Search

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a condition characterised by calcification and ossification of ligaments and entheses. The condition usually affects the axial skeleton, in particular, at the thoracic segment, though also other portions of the spine are often involved. DISH often involves also peripheral tendinous and/or entheseal sites either alone, or in association with the involvement of peripheral joints. At times, new bone formation involves the bone itself, but sometimes it involves joints not usually affected by osteoarthritis (OA) which result in bony enlargement of the epiphysis, joints space narrowing and a reduced range of motion. Because of the entheseal involvement, DISH can be mistaken for seronegative spondyloarthropathies or for a "simple" OA. Furthermore, other implications for the recognition of DISH include spinal fractures, difficult intubation and upper endoscopies, decreased response rates in DISH with concomitant spondyloarthritides, and increased likelihood to be affected by metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. This Atlas is intended to show the imaging finding in DISH in patients diagnosed with the condition by the Resnick classification criteria., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a condition characterized by the formation of new bone along the anterolateral spinal column at four adjacent vertebral bodies. Purpose To propose and validate criteria for the early phase of DISH by using CT data from two large-scale retrospective cohorts, each with 5-year follow-up. Materials and Methods For this retrospective study, CT data at baseline and follow-up in 1367 patients (cohort I) from 2004 to 2011 were evaluated by two observers to define no DISH, early-stage DISH, and definite DISH on the basis of interval development of consecutive complete or incomplete bone bridges. An independent group of 2267 participants from the COPDGene cohort from 2008 to 2016 was used to validate the early DISH criteria (cohort II). The sensitivity and specificity of early DISH criteria were based on findings in the last CT study as the reference standard by using a nested case-control design. κ Values were calculated between seven readers and with a 3-month interval for one reader. Results Cohort I consisted of 100% men, with a mean age of 60.0 years ± 5.6 (standard deviation) and a mean time between baseline and follow-up CT of 5.0 years ± 1.1. Cohort II consisted of 51% men, with a mean age of 59.9 years ± 8.6 and a mean time between baseline and follow-up CT of 5.4 years ± 0.5. In the derivation cohort, 55 patients comprised the early DISH group. Early DISH was defined as the presence of a spinal segment with a complete bone bridge with an adjacent segment of at least a near-complete bone bridge and another adjacent segment with at least the presence of newly formed bone or when three or more adjacent segments were recorded as showing a near-complete bone bridge. In the validation cohort, sensitivity for early DISH (vs no DISH) was 96% (99 of 103 participants; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 90%, 99%). The corresponding specificity was 83% (1695 of 2034 participants; 95% CI: 82%, 85%). The Fleiss κ for interrater reliability was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.78), and the κ for intrarater reliability was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.96). Conclusion Early diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) criteria had high sensitivity and specificity for predicting the development of DISH. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Block in this issue.

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a highly effective and potentially ablative treatment for complex spinal metastases. Recent data have suggested radiobiologic effects of SBRT that expand beyond the traditional concept of DNA damage. Antitumor immunity, vascular damage leading to tumor necrosis, and increased rates of tumor apoptosis have been implied; however, in-human evidence remains scarce. The present study reports unique pathologic confirmation of SBRT-induced biological effects within spinal metastases treated with preoperative SBRT., Methods and Materials: Ten patients with spinal metastases secondary to various solid tumors were treated with preoperative single-fraction SBRT (18 Gy) to the magnetic resonance imaging-defined macroscopic metastasis, followed by spinal stabilization within 24 hours. Perioperative samples of spinal metastases were obtained, and 6 patients also had a pre-SBRT biopsy specimen available for a matched comparison. The samples were stained for tumor necrosis on routine hematoxylin-eosin-stained slices and, subsequently, immunohistochemical staining for T cells (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+), natural killer cells (CD56+), endothelium (CD31+), and apoptotic activity (caspase-3)., Results: Perioperative biopsy specimens were obtained ∼6 hours (range 4.5-7.5) or 21 hours (range 18.5-22.5) after SBRT. Necrosis was observed in 83% of the 21-hour post-SBRT samples (5 of 6) compared with 0% of pre-SBRT biopsies (0 of 6) and 6-hour post-SBRT biopsies (0 of 4). Tumor cell apoptosis had increased greatly in the 21-hour post-SBRT samples compared with before and 6 hours after SBRT. The CD31+ vessel counts decreased after SBRT, as did mitotic activity. Both of the renal cell metastases displayed major decreases in vessel density. Desmoplastic reaction was visible in 67% (4 of 6) of the pre-SBRT samples compared with 100% (10 of 10) the post-SBRT samples. The T-cell and natural killer cell counts were relatively unaffected., Conclusions: High-dose single-fraction SBRT induced tumor necrosis, desmoplasia, and tumor apoptosis and decreased tumor vessel density within 24 hours, even in renal cell metastases. The role of immune cells seems limited in this early phase. These first-in-human results imply direct vascular and DNA damage mechanisms important in the clinical efficacy specific to spinal SBRT., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A substantial number of patients with spinal metastases experience no treatment effect from palliative radiotherapy. Mechanical spinal instability, due to metastatic disease, could be associated with failed pain control following radiotherapy. This study investigates the relationship between the degree of spinal instability, as defined by the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), and response to radiotherapy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases in a multi-institutional cohort., Methods and Materials: The SINS of 155 patients with painful thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral metastases from two tertiary hospitals was calculated using images from radiotherapy planning CT scans. Patient-reported pain response, available for 124 patients, was prospectively assessed. Pain response was categorized, according to international guidelines, as complete, partial, indeterminate, or progression of pain. The association between SINS and pain response was estimated by multivariable logistic regression analysis, correcting for predetermined clinical variables., Results: Of the 124 patients, 16 patients experienced a complete response and 65 patients experienced a partial response. Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score was associated with a complete pain response (adjusted odds-radio [ORadj] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.98), but not with an overall pain response (ORadj 0.94; 95% CI 0.81-1.10)., Conclusions: A lower SINS, indicating spinal stability, is associated with a complete pain response to radiotherapy. This supports the hypothesis that pain resulting from mechanical spinal instability responds less well to radiotherapy compared with pain from local tumor activity. No association could be determined between SINS and an overall pain response, which might indicate that this referral tool is not yet optimal for prediction of treatment outcome., Implications for Practice: Patients with stable painful spinal metastases, as indicated by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) of 6 or lower, can effectively be treated with palliative external beam radiotherapy. The majority of patients with (impending) spinal instability, as indicated by a SINS score of 7 or higher, will achieve a (partial) response after palliative radiotherapy; however, some patients might require surgical intervention. Therefore, it is recommended to refer patients with a SINS score of 7 or higher to a spine surgeon to evaluate the need for surgical intervention., Competing Interests: Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of the article., (© AlphaMed Press 2017.)

Purpose: To investigate whether wide variations are seen in the measurement techniques preferred by spine surgeons around the world to assess traumatic fracture kyphosis and vertebral body height loss (VBHL)., Methods: An online survey was conducted at two time points among an international community of spine trauma experts from all world regions. The first survey (TL-survey) focused on the thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbar spine, the second survey (C-survey) on the subaxial cervical spine. Participants were asked to indicate which measurement technique(s) they used for measuring kyphosis and VBHL. Descriptive statistics, frequency analysis and the Fisher exact test were used to analyze the responses., Results: Of the 279 invited experts, 107 (38.4 %) participated in the TL-survey, and 108 (38.7 %) in the C-survey. The Cobb angle was the most frequently used for all spine regions to assess kyphosis (55.6-75.7 %), followed by the wedge angle and adjacent endplates method. Concerning VBHL, the majority of the experts used the vertebral body compression ratio in all spine regions (51.4-54.6 %). The most frequently used combination for kyphosis was the Cobb and wedge angles. Considerable differences were observed between the world regions, while fewer differences were seen between surgeons with different degrees of experience., Conclusions: This study identified worldwide variations in measurement techniques preferred by treating spine surgeons to assess fracture kyphosis and VBHL in spine trauma patients. These results establish the importance of standardizing assessment parameters in spine trauma care, and can be taken into account to further investigate these radiographic parameters.

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a predominantly radiographic diagnosis and histological knowledge of DISH is limited. The aim of this study was to describe the histological characteristics of DISH in the spinal column and to study the relation between DISH and intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. Therefore, 10 human cadaveric spines with fluoroscopic evidence of DISH were compared with 10 controls. Plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained and tissue blocks were resected from three predefined levels of all specimens. The microscopic sections were scored by two blinded observers using a newly developed scoring system specific for characteristics of DISH and a validated scoring system for IVD degeneration. Maximum IVD height was measured on the CT scans. Analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test. When compared to controls, the right sided sections from DISH specimens showed partial or complete bone bridges, consisting of cortical woven bone, accompanied by morphological changes in the adjoining part of the IVD. Using the histological scoring system for DISH, all parameters were significantly different between the DISH and control group (p < 0.01). The contralateral location did not show differences between the groups. The overall degree of IVD degeneration and height of IVD was comparable for the two groups. The histopathological changes observed in spines with DISH corresponded to the fluoroscopic images and CT scans. The degree of IVD degeneration and IVD height was comparable for both groups, suggesting a limited role for IVD degeneration in the pathogenesis of DISH. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:140-146, 2017., (© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Study Design: Systematic literature review., Objective: To address the following questions in a systematic literature review: 1. How is spinal neoplastic instability defined or classified in the literature before and after the introduction of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS)? 2. How has SINS affected daily clinical practice? 3. Can SINS be used as a prognostic tool?, Summary of Background Data: Spinal neoplastic-related instability was defined in 2010 and simultaneously SINS was introduced as a novel tool with criteria agreed upon by expert consensus to assess the degree of spinal stability., Methods: PubMed, Embase, and clinical trial databases were searched with the key words "spinal neoplasm," "spinal instability," "spinal instability neoplastic score," and synonyms. Studies describing spinal neoplastic-related instability were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes included studies describing and/or defining neoplastic-related instability, SINS, and studies using SINS as a prognostic factor., Results: The search identified 1414 articles, of which 51 met the inclusion criteria. No precise definition or validated assessment tool was used specific to spinal neoplastic-related instability prior to the introduction of SINS. Since the publication of SINS in 2010, the vast majority of the literature regarding spinal instability has used SINS to assess or describe instability. Twelve studies specifically investigated the prognostic value of SINS in patients who underwent radiotherapy or surgery., Conclusion: No consensus could be determined regarding the definition, assessment, or reporting of neoplastic-related instability before introduction of SINS. Defining spinal neoplastic-related instability and the introduction of SINS have led to improved uniform reporting within the spinal neoplastic literature. Currently, the prognostic value of SINS is controversial., Level of Evidence: N/A.

Study Design: Systematic review and consensus expert opinion., Objective: To provide surgeons and other health care professionals with guidelines for surgical reconstruction of metastatic spine disease based on evidence and expert opinion., Summary of Background Data: The surgical treatment of spinal metastases is controversial. Specifically two aspects of surgical reconstruction are addressed in this study: (i) choice of bone graft used during surgery for metastatic spine tumors and (ii) the design of reconstruction or construct to stabilize., Methods: A systematic review of the available medical literature from 1980 to 2015 was conducted, and combined with consensus expert opinion from a recent survey of spine surgeons who treat metastatic spine tumors., Results: There is very little evidence in the literature to provide guidance on the use of bone graft in metastatic tumor reconstruction. There is little evidence in the literature to support the preferential use of one graft type over the other. Approximately, 41% of respondents said they used bone graft or bone graft substitutes to accomplish fusion. There were 17 studies that described the use of a prefabricated prosthetic, 10 studies describing the use of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement, and only three studies describing the use of bone graft for anterior column reconstruction. The use of structural allograft was most popular among the experts for anterior reconstruction, followed by cage reconstruction, and PMMA bone cement., Conclusion: Achieving bony union may be of importance for the maintenance of spinal stability in the long term after reconstruction. Whether bony union is required for patients with shorter life expectancies is debatable. The literature supports the use of anterior reconstruction with either a prefabricated prosthetic or PMMA bone cement. It also supports the use of an anterior construct reinforced with bilateral posterior instrumentation when performing a three-column reconstruction., Level of Evidence: N/A.

Background: Stable spinal metastases are effectively treated with radiotherapy, whereas unstable spinal metastases often need surgical fixation followed by radiotherapy for local control. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) was developed as a tool to assess spinal neoplastic related instability with the goal of helping to guide referrals among oncology specialists. We compare the average degree of spinal instability between patients with spinal metastases referred for surgery or for radiotherapy and evaluate whether this difference changed after introduction of the SINS in clinical practice., Methods: All patients with spinal metastases treated with palliative surgery or radiotherapy in the period 2009-2013 were identified in two spine centers. For all patients, the SINS was scored on pretreatment imaging. The SINS before and after introduction of the SINS in 2011 were compared within the surgical and radiotherapy group. Furthermore, the overall SINS was compared between the two groups., Results: The overall SINS was significantly higher in the surgical group, with a mean SINS of 10.7 (median 11) versus 7.2 (median 8) for the radiotherapy group. The mean SINS decreased significantly for both groups after introduction of the SINS in clinical practice from 11.2 to 10.3 in the surgical group and from 8.4 to 7.2 in the radiotherapy group., Conclusion: The SINS differed significantly between patients treated with surgery or radiotherapy. The introduction of SINS led to a decrease in SINS score for both groups, suggesting that using SINS in metastatic spinal disease increases awareness for instability and may subsequently result in earlier referrals for surgical intervention., Implications for Practice: Spinal metastases can present with varying degrees of mechanical instability. Because unstable spinal metastases may respond insufficiently to palliative radiotherapy and can lead to loss of ambulation, timely detection and appropriate referral are important. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) may help physicians caring for patients with metastasized disease to identify spinal instability before the onset of neurological deficits. In this study, it was shown that the introduction of SINS in routine practice led to a decrease in spinal instability in radiotherapy and surgical cohorts. The use of SINS may increase awareness of instability and subsequently result in earlier referrals., (©AlphaMed Press.)

Conflicts of interest arising from ties between pharmaceutical industry and physicians are common and may bias research. The extent to which these ties exist among editorial board members of medical journals is not known. This study aims to determine the prevalence and financial magnitude of potential conflicts of interest among editorial board members of five leading spine journals. The editorial boards of: The Spine Journal; Spine; European Spine Journal; Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine; and Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques were extracted on January 2013 from the journals' websites. Disclosure statements were retrieved from the 2013 disclosure index of the North American Spine Society; the program of the 20th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques; the program of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society; the program of the AOSpine global spine congress; the presentations of the 2013 Annual Eurospine meeting; and the disclosure index of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Names of the editorial board members were compared with the individuals who completed a disclosure for one of these indexes. Disclosures were extracted when full names matched. Two hundred and ten (29%) of the 716 identified editorial board members reported a potential conflict of interest and 154 (22%) reported nothing to disclose. The remaining 352 (49%) editorial board members had no disclosure statement listed for one of the indexes. Eighty-nine (42%) of the 210 editorial board members with a potential conflict of interest reported a financial relationship of more than $10,000 during the prior year. This finding confirms that potential conflicts of interest exist in editorial boards which might influence the peer review process and can result in bias. Academia and medical journals in particular should be aware of this and strive to improve transparency of the review process. We emphasize recommendations that contribute to achieving this goal.

Background Context: Although radiotherapy is effective in achieving pain relief in most patients, it is not completely understood why some patients respond well to radiotherapy and others do not. Our hypothesis was that metastatic bone pain, if predominantly caused by mechanical instability of the spine, responds less well to radiotherapy than metastatic bone pain caused by local tumor activity. Recently, the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) was proposed as a standardized referral tool for nonspine specialists to facilitate early diagnosis of spinal instability., Purpose: To investigate the association between spinal instability as defined by the SINS and response to radiotherapy in patients with spinal metastases., Study Design: A retrospectively matched case-control study in an academic tertiary referral center, conducted according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines., Patient Sample: Thirty-eight patients with spinal metastases who were retreated after initial palliative radiotherapy from January 2009 to December 2010 were matched to 76 control patients who were not retreated., Outcome Measures: Radiotherapy failure as defined by retreatment (radiotherapy, surgery, and conservative) after palliative radiotherapy for spinal metastases., Methods: Radiotherapy planning computed tomography scans were scored by a blinded spine surgeon according to the SINS criteria. The association between SINS and radiotherapy failure was estimated by univariate and multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis., Results: Median SINS was 10 (range 4-16) for cases and 7 (range 1-16) for controls. The SINS was significantly and independently associated with radiotherapy failure (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.5; p=.01)., Conclusions: This study shows that a higher spinal instability score increases the risk of radiotherapy failure in patients with spinal metastases, independent of performance status, primary tumor, and symptoms. These results may support the hypothesis that metastatic spinal bone pain, predominantly caused by mechanical instability, responds less well to radiotherapy than pain mainly resulting from local tumor activity., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: The position of a needle tip displayed on a navigation system after transpedicular introduction into a vertebral body is compared with the real position of the needle tip when using a direct navigation coupling between a three-dimensional rotational X-ray (3DRX) system and a navigation system., Objectives: To assess whether the needle tip position displayed by the navigation system corresponds to the real needle position and to quantitatively determine needle navigation accuracy in a clinically relevant setting., Summary of Background Data: Image-guided navigation has reportedly increased the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw insertion and decreased complication rates. In former studies, the result of image-guided navigation was mainly compared qualitatively with the result of conventional fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Previously, a direct navigation coupling between a 3DRX system and a standard navigation system was introduced that bypasses the need for explicit patient-to-image registration necessary for image-guided orthopedic surgery. In a phantom experiment, the reported accuracy of navigation with the coupling to a 3DRX system was approximately 1 mm. However, in a clinical setting, additional errors can be introduced., Methods: Twenty-three needles were placed transpedicularly into vertebral bodies of embalmed human trunks using 3DRX-guided navigation. The navigated needle tip positions were compared with the real needle tip positions manually extracted from 3DRX volumes acquired after completion of the introduction., Results: The average distance between the navigated needle tip and the real position of the needle tip extracted from a postprocedure 3DRX volume was 2.5 +/- 1.5 mm., Conclusions: Accuracy of 3DRX-guided navigation is 2.5 +/- 1.5 mm in a clinically relevant setting, which is less than the accuracy determined in phantom experiments.

The most widely used imaging devices in trauma spine surgery are fluoroscopy and computed tomography. Both techniques have their specific pros and cons and expose both patient and operating staff to considerable radiation during image acquisition. Three-dimensional-rotational x-ray imaging (3-DRX) is a relatively new technique in which a C-arm is moved around the patient to allow for an "acquisition run" during which multiple fluoroscopy images are obtained. The images can subsequently be processed on a workstation into a 3-D volume, which can then be manipulated in a similar way to 3-D computed tomography data. The 3-DRX technique combines the advantages of both fluoroscopy and computed tomography: fast visual feedback and high resolution multiplanar reformatted images, respectively, and could be used in an intraoperative setting. In this paper some technical aspects of 3-DRX imaging and its potential role in spinal trauma treatment are presented.

Study Design: Magnetic resonance (MR) and three-dimensional rotational x-ray (3DRX) images of cadaveric spinal segments were registered using a conventional point-based technique and a noninvasive technique called maximization of mutual information (MMI)., Objectives: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of MMI-based registration in comparison with point-based registration as a new noninvasive image-to-patient registration technique for use in minimally invasive image-guided spine surgery., Summary of Background Data: In image-guided orthopedic surgery, correspondence between before surgery acquired images and the patient is required. Currently, this necessitates an invasive registration step, in which anatomic landmarks on the bone surface have to be physically touched by a pointer. To overcome this invasive procedure, we propose using a calibrated 3DRX system, a modality that can visualize high contrast objects intraoperatively and that provides a direct correspondence between the image data and the patient. A noninvasive voxel-based technique is used to register the intraoperative 3DRX image to a before surgery acquired MR image., Methods: Cadaveric thoracic and lumbar spine segments were implanted with markers, which were used as landmarks. The accuracy of the landmark-based registration was compared with MMI-based registration using the residual errors on the marker positions., Results: The errors made using the point-based registration technique were compared with the errors made with MMI. The results show a statistically significant lower error (P < 0.01) for the proposed MMI method., Conclusions: Noninvasive MMI registration of intraoperative 3DRX images to preoperative MR images is more accurate than point-based registration in cadaveric spine segments. It is therefore a promising technique for replacing the invasive landmark-based registration that is currently used in image-guided spine surgery.