Search

Purpose: To evaluate stent placement in the treatment of mesenteric ischemia., Patients and Methods: Twelve patients (eight women, four men; mean age, 63 years) with chronic mesenteric ischemia underwent stent placement for stenoses or occlusions during a 5.5-year period. Nine patients with 10 stenoses (three celiac arteries, seven superior mesenteric arteries) and three patients with three chronic occlusions (two superior mesenteric arteries, one aortosuperior mesenteric artery bypass graft) were treated., Results: Initial technical success was achieved in 11 of the 12 patients (92%), including all three patients with chronic occlusions. There were no technical complications. There was one postprocedural death (<30 days) due to bowel ischemia and infarction, despite a technically successful procedure. Clinical follow-up was available in all 12 patients, with a mean follow-up of 15.7 months (range, 0-38.5 months). Primary and primary-assisted patency up to 18 months was 74% (standard error [SE], 13%) and 83% (SE, 11%), respectively. Secondary patency was 83% (SE, 11%) at 3 years. All three patients (100%) with chronic occlusions had relief of clinical signs and symptoms at a mean follow-up of 22 months (range, 13-38.5 months)., Conclusions: Stent placement is safe and clinically effective as an adjunctive therapy to angioplasty or as a primary method of treatment for chronic mesenteric ischemia in patients with focal visceral artery stenoses or occlusions.

Purpose: To retrospectively review and to report the results of stent placement for focal mid-abdominal aortic stenoses., Materials and Methods: During a 4-year period, 10 focal mid-abdominal aortic stenoses were treated with stent placement in nine patients (six women and three men; mean age, 61 years; range, 49-73 years). All of the stenoses were atherosclerotic in nature except for one at the proximal anastomosis of an aortobi-femoral graft, which may have been from fibrointimal hyperplasia. Seven of the 10 stenoses were treated with primary stent placement, whereas three were treated with stent placement after suboptimal angioplasty., Results: The technical success rate was 100%. Clinical success, defined as complete elimination or improvement of symptoms present before stent placement, was achieved in eight of the nine patients with a mean duration of follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.2-3.0 years)., Conclusion: In view of the excellent technical and clinical success, the authors believe that stent placement should be considered as an adjective therapy to angioplasty or as a primary method of treatment in properly selected patients with focal mid-abdominal aortic stenoses.