Search

Exoscopes were recently developed as an alternative to the operative microscope (OM) and endoscope for intraoperative visualization during neurosurgery. Prior reviews studying mixed cranial and spinal surgical cohorts reported advantages with exoscope use, including improved ergonomics and teaching. In recent years, there has been an increase in exoscope research, with no updated systematic review focused exclusively on the benefits and limitations of exoscope use in spine surgery. Thus, we sought to systematically synthesize the literature related to exoscope-assisted spine surgery. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies reported between 2010 and September 2023. Data, such as the exoscope model used, procedure types performed, and user observations, were then collected. A total of 31 studies met our inclusion criteria, including 481 patients with spine pathologies who underwent a surgical procedure using 1 of 9 exoscope models. The lumbar region was the most frequently operated area (n = 234; 48.6%), and discectomies comprised the most overall procedures (n = 273; 56.8%). All patients benefited clinically. The reported advantages of exoscopes compared with OMs or endoscopes were improved focal distance, surgeon posture, trainee education, compactness, and assistant participation. Other aspects such as stereopsis, illumination, and cost had various observations. Exoscopes have advantages compared with OMs or endoscopes during spine surgery. The user learning curve is minimal, and no negative patient outcomes have been reported. However, some aspects of exoscope use necessitate longer term prospective research before exoscopes can be considered a standard tool in the armamentarium of intraoperative visualization strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The differential diagnosis for postoperative back pain is broad, and conventional imaging modalities are not always conclusive. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of the literature and present case studies describing the use of single-photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the diagnosis of back pain following spine surgery. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across 5 databases. Relevant keywords included PET/CT, bone SPECT/CT, and pseudarthrosis. The studies were assessed for diagnostic accuracy of the imaging technologies. A total of 2,444 studies were screened, 91 were selected for full-text review, and 21 were ultimately included. Six retrospective studies investigated the use of SPECT/CT with a total sample size of 309 patients. Two of these studies used SPECT/CT to predict screw loosening in over 50% of patients. Eight studies examined the use of 18-fluoride sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) PET/CT. Among these studies, measures of diagnostic accuracy varied but overall demonstrated the ability of 18F-NaF PET/CT to detect screw loosening and pseudarthrosis. Seven studies examined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and supported its utility in the diagnosis of postoperative infections in the spine. PET/CT and SPECT/CT are useful in the evaluation of postoperative pain of the spine, especially in patients for whom conventional imaging modalities yield inconclusive results. More diagnostic accuracy studies with strong reference standards are needed to compare hybrid imaging to conventional imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]