Search

With the success of immunotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) is being increasingly used for local staged esophageal cancer, especially in the context of clinical trials, which brings similar pCR with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and shows promising results. However, there is still a part of potentially operable patients can't undergo surgery after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. The follow-up treatment and prognosis of this population remain unclear. Patients pathologically diagnosed with ESCC, clinical stage T1-3N+M0 or T3-4aNanyM0 (AJCC 8th), PS 0–1 were retrospectively enrolled from 1/2020 to 6/2021 in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. All patients firstly received PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (albumin paclitaxel, 260 mg/m2 on day 1 plus carboplatin AUC = 5 on day 1) every 3 weeks for 2–4 cycles. For those patients who did not receive surgery, definitive radiotherapy with 50.4 Gy/28F or 50 Gy/25F was adopted using VMAT, concurrent with chemotherapy or alone. The concurrent chemotherapy regimens included weekly TC (paclitaxel 50 mg/m2, d1, carboplatin AUC = 2, d1) or S1 (60 mg bid d1–14, 29–42). The survival outcomes and treatment toxicity were recorded and analyzed. A total of 56 eligible patients were finally identified from 558 patients who were treated in department of thoracic surgery, among all the patients, 25 (44.6%) received radiotherapy alone, and 31 (55.4%) received chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant CIT. The median follow-up was 20.4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8.7–27 months). The median PFS and OS were 17.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.0–21.9 months) and 20.5 months (95% CI 11.8–27.9 months), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the median OS was 26.3 months (95% CI 15.33–NA) for patients exhibiting partial response (PR) to CIT, compared to 17 months (95% CI 8.77–26.4) for those with stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD), yielding a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54 (95% CI 0.27–1.06, P = 0.07). No significant difference was observed for patients received radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy with HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.72–2.6, P = 0.33). The most common Adverse events (AEs) observed during this study were anemia (98.2%), leukopenia (83.9%), thrombocytopenia (53.6%). AEs of grade ≥ 3 radiation-induced pneumonitis and esophagitis were 12.5% and 32.1%, especially, 6 patients (10.7%) died from esophageal fistula and 2 patients (3.6%) died from grade 5 pneumonitis. For local advanced ESCC patients after neoadjuvant CIT who did not receive surgery, definitive radiotherapy was an optional treatment strategy. However, those patients with no response to CIT also showed poor response to radiotherapy, and particular attention should be paid to treatment related toxicity, especially esophageal fistula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Chinese population.Patients and Methods: Patients with ESCC, who received SIB-IMRT from September 2011 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The SIB-IMRT plans were designed to deliver primary gross tumor volume at 60-64.4 Gy in 28-30 fractions, and planning target volume at 50.4-56 Gy in 28-30 fractions. Treatment-related toxicities were estimated based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, and tumor response after the treatment was estimated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier.Results: All patients completed definitive radiotherapy, 54 (78.3%) received combined chemotherapy, of which 31 (44.9%) were concurrent chemoradiotherapy and 23 (33.3%) were sequential chemotherapy. The objective response rate is 82.6% (56/69), with complete response 11 (15.9%), partial response 45 (65.2%), stable disease 8 (11.6%), and progressive disease 5 (7.2%). The 1-, 2- and 3-year LPFS was 74.4%, 57.8%, and 55.6%, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS was 62.3%, 41.0%, and 34.2%, respectively, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS was 73.8%, 57.4%, and 41.0%, respectively, with a median OS of 27.1 months (4.5-54.9 m). For those who received concurrent chemotherapy, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS was 75.9%, 69.0%, and 55.2%, respectively, better than those who had sequential chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone (χ2 = 3.115, P = 0.078). Radiation esophagitis occurred in 63.8% and 14.5% with Grade 2 and 3, respectively. No patients occurred ≥ Grade 3 radiation pneumonia.Conclusions: It is safe and effective using SIB-IMRT technology to treat patients with ESCC. More prospective clinical studies should be needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

MiR-34a has been reported as a non-coding RNA universally expressed in normal old cells and a probable suppressor of diverse cancer cells; however, this miRNA's expression and anti-tumor mechanism in esophageal squamous cancer cells (ESCC) remains unclear. We explored these questions in three human ESCC lines, KYSE-450, KYSE-410, and ECa-109, with wild-type p53 and mutant p53 backgrounds. Through a specific stem-loop RT primer for miR-34a, we examined the relevant expression level of miR-34a in these three cell lines using real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). We found that the expression level of miR-34a induced by the DNA damage agent adrmycin (ADR) was both p53- and time-dependent. Following incubation with miR-34a, cellular growth inhibition was exhibited differently in the three cell lines harbored with different p53 backgrounds. Furthermore, the MTT assay demonstrated an miR-34a-related cytotoxic effect in cell growth. Senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal) staining was used to examine senescence-like phenotypes induced by miR-34a. Mechanistic investigation suggested that the down-regulation of Sirtuin1 (SIRT1) and up-regulation of p53/p21 contributed to the anti-tumor mechanism of miR-34a in wild-type p53 ECa-109 cells, while neither of the apoptosis-related proteins PARP and caspase-3 caused significant changes. In summary, our findings indicated that the intrinsic expression of miR-34a was relatively low and was expressed differently among different p53 backgrounds and ADR treatment times. The anti-tumor effect of miR-34a was primarily dependent on the regulation of SIRT1 and p53/p21 protein, not apoptosis-associated proteins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]