Search

Limited data are currently available on the outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) with a reduced performance status. We herein present the results of a registry study on 2,936 AML patients undergoing allo-SCT in first remission (CR1) with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score less than or equal to 80%. Two-year leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, and relapse-free survival (GRFS) rates were 54%, 59%, and 41%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with a KPS score = 80% had lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and superior OS in comparison to patients with a KPS score <80% (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with a KPS score =80%, a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen was associated with an increased risk of relapse (p = 0.002) and lower GRFS (p < 0.001) compared to myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Differently, in patients with a KPS score <80%, a RIC regimen resulted in lower NRM (p < 0.001), whereas relapse incidence did not differ, thus leading to an improved GRFS (p = 0.008) as compared to MAC. A transplant from a matched sibling donor (MSD) was associated with a reduced incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (p < 0.01) and NRM (p < 0.01) in comparison to other donor types. In conclusion, allo-SCT appears feasible in AML patients with a jeopardized KPS score. Survival is significantly affected by the conditioning intensity, which should be adjusted according to the severity of KPS impairment., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major factor contributing to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Because of the small number of results from well designed, large-scale, clinical studies there is considerable variability in the prevention and treatment of GVHD worldwide. In 2014, to standardise treatment approaches the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation published recommendations on the management of GVHD in the setting of HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor transplantation in adult patients with haematological malignancies. Here we update these recommendations including the results of study published after 2014. Evidence was searched in three steps: first, a widespread scan of published trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews; second, expert opinion was added for specific issues following several rounds of debate; and third, a refined search to target debated or rapidly updating issues. On the basis of this evidence and the 2014 recommendations, five members of the EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party created 38 statements on GVHD prophylaxis, drug management, and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD. Subsequently, they created the EBMT GVHD management recommendation expert panel by recruiting 20 experts with expertise in GVHD management. An email-based, two-round Delphi panel approach was used to manage the consensus. Modified National Comprehensive Cancer Network categories for evidence and consensus were applied to the approved statements. We reached 100% consensus for 29 recommendations and 95% consensus for nine recommendations. Key updates to these recommendations include a broader use of rabbit anti-T-cell globulin; lower steroid doses for the management of grade 2 acute GVHD with isolated skin or upper gastrointestinal tract manifestations; fluticasone, azithromycin, and montelukast should be used for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; and the addition of newer treatment options for resteroid-refractory acute and chronic GVHD. In addition, we discuss specific aspects of GVHD prophylaxis and management in the setting of haploidentical transplantation and in paediatric patients, but no formal recommendations on those procedures have been provided in this Review. The European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation proposes to use these recommendations as a basis for the routine management of GVHD during stem-cell transplantation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the era of eculizumab, identifying patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria who may benefit from allogeneic stem cell transplantation is challenging., Design and Methods: We describe the characteristics and overall survival of 211 patients transplanted for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in 83 EBMT centers from 1978 to 2007. Next, we conducted a comparison with a cohort of 402 non-transplanted patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria diagnosed between 1950 and 2005 in 92 French centers. We compared the occurrence of complications (i.e. thromboembolism and aplastic anemia) using either an individual or a stratum-matching procedure., Results: After a median follow-up of 5 years, the 5-year overall survival rate ± standard error (%) was 68 ± 3 in the transplanted group (54 ± 7 in the case of thromboembolism, 69 ± 5 in the case of aplastic anemia without thromboembolism and 86 ± 6 in the case of recurrent hemolytic anemia without thromboembolism or aplastic anemia). Only thromboembolism as the indication for transplantation was associated with worse outcome (P=0.03). We identified 24 pairs of transplanted and non-transplanted patients with thromboembolism for the matched comparison, with worse overall survival for the transplanted patients (hazard ratio=10.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-78.1; P=0.007). This was confirmed by the global matching procedure (P=0.03). As regards aplastic anemia without thromboembolism, 30 pairs were identified for the matched comparison. It was not observed that transplanted patients had a significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio=4.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-18.9; P=0.06). A global matching procedure was not feasible., Conclusions: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is probably not a suitable treatment option for life-threatening thromboembolism in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

Purpose: To investigate the influence of donor type (human leukocyte antigen [HLA] -identical sibling donor versus HLA-A-, HLA-B-, HLA-Cw-, HLA-DRB1-, and HLA-DQB1-identical unrelated donors, or so-called 10/10) on the outcome of patients who underwent allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT), adjusting for other prognostic factors, in patients with standard-risk hematologic malignancy., Patients and Methods: Between March 2000 and January 2003, we prospectively investigated the outcome of 236 consecutive patients with standard-risk malignancy from 12 French centers. Fifty-five patients underwent alloSCT from an unrelated HLA-identical donor at the allelic level, whereas 181 patients received an alloSCT from an HLA-identical sibling. Diagnoses included acute leukemia (n = 175), chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 43), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n = 18). All patients received unmodified marrow graft following myeloablative conditioning with cyclophosphamide and total-body irradiation. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and short-course methotrexate in all patients., Results: In multivariable analysis, overall survival and transplantation-related mortality were adversely influenced by recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV) -positive serology, age of donor older than 37 years, and the occurrence of acute grade > or = II GVHD. Event-free survival rates were lower for patients with recipient CMV-positive serology. Acute grades II to IV GVHD rates were higher for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). No factor was found to influence either relapse or acute grades III to IV GVHD. The effect of donor type was nonsignificant for all criteria., Conclusion: In patients with standard-risk malignancy, transplantation from unrelated HLA-allellically matched donors led to outcomes similar to those from HLA-identical sibling donors.

Background: Increased risk of transplant related mortality in male recipients of female hematopoietic stem cell grafts and in vitro reactivity of lymphocytes against H-Y encoded gene products in females with rejected male grafts have been documented. An increased rejection of male grafts in female recipients is not reported for solid organ or stem cell transplants and the role of H-Y as transplantation antigen has been controversial., Methods: Data from 1481 patients with a hematopoietic stem cell transplant for aplastic anemia reported from 154 centers in 28 countries were analyzed. Outcome was compared between patients with donors of the same or opposite sex., Results: Survival at 5 years was significantly better in patients with donors from the same sex: 68% vs. 60% (P = 0.001). Male patients with female donors had a decreased survival (relative risk of death 1.52, P < 0.001) and an increased risk of severe graft-versus-host disease (relative risk 1.33, P = 0.03) compared to recipients of sex-matched grafts. Female patients with male donors had a decreased survival (relative risk of death 1.44, P = 0.01) and an increased risk of rejection (relative risk 2.20, P = 0.01) compared to recipients of sex-matched grafts. In a subgroup analysis, the negative effects of donor/recipient sex-mismatching appeared confined to patients receiving conditioning regimens not containing antithymocyte globulin., Conclusions: These data confirm H-Y as a clinically relevant transplantation antigen, in both the graft-versus-host and the host-versus-graft direction. Wherever possible, donor-recipient sex-matching should be integrated into donor selection algorithms.

To assess the role of NOD2/CARD15 variants on the long-term outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in a genetically homogeneous group, we extended our previous study (cohort I, n = 78) and typed DNA for NOD2/CARD15 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from an additional 225 recipients and their HLA-identical sibling donors (cohort II) treated at four other European centers. Results of genotyping were compared with clinical outcome. The strong association of NOD2/CARD15 variants with transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was confirmed in univariate and multivariate analysis; TRM increased from 20% in cohort I/22% in cohort II in recipient/donor pairs without any NOD2/CARD15 variants to 47% in cohort I/32% in cohort II in the presence of one variant in either donor or recipient and further to 57% in cohort I/74% in cohort II in the presence of 2 or more variants (P < .002 in both cohorts). NOD2/CARD15 SNPs were not associated with relapse rate but had a strong impact on overall survival. In an analysis of center effects, the type of gastrointestinal decontamination was the only factor interfering with the prognostic significance of NOD2/CARD15 SNPs. Our data further support an interaction between gastrointestinal defense mechanisms, activation of the innate immune system, and specific transplant-related complications.

Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) confer a survival advantage in the absence of FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD). Here, we investigated the main predictors of outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We identified 1572 adult (age ≥ 18 year) patients with NPM1-mutated AML in first complete remission (CR1:78%) or second complete remission (CR2:22%) who were transplanted from matched sibling donors (30.8%) or unrelated donors (57.4%) between 2007 and 2019 at EBMT participating centers. Median follow-up for survivors was 23.7 months. FLT3-ITD was present in 69.3% of patients and 39.2% had detectable minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) at transplant. In multivariate analysis, relapse incidence (RI) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were negatively affected by concomitant FLT3-ITD mutation (HR 1.66 p = 0.0001, and HR 1.53, p < 0.0001, respectively), MRD positivity at transplant (HR 2.18, p < 10-5 and HR 1.71, p < 10-5, respectively), and transplant in CR2 (HR 1.36, p = 0.026, and HR 1.26, p = 0.033, respectively), but positively affected by Karnofsky score ≥90 (HR 0.74, p = 0.012, and HR 0.7, p = 0.0002, respectively). Overall survival (OS) was also negatively influenced by concomitant FLT3-ITD (HR 1.6, p = 0.0001), MRD positivity at transplant (HR 1.61, p < 10-5), and older age (HR 1.22 per 10 years, p < 0.0001), but positively affected by matched sibling donor (unrelated donor: HR 1.35, p = 0.012; haploidentical donor: HR 1.45, p = 0.037) and Karnofsky score ≥90 (HR 0.73, p = 0.004). These results highlight the independent and significant role of FLT3-ITD, MRD status, and disease status on posttransplant outcomes in patients with NPM1-mutated AML allowing physicians to identify patients at risk of relapse who may benefit from posttransplant prophylactic interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rituximab (R) is increasingly incorporated in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in patients with B-cell malignancies, not only to improve disease control, but also to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). There are no randomized prospective data to validate this practice, although single center data and the CIBMTR analysis have shown promising results. We aimed at validation of these findings in a large registry study. We conducted a retrospective analysis using the EBMT registry of 3,803 adult patients with B-cell malignancies undergoing alloHCT (2001–2013) with either rituximab (R-RIC-9%) or non-rituximab (RIC-91%) reduced intensity regimens respectively. Median age and median follow up were 55 years (range 19.1–77.3) and 43.2 months (range 0.3–179.8), respectively. There was no difference in transplant outcomes (R-RIC vs RIC), including 1-year overall survival (69.9% vs 70.7%), 1-year disease-free survival (64.4% vs 62.2%), 1-year non-relapse mortality (21% vs 22%), and day-100 incidence of acute GVHD 2-4° (12% vs 12%). In summary, we found that addition of rituximab in RIC regimens for B-cell malignancies had no significant impact on major transplant outcome variables. Of note, data on chronic GVHD was not available, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn from the present study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT). Addition of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or post‐transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) to standard immunosuppressive agents reduces GVHD in different donor settings. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of adults with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allo‐HSCT from HLA‐identical sibling donors after the use of PTCY (n = 197) or ATG (n = 1913). RESULTS: Patients in the PTCY group were younger than those in the ATG group (median age, 47 vs 54 years; P <.01). Peripheral blood was the most frequently used stem cell source, being significantly more frequent in the ATG group than in the PTCY group (95% vs 70% P <.01). The conditioning regimen was more frequently myeloablative in the PTCY group than in the ATG group (59% vs 48%; P <.01). Time to neutrophil engraftment was shorter in the ATG group than in the PTCY group (17 vs 20 days; P <.01). No differences were observed according to the other transplantation outcomes, except for chronic GVHD of all grades and extensive chronic GVHD at 2 years, which were significantly lower in the ATG group compared with the PTCY group (P <.02). CONCLUSION: PTCY is feasible in an HLA‐identical sibling setting, and despite similar outcomes, ATG may be associated with lower incidence of chronic GVHD. Addition of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or post‐transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) to standard immunosuppressive agents in patients who received a transplant from an HLA‐identical sibling donor is feasible and allows low rates of graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD).When compared with PTCY, the use of ATG is associated with lower cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with t(6;9)(p23;q34) is a poor‐risk entity, commonly associated with FLT3‐ITD (internal tandem duplication). Allogeneic stem‐cell tranplantation (allo‐SCT) is recommended, although studies analysing the outcome of allo‐SCT in this setting are lacking. We selected 195 patients with t(6;9) AML, who received a first allo‐SCT between 2000 and 2016 from the EBMT (European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation) registry. Disease status at time of allo‐SCT was the strongest independent prognostic factor, with a two‐year leukaemia‐free survival and relapse incidence of 57% and 19% in patients in CR1 (first complete remission), 34% and 33% in CR2 (second complete remission), and 24% and 49% in patients not in remission, respectively (P < 0·001). This study, which represents the largest one available in t(6;9) AML, supports the recommendation to submit these patients to allo‐SCT in CR1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Following chemotherapy, secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML), occurring after antecedent hematologic diseases, previous chemotherapy or radiation, has an inferior prognosis compared with de novo AML. To define the outcome of sAML in the context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), a retrospective, registry-based comparison was performed, including 11,439 patients with de novo and 1325 with sAML. Among transplants in first complete remission (CR1) (n = 8,600), the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 28.5% and 16.4% for de novo, and 35% and 23.4% for sAML. Three-year overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and Graft-versus-Host Disease/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 60.8%, 55.1%, and 38.6% for de novo, and 46.7%, 41.6%, and 28.4% for sAML, respectively. In multivariate analysis, sAML was associated with a lower OS (HR = 1.33 [95% CI = 1.21–1.48]; p < 10−5), LFS (HR = 1.32 [95% CI = 1.19–1.45]; p < 10−5) and GRFS (HR = 1.2 [95% CI = 1.1–1.31]; p < 10−4) and higher NRM (HR = 1.37 [95% CI = 1.17–1.59]; p < 10−4) and RI (HR = 1.27 [95% CI = 1.12–1.44]; p < 10−3). Results of the Cox model were confirmed in a matched-pair analysis. In contrast, results did not differ between de novo and sAML after alloSCT in induction failure or relapse. Hence, this analysis identified sAML as an independent risk factor for outcome after alloSCT in CR1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a matched sibling donor (MSD) is considered the first choice for an allogeneic transplantation. However, a female donor for a male recipient is a poor prognostic factor. The authors compared haploidentical (HAPLO) donors with female MSDs.Methods: In total, 834 men underwent allogenic transplantation from a female MSD, and 232 men underwent allogenic transplantation from a HAPLO donor. Of these, 86% of HAPLO recipients and 3% of MSD recipients received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis posttransplantation with high-dose cyclophosphamide. A significant qualitative interaction was observed between donor type and cytogenetics, Therefore, the analyses were stratified on cytogenetics.Results: Of the men with intermediate-risk AML, 638 received transplantation from a female MSD, and 160 received transplantation from a HAPLO donor. In multivariate analysis, poor risk factors were a HAPLO donor versus an MSD for nonrelapse mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; P = .02) and patient age for nonrelapse mortality and overall survival (HR, 1.22 [P = .02] and 1.15 [P = .02], respectively). HAPLO transplantation resulted in less chronic GVHD (HR, 0.43; P < 10-4 ) but lower leukemia-free survival (HR, 1.7; P = .04). The GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was not different. Of the men with high-risk AML, 196 received transplantation from a female MSD, and 72 received transplantation from a HAPLO donor. By multivariate analysis, HAPLO recipients had a lower incidence of relapse (HR, 0.40; P = .004), better leukemia-free survival (HR, 0.46; P = .003), better overall survival (HR, 0.43; P = .003), and better GRFS (HR, 0.54; P = .006).Conclusions: In men who have intermediate-risk AML, allogenic transplantation from a sister MSD or a HAPLO donor produces similar GRFS. However, in men who have high-risk AML, a HAPLO donor combined with prophylactic high-dose cyclophosphamide posttransplantation may be a better choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (allo‐HSCT) remains the only curative approach for Myelofibrosis (MF). Scarce information exists in the literature on the outcome and, indeed, management of those MF patients who relapse following transplant. We hereby report on the management and outcome of 202 patients who relapsed post allo‐HSCT for MF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reduced-intensity conditioning ( RIC)-allo SCT is increasingly used for acute myelogenous leukemia. Limited data are available for the comparison of peripheral blood stem cells with bone marrow for RIC-allo SCT. We used the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation ( EBMT) ALWP data to compare the outcome of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells ( PBSC) ( n = 1430) vs. bone marrow ( BM) ( n = 107) for acute myelogenous leukemia ( AML) patients with complete remission that underwent RIC-allo SCT from compatible sibling donors. The leukemia features, the disease status, and the time from diagnosis were similar between the two groups. Engraftment was achieved in 99% and 93% in the PBSC and BM groups, respectively ( P < 0.0001). The day of engraftment was significantly earlier for the PBSC vs. the BM group, 15 (1-59) and 19 (5-69), respectively ( P < 0.001). Acute GVHD, severe GVHD (grade III-IV) and chronic GVHD did not differ between the groups. leukemia-free survival ( LFS), relapse, and non-relapsed mortality ( NRM) were 51 ± 2%, 32 ± 1%, and 17 ± 1% vs. 50 ± 6%, 38 ± 6%, and 12 ± 3% for the PBSC and BM groups, respectively. Our results indicate faster engraftment, but no difference in GVHD, LFS, relapse, and NRM when comparing PBSC to BM grafts from sibling donors following RIC conditioning. This is the first study comparing PBSC to BM grafts in the RIC setting, analyzing a homogeneous population of patients with AML in remission. Whether PBSC should be preferred for advanced phases of the disease, where the outcome is dominated by relapse incidences, needs further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary This study analysed the effects of growth factor on outcome after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation ( HSCT) with >9 years follow-up. Of 1887 adult patients with acute leukaemia who received bone marrow from human leucocyte antigen ( HLA)-identical siblings and were treated with myeloablative conditioning, 459 (24%) were treated with growth factor. Growth factor hastened engraftment of neutrophils ( P < 0·0001), but reduced platelet counts ( P = 0·0002). Graft-versus-host disease ( GVHD)-free survival (no acute GVHD grade II-IV or chronic GVHD) at 10 years was 12 ± 2% (± SE) in the growth factor group, as opposed to 17 ± 2% in the controls [hazard ratio ( HR) 0·81, P = 0·001]. Similar differences in GVHD-free survival were seen in patients with or without conditioning with total body irradiation ( TBI). Non-relapse mortality ( NRM) was higher in the growth factor group irrespective of whether or not TBI conditioning was included [ HR = 1·48; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·15-1·9; P = 0·002; HR = 1·59; 95% CI: 1·07-2·37; P = 0·02, respectively]. Both groups had similar probabilities of leukaemic relapse ( HR = 0·96; 95% CI: 0·78-1·18; P = 0·71). Leukaemia-free survival ( LFS) at 10 years was 35 ± 2% in those receiving growth factor prophylaxis, as opposed to 44 ± 1% in the controls ( HR = 0·70; 95% CI: 0·60-0·82; P = 0·00001). Prophylaxis with growth factor increases the risk of GVHD, does not affect relapse, increases NRM and reduces LFS > 10 years after HSCT, regardless of conditioning with TBI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantation (MUD-SCT) provides the only curative option for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who fail conventional therapies and do not have a sibling donor. The purpose of this study was to analyse the outcome of patients with FL treated with MUD-SCT included in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. 131 patients treated with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC, n = 87) or conventional myeloablative (CONV, n = 44) MUD-SCT between 2000 and 2005 were included. Median time from diagnosis to MUD-SCT was 47 months and the median number of previous therapeutic regimens was 4 (previous autograft: 47%). RIC recipients were significantly older, with a longer interval from diagnosis to MUD-SCT and had failed a previous autograft more frequently than CONV recipients. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 24% and 30% at 100-d and 1-year, respectively. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 17% of the patients developed disease progression, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) being 47%. Three-year overall survival (OS) for the whole series was 51%. On multivariate analysis, RIC regimens were associated with at lower NRM and a significantly longer PFS and OS. This retrospective study demonstrated that MUD-SCT results, even in heavily pre-treated populations, in a meaningful PFS and OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Cord blood (CB) represents an alternate source of stem cells in transplantation. Nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) are a physiological subset of CB population. Although it is important to have an accurate estimate of CD34+ cell number, NRBCs could compromise white blood cell count and interfere with CD34+ cell quantification. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 826 CB units were analyzed for total nucleated cells (TNCs), NRBCs, and CD34+ cells by flow cytometry. NRBCs were also counted conventionally by manual microscopy. Percentages of CD34+ cells corrected by NRBC count (CD34+c) were determined as follows: %CD34+c = CD34+/CD45+ (×106)/(TNCs (×108) – NRBCs (×108)). RESULTS: The mean percentages of CD34+ cells and NRBCs were 0.27 percent (range, 0.01%-1.25%) and 7.64 percent (range, 0.13%-84%), respectively. Comparison between flow cytometric and microscopic NRBC count showed a regression of y = 0.685 + 0.719x and a coefficient of determination of r2 = 0.721. When corrected with NRBC count, the mean percentage of CD34+ c cells was 0.295 percent (p = 0.0008 compared with CD34+%) and mean TNCc count was 14.8 × 108 (p < 10−4 compared to TNC count). CONCLUSION: The determination of NRBCs with a flow cytometric method might represent a new strategy for providing satisfactory quality assurance controls of CB products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports on the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). It provides statistical analysis on the risk factors associated with nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and survival of chronic GVHD and evaluated patient, transplantation and chronic GVHD characteristics. It notes that risk scores were computed by assigning variables specific risk scores for each of the selected variables.

To analyze the influence of distinct combinations ofmolecular aberrations on outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML), a retrospective registry analysis was performed on 702 adults undergoing HSCT in first complete remission (CR). Patients were grouped according to presence or absence of NPM1 mutations (NPM1mut) and FLT3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD). Double-negative patients were evaluated for mutations of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein a gene (CEBPα). The influence of genotypes on relapse, non-relapse mortality, leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS), and a prognostic classification combining NPM1/FLT3-ITD profile and classical risk factors were calculated. Two-year OS fromHSCTwas 81 ± 5% in NPM1mut/FLT3wt, 75 ± 3% in NPM1wt/FLT3wt, 66 ± 3% in NPM1mut/ FLT3-ITD, and 54 ± 7% in NPM1wt/FLT3-ITD (P = .003). Analysis of CEBPα among patients with NPM1wt/FLT3wt revealed excellent results both in patients with CEBPαmut and with atriple negative genotype(2-year OS:100%/77 ± 3%). In aCox-model of predefined variables, age, FLT3-ITD and >1 course of chemotherapy to reach CR were risk factors associated with inferior outcome, regardless of NPM1 mutational status, variations of transplant protocols, or development of graft-versus-host disease. In a prognostic risk classification, 2-year OS/LFS rates were 88 ± 3%/79 ± 4% without any, 77 ± 2%/73 ± 3% with one, and 53 ± 4%/50 ± 4 with ≥2 risk factors (P = .003/.002). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Measurable residual disease (MRD) status pre- transplantation (alloSCT) predicts transplant outcome. Nonetheless, the impact of MRD persistence (MRD+) might be modulated by the use of anti thymocyte globulin (ATG) to prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD). Since GVHD is usually associated with the graft versus leukemia effect (GVL), there is a concern that ATG may increase relapse incidence (RI) in patients (pts) with a higher risk of relapse. We therefore investigated whether MRD status pre-alloSCT could impact the outcome in AML patients receiving alloSCT with ATG in CR1. Methods Study included adult AML pts undergoing alloSCT in CR1 during 2005-2016 period. First, we assessed the impact of MRD status, cytogenetics, FLT3 -ITD and ATG in the whole population. Then, we studied the impact of ATG in relation to the MRD status at time of alloSCT. Results 1509 pts (1083 MRD negative (MRD-) and 426 MRD+) were included. In the MRD- group, 552 (48%) pts did not receive ATG (MRD− /no ATG) and 561 (52%) received ATG (MRD−/ATG), whereas within MRD+ cohort, 187 (44%) received no ATG (MRD+/no ATG) and 239 (58%) received ATG (MRD+/ATG). Median age was 51 (range 18-73) years, 51% were females. Acute GVHD grade III-IV and cGVHD were significantly lower in pts who received ATG in comparison to those who did not, translating into better GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Non-relapse mortality (NRM), RI, LFS and OS did not differ statistically. Focusing on the influence of MRD status, the overall RI was higher in MRD+ patients prior to alloSCT (38.7% vs. 22.8%, p < 10−5), and LFS, OS and GRFS were all significantly superior in the MRD- cohort (66.2% vs 51.4% p < 10−5; 72.6% vs 59.8%, p = <10−5, and 51.5% vs 37% p < 10−5, respectively). While, NRM and GVHD did not differ. Then, we investigated the effect of ATG separately in MRD- and MRD+pts. By multivariate analysis, in MRD- pts, ATG did not affect RI (24.3 vs. 21.5% at 2y in MRD−/no ATG and MRD−/ATG; HR 0.80, P = 0.17), but was associated with lower incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD, overall and extensive cGVHD and NRM (HR 0.71 P = 0.04, HR 0.37 P = 0.0009; HR 0.55 p < 10−4, HR 0.42 P < 10−5 and HR 0.66 p = 0.05, respectively). As a result, ATG was associated with improved LFS, OS and GRFS (HR 0.74 P = 0.02, HR 0.69 P = 0.01 and HR 0.62 P = 0.00001). In MRD+ pts, ATG was associated with lower incidence of overall and extensive cGVHD (HR 0.56 p = 0.03, HR 0.40 P = 0.01, respectively), without a significant impact on any other alloSCT outcomes, including RI (38.8% vs 38.6% in MRD+/no ATG and MRD*/ATG; HR 1.02 P = 0.92). Conclusions ATG reduces acute and cGVHD incidence and severity in AML pts undergoing alloSCT in CR1, resulting in improved GRFS. AML relapse risk remained unmodified by ATG use, even in the high risk subset of MRD+ patients' pre-alloSCT. Therefore, the use of ATG is not detrimental, and can allow for a significant clinical benefit in all CR1 AML patients who are candidate for alloSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) secondary to another haematological neoplasia or malignant disease (sAML) is thought to have an inferior prognosis than de novo AML. However, the role of this difference for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is unclear. A registry-based analysis was performed to compare results after SCT for sAML versus AML. Methods Inclusion criteria were age ≥18y and SCT for de novo or sAML from a matched related, unrelated or T-cell replete haploidentical donor between 2000 and 2016. A multivariate Cox model was performed for risk factors for outcome. It was stratified for different stages at SCT. Further, a matched pair analysis of de novo versus sAML was done, using age (+/-3 years), stage at SCT, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), conditioning, in vivo/ex vivo T cell depletion, donor, donor/recipient sex and CMV-status combination, cytogenetics, and graft source as matching criteria. Results 11439 patients (pts) with de novo and 1325 with sAML were identified. Median follow-up was 36 and 33 months. After SCT in first complete remission (CR1), 3Y cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 28.5%/16.4% for de novo (n=7691), and 35%/23.4% for sAML (n=909). 3Y overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and GvHD/relapse free survival (GRFS) were 60.8%, 55.1% and 38.6% for de novo and 46.7%, 41.6% and 28.4% for sAML. In a multivariate Cox model focusing on SCT in CR1, sAML was associated with higher NRM (HR=1.32; p<10−5) and CIR (HR=1.28; p=0.0002), and lower LFS (HR=1.30; p<10−5), OS (HR=1.32; p<10−5) and GRFS (HR=1.20; p<10−5). Other factors for OS were age (p=<10-5), cytogenetics (intermediate, p=0.002, poor, p=<10-5), patient/donor sex combination (female/male, p=<10-5), KPS (<>80, p=0.003) and donor (UD 10/10 match, p=0.007; UD 9/10 match, p=10-5; haplo, p=0.002). When focusing on pts transplanted for primary refractory (de novo, n=607, sAML, n=199) or relapsed AML (de novo, n=1009, sAML, n=124), results were generally inferior. However, Cox models did not identify sAML as a relevant factor. Instead, outcome was determined by age, cytogenetics and KPS. The matched pair analysis was performed on 877 pairs and confirmed the above findings: Over all, sAML was associated with higher NRM (p=0.004), and lower LFS (p=0.004), OS (p=0.008) and GRFS (p=0.04). However, when the analysis was stratified by stage at SCT, again differences were only seen among pts transplanted in CR1, but not after SCT in advanced disease. Conclusion Our large-scale, registry-based analysis identified sAML as independent risk factor for outcome after SCT in first CR1. In primary refractory and relapsed AML, other factors such as age, cytogenetics and performance status were of higher relevance. This data may help to improve risk stratification and prognostic estimates after SCT for sAML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• In this largest cohort of myelofibrosis transplants analyzed to date, no significant difference in 5-year probabilities of overall survival (OS) was noted between those undergoing myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (53.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.1% to 56.9%) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (51.0%; 95% CI, 48.3% to 53.7%); P =.78. • Graft failure rates appeared higher in those undergoing RIC protocols compared with MAC protocols. • MAC platforms demonstrated a trend toward less relapse and significantly improved graft-versus-host disease-free/relapse-free survival, although this requires validation. This retrospective study by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation analyzed the outcome of 2224 patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) between 2000 and 2014; 781 (35%) underwent myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 1443 (65%) reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). Median patient age was 52.9 years (range, 18 to 74 years) and 57.5 years (range, 21 to 76 years) in the MAC and RIC cohorts, respectively. Donor type was similar: matched sibling donors (MAC, 317 [41%]; RIC, 552 [38%]) and unrelated donors (MAC, 464 [59%]; RIC, 891 [62%]). Median time to both neutrophil and platelet (>20 × 109/L) engraftment did not differ between cohorts. Rates of grade II to IV acute GVHD were 28% (MAC) and 31% (RIC; P = NS). Cumulative chronic GVHD rates (limited/extensive) were 22%/27% (MAC) and 19%/31% (RIC; P =.10). Cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 25.5%, 32.2%, and 34.6% (MAC) and 26.3%, 32.8%, and 34.4% (RIC), respectively. There was a trend toward a higher relapse rate with RIC regimens compared with MAC (P =.08); rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 10.9%, 17.2%, and 20.1% (MAC) and 14%, 19.7%, and 23.2% (RIC), respectively. No significant difference in 5-year probabilities of overall survival (OS) was noted: MAC (53.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49.1% to 56.9%) and RIC (51.0%; 95% CI, 48.3% to 53.7%); P =.78. Regarding the composite end point of GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS), the unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimate of 5-year GRFS was 32.4% (95% CI, 29.0% to 36.1%) in the MAC group and 26.1% (95% CI, 23.9% to 28.2%) in the RIC group (P =.001). In the MAC cohort, multivariable analysis confirmed worse OS and NRM with older age (>50 years), using an unrelated donor and a Karnofsky Performance Status of 80 or less. For the RIC cohort, worse OS and NRM were associated with age 60 to 70 years compared with younger recipients, use of a mismatched donor, and poor performance status. In conclusion, although similar OS rates existed for both cohorts overall, this study suggests that MAC should still be used for younger individuals suitable for such an approach due to a trend toward less relapse and an overall suggested advantage of improved GRFS, albeit this should be examined in a more homogeneous cohort. RIC allo-SCT still offers significant survival advantage in the older, fitter MF allograft patient, and optimization to reduce significant relapse and NRM rates is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Overall outcomes of patients allografted for BC CML remain poor in the TKI era. • Survival after alloSCT for BC CML depends on the pretransplant remission status. • Conventional prognostic factors remain outcome determinants for BC CML in remission. • UD transplant is associated with better LFS in patients with active BC at alloSCT. The prognosis of patients with blast crisis (BC) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is still dismal. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation represents the only curative treatment option, but data on transplant outcomes are scarce. We therefore conducted a retrospective, registry-based study of adult patients allografted for BC CML, focusing on patients with active disease at transplant and pretransplant prognostic factors. One hundred seventy patients allografted for BC CML after tyrosine kinase inhibitor pretreatment between 2004 and 2016 were analyzed. Before transplant, 95 patients were in remission, whereas 75 patients had active BC. In multivariable analysis of the entire cohort, active BC at transplant was the strongest factor associated with decreased overall survival (hazrd ratio, 1.87; P =.010) and shorter leukemia-free survival (LFS; hazard ratio, 1.69; P =.017). For patients with BC in remission at transplant, advanced age (≥45 years), lower performance status (≤80%), longer interval from diagnosis BC to transplant (>12 months), myeloablative conditioning, and unrelated donor (UD) transplant were risk factors for inferior survival. In patients with active BC, only UD transplant was significantly associated with prolonged LFS and trended toward improved overall survival. In summary, survival of patients allografted for BC CML was strongly dependent on pretransplant remission status. In patients with remission of BC, conventional prognostic factors remained the major determinants of outcome, whereas in those with active BC at transplant, UD transplant was associated with prolonged LFS in our study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The DIPSS was not predictive of survival in myelofibrosis secondary to essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera after stem cell transplantation. • The MYSEC-PM predicted survival and showed improved prognostic ability. • Although performance of the MYSEC-PM was still moderate, risk stratification may be improved by incorporating clinical, mutational, and transplant-related factors. We aimed to validate the MYelofibrosis SECondary to PV and ET prognostic model (MYSEC-PM) in 159 patients with myelofibrosis secondary to polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry undergoing transplantation from matched siblings or unrelated donors. Furthermore, we aimed to test its prognostic performance in comparison with the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). Score performance was analyzed using the concordance index (C): the probability that a patient who experienced an event had a higher risk score than a patient who did not (C >.5 suggesting predictive ability). Median follow-up of the total cohort was 41 months (range, 34 to 54), 45 months in post-PV and 38 months in post-ET myelofibrosis. Survival at 1, 2, and 4 years was 70% (95% CI, 63% to 77%), 61% (95% CI, 53% to 69%), and 52% (95% CI, 43% to 61%) for the total cohort; 70% (95% CI, 59% to 80%), 61% (95% CI, 49% to 73%), and 51% (95% CI, 38% to 64%) for post-PV; and 71% (95% CI, 61% to 81%), 61% (95% CI, 50% to 72%), and 54% (95% CI, 42% to 66%) for post-ET myelofibrosis (P =.78). Overall, the DIPSS was not significantly predictive of outcome (P =.28). With respect to the MYSEC-PM, overall survival at 4 years was 69% for the low-risk, 55% for the intermediate 1-risk, 47% for the intermediate 2-risk, and 22% (0% to 45%) for the high-risk groups. The prognostic model was predictive of survival overall (P =.05), whereas groups with intermediate 2 and high risk showed no significant difference (P =.44). Assessment of prognostic utility yielded a C-index of.575 (95% CI,.502 to.648) for the DIPSS, whereas assessment of the MYSEC-PM resulted in a C-statistics of.636 (95% CI,.563 to.708), indicating improvement in prediction of post-transplant survival using the new MYSEC-PM. In addition, transplantations from an unrelated donor in comparison with an HLA-identical sibling showed worse outcome (P =.04), and transplant recipients seropositive for cytomegalovirus in comparison with seronegative recipients (P =.01) showed worse survival. In conclusion, incorporating transplant-specific and clinical and mutational information together with the MYSEC-PM may enhance risk stratification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dose intensity of the conditioning regimen has significant impact on the outcomes after stem cell transplantation (SCT) for acute myeloid leukemia. Most studies have shown more relapse, less nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and similar overall survival after reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning. There are limited data on the dose equivalence and expected outcomes of treosulfan-based compared with busulfan-based conditioning. We compared SCT outcomes after fludarabine with either intravenous busulfan at a myeloablative dose (FB4, 12.8 mg/kg, n = 1265) or a reduced dose (FB2, 6.4 mg/kg, n = 1456) or treosulfan at 42 g/m 2 (FT14, n = 403) or 36 g/m 2 (FT12, n = 168). Median patient age was 48, 60, 57, and 60 years in the FB4, FB2, FT14, and FT12 groups, respectively ( P  < .0001). Two-year overall survival was 58%, 53%, 53%, and 51%, respectively ( P  = .25). Multivariate analysis identified advanced age, advanced disease status, and secondary leukemia to be associated with worse survival. Relapse rate was 30%, 35%, 34%, and 40%, respectively. Relapse was more common after FB2, advanced age and disease status, secondary leukemia, and sibling donors. NRM was 17%, 18%, 21%, and 16%, respectively. NRM was least common after FT12 and more common with advanced age and disease status and unrelated donors. Treosulfan-based regimens were associated with lower rates of graft-versus-host disease. There was no difference in any outcome among patients in first complete remission at transplantation. However, there was better survival with treosulfan-based conditioning in advanced leukemia. In conclusion, survival is determined mostly by disease biology and is similar after various regimens. Treosulfan-based conditioning is more similar to myeloablative than to reduced-intensity conditioning but can be administered safely in older patients, with lower rates of graft-versus-host disease and possibly better outcomes in patients with active leukemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data set was used to retrospectively analyze the outcomes of hypomethylating therapy (HMA) compared with those of conventional chemotherapy (CC) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in 209 patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes. Median follow-up was 22.1 months and the median age of the group was 57.6 years with 37% of the population older than > 60 years. The majority of patients (59%) received reduced-intensity conditioning and 34% and 27% had intermediate-2 and high international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) scores. At time of HSCT, 32% of patients did not achieve complete remission (CR) and 13% had primary refractory disease. On univariate analysis, outcomes at 3 years were not significantly different between HMA and CC for overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM): OS (42% versus 35%), RFS (29% versus 31%), CIR (45% versus 40%), and NRM (26% versus 28%). Comparing characteristics of the groups, there were more patients < 55 years old, more patients in CR (68% versus 32%), and fewer patients with primary refractory disease in the CC group than in the HMA group (10% versus 19%, P < .001). Patients with primary refractory disease had worse outcomes than those in CR with regard to OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41 to 4.13; P = .001), RFS (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.37 to 3.76; P = .001), and NRM (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.18 to 5.26; P = .016). In addition, an adverse effect of IPSS-R cytogenetic risk group was evident for RFS. In summary, outcomes after HSCT are similar for patients receiving HMA compared with those receiving CC, despite the higher proportion of patients with primary refractory disease in the HMA group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Based on expert opinion and retrospective data the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Project proposed criteria for diagnosis and staging of both overall severity as well as organ severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) for use in clinical trials. In 2008, representatives of German and Austrian allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) centers established a study group on cGVHD during the annual meeting of the German Working Group on Bone Marrow and Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (DAG-KBT) to intensify a dialog among HSCT physicians, pathologists, and medical consultants focusing on the usefulness of the NIH consensus criteria for patient care in clinical practice and to promote collaborations between HSCT centers as well as different medical specialities involved in HSCT. We first conducted a survey of current practices of diagnosis, staging, and overall grading of cGVHD in daily clinical routine by sending an electronic questionnaire to the heads of the HSCT centers. During 3 meetings in 2009, more representatives of allogeneic HSCT centers were included into the discussion process, resulting in 81% participation representing 88% of all allogeneic HSCT activities in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. During the third consensus meeting held in Regensburg, Germany, from November 6 to November 7, 2009, important agreements were achieved among participant having a strong impact on care of patients with cGVHD. Areas of disagreement such as distinction between classical NIH cGVHD and overlap syndrome or assignment of liver GVHD after day 100 to acute or chronic category will be further assessed in prospective observational studies among participants in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report here the results of a retrospective study designed to evaluate outcome of patients with AML with KPS score ≤80% following allo-SCT. The analysis included adult AML patients undergoing allo-SCT in CR1 between 2000 and 2018, with a KPS score at the time of transplant between 50% and 80%. A total of 2,963 patients were identified. Median age at transplant was 55 years (18-77 years). The KPS score was 80% in 85% of the patients and <80% in 15% of the patients. Cytogenetic risk was good, intermediate or poor in 6%, 68% and 26% of the patients, respectively. Donor type was sibling (MSD), matched (10/10 UD), mismatched (9/10 UD) unrelated, haploidentical (haplo) or cord blood (CB) in 47%, 35%, 8%, 6% and 4% of patients. Conditioning was myeloablative (MAC) or reduced-intensity (RIC) in 42% and 58% of patients. Stem cell source was PBSC or BM in 84% and 14% of the patients, respectively. Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGvHD) and chronic GVHD (cGvHD) was 26% and 38%, respectively. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse incidence (RI) at 2 years were 19% and 27%. Leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) rates were 54%, 59% and 41%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, transplant from a MSD was associated with a reduced risk of aGvHD (10/10 UD HR 1.8, 9/10 UD HR 2.4, haplo HR 1.9, CB HR 3.4, p<10−4) and NRM (10/10 UD HR 1.4, 9/10 UD HR 2.4, haplo HR 1.8, CB HR 2, p<10−3, MSD as reference) as compared to all other donor types. Patients with KPS score of 80% had significantly lower NRM and improved survival as compared to patients with KPS<80%. Other factors independently associated with improved OS were younger age, female sex, good or intermediate risk cytogenetics and de-novo AML. In order to compare outcome following MAC and RIC conditioning regimens the analysis was restricted to patients receiving transplant from MSD or UD. Patients with a KPS score of 80% or <80% were analyzed separately. In the group of patients with a KPS score of 80%, a RIC regimen was associated with higher RI (HR 1.4, p<0.01), higher incidence of severe cGVHD (HR 1.6, p<0.001), and inferior GRFS (HR 1.3, p<0.001) as compared to MAC. NRM was not significantly different following RIC or MAC in this population. In contrast, in patients with a KPS score <80%, RIC was associated with lower NRM (HR 0.3, p<0.0001) and better LFS (HR 0.6, p<0.01), OS (HR 0.5, p<0.0001) and GRFS (HR 0.6, p<0.01) as compared to MAC. In conclusion, allo-SCT is feasible in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission and KPS score ≤80%, with acceptable NRM and survival rates. In patients with a KPS score of 80% a MAC regimen was associated with lower relapse rate, similar NRM and better GRFS as compared to RIC, while in patients with a KPS score <80% RIC was associated with reduced NRM and improved OS. In addition, transplant from a MSD was associated with reduced risk of NRM and aGVHD rates as compared to other donor types. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on outcome of allogeneic transplantation (HSCT) from mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) (≤6/8) in leukemic patients (pts) are limited. We assess HSCT results in pts with AML/ALL in CR transplanted between 2000 and 2017 from ≤6/8 MMUD (2-4 HLA mismatches at the allelic level at loci A, B, C and DR) reported to the EBMT. A total of 465 pts were allocated, AML-320 and ALL-145. Median age was 50.2 years (range, 18-71.8) and 34.8 years (range, 18.2-62.9); 54% and 64% were males, respectively. Median F/U was 63 and 75 months, respectively. 69% and 66% were in CR1, while 31% and 34% were in CR2. 40% of AML pts had intermediate risk cytogenetics, 10% poor risk and 5% good risk (missing 45%),respectively. 37% of ALL pts were Ph positive, 22% Ph negative and 18% T ALL (17% B ALL with no Ph data,6% missing data). The number of HLA mismatches (HLAMM) was 6/8 - in 82% and 85%,5/8- in 11.5% and 12% and 3-4 in 6% and 3% of AML and ALL pts, respectively. 85% of AML pts and 77% of ALL pts received PBSC graft. Conditioning regimen was myeloablative in the majority of pts (89% of AML and 61% of ALL pts). 82% and 77% underwent in vivo TCD, respectively. GVHD prophylaxis was CSA/MTX in 51% and 67% and CSA/MMF in 21% and 10% of AML and ALL pts, respectively. Engraftment was achieved in 97% and 95% of pts, respectively. The incidence of acute (a) GVHD grade (Gr) II-IV and Gr III-IV was 34% and 41% and 14% and 21% for AML and ALL pts, respectively. Total and extensive chronic(c) GVHD rates at 2y were 38% and 38% and 23% and 14%, respectively. The main causes of death were disease recurrence (37% in both), GVHD (29% and 22%) and infections (22% and 26%).The 2 and 5y outcomes in the entire population were: RI-28% and 33%, NRM-28% and 30%; LFS-44% and 37%, OS- 50% and 41% and GRFS- 33% and 27%, respectively. More than 2 HLA mismatches were associated with a higher incidence of aGVHD Gr II-IV (29% vs 15%, respectively).In MVA, RI was lower for ALL vs AML HR (95% CI) 0.60, p=0.02. Disease status (CR2 vs CR1) was poor prognostic factor for RI, LFS and OS. Age was prognostic factor for NRM, LFS and OS. HLA mismatch at locus DR was poor prognostic factor, giving increased NRM: HR (95% CI) 1.68, p=0.02, and lower LFS: HR (95% CI), 1.42, p= 0.03and OS HR (95% CI) 1.46, p= 0.03and higher GVHD Gr II-IV HR (95% CI) 1.48, p= 0.048. Results of MVA in AML pts in CR1 were similar. GVHD prophylaxis CSA/MMF in comparison to CSA/MTX resulted in higher NRM HR (95% CI) 2.2,p= 0.005 and lower GRFS HR (95% CI) 1.58, p= 0.02.Notably, in 154 pts with AML in CR1 transplanted from ≤6/8 UD with T cell depletion c mismatches was associated with higher incidence of cGVHD HR (95% CI) 2.52, p=0.002. HSCT from ≤6/8 MMUD transplantation can provide 40% 5y OS, 37% LFS and GRFS of 27% in leukemic pts. DR mismatch is a poor prognostic factor. cGVHD incidence at 5y is 41% with 21% being severe and is associated in AML pts with HLA C mismatches. CSA and MTX is the preferred GVHD prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Baseline karyotype at diagnosis remains the pivotal determinant of outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The Medical Research Council (MRC) prognostic model is currently the benchmark for risk assessment in this patient population. However, the prognostic role of the complete spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities in AML patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is currently unknown. Furthermore, their significance in conjunction with FLT3-ITD status has not been addressed thus far. Methods Using the Acute Leukemia Working Party/European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation multicenter database a retrospective analysis was performed to assess the clinical outcomes of AML patients undergoing allo-SCT with respect to specific recurring cytogenetic abnormalities complemented with FLT3-ITD status. We analyzed a cohort consisting of 8558 adult AML patients who underwent allo-SCT in first remission from either a matched sibling or a matched unrelated donor in 2006-2016. Results Patients with inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26), del(5q), monosomy 7, chromosome 17p abnormalities, t(10;11)(p11-14;q13-23), t(6;11)(q27;q23), as well as those patients with a monosomal or complex karyotype experienced significantly inferior leukemia-free survival (LFS) compared to patients with a normal karyotype. Del (9q), trisomy 14, and loss of chromosome X were associated with improved LFS rates. A novel prognostic model delineating 5 distinct groups incorporating cytogenetic complexity and FLT3-ITD status was constructed with significant prognostic implications. Conclusion Our analysis endorses the prognostic significance of the MRC predictive model in patients undergoing allo-SCT in CR1 with some specific modifications. Furthermore, consideration of FLT3-ITD and karyotypic complexity improved the projective capacity of the MRC model in transplanted patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor on occurrence of Flematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (FSCT) in patients suffering from Fanconi anemia is presented. Topics discussed include overall toxicity in FA patients transplanted with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings, combination of low-dose cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine in HLA-matched related-donor HSCT in patients with FA, and medical care needed in occurrence of the disease.