Search

Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) has gained popularity as an alternative to percutaneous biliary drainage for patients in whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has failed. There are no previous studies comparing EUS-CDS with endoscopic transpapillary stenting (ETS) as first-line treatment for distal malignant obstruction. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of EUS-CDS and ETS as first-line treatment in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction., Patients and Methods: A total of 82 patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction underwent initial biliary drainage using self-expandable metal stents at a tertiary care university hospital. ETS was performed between June 2009 and May 2012, and EUS-CDS was performed between May 2012 and March 2014. Clinical success rates, adverse event rates, and reintervention rates were retrospectively evaluated for EUS-CDS and ETS., Results: A total of 26 patients underwent EUS-CDS and 56 underwent ETS. Clinical success rates were equivalent between the groups (EUS-CDS 96.2 %, ETS 98.2 %; P = 0.54). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter with EUS-CDS than with ETS (19.7 vs. 30.2 minutes; P < 0.01). The rate of overall adverse events was not significantly different between the groups (EUS-CDS 26.9 %, ETS 35.7 %; P = 0.46). Post-procedural pancreatitis was only observed in the ETS group (0 % vs. 16.1 %; P = 0.03). The reintervention rate at 1 year was 16.6 % and 13.6 % for EUS-CDS and ETS, respectively (P = 0.50)., Conclusions: EUS-CDS performed by expert endoscopists was associated with a short procedure time and no risk of pancreatitis, and would therefore be feasible as a first-line treatment for patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

A 72-year-old man with jaundice by ampullary adenocarci-noma was treated at our hospital. For biliary decompression, a transpapillary, fully covered, self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) was deployed. Four days later, the patient devel-oped acute cholangitis. Endoscopic carbon dioxide cholan-giography revealed kinking of the common bile duct above the proximal end of the FCSEMS. A 7-F double-pigtail plastic stent was therefore placed through the FCSEMS to correct the kink, straightening the common bile duct (CBD) and im-proving cholangitis. This is the first report of a unique use of a double-pigtail plastic stent to correct CBD kinking. The place-ment of a double-pigtail plastic stent can correct CBD kink-ing, without requiring replacement or addition of a FCSEMS, and can lead to cost savings.

Background: Bilateral self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for the management of unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO) is technically challenging to perform using the existing metallic stents with thick delivery systems. The recently developed 6-Fr delivery systems could facilitate a single-step simultaneous side-by-side placement through the accessory channel of the duodenoscope. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of this procedure., Methods: Between May and September 2013, 13 consecutive patients with UMHBO underwent a single-step simultaneous side-by-side placement of SEMS with the 6-Fr delivery system. The technical success rate, stent patency, and rate of complications were evaluated from the prospectively collected database., Results: Technical success was achieved in 11 (84.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.8-95.8) patients. The median procedure time was 25 min. Early and late complications were observed in 23% (one segmental cholangitis and two liver abscesses) and 15% (one segmental cholangitis and one cholecystitis) patients, respectively. Median dysfunction free patency was 263 days (95% CI: 37-263). Five patients (38%) experienced stent occlusion that was successfully managed by endoscopic stent placement., Conclusions: A single-step simultaneous side-by-side placement of SEMS with a 6-Fr delivery system was feasible for the management of UMHBO., (© 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: Endoscopic double self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement by the partial stent-in-stent (PSIS) method has been reported to be useful for the management of unresectable hilar malignant biliary obstruction. However, it is technically challenging, and the optimal SEMS for the procedure remains unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for technical failure of endoscopic double SEMS placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO)., Methods: Between December 2009 and May 2013, 50 consecutive patients with MHBO underwent endoscopic double SEMS placement by the PSIS method. We retrospectively evaluated the rate of successful double SEMS placement and identified the risk factors for technical failure., Results: The technical success rate for double SEMS placement was 82.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.2-90.2). On univariate analysis, the rate of technical failure was high in patients with metastatic disease and unilateral placement. Multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic disease was a significant risk factor for technical failure (odds ratio: 9.63, 95% CI: 1.11-105.5). The subgroup analysis after double guidewire insertion showed that the rate of technical success was higher in the laser-cut type SEMS with a large mesh and thick delivery system than in the braided type SEMS with a small mesh and thick delivery system., Conclusions: Metastatic disease was a significant risk factor for technical failure of double SEMS placement for unresectable MHBO. The laser-cut type SEMS with a large mesh and thin delivery system might be preferable for the PSIS procedure., (© 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)