Search

Background Dynamic balance is a vital aspect of everyday life. It is important to incorporate an exercise program that is useful for maintaining and improving balance in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, there is a lack of evidence supporting the effectiveness of spinal stabilization exercises (SSEs) on improving dynamic balance. Purpose To determine the effectiveness of SSEs on dynamic balance in adults with CLBP. Study Design A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Methods Forty participants with CLBP were assigned randomly into either an SSE group or a general exercise (GE) group, which consisted of flexibility and range-of-motion exercises. Participants attended a total of four to eight supervised physical therapy (PT) sessions and performed their assigned exercises at home in the first four weeks of the eight-week intervention. In the last four weeks, the participants performed their exercises at home with no supervised PT sessions. Participants' dynamic balance was measured using the Y-Balance Test (YBT) and the normalized composite scores, Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire scores were collected at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks. Results A significant difference between groups from two weeks to four weeks (p = 0.002) was found, with the SSE group demonstrating higher YBT composite scores than the GE group. However, there were no significant between-group differences from baseline to two weeks (p =0.098), and from four weeks to eight weeks (p = 0.413). Conclusions Supervised SSEs were superior to GEs in improving dynamic balance for the first four weeks after initiating intervention in adults with CLBP. However, GEs appeared to have an effect equivalent to that of SSEs after 8-week intervention. Levels of Evidence 1b. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a musculoskeletal disorder that affects more than 80% of people in the United States at least once in their lifetime. LBP is one of the most common complaints prompting individuals to seek medical care. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of spinal stabilization exercises (SSEs) on movement performance, pain intensity, and disability level in adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods Forty participants, 20 in each group, with CLBP were recruited and randomly allocated into one of two interventions: SSEs and general exercises (GEs). All participants received their assigned intervention under supervision one to two times per week for the first four weeks and then were asked to continue their program at home for another four weeks. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks, including the Functional Movement ScreenTM (FMSTM), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OSW) scores. Results There was a significant interaction for the FMSTM scores (p = 0.016), but not for the NPRS and OSW scores. Post hoc analysis showed significant between-group differences between baseline and four weeks (p = 0.005) and between baseline and eight weeks (p = 0.026) favor SSEs over GEs. Further, the results demonstrated that all participants, regardless of group, had significant improvements in movement performance, pain intensity, and disability level over time. Conclusion The results of the study favor SSEs over GEs in improving movement performance for individuals with CLBP, specifically after four weeks of the supervised SSE program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To use ultrasound (US) imaging to determine the validity and reliability of needle placement of two dry needling (DN) protocols for the lumbar multifidus (LM) in individuals with a high body mass index (BMI). Twenty-one participants with a BMI higher than 25 kg/m2 completed the study. A US scanner was used to determine the location of needle placement after a 100 mm long needle was inserted in the LM at L4 and L5 following two DN protocols for the deep LM muscle. US images were saved and viewed 6 months later to determine the intra-tester reliability. The probability of reaching the deep LM muscle was high (85–95%) at L4 and L5. Although the needle reached a bony landmark 85–100% of the time, it only reached the vertebra lamina as intended 70–75% of the time. The intra-tester reliability of needle placements based on analysis of real-time and recorded US images was poor-to-moderate. Although the bony drop may not indicate that the needle has reached the vertebra lamina as the protocol intended, reaching a bony drop is still meaningful as it coincided with reaching the LM in the majority of participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Robotic Exoskeletons (EKSO) are novel technology for retraining common gait dysfunction in people post-stroke. EKSO's capability to influence gait characteristics post-stroke is unknown. Objectives: To compare temporospatial, kinematic, and muscle activity gait characteristics before and after a single EKSO session and examine kinematic symmetry between involved and uninvolved limbs. Methods: Participants post-stroke walked under two conditions: pre-EKSO, and immediately post-EKSO. A 10-camera motion capture system synchronized with 6 force plates was used to obtain temporospatial and kinematic gait characteristics from 5 walking trials of 9 meters at a self-selected speed. Surface EMG activity was obtained from bilateral gluteus medius, rectus femoris, medial hamstrings, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles. Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests were used to analyze differences pre- and post-EKSO. Single EKSO session consisted of 22.3±6.8 minutes total time (walk time=7.2±1.5 minutes) with 250±40 steps. Results: Six ambulatory (Functional Ambulation Category, range=4-5) adults (3 female; 44.7±14.6 years) with chronic stroke (4.5±1.9 years post-stroke) participated. No significant differences were observed for temporospatial gait characteristics. Muscle activity was significantly less post-EKSO in the involved leg rectus femoris during swing phase (p=0.028). Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion on the involved leg post-EKSO was significantly less during stance phase (p=0.046). Differences between involved and uninvolved joint range of motion symmetry were found pre-EKSO but not post-EKSO in swing phase hip flexion and stance phase knee flexion and knee extension. Conclusions: EKSO training appears capable of altering gait in people with chronic stroke and a viable intervention to reduce gait dysfunction post-stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Clinical practice guidelines recommend a focus on regional interdependence for the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study investigated the additive effect of regional manual therapy (RMT) when combined with standard physical therapy (SPT) in a subgroup with CLBP. Methods: Forty-six participants with CLBP and movement coordination impairments were randomly assigned to receive SPT consisting of a motor control exercise program and lumbar spine manual therapy, or SPT with the addition of RMT to the hips, pelvis, and thoracic spine. Outcome measures included disability level, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, fear avoidance beliefs, and perceived effect of treatment. Appropriate parametric and non-parametric testing was used for analysis. Results: Both groups demonstrated improvements in disability level, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and fear avoidance beliefs across time (P < 0.001). There was no difference between groups for any variable over 12 weeks, although a significantly greater proportion of participants in the RMT group exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for disability. The perceived effect of treatment also was significantly higher in the group receiving RMT at two weeks and four weeks, but not 12 weeks. Discussion: SPT with or without RMT resulted in significant improvements in disability level, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and fear avoidance beliefs over 12 weeks in persons with CLBP and movement coordination impairments. RMT resulted in greater perceived effect of treatment, and a clinically meaningful improvement in disability, across four weeks compared to SPT alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To examine the effects of lumbopelvic stabilization exercises (LSE) and pelvic compression belts on muscle behavior in women with sacroiliac joint. Study Design: Feasibility randomized clinical trial. Background: Patients with unilateral lumbopelvic pain have been shown to have altered muscle recruitment patterns of the transverse abdominis (TrA) and internal oblique muscles. The effects of LSE and pelvic compression belts on muscle behavior are unknown in this population. Methods and Measures: Twenty-five women with unilateral sacroiliac joint pain were randomly assigned to the LSE plus belt (LSE + belt) group or the LSE group. Both groups received the same LSE for 12 weeks with the first 4 weeks under supervision. The LSE + belt group also received a pelvic compression belt for the first 4 weeks. Outcome measures, including the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and percent change of muscle thickness for the TrA and internal oblique, were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. In addition, Global Rating of Change Scale scores were collected at 4 and 12 weeks. Results: The analysis of variance results revealed no significant interaction for Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, or percent change of TrA and internal oblique; however, all had significant improvements in over time. There was no significant difference in Global Rating of Change Scale scores between groups. Conclusion: The results of this feasibility study did not offer clear evidence of the benefit of pelvic compression belt over LSE for those with sacroiliac joint pain. All participants demonstrated an increased muscle thickness of TrA in the first 4 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to determine the reliability and validity of two clinical measurements of cervical lordosis and to compare these measurements of individuals with cervical spine symptoms to those of asymptomatic individuals. METHODS: Fifty-seven participants were recruited for the study: 18 following cervical fusion, 20 with neck pain and no surgery, and 19 with no neck pain. Cervical lordosis was measured using a flexible ruler (flexirule) and a modified bubble inclinometer. Intertester and intratester reliability were calculated for both methods. Validity was assessed by correlating measurements taken using both methods to Cobb angles between C2 and C7 on lateral view radiography of the participants in the cervical fusion and the neck pain groups. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) revealed good intratester reliability for both methods. Intertester reliability was fair for the flexirule method but good for the inclinometer method. Pearson correlations with radiographic angles were poor for both methods. ANOVAs showed no significant difference in cervical lordosis measurements between asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. CONCLUSION: Although both the flexirule and inclinometer methods are reliable, neither method correlated with the Cobb angle on the radiography, suggesting these methods may measure different aspects of cervical spine alignment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: The estimated prevalence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is 13–30% in patients with non-specific low back pain. One common presentation is pain at or near the SIJ, and common physical therapy interventions include lumbopelvic stabilisation programmes and pelvic compression belts. The aim of this study was to: i) assess how compression of the SIJ affects the thickness of the deep abdominal muscles during the active straight leg raise (ASLR); ii) determine between-day intra-tester reliability of ultrasound imaging to assess percentage change in thickness of the deep abdominal muscles. Methods: Participants (n=15) with unilateral symptoms near the SIJ and age-matched and sex-matched controls (n=15) were recruited for this study. Ultrasound imaging was used to obtain the thickness of the transverse abdominis (TrA) and internal oblique (IO) muscles. Measurements were taken at rest and during the ASLR, with and without pelvic compression. Results: Two separate two-way (group×pelvic compression) analysis of variance (ANOVA) designs with repeated measures were used to analyse the thickness of the TrA and IO muscles; interactions were not significant for percentage change in the TrA (p=0.57) or IO (p=0.10) muscles. Intra-tester reliability was higher when testing with pelvic compression and in the control group (ICC: 0.85–0.89 vs 0.70–0.76). Conclusions: Pelvic compression did not immediately affect the muscular response of the TrA or IO muscles during the ASLR. Pelvic compression belts may be used to address the passive systems of the pelvis by increasing stability; however, specific localised exercises may be needed to improve the percentage change in thickness of the deep abdominal muscles during the ASLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]