Search

Dementia currently affects about 50 million people worldwide, and this number is rising. Since there is still no cure, the primary focus remains on preventing modifiable risk factors such as cardiovascular factors. It is now recognized that high blood pressure is a risk factor for dementia. An increasing number of studies suggest that blood pressure variability may also be a risk factor for dementia. However, these studies have significant methodological weaknesses and fail to distinguish between long-term and short-term variability. The aim of this work was to propose a new joint model that combines a mixed-effects model, which handles the residual variance distinguishing inter-visit variability from intra-visit variability, and an illness-death model that allows for interval censoring and semi-competing risks. A subject-specific random effect is included in the model for both variances. Risks can simultaneously depend on the current value and slope of the marker, as well as on each of the two components of the residual variance. The model estimation is performed by maximizing the likelihood function using the Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm. A simulation study validates the estimation procedure, which is implemented in an R package. The model was estimated using data from the Three-City (3C) cohort to study the impact of intra- and inter-visits blood pressure variability on the risk of dementia and death., Comment: 16 pages, 2 figures, 4 tables

Alzheimer's disease gradually affects several components including the cerebral dimension with brain atrophies, the cognitive dimension with a decline in various functions and the functional dimension with impairment in the daily living activities. Understanding how such dimensions interconnect is crucial for AD research. However it requires to simultaneously capture the dynamic and multidimensional aspects, and to explore temporal relationships between dimensions. We propose an original dynamic structural model that accounts for all these features. The model defines dimensions as latent processes and combines a multivariate linear mixed model and a system of difference equations to model trajectories and temporal relationships between latent processes in finely discrete time. Dimensions are simultaneously related to their observed (possibly multivariate) markers through nonlinear equations of observation. Parameters are estimated in the maximum likelihood framework enjoying a closed form for the likelihood. We demonstrate in a simulation study that this dynamic model in discrete time benefits the same causal interpretation of temporal relationships as models defined in continuous time as long as the discretization step remains small. The model is then applied to the data of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Three longitudinal dimensions (cerebral anatomy, cognitive ability and functional autonomy) measured by 6 markers are analyzed and their temporal structure is contrasted between different clinical stages of Alzheimer's disease. Keywords: causality, difference equations, latent process, longitudinal data, mixed models, multivariate data.

Joint modelling of longitudinal and survival data is increasingly used in clinical trials on cancer. In prostate cancer for example, these models permit to account for the link between longitudinal measures of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the time of clinical recurrence when studying the risk of relapse. In practice, multiple types of relapse may occur successively. Distinguishing these transitions between health states would allow to evaluate, for example, how PSA trajectory and classical covariates impact the risk of dying after a distant recurrence post-radiotherapy, or to predict the risk of one specific type of clinical recurrence post-radiotherapy, from the PSA history. In this context, we present a joint model for a longitudinal process and a multi-state process which is divided into two sub-models: a linear mixed sub-model for longitudinal data, and a multi-state sub-model with proportional hazards for transition times, both linked by shared random effects. Parameters of this joint multi-state model are estimated within the maximum likelihood framework using an EM algorithm coupled to a quasi-Newton algorithm in case of slow convergence. It is implemented under R, by combining and extending the mstate and JM packages. The estimation program is validated by simulations and applied on pooled data from two cohorts of men with localized prostate cancer and treated by radiotherapy. Thanks to the classical covariates available at baseline and the PSA measurements collected repeatedly during the follow-up, we are able to assess the biomarker's trajectory, define the risks of transitions between health states, and quantify the impact of the PSA dynamics on each transition intensity., Comment: Added appendix

Joint models initially dedicated to a single longitudinal marker and a single time-to-event need to be extended to account for the rich longitudinal data of cohort studies. Multiple causes of clinical progression are indeed usually observed, and multiple longitudinal markers are collected when the true latent trait of interest is hard to capture (e.g. quality of life, functional dependency, cognitive level). These multivariate and longitudinal data also usually have nonstandard distributions (discrete, asymmetric, bounded,...). We propose a joint model based on a latent process and latent classes to analyze simultaneously such multiple longitudinal markers of different natures, and multiple causes of progression. A latent process model describes the latent trait of interest and links it to the observed longitudinal outcomes using flexible measurement models adapted to different types of data, and a latent class structure links the longitudinal and the cause-specific survival models. The joint model is estimated in the maximum likelihood framework. A score test is developed to evaluate the assumption of conditional independence of the longitudinal markers and each cause of progression given the latent classes. In addition, individual dynamic cumulative incidences of each cause of progression based on the repeated marker data are derived. The methodology is validated in a simulation study and applied on real data about cognitive aging coming from a large population-based study. The aim is to predict the risk of dementia by accounting for the competing death according to the profiles of semantic memory measured by two asymmetric psychometric tests.

Longitudinal studies could be complicated by left-censored repeated measures. For example, in Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection, there is a detection limit of the assay used to quantify the plasma viral load. Simple imputation of the limit of the detection or of half of this limit for left-censored measures biases estimations and their standard errors. In this paper, we review two likelihood-based methods proposed to handle left-censoring of the outcome in linear mixed model. We show how to fit these models using SAS Proc NLMIXED and we compare this tool with other programs. Indications and limitations of the programs are discussed and an example in the field of HIV infection is shown.

Bivariate linear mixed models are useful when analyzing longitudinal data of two associated markers. In this paper, we present a bivariate linear mixed model including random effects or first-order auto-regressive process and independent measurement error for both markers. Codes and tricks to fit these models using SAS Proc MIXED are provided. Limitations of this program are discussed and an example in the field of HIV infection is shown. Despite some limitations, SAS Proc MIXED is a useful tool that may be easily extendable to multivariate response in longitudinal studies.