac risk, it seems that DES in-stent restenosis outcomes are slightly worse than BMS in-stent restenosis outcomes.

Background: Distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions is associated with a high rate of myonecrosis. Although direct stenting (DS) is feasible with less catheter manipulations, its ability to prevent distal embolization in SVG lesions compared with distal protection devices (DPD) is unknown., Methods: The study included 188 SVG lesions subjected to PCI, 101 patients with 101 lesions treated with DPD, and 87 patients with 87 lesions by DS without DPD. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in-hospital and at 30 days were compared., Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable, except for higher frequencies of unstable angina (53% vs. 67%, P = 0.045) and prior myocardial infarction (38% vs. 53%, P = 0.07) in the DS group. There was no difference in lesion type aside from more restenotic lesions in the DS group (7% vs. 16%, P = 0.047). Drug-eluting stent deployment was similar. Stent length in the DPD group (22.8 +/- 7.2 mm) was significantly longer than that in the DS group (17.6 +/- 8.0 mm, P < 0.001). Although maximum creatine kinase (CK)-MB value in the DPD group (2.5 +/- 5.8 ng/ml) was significantly larger than in the DS group (1.3 +/- 1.5 ng/ml, P = 0.039), the frequency of CK-MB rise >2 times the upper limit of normal did not differ (11% vs. 6%, P = 0.2). There were no differences in MACE rates in-hospital and at 30 days. By multivariate analysis, neither DPD nor DS was a significant predictor for maximum CK-MB value., Conclusion: DS should be considered an alternative treatment to PCI with DPD for selected SVG lesions., ((c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Conflicting data exist regarding an advantage of drug-eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stents (BMS) in catheter-based treatment of saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenoses. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of these modalities in that lesion subset. The DES group consisted of 138 cases with 183 lesions (sirolimus-eluting stents, n = 117; paclitaxel-eluting stents, n = 66) and the BMS group consisted of 344 cases with 478 lesions that were followed to 1 year. We examined a composite end point that comprised death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. More BMS were deployed per patient (p <0.001) and the diameters of BMS deployed was significantly greater (p <0.001). Peak postprocedure values of creatine kinase-MB (p = 0.003) and troponin I (p = 0.05) were higher in BMS. At 1 year there was no significant superiority of DES over BMS with regard to hard end points (death and Q-wave myocardial infarction). In conclusion, this study indicates that both DES and BMS for SVG disease provide acceptably safe and efficacious results, but unlike the case in native coronary arteries, DES use does not reduce the frequency of the need for repeat revascularization.

Background: Recent randomized trials have demonstrated conflicting results regarding the use of drug-eluting stents (DESs) as compared to bare metal stents (BMSs) in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We compared outcomes among patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who received DES with those who received BMS., Methods: In-hospital, 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year outcomes of a cohort of 122 patients who underwent primary or facilitated PCI and received a BMS were compared to 122 propensity-matched patients who received a DES. Seventy-two patients received sirolimus-eluting stents, and 50 received paclitaxel-eluting stents., Results: Baseline demographics were similar among groups. One-, 6-, and 12-month outcomes, including reinfarction, death, stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization (TVR), were similar among groups. At 1 year, all-cause mortality was 13.3% in the BMS group and 9.2% in the DES group [P=not significant (ns)], recurrent MI was 5.3% in the BMS group vs. 4.4% in the DES group (P=ns), and TVR was 7% in the BMS group vs. 8.7% in the DES group (P=ns)., Conclusions: Our data do not support the general use of DES in the setting of STEMI given similar cardiovascular outcomes among patients receiving BMS or DES, the need for long-term dual antiplatelet therapy with DES, and the possible repercussions of very late stent thrombosis.

Background: Stents are used to treat the first and even successive episodes of in-stent restenosis (ISR)., Methods: In 18 patients (19 lesions), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed after placement of a stent for a nonrestenotic lesion after the second stent was used to treat the first episode of ISR and after the third stent was used to treat the second episode of ISR. The duration between the first and second stent was 355 +/- 374 days, and between the second and third stent was 330 +/- 279 days. The duration of follow up after the third stent was 307 +/- 145 days. High-pressure inflation (> 14 atm) was performed for 69% (11/16) of patients when treating the first episode of ISR, and all patients when treating the re-ISR (p = 0.018)., Results: Nevertheless, vessel area and final minimal stent area (MSA) did not increase with successive restenting, and the ratio of minimum stent diameter to nominal stent size suggested that chronic stent underexpansion persisted. MSA > 5 mm2 was noted in 54% after the first stent, 35% after the second stent, and 42% after the third stent (p = 0.6). After the third stent, the rate of target lesion revascularization was 26% (5/19) and target vessel revascularization was 37% (7/19); there was 1 nonfatal myocardial infarction. Thus, the overall rate of major adverse cardiac events was 42%., Conclusion: While serial restenting a recurrent ISR lesion was not associated with progressive decrease in MSA, it was still associated with chronic stent underexpansion and a high rate of adverse events. Attention should be directed to achieving better stent expansion to minimize subsequent recurrences.

Background: The incidence of postprocedural creatine kinase (CK)-MB elevation to >3x the upper limit of normal after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been reported at rates of up to 18% in the bare metal stent era and is correlated with higher adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This study examined the incidence and prognostic significance of CK-MB elevations after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation., Methods: The records of 2,537 patients who underwent DES implantation and completed > or =6 months' follow-up were evaluated. Patients with acute myocardial infarction and those who presented in cardiogenic shock and had elevated cardiac enzymes at baseline were excluded from the analysis. Of these, 179 patients (7.1%) had > or =3x postprocedural CK-MB and 2,358 patients had <3x CK-MB elevation. The composite end point of target vessel revascularization-major adverse cardiac events (TVR-MACE) at 6 months was compared between groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of adverse cardiac outcomes., Results: The patients with CK-MB > or =3x elevation had a higher number of diseased vessels (2.15 +/- 0.86 vs. 1.81 +/- 0.87; P < 0.001), higher prevalence of type C lesions (29.9% vs. 17.7%; P < 0.001), received a higher average number of stents, and total stented length (1.72 +/- 0.89 vs. 1.49 +/- 0.83; P < 0.001 and 37.4 +/- 23.0 mm vs. 30.8 +/- 20.7 mm; P = 0.0003, respectively), and had lower rates of clinical success (91.9% vs. 99.2%; P < 0.001). The 6-month and 1-year TVR-MACE rates were higher for the elevated CK-MB group (11.9% vs. 7.0%; P = 0.02 and 16.1% vs. 26.6%, respectively; P = 0.005). The rates of subacute thrombosis were also significantly higher in the group with elevated CK-MB (0.4% vs. 3.2%, P < 0.001). Though significant CK-MB release was a predictor of TVR-MACE after univariate analysis, multivessel PCI, subacute stent thrombosis, total stented length, and history of prior PCI were the only predictors after multivariate regression analysis., Conclusions: Postprocedural CK-MB > or =3x elevation following PCI with DES continues to be a marker for the complexity of coronary disease and lack of clinical success; and correlates with higher rates of subacute thrombosis as well as late adverse events at 6-months and 1-year postprocedure.

We are aware of no studies of peri-stent disease progression or luminal compromise in saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions. We used serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to assess disease progression in peri-stent saphenous vein bypass graft reference segments. We studied 37 peri-stent SVG reference segments in 21 patients; 16 were proximal and 21 were distal to the stent. The same anatomic image slice was analyzed after the intervention and at follow-up; this site was 3.68 +/- 2.22 mm from the stent edge. Graft age was 10.1 +/- 5.4 years, and mean follow-up duration was 13 months (range 3 to 61). Overall, change in SVG area, change in lumen area, and change in plaque burden correlated with postintervention plaque burden (r = 0.448, p = 0.005; r = -0.584, p <0.001; and r = 0.507, p = 0.001, respectively). For the proximal edge, change in lumen area correlated with change in plaque area (r = -0.951, p <0.001), but not with change in SVG area (r = -0.337, p = 0.201). For the distal edge, change in lumen area correlated more strongly with change in plaque area (r = -0.982, p <0.001) than with change in SVG area (r = -0.624, p = 0.003). When peri-stent reference segments were divided into 2 groups according to postintervention plaque burden (>50% [n = 20] vs <50% [n = 17]), there was a greater decrease in lumen area (-1.12 +/- 0.81 vs -0.33 +/- 0.26 mm(2), p <0.001) and greater increases in SVG area (0.26 +/- 0.29 vs 0.09 +/- 0.09 mm(2), p = 0.027), plaque area (1.37 +/- 0.96 vs 0.42 +/- 0.30 mm(2), p <0.001), and plaque burden (8.2 +/- 5.6% vs. 2.8 +/- 1.6%, p <0.001) in segments with a plaque burden >50%. In conclusion, peri-stent reference segment SVG disease progression and lumen loss were more significant in segments with a greater postintervention plaque burden after implantation of a bare metal stent or drug-eluting stent.

Although drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis and target lesion revascularization compared with bare metal stents (BMSs), the specter of late stent thrombosis has curbed enthusiasm for the widespread use of drug-eluting stents. Alternatively, increasing BMS use would increase restenosis and potentially increase adverse events. The presentation and outcomes of BMS restenosis are controversial. We evaluated 2,539 patients with BMS restenosis referred for repeat revascularization. Major adverse cardiac events, including mortality and myocardial infarction (MI), were assessed at clinical presentation, 30 days, and 6 months. Patients with acute presentation (i.e., unstable angina requiring hospitalization or MI) were compared with patients with stable presentation. At presentation, 19.2% of patients were asymptomatic, 27.5% had exertional angina, 46.6% had unstable angina, and 6.7% had MI. Mortality and MI rates were 1.1% and 1.4%, respectively, at 30 days and 3.3% and 4.5%, respectively, at 6 months. Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and those without ACS had similarly low mortality rates at 30 days (1.2% ACS vs 1.0% non-ACS, p = 0.65) and 6 months (3.4% ACS vs 3.3% non-ACS, p = 0.93) and MI rates at 30 days (1.3% ACS vs 1.4% non-ACS, p = 0.87) and 6 months (4.7% ACS vs 4.3% non-ACS, p = 0.65). Combined major adverse cardiac events were similar at 30 days (2.5% vs 2.1%, p = 0.53) and 6 months (7.4% ACS vs 6.9%, non-ACS, p = 0.65). In conclusion, although BMS restenosis often manifests as an ACS, it is associated with a low incidence of 6-month major adverse cardiac events and does not predict a negative outcome.

Despite significant decreases in restenosis and repeated intervention achieved using drug-eluting stents (DESs), the benefit has not been homogenous across all patient and lesion subsets. Identification of correlates of DES restenosis may allow a differing management approach and lead to improved patient outcomes. The study population consisted of 3,535 consecutive patients (5,046 lesions) who underwent successful sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for >or=1 native coronary artery or bypass graft lesion from April 2003 to September 2006. From this cohort, 197 patients (237 lesions) were identified to have in-stent restenosis (ISR) requiring revascularization within 12 months of stent implantation. This group was compared with the remainder of the patient population. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of DES ISR. Independent correlates of DES ISR using multivariate analysis included both clinical and procedural factors. Clinical predictors were age, hypertension, and unstable angina. Procedural predictors were left anterior descending artery intervention, number of stents implanted, stented length/lesion, and lack of intravascular ultrasound guidance. Implantation of >or=3 stents was associated with a significantly higher restenosis risk (9.7% vs 5.1%; p=0.0003). A 10-mm increase in stented length was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.18 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.35). Diabetes, stent diameter, and stent type were found not to be predictive of DES ISR. In conclusion, correlates of DES ISR included both clinical and procedural factors. Limiting the number of stents and stented length, in addition to intravascular ultrasound guidance, may minimize DES ISR.

Background: Advances in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents have dramatically improved results of these procedures. The optimal treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease is uncertain given the lack of prospective, randomized data reflecting current practice. This study represents a "real-world" evaluation of current technology in the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease., Methods and Results: A total of 1680 patients undergoing revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease were identified. Of these, 1080 patients were treated for 2-vessel disease (196 CABG and 884 PCI) and 600 for 3-vessel disease (505 CABG and 95 PCI). One-year mortality, cerebrovascular events, Q-wave myocardial infarction, target vessel failure, and composite major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were compared between the CABG and PCI cohorts. Outcomes were adjusted for baseline covariates and reported as hazard ratios. The unadjusted major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event rate was reduced with CABG for patients with 2-vessel disease (9.7% CABG versus 21.2% PCI; P<0.001) and 3-vessel disease (10.8% CABG versus 28.4% PCI; P<0.001). Adjusted outcomes showed increased major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event with PCI for patients with 2-vessel (hazard ratio 2.29; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.76; P=0.01) and 3-vessel disease (hazard ratio 2.90; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.78; P<0.001). Adjusted outcomes for the nondiabetic subpopulation demonstrated equivalent major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event with PCI for 2-vessel (hazard ratio 1.77; 95% CI 0.96 to 3.25; P=0.07) and 3-vessel disease (hazard ratio 1.70; 95% CI 0.77 to 3.61; P=0.19)., Conclusions: Compared with PCI with drug-eluting stents, CABG resulted in improved major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event in patients with 2- and 3-vessel coronary artery disease, primarily in those with underlying diabetes. Coronary artery bypass surgery may be the preferred revascularization strategy in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Drug-eluting stent (DES) thrombosis (ST) can be devastating. The study aim was to evaluate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) predictors for DES thrombosis by comparing IVUS studies after implantation in 13 patients with 14 DES thrombosis lesions with a group of controls (30 lesions in 27 patients) matched for history of chronic renal failure and type of DES. Five patients (38%) discontinued dual antiplatelet therapy at the time of ST. There were 3 in-stent restenosis lesions (21%) treated using DESs in the ST group compared with 0 in the control group (p <0.05). Compared with the control group, IVUS studies in the ST group showed a smaller minimum stent area (4.6 +/- 1.1 vs 5.6 +/- 1.7 mm(2), p = 0.0489). In the ST group, 11 of 14 stents had a minimum stent area < or =5.0 mm(2) compared with 12 of 30 in the control group (p = 0.0392). Minimum stent area in patients who stopped clopidogrel therapy and developed ST (5.30 +/- 1.15 mm(2)) tended to be larger compared with that in patients who developed ST while using clopidogrel (4.24 +/- 0.96 mm(2), p = 0.091). Within the 5-mm-long proximal and distal reference segments analyzed, the ST group had larger proximal reference maximum plaque burdens and smaller minimum lumen areas, along with a tendency toward similar findings in the distal reference segments. In conclusion, IVUS findings at the time of DES implantation in patients who subsequently developed ST showed a smaller minimum stent area (especially in patients who developed ST while using clopidogrel) and more residual disease at the stent edges.

Background: Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) both significantly reduce the need for repeat intervention compared to bare metal stents. Studies comparing the clinical outcomes of these stents in noncomplex subsets of patients and lesions demonstrate a similar safety and efficacy profile. The data for more complex subsets of patients and lesions remains conflicting. This study aimed to compare SES with PES in a selected population with a broad range of complex features., Methods and Results: The patient population consisted of 1,591 consecutive patients with complex features undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. In the SES group there were 1,095 patients (1,653 lesions) and in the PES group 496 patients (802 lesions). In-hospital, 30-day, and 12-month clinical outcomes were compared between groups. No discernable difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between SES and PES was detected at intermediate and longer-term follow-up (SES 22.4% vs. PES 20.5% at 12 months; P=0.407). A trend toward increased angiographically documented stent thrombosis was observed in the SES group at both 3 and 12 months (SES 2.2% vs. PES 0.8% at 12 months; P=0.051). When adopting the more inclusive definition of probable stent thrombosis, this trend was no longer seen. After adjusting for baseline differences between the two groups, there still remained no difference in MACE between SES and PES (HR 1.051 [CI 0.826-1.339] P=0.685). The trend toward increased angiographically documented stent thrombosis in the SES group remained after adjustment for baseline differences (HR 2.836 [CI 0.968-8.311] P=0.057)., Conclusions: In a selected population with complex disease the rate of MACE was comparable between SES and PES, with higher overall rates of thrombosis and MACE compared to a noncomplex population. Thus, the focus should be directed to prevent late complications in this complex subset regardless of stent type selection., (Copyright (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Retrieval of intravascular objects can be accomplished through snare retrieval. We report a case in which a patient presented with symptomatic in-stent restenosis caused by a fractured aorto-ostial sirolimus-eluting stent in a saphenous vein graft. Because of the inability to selectively engage the stent ostium with the guide catheter, the fractured stent was removed with an endovascular snare in order to permit successful revascularization. With the proximal portion of the stent retrieved by the snare, a new stent was implanted without complication., (Copyright (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) significantly decrease the need for repeat interventions compared with bare metal stents. Comparative outcome data from randomized, controlled, head-to-head trials using these systems in a selected group of patients and lesions are conflicting; therefore, we compared clinical outcomes of unselected patients who underwent contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention with SES or PES implantation. In the REWARDS registry, 1-year clinical outcomes of 1,925 patients who received SESs were compared with 844 patients who received PESs. Outcomes at 30 days and 6 months were similar between groups, with a trend toward higher rates of stent thrombosis in the SES group compared with the PES group. Stent thrombosis rate at 12 months was significantly higher in the SES than in the PES group, with cumulative stent thrombosis rates of 1.9% in the SES group and 0.8% in the PES group (p = 0.034). However, overall rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were similar in the 2 groups at 12 months. After adjusting for significant multivariate predictors of MACEs, the hazard ratio at 1 year was 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.33, p = 0.607) and the major predictors for MACEs were a history of renal failure, diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, class III or IV heart failure, type C lesions, and saphenous vein grafts. In conclusion, use of SESs and PESs in unrestricted, contemporary practice had comparable outcomes in terms of low rates of revascularization and clinical events. Stent thrombosis continues to be a major concern for SESs and PESs.

Drug-eluting stents (DESs) are superior to bare metal stents (BMSs) in decreasing restenosis rates across a wide range of patient and lesion subsets. However, widespread utilization of DESs raises concerns with regard to risks of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, the potential for late adverse events such as late thrombosis, and cost. Vessel diameter and lesion length have been previously identified as predictors for restenosis for DESs and BMSs. This study compared the clinical outcomes of DESs versus BMSs in large coronary arteries (> or =3.5 mm). A cohort of 233 patients who underwent single-vessel angioplasty with DES implantation in large vessels was compared with 233 propensity-matched patients who received BMSs in vessels with similar reference vessel diameters. Clinical outcomes at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year were compared between groups. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were similar. Target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization rates and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events were low and comparable between the 2 groups at all follow-up intervals. At 1 year, the primary outcome occurred in 8.5% of patients with DESs and 7.7% of patients with BMSs (p = 0.80). There were no episodes of subacute stent thrombosis or late thrombosis in either group. In conclusion, implantation of DESs in large coronary arteries confers no additional benefit compared with BMSs, and the 2 approaches are associated with equally favorable clinical outcomes at 1 year.

Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) implantation for the treatment of single coronary lesions has proved to be effective and durable. However, the safety and efficacy of overlapping drug-eluting stents for the treatment of long lesions have not been well established. In total, 114 patients who received overlapping drug-eluting stents were identified, 55 of whom received overlapping SESs and 59 received overlapping PESs. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were balanced. In-hospital complications were similar between the 2 groups. At 30-day and 6-month follow-ups, all clinical outcomes were also similar. In addition, the event-free survival rate was comparable (p = 0.71). Implantation of overlapping drug-eluting stents for the treatment of long, native coronary lesions is feasible and effective. In conclusion, in this observational study, clinical outcomes appeared similar in patients treated with overlapping SES implantation compared with those treated with overlapping PES implantation.

This study examined the outcomes of patients who underwent sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions (HCCL) with and without the use of rotational atherectomy (rotablator). We investigated 150 consecutive patients with angiographic evidence of HCCL who underwent SES implantation. Sixty-nine patients underwent SES implantation without the need of rotablator (SES), and 81 patients required rotational atherectomy to modify the plaque and facilitate the delivery of the stent (SES + rotational atherectomy). Clinical success was equivalent in both groups (>98%) and there were no in-hospital outcome differences. At 6 months, the target lesion revascularization rate was 4.9% in SES vs. 4.2% in SES + rotational atherectomy groups, respectively (P = NS). Mortality at 6 months was 7.9% in the SES group vs. 6.8% in the SES + rotational atherectomy group (P = NS). SES performs well in patients with complex HCCL, with a relative low event rate. Lesions requiring rotational atherectomy to facilitate dilation and stenting had similar outcomes after SES implantation to those that could be stented without the need for rotablator.

Drug-eluting stents (DESs), although promising technology, still are associated with restenosis; therefore, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of intravascular radiation therapy for the treatment of DES in-stent restenosis (ISR). Treatment of DES ISR has not been established, although intravascular radiation therapy is an effective treatment for patients with ISR of bare metal stents. Other modalities are conventional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including restenting with DES. Radiation for Eluting Stents in Coronary FailUrE (RESCUE) is an international, Internet-based registry of 61 patients who presented with ISR of a DES and were assigned to intravascular radiation therapy with commercially available systems after PCI. Outcomes of these patients were compared with those of a consecutive series of 50 patients who presented with ISR of a DES and were assigned to repeat DES (r-DES) treatment. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups, except for more Cypher stents as the initial DES that restenosed in the r-DES group than in the intravascular radiation therapy group (88.5% vs 69%, p = 0.01). At 8 months there were fewer overall major adverse cardiac events in the intravascular radiation therapy group compared with the r-DES group (9.8% vs 24%, p = 0.044). The need for target vessel and target lesion revascularizations was similar in the 2 groups at 8 months. There has been no report of subacute thrombosis in either group. In conclusion, intravascular radiation therapy as adjunct therapy to PCI for patients presenting with ISR of a DES is safe and should be considered an alternative therapeutic option for this difficult subset of patients.

We used intravascular ultrasound to evaluate the incidence, characteristics, and clinical sequel of plaque prolapse within drug-eluting stents. The influence of stent design on plaque prolapse has not been studied. Drug-eluting stents were serially expanded, first at 14 atm and then at 20 atm, with intravascular ultrasound imaging after each inflation. The stent, lumen, and maximum plaque prolapse areas were measured. The residual lumen area and percentage of plaque prolapse burden (maximum plaque prolapse area/stent area) were calculated. Plaque prolapse was divided into grades 1 (<5%), 2 (5% to 10%), and 3 (10% to 20%). Eighty patients (83 lesions, 41 Cypher and 42 Taxus Express stents) were studied. The incidence of plaque prolapse was 41% (17 of 41 lesions) with the Cypher stents versus 24% (10 of 41 lesions) with the Taxus stents after 14 atm (p = 0.096) and 35% (14 of 40) in Cypher stents versus 17.8% (5 of 28) in Taxus stents after 20 atm (p = 0.17). However, the maximum plaque prolapse area was never >20% of the stent area. The frequency and amount of plaque prolapse neither increased nor decreased at higher (20 atm) inflation pressures. Lesions with prolapse were longer (p = 0.004), with a larger external elastic membrane area and greater plaque burden (each p <0.0001) and a larger remodeling index (p = 0.013). Conversely, nonprolapsed plaques had a higher incidence of superficial calcium (p = 0.001). Creatinine kinase-MB elevation was higher with plaque prolapse, and the magnitude of creatinine kinase-MB elevation correlated with the extent of plaque prolapse (r = 0.664, p = 0.002). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that a longer lesion length (p = 0.012), and smaller minimal luminal area (p = 0.031) had higher risks of plaque prolapse. In conclusion, plaque prolapse was frequently observed in Cypher and Taxus stents. However, sequential intravascular ultrasound imaging showed that the frequency and amount of plaque prolapse were neither increased nor decreased by additional higher pressure inflations.

Objectives: We sought to compare the adequacy of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) and sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) expansion based on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging criteria at conventional delivery pressures., Methods: Forty-six patients underwent SES implantation and 42 patients underwent PES implantation for de novo native coronary lesions<33 mm in length with reference lumen diameters of 2.5-3.5 mm. Stents were serially expanded with gradual balloon inflations at 14 and 20 atm. IVUS imaging was performed prior to intervention and after each balloon inflation. Stent expansion (minimal stent cross-sectional area/reference lumen cross-sectional area) was measured. Inadequate stent expansion was defined using the MUSIC criteria (all struts apposed, no tissue protrusion, and final lumen cross-sectional area>80% of the reference or >90% if minimal lumen cross-sectional area was <9 mm2)., Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar except for shorter lesion length, larger mean lumen cross-sectional area, larger lumen diameter, and lower plaque burden in the PES group. Stent expansion was inadequate in 80% of patients with SES versus 63% of patients with PES at 14 atm, although this was not statistically significant. After 20 atm, 48% of patients with SES remained underexpanded as compared with 35% of patients with PES., Conclusion: Drug-eluting stents showed significant underexpansion by MUSIC criteria at conventionally used inflation pressures. Higher balloon inflations are required especially during deployment of a SES. IVUS guidance is recommended to ensure optimal results and outcomes with both stents.

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol has protective cardiovascular effects. We investigated the effect of baseline HDL cholesterol on the outcomes of patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation for acute coronary syndrome. Since March 2003, 1,032 consecutive patients were, according to their baseline HDL cholesterol level, included in a low HDL cholesterol group (n = 550, <40 mg/dl in men, <45 mg/dl in women, mean 32 +/- 7) or a high HDL cholesterol group (n = 482, >40 mg/dl in men, >45 mg/dl in women, mean 55 +/- 19). End points were death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and a composite of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and 1 year. We assessed the relation between HDL cholesterol and end points. Patients with low HDL cholesterol more often had diabetes, a higher body mass index, higher triglyceride levels, and lower total cholesterol levels. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and statin treatment (98% in the 2 groups) were comparable. Incidences of mortality and major adverse cardiac events at 30 days were higher in the low than in the high HDL cholesterol group (p <0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively; chi-square analysis). At 1 year, more deaths occurred in the low HDL cholesterol group (p <0.001; chi-square analysis), as did major adverse cardiac events (p <0.001; chi-square analysis). Multivariate analysis showed low HDL cholesterol at baseline (hazard ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.33 to 5.12) to be a key predictor of major adverse cardiac events and death (hazard ratio 3.33, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 10.0) at 1 year. In conclusion, regardless of baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and statin therapy, additional strategies to increase HDL cholesterol should be evaluated in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Drug-eluting stents (DESs) decrease the need for repeat revascularization in native coronary arteries and vein grafts. This study examined the safety and efficacy of DESs for the treatment of lesions in the internal mammary artery (IMA) conduits and compared the outcomes with those from bare metal stents (BMSs). Records of 69 consecutive patients who underwent stenting of the IMA from 2001 to 2004 were reviewed and analyzed. Of these, 30 patients were treated with DESs (sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents) and 39 patients with BMSs. In-hospital and 6-month clinical outcomes were recorded and compared. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. Lesion location and characteristics were also similar, except for a trend toward longer stent lengths in the DES group (DES 20.2 +/- 7.7 mm vs BMS 14.8 +/- 3.5 mm, p = 0.255). There was no late thrombosis in either group. There were no significant differences in in-hospital and 1- and 6-month outcomes between the 2 groups, including target lesion revascularization with DESs (DESs 3.33% vs BMSs 10%, p = 0.38). In conclusion, DES implantation into IMAs appears safe and is associated with low rates of recurrences. These results may support expansion of use of DESs for the management of IMA stenotic lesions.

Longer stent length has remained associated with the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era; therefore, we aimed to determine clinical outcomes after extensive stent coverage with DES implantations in single coronary lesions. We evaluated the data from 99 consecutive patients treated with extensive DES coverage, defined as > or = 50 mm (mean 63.3 +/- 13.2, range 50 to 115), and a concurrent series of 466 patients with < or = 24-mm DES length (mean 18.4 +/- 3.8, range 8 to 24). The periprocedural, 1-, and 6-month outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. The baseline characteristics were mostly comparable between the 2 groups, and procedural and in-hospital outcomes were similar. Although the incidence of death and myocardial infarction at follow-up were comparable, the combined end points of target lesion revascularization plus MACEs at 6 months occurred more often with extensive stent coverage. Multivariate analysis revealed stent length to be the only independent predictor of target lesion revascularization plus MACEs. Patients treated with extensive DES coverage had similar procedural success, major in-hospital complications, and death and myocardial infarction at follow-up, but had more combined adverse events because of an overall higher target lesion revascularization rate.

This study was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) on the outcomes of diabetic patients. Recent data with drug-eluting stents have shown improved clinical outcomes in diabetic patients. This study compared outcomes between the 2 available drug-eluting stents, SESs and PESs. From the prospective drug-eluting stent registries at the investigators' institution, 1,320 consecutive diabetic patients treated with SESs (n=873, 1,293 lesions) and PESs (n=447, 733 lesions) were identified and their in-hospital and 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes compared. Baseline characteristics showed more men, more patients with previous coronary bypass surgery, and smaller ejection fractions in the PES group and more obese patients in the SES group. Procedural characteristics were similar except for more left anterior descending artery and proximal lesions and the greater use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the SES group and more type C lesions, direct stenting, and stents per patient in the PES group. In-hospital complications were similar. Clinical follow-up at 1 month was also similar between the 2 groups, including subacute stent thrombosis. At 6 months, the 2 groups had similar mortality (7% vs 7%), myocardial infarctions (18% vs 21%), target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events (11% vs 12%), and late thrombosis (0.3% vs 0%). Subanalysis of insulin-treated diabetic patients showed no significant differences in outcomes in the 2 groups. No significant differences were found between SESs and PESs on Cox regression analysis for hazard ratios. In conclusion, SESs and PESs are associated with similar efficacy and safety with regard to repeat revascularization rates, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis up to 6 months for the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus regardless of insulin therapy.

Objectives: We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of octogenarians > or =80 years of age after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation., Background: Although octogenarians constitute a fast-growing portion of cardiovascular patients, they are not adequately represented in current clinical revascularization trials., Methods: We analyzed the data of 3,166 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and DES implantation since March 2003. Periprocedural events, 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes were compared between octogenarians (n = 339) and patients <80 years of age (n = 2,827)., Results: Baseline characteristics revealed a higher prevalence of females (P < 0.001), Caucasians (P = 0.004), chronic renal failure (P < 0.001), heart failure (P < 0.001), number of diseased vessels (P = 0.009), and lower ejection fraction (P = 0.03) in octogenarians. Patients <80 years showed more positive family history (P < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.006), smoking (P < 0.001), and obesity (P < 0.001). Clinical presentation and procedural success were similar in both groups as were death, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization in-hospital. At 6 months, restenosis rates were low and comparable. In the subgroup of octogenarians who presented with acute coronary syndrome, mortality (15% vs. 3%, P < 0.001) and Q-wave MI occurred more often. Multivariate analysis revealed age >80 (P = 0.008), cardiogenic shock (P < 0.001), Q-wave MI at presentation (P = 0.003), and length of hospital stay (P = 0.003) to be independent predictors of mortality., Conclusions: PCI with DES in octogenarians results in a similar reduction of restenosis rates when compared to patients <80 years. Yet in octogenarians who presented with acute coronary syndrome, incidence of mortality and Q-wave MI at 6 months was higher as compared to younger patients., (Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent stenting with > or =3 sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) when compared with those treated with > or =3 paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES)., Background: Drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for single coronary lesions is proven to be effective and durable., Methods: A total of 126 patients who received DES were identified, of which 66 patients received > or =3 SES (SES group) and 60 patients received > or =3 PES (PES group)., Results: The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were compatible between the two study groups. During the index hospitalization, all clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups. There were no deaths or Q-wave myocardial infarctions (MIs) in either group. At 30 days' and 6 months' follow-up, all clinical outcomes, including death, Q-wave MI, non-Q-wave MI, target lesion revascularization, target vascular revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events, were compatible between both groups. There were 2 patients (3.0%) with subacute thrombosis in the SES group and 1 patient (1.7%) in the PES group, but there was no statistical significance. There was no late thrombosis from either group. In addition, patients in the SES group had similar event-free survival rates as compared with those in the PES group (P = 0.56)., Conclusions: Patients who require > or =3 DES implantations experienced increased adverse clinical events as compared with historical single stent implantation. However, there were no differences in safety and efficacy among the patients treated with SES as compared with those treated with PES., (Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Objectives: We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of dialysis versus nondialysis patients after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation., Background: The revascularization of ischemic heart disease in dialysis patients has remained controversial due to consistent exclusion of this population from major trials, especially in the context of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with DES., Methods: We analyzed the data on 3,442 consecutive patients who underwent PCI and DES implantation since March 2003. Periprocedural events, 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes were then compared between dialysis (n = 72) and nondialysis patients (n = 3,370)., Results: Baseline characteristics revealed a higher prevalence of female gender (p = 0.03), African Americans (p < 0.001), hypertension (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), number of diseased vessels (p = 0.04), lower ejection fraction (p < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of acute myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.04) in dialysis patients. Nondialysis patients showed more history of smoking (p < 0.001) and obesity (p = 0.02). Procedural success was higher (p = 0.05), while there was a trend toward a lower mortality rate, in the nondialysis group during hospitalization. At 6 months, the restenosis rate was low and comparable, but mortality occurred more often (16% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.001) in dialysis patients. Multivariate analysis revealed cardiogenic shock (p = 0.04) to be an independent predictor of mortality., Conclusions: PCI with DES in dialysis patients is safe and feasible, with a similar reduction of repeat revascularization when compared with nondialysis patients. There was, however, a higher incidence of mortality in dialysis patients at 6 months, mostly influenced by contributing comorbidities and more severe conditions at presentation.

There are treatment failures after de novo drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and after treatment with DESs or vascular brachytherapy (VBT) of in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions. We studied 38 patients who presented with DES failure (26 patients after de novo DES implantation and 12 patients after DES treatment of ISR) and 30 patients who presented with VBT failure (all after treatment of ISR). Standard clinical data were collected and volumetric intravascular ultrasound was measured. Patients who presented with DES failures were 58.8 +/- 9.6 years of age and those who presented with VBT failures were 59.8 +/- 8.7 years of age; 60.5% of DES and 58.6% of VBT failures were in men; 31.5% of DES failures and 46.6% of VBT failures occurred in diabetic patients; and times to presentation were 210 +/- 101 days in DES failures and 510 +/- 527 days in VBT failures (p = 0.001). Minimal stent area was significantly larger in VBT than in the 2 DES failure groups (de novo DES implantation and DES treatment of ISR, p <0.0001); this was associated with more neointimal hyperplasia in VBT failures (p <0.0001). After it was normalized to stent length, intimal hyperplasia was diffusely distributed in VBT failures; conversely, DES failures were associated with less intimal hyperplasia and the intimal hyperplasia was mostly focal, with greater accumulation in the proximal and mid segments. In conclusion, VBT failures were caused by significant, recurrent, and diffuse intimal hyperplasia in the setting of adequate stent expansion, whereas DES failures were caused by only modest, but focal, intimal hyperplasia in the setting of DES underexpansion.

We investigated the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DESs) for the treatment of patients who presented with in-stent restenosis (ISR) of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) and compared the in-hospital and 6-month clinical outcomes of DESs with those of intravascular brachytherapy and balloon angioplasty alone. Records of 187 patients who presented with ISR of SVGs were analyzed. Of these, 34 consecutive patients were treated with DES implantation, 93 were treated with intravascular brachytherapy (n = 60 with gamma-radiation, n = 33 with beta-radiation), and 60 patients underwent conventional treatment with balloon angioplasty alone. Clinical and angiographic characteristics at baseline were comparable between groups. The DES group had less non-Q-wave myocardial infarction than did the intravascular brachytherapy and balloon angioplasty groups (0%, 20%, and 26%, p = 0.003 and <0.001, respectively). At 6 months, death occurred in 0% of the DES group, 2% of the intravascular brachytherapy group, and 5% of the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.36 and <0.18, respectively). Target lesion revascularization/major adverse cardiac events were similar in the intravascular brachytherapy and DES groups (12% and 3%, p = 0.13) and significantly decreased compared with patients who were treated with balloon angioplasty alone (55%, p <0.001 for the 2 comparisons). The results of this retrospective analysis suggest that DES implantation is at least as effective and safe as intravascular brachytherapy for the treatment of SVG ISR and that these treatment modalities are superior to balloon angioplasty alone.

Background: Saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention is associated with a significantly increased rate of periprocedural complications and late clinical and angiographic restenosis. In the contemporary drug-eluting stent (DES) era, the comparison of the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in SVG interventions is currently unknown. We conducted this retrospective analysis to investigate this issue., Methods and Results: Forty-seven patients with 50 SVG lesions who underwent standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with SES (SES group) were compared with 42 patients with 45 SVG lesions with PES (PES group). All patients received distal protection devices (DPDs) during the interventions. The in-hospital, 30-day, and 6-month clinical outcomes in both groups were compared. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were balanced between both groups except for the proximal and mid lesions. There were no deaths or Q-wave myocardial infarctions (MIs) during the index hospitalization. Non-Q-wave MI was similar between the two groups (SES vs PES, 4.3% vs 7.1%, P=0.55). At 30-day and 6-month follow-ups, all the clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups. There was no subacute thrombosis (SAT) or late thrombosis in either group. The event-free survival at 6 months was also similar between both groups (P=0.75)., Conclusions: The use of DES in patients undergoing SVG intervention with a DPD is clinically safe and feasible. As compared to SES, PES have the same efficacy and clinical outcomes in SVG interventions up to 6 months.

Background: Sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for the treatment of single coronary lesions is proven to be effective and durable. However, the safety and efficacy of overlapping SES for the treatment of long lesions have not been well established., Objectives: We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of overlapping versus nonoverlapping SES., Methods: Fifty-five patients who received overlapping SES were compared with 39 patients who received nonoverlapping SES., Results: The baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were balanced between the two study groups. The in-hospital complications were similar between groups, except that non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was significantly higher in the Overlapping SES group when compared with the Nonoverlapping SES group (23.6% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.04). This higher rate of myonecrosis is due to periprocedural side branch compromises, including side branch narrowing, occlusion, and flow reduction. At 30 days and 6 months follow-up, all clinical outcomes were similar between the study groups. In addition, the event-free survival rate was similar between groups (P = 0.87)., Conclusions: The implantation of overlapping SES for the treatment of long, native coronary lesions is feasible and effective but is associated with an increased rate of periprocedural myonecrosis. This phenomenon is caused primarily by side branch compromises, but does not have any adverse impact on late clinical events.

Patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) have higher rates of target vessel revascularization and mortality. The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) to improve the clinical outcomes of these patients is unknown. We investigated the effect of SESs versus bare metal stents (BMSs) on outcomes of patients with CRI. Among the first 1,522 patients treated with SESs, 76 were identified with CRI and 1,446 without CRI. In-hospital and 1- and 6-month clinical outcomes were compared with 153 patients with CRI who were treated with BMSs. Patients with CRI were older, hypertensive, and diabetic and had more previous myocardial infarctions, revascularizations, and decreased left ventricular function (p <0.001). These patients had more saphenous vein graft lesions, were treated with more debulking devices (p <0.003), and had higher rates of in-hospital complications and mortality (p <0.001) compared with those without CRI. Among patients with CRI, treatment with SESs did not affect clinical outcomes at 1 month and was associated with lower incidences of target vessel revascularization (7.1% vs 22.1%, p = 0.02) at 6 months but did not affect other events, including mortality (16.7% vs 14.7% p = 0.89), compared with BMSs. However, treatment with SESs in patients without CRI was associated with significantly lower rates of major adverse cardiac events at 6 months (p <0.001). In conclusion, percutaneous coronary intervention with SESs in patients with CRI is associated with low rates of repeat revascularization compared with BMSs but has no effect on mortality at 6 months.

This retrospective analysis compared clinical outcomes of patients who underwent stenting with > or =3 sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) with those who received a single SES. SES (Cypher) implantation for single vessels is proved to be effective and durable, but knowledge regarding the safety and effectiveness of multiple stenting with SESs is currently limited. In total, 929 consecutive patients who received SESs were identified; 63 received > or =3 SESs (multi group) and 866 received 1 SES (single group). The multi group had more non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions (MIs) during the index hospitalization (p = 0.02). At 30-day follow-up, death, Q-wave MI, subacute thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events were higher in the multi group than in the single group. At 6 months, death, Q-wave MI, target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events continued to be higher in the multi group. Using multivariate analysis, > or =3 SES implantations, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type C lesions, and cardiogenic shock were identified as independent predictors for 6-month major adverse cardiac events. In addition, patients in the multi group had a significantly lower survival rate than patients in the single group (p <0.0001). Patients who required > or =3 SES implantations developed increased periprocedural non-Q-wave MI and worse adverse clinical outcomes at 30 days and 6 months compared with patients who required a single SES implantation. In conclusion, when patients present with multiple coronary lesions, percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple SESs should be undertaken with great caution.

Background: Stent thrombosis (ST) is a serious complication of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation regardless of the timing (acute, subacute, or late). The correlates of ST with DES are not yet completely elucidated., Methods and Results: From a total cohort of 2974 consecutive patients treated with DES since April 2003, we identified 38 patients who presented with angiographic evidence of ST (1.27%). The ST occurred acutely in 5 patients, subacutely (< or =30 days) in 25 patients, and late (>30 days) in 8 patients. The clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables of these patients were compared with the remaining 2936 consecutive patients who underwent DES implantation and did not experience ST during a follow-up of 12 months. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the correlates of ST. Compared with patients without ST, patients with ST had a higher frequency of diabetes, acute postprocedural renal failure, and chronic renal failure. There were more bifurcation lesions, type C lesions, and a trend for smaller-diameter stents. Discontinuation of clopidogrel was higher in these patients (36.8% versus 10.7%; P<0.0001). The mean duration to ST from the stent implantation was 8.9+/-8.5 days in subacute and 152.7+/-100.4 days in late thrombosis cases. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with ST compared with those without ST at 6 months (31% versus 3%; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis detected cessation of clopidogrel therapy, renal failure, bifurcation lesions, and in-stent restenosis as significant correlates of ST (P<0.05)., Conclusions: ST continues to be a serious complication of contemporary DES use. Careful management is warranted in patients with renal failure and in those undergoing treatment for in-stent restenosis and bifurcations. Special focus on clopidogrel compliance may minimize the incidence of ST after DES implantation.

Saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention is associated with a significantly increased rate of periprocedural complications and late clinical and angiographic restenosis. We examined the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs; Cypher) compared with bare metal stents (BMSs) in SVG intervention. Forty-eight patients who had 50 SVG lesions and underwent standard percutaneous coronary intervention with SESs (SES group) were compared with 57 patients who had 64 SVG lesions and underwent intervention with BMSs (BMS group). All patients received distal protection devices during SVG intervention. In-hospital, 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year clinical outcomes in the 2 groups were compared. Baseline clinical and procedural characteristics were balanced between groups. There were no deaths or Q-wave myocardial infarctions during the index hospitalization, but compared with the BMS group, patients in the SES group had significantly fewer non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions (4% vs 21%, p = 0.01), which was mainly attributed to increased periprocedural creatine kinase-MB levels. At 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year follow-ups, all clinical outcomes were similar between groups. Event-free survival at 1 year was also similar between groups (p = 0.84). In conclusion, the use of SESs in patients who undergo SVG intervention with a distal protection device is clinically safe and feasible but is not associated with decreased clinical events up to 1 year compared with BMSs.

Recurrent in-stent restenosis (ISR) following intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) continues to be a therapeutic challenge. The present study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who were treated with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation versus repeat IRT for recurrent ISR after brachytherapy failure. A cohort of 88 patients who were previously treated with brachytherapy for ISR and presented with angina and recurrence of angiographic restenosis were evaluated for treatment with either DES [sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES); n = 34] or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and repeat radiation (gamma or beta radiation; n = 54). The two groups had similar baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. The in-hospital outcomes were similar between both groups. At long-term follow-up of 9.7 +/- 4.1 months for the DES group and 10.3 +/- 3.5 months for the repeat IRT group, there were no deaths or myocardial infarctions (MI). There was a trend toward more target vessel revascularization-major adverse cardiac events (TVR-MACE) in the DES group (p = 0.09). In addition, the patients in the DES group had a significantly lower survival rate compared to those in the repeat IRT group (p = 0.018). For patients who had recurrent ISR following IRT, either DES implantation or repeat radiation is safe and is associated with excellent immediate outcomes. Yet, at long-term follow-up, repeat IRT was associated with less recurrences and need for repeat revascularization when compared to DES implantation. Therefore, repeat IRT should be considered as an option for this difficult patient subset.