Search

Simple Summary: Cytological evaluation of lymph nodes (LN) during staging of canine Mast Cell Tumors (MCTs) is a hot topic. While histology is currently the gold standard of LN evaluation, cytology would have the advantage of in vivo investigation that allows for the planning of a therapeutical approach. However, at present, LN cytological examination and interpretation needs to be standardized. In the present work, the significance of the nodal mast cell number in dogs with and without MCT has been investigated, comparing different counting methods and different sample preparation techniques. Our results suggest that, while counting methods and sample preparation technique do not influence MC count, the nodal MC number can discriminate between metastatic and non-metastatic LNs, but fails to distinguish between metastatic and possibly metastatic LNs. Cytological evaluation of lymph nodes (LN) in canine cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCT) has a key role in MCT staging. However, cytological discrimination between metastatic and reactive LNs is debated and diagnostic criteria inconsistent. The aim of this study was to retrospectively quantify nodal mast cells (MCs) in non-oncological (NOD) and MCT-bearing dogs (MCTBD), using different sample preparation techniques, to evaluate the significance of the MCT number. Cytological specimens from NOD-LNs (10 fine-needle aspirates—FNAs) and MCTBD-LNs (10 FNAs, 10 scrapings, 10 touch imprints) were evaluated. MCTBD-LNs were grouped in: non-metastatic, possibly-metastatic, and metastatic based on current literature criteria. MCs were counted in 4, 8, and 20 high-power-fields, and over 500, 1000, and 2000 total cells. MCs were significantly more numerous in MCTBD-LNs than in NOD-LNs and in "metastatic" samples than in "non-metastatic". There was no significant difference between "metastatic" and "possibly metastatic" samples. Sample preparation techniques did not influence these results. A negative correlation between MCs number and sample cellularity was observed. Results were confirmed regardless of the counting method applied. MCs counting per se cannot distinguish possibly metastatic and metastatic cytological samples. Sample preparation technique and the counting method applied seem to have no influence on cytological quantification of nodal MCs in MCTBDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tumour stage is a prognostic indicator for canine malignant head and neck tumours (MHNT). However, consensus is lacking on nodal staging in the absence of clinically apparent nodal disease (cN0 neck). This prospective observational study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of radiopharmaceutical and blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), to assess the correspondence between sentinel lymph node (SLN) and clinically expected regional lymph node (RLN) and the impact on staging of the procedure in dogs with MHNT and cN0 neck. Twenty-three dogs with MHNT and cN0 neck underwent tumour excision and SLNB guided by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma-probe and blue dye. Diagnostic performances and detection rate were calculated. Correspondence between SLN and RLN, number of nodes excised, histopathological status of the SLN and complications related to the procedure were recorded. The mapping technique identified at least one SLN in 19/23 dogs, with a detection rate of 83%. The SLN did not correspond to the RLN in 52% of dogs. Multiple nodes were removed in 61% of dogs. At histopathology, eight (42%) dogs had SLN+, of which four differed from the RLN. Only minor self-limiting complications occurred in five (22%) dogs. Radiopharmaceutical and blue dye guidance is accurate (sensitivity 88.9%; specificity 100%) for SLNB in dogs with MHNT and cN0 and allowed the extirpation of unpredictable and/or multiple SLN with minimal morbidity. Incorporation of SLNB in the management of MHNT is desirable to correctly stage the cN0 neck, owing the unpredictability of the lymphatic drainage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Mast cell tumor (MCT) is the most common integumentary neoplasm in dogs. The draining lymph node (LN) is the first site of histologically detectable metastasis, even if not clinically altered. The recent literature showed the discrepancy between the regional LN and the truly draining LN (the so-called sentinel lymph node—SLN) in dogs with integumentary MCT. However, the mapping and biopsy of SLN include additional anesthesiologic, diagnostic and surgical procedures, and additional cost. The study aimed to assess the possible association between clinicopathological variables and SLN status. Sixty-six cases of low-grade cutaneous and subcutaneous MCT in dogs admitted to the mapping and biopsy of SLN were included. An MCT dimension smaller than 3 cm seems to correlate less with occult or overt SLN metastasis, although further study should confirm the exclusion of cases with this variable to the mapping and biopsy of the SLN. In contrast, the high association of tumor ≥ 3 cm and subcutaneous MCT with overt SLN metastasis involves a solid suggestion for those procedures in the presence of one of these variables. The recent literature supports the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in dogs with MCT due to discrepancy with the regional lymph node and the high percentage of occult metastasis. However, the SLN biopsy includes additional anesthesiologic, diagnostic, and surgical procedures, and additional costs. The study aimed to assess the association between clinicopathological variables and SLN status, determining the identification of dogs at lower risk of SLN metastases. Dogs with integumentary MCT were admitted to the lymphoscintigraphic mapping and subsequent biopsy of SLN. The association between clinicopathological variables of MCT and SLN status was statistically tested, both considering occult and overt metastasis together (HN2-HN3) and overt metastasis (HN3) alone. Fifty low-grade cutaneous MCT and 16 subcutaneous MCT were included. A small to moderate association between integumentary MCT ≥ 3 cm and HN2-HN3 SLN was found. A strong association of integumentary MCT dimension and subcutaneous MCT with HN3 SLN occurred. Dimension of low-grade cutaneous and subcutaneous MCT seems to correlate with SLN status, but additional study should confirm this data before excluding small MCT to the SLN biopsy. On the contrary, the study results induce a solid suggestion for mapping and biopsy of the SLN in MCT > 3 cm and subcutaneous MCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]