Search

Objectives: Distal junctional failure (DJF) is less commonly described than proximal junctional failure following posterior spinal fusion, and particularly adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. We describe a case series of patients with DJF, taking into account sagittal spinopelvic alignment, and suggest potential risk factors in light of the current literature. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective review of posterior spinal fusion patients with DJF who underwent subsequent revision surgery between June 2009 and January 2019. Demographics and surgical details were collected. Radiographical measurements included the following: preoperative and postoperative sagittal and coronal alignment for each index or revision surgery. The upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV), lower instrumented vertebra (LIV), and fusion length were recorded. Results: Nineteen cases (64.7 ± 13.5 years, 12 women, seven men) were included. The mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 2.4 years. The number of instrumented levels was 6.79 ± 2.97. Among the patients, 84.2% (n = 16) presented at least one known DJF risk factor. LIV was frequently L5 (n = 10) or S1 (n = 2). Six patients had an initial circumferential fusion at the distal end. Initial DJFs were vertebral fracture distal to the fusion (n = 5), screw pull-out (n = 9), spinal stenosis (n = 4), instability (n = 4), and one early DJK. The distal mechanical complications after a first revision included screw pull-out (n = 4), screw fracture (n = 3), non-union (n = 2), and an iatrogenic spondylolisthesis. Conclusions: In this case series, insufficient sagittal balance restoration, female gender, osteoporosis, L5 or S1 LIV in long constructs were associated with DJF. Restoring spinal balance and circumferentially fusing the base of constructs represent key steps to maintain correction and prevent revisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the United States, nearly 1.2 million people > 12 years old have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which is associated with postoperative complications following orthopedic procedures. Little is known about how asymptomatic HIV (AHIV) patients fare postoperatively. This study compares complications after common spine surgeries between patients with and without AHIV. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was retrospectively reviewed from 2005–2013, identifying patients aged > 18 years who underwent 2–3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), ≥4-level thoracolumbar fusion (TLF), or 2–3-level lumbar fusion (LF). Patients with AHIV and without HIV were 1:1 propensity score-matched. Univariate analysis and multivariable binary logistic regression were performed to assess associations between HIV status and outcomes by cohort. 2–3-level ACDF (n = 594 total patients) and ≥4-level TLF (n = 86 total patients) cohorts demonstrated comparable length of stay (LOS), rates of wound-related, implant-related, medical, surgical, and overall complications between AHIV and controls. 2–3-level LF (n = 570 total patients) cohorts had comparable LOS, implant-related, medical, surgical, and overall complications. AHIV patients experienced higher postoperative respiratory complications (4.3% vs. 0.4%,). AHIV was not associated with higher risks of medical, surgical, or overall inpatient postoperative complications following most spine surgical procedures. The results suggest the postoperative course may be improved in patients with baseline control of HIV infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Currently, the functional status of patients undergoing spine surgery is assessed with quality-of-life questionnaires, and a more objective and quantifiable assessment method is lacking. Dr. Jean Dubousset conceptually proposed a four-component functional test, but to our knowledge, reference values derived from asymptomatic individuals have not yet been reported, and these are needed to assess the test's clinical utility in patients with spinal deformities.Questions/purposes: (1) What are the reference values for the Dubousset Functional Test (DFT) in asymptomatic people? (2) Is there a correlation between demographic variables such as age and BMI and performance of the DFT among asymptomatic people?Methods: This single-institution prospective study was performed from January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2018. Asymptomatic volunteers were recruited from our college of medicine and hospital staff to participate in the DFT. Included participants did not report any musculoskeletal problems or trauma within 5 years. Additionally, they did not report any history of lower limb fracture, THA, TKA, or patellofemoral arthroplasty. Patients were also excluded if they reported any active medical comorbidities. Demographic data collected included age, sex, BMI, and self-reported race. Sixty-five asymptomatic volunteers were included in this study. Their mean age was 42 ± 15 years; 27 of the 65 participants (42%) were women. Their mean BMI was 26 ± 5 kg/m. The racial distribution of the participants was 34% white (22 of 65 participants), 25% black (16 of 65 participants), 15% Asian (10 of 65 participants), 9% subcontinental Indian (six of 65 participants), 6% Latino (four of 65 participants), and 10% other (seven of 65 participants). In a controlled setting, participants completed the DFT after verbal instruction and demonstration of each test, and all participants were video recorded. The four test components included the Up and Walking Test (unassisted sit-to-stand from a chair, walk forward/backward 5 meters [no turn], then unassisted stand-to-sit), Steps Test (ascend three steps, turn, descend three steps), Down and Sitting Test (stand-to-ground, followed by ground-to-stand, with assistance as needed), and Dual-Tasking Test (walk 5 meters forwards and back while counting down from 50 by 2). Tests were timed, and data were collected from video recordings to ensure consistency. Reference values for the DFT were determined via a descriptive analysis, and we calculated the mean, SD, 95% CI, median, and range of time taken to complete each test component, with univariate comparisons between men and women for each component. Linear correlations between age and BMI and test components were studied, and the frequency of verbal and physical pausing and adverse events was noted.Results: The Up and Walking Test was completed in a mean of 15 seconds (95% CI, 14-16), the Steps Test was completed in 6.3 seconds (95% CI, 6.0-6.6), the Down and Sitting Test was completed in 6.0 seconds (95% CI, 5.4-6.6), and the Dual-Tasking Test was performed in 13 seconds (95% CI, 12-14). The length of time it took to complete the Down and Sitting (r = 0.529; p = 0.001), Up and Walking (r = 0.429; p = 0.001), and Steps (r = 0.356; p = 0.014) components increased with as the volunteer's age increased. No correlation was found between age and the time taken to complete the Dual-Tasking Test (r = 0.134; p = 0.289). Similarly, the length of time it took to complete the Down and Sitting (r = 0.372; p = 0.005), Up and Walking (r = 0.289; p = 0.032), and Steps (r = 0.366; p = 0.013) components increased with increasing BMI; no correlation was found between the Dual-Tasking Test's time and BMI (r = 0.078; p = 0.539).Conclusions: We found that the DFT could be completed by asymptomatic volunteers in approximately 1 minute, although it took longer for older patients and patients with higher BMI.Clinical Relevance: We believe, but did not show, that the DFT might be useful in assessing patients with spinal deformities. The normal values we calculated should be compared in future studies with those of patients before and after undergoing spine surgery to determine whether this test has practical clinical utility. The DFT provides objective metrics to assess function and balance that are easy to obtain, and the test requires no special equipment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The French Society of Spine Surgery (SFCR) conducted a prospective epidemiologic multicenter study. The purpose was to investigate mortality, complication, and fusion rates in patients with odontoid fracture, depending on age, comorbidities, fracture type, and treatment.Methods: Out of 204 patients, 60 were ≤ 70 years and 144 were > 70 years. Demographic data, comorbidities, treatment types and complications (general medical, infectious, neurologic, and mechanical), and death were registered within the first year. Fractures were classified according to Anderson-D'Alonzo and Roy-Camille on the initial CT. A 1-year follow-up CT was available in 144 patients to evaluate fracture consolidation.Results: Type II and oblique-posterior fractures were the most frequent patterns. The treatment was conservative in 52.5% and surgical in 47.5%. The mortality rate in patients ≤ 70 was 3.3% and 16.7% in patients > 70 years (p = 0.0002). Fracture pattern and treatment type did not influence mortality. General medical complications were significantly more frequent > 70 years (p = 0.021) and after surgical treatment (p = 0.028). Neurologic complications occurred in 0.5%, postoperative infections in 2.0%, and implant-related mechanical complications in 10.3% (associated with pseudarthrosis). Fracture fusion was observed in 93.5% of patients ≤ 70 years and in 62.5% >70 years (p < 0.0001). Pseudarthrosis was present in 31.5% of oblique-posterior fractures and in 24.3% after conservative treatment.Conclusions: Age and comorbidities influenced mortality and medical complication rates most regardless of fracture type and treatment choice. Pseudarthrosis represented the main complication, which increased with age. Pseudarthrosis was most frequent in type II and oblique-posterior fractures after conservative treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A monocentric open-label randomized controlled trial (MRCT).Objective: Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between isolated instrumented posterior fusion (PLF) and associated instrumented posterior fusion and interbody fusion by transforaminal approach (PLF + TLIF) for patients suffering from one-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) undergoing surgery.Summary Of Background Data: DS is a common cause of symptomatic lumbar stenosis. PLF has shown better clinical outcome than decompression with noninstrumented posterolateral fusion. TLIF with interbody cage showed better fusion rate than PLF. There is a need for randomized controlled trials to compare PLF with and without TLIF as to clinical and radiological outcomes.Methods: This is a MRCT comparing PLF and TLIF techniques in surgical treatment of DS. Sixty patients were included in a secured database from 2009 to 2011 and randomized into two groups: 30 PLF with posterior pedicle screws and intertransverse autologuous graft, and 30 TLIF in which an interbody fusion by transforaminal approach was added. Data included clinical (pain and disability), surgical (blood loss and operating time), and radiological (alignment and fusion) parameters at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Comparison was made by Student t test and Chi-square test.Results: There was a significant improvement in each group for pain and disability but no difference between the groups. Radiographic assessment showed better posterolateral fusion rate for TLIF without superiority in segmental lordosis improvement. A case of deformity cascade with spino-pelvic mismatch at baseline was noted in PLF.Conclusion: Posterior decompression and instrumented fusion is an efficient technique that proved its significant clinical benefit in the surgical treatment of DS. TLIF did not show its superiority neither in clinical nor alignment parameters despite a better fusion rate. These results suggest that TLIF is not mandatory in this specific indication. Sagittal alignment analysis by standing full-body images should be considered in DS care.Level Of Evidence: 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospective, multicenter database.Objective: The aim of the study was to determine age-specific spino-pelvic parameters, to extrapolate age-specific Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) values from published Short Form (SF)-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) data, and to propose age-specific realignment thresholds for adult spinal deformity (ASD).Summary Of Background Data: The Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification offers a framework for defining alignment in patients with ASD. Although age-specific changes in spinal alignment and patient-reported outcomes have been established in the literature, their relationship in the setting of ASD operative realignment has not been reported.Methods: ASD patients who received operative or nonoperative treatment were consecutively enrolled. Patients were stratified by age, consistent with published US-normative values (Norms) of the SF-36 PCS (<35, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, >75  y old). At baseline, relationships between between radiographic spino-pelvic parameters (lumbar-pelvic mismatch [PI-LL], pelvic tilt [PT], sagittal vertical axis [SVA], and T1 pelvic angle [TPA]), age, and PCS were established using linear regression analysis; normative PCS values were then used to establish age-specific targets. Correlation analysis with ODI and PCS was used to determine age-specific ideal alignment.Results: Baseline analysis included 773 patients (53.7 y old, 54% operative, 83% female). There was a strong correlation between ODI and PCS (r = 0.814, P < 0.001), allowing for the extrapolation of US-normative ODI by age group. Linear regression analysis (all with r > 0.510, P < 0.001) combined with US-normative PCS values demonstrated that ideal spino-pelvic values increased with age, ranging from PT = 10.9 degrees, PI-LL = -10.5 degrees, and SVA = 4.1 mm for patients under 35 years to PT = 28.5 degrees, PI-LL = 16.7 degrees, and SVA = 78.1 mm for patients over 75 years. Clinically, older patients had greater compensation, more degenerative loss of lordosis, and were more pitched forward.Conclusion: This study demonstrated that sagittal spino-pelvic alignment varies with age. Thus, operative realignment targets should account for age, with younger patients requiring more rigorous alignment objectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Outcomes following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and Total Disc Replacement (TDR) procedures are known to be satisfactory; however, following ACDF, morbidity may be as high as 19%, and reoperation rates for TDR as high as 3%. Factors that may predict risks of developing complications are under-reported, with limited existing data. PURPOSE Therefore, this study sought to determine how complications varied among ACDF, TDR, and combined ACDF-TDR as well as what variables significantly impacted development of postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE All patients who underwent ACDF and/or TDR from 2009 to 2011 with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). A total of 20,487 patients were included. OUTCOME MEASURES Demographics, hospital-related parameters, mortality, and postoperative outcomes (complications, readmissions, and revisions). METHODS The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) was used to identify all patients who underwent ACDF or TDR from 2009 to 2011 with minimum 2-year follow-up surveillance, and three cohorts were formed: ACDF, TDR, or combined ACDF-TDR. Primary data points collected included patient demographics, hospital-related parameters, mortality, and postoperative outcomes (complications, readmissions, and revisions). Multivariate logistic regression models identified independent predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS A total of 20,487 patients identified, 19,808 underwent ACDF only, 449 underwent TDR, and 230 underwent a combined ACDF and TDR. There was a significant difference in age across the cohorts, the youngest of which was TDR (44.1 vs. ACDF 51.3 and ACDF-TDR 48.46 years, p<.001). Total hospital charges also varied significantly across the cohorts, with TDR as the least expensive ($36205.43 vs. ACDF $42941.44 and ACDF-TDR $46488.85, p=.002). No differences were found with length of stay, race, and gender. All procedures had comparably low mortality rates, with a 0.2% mortality rate associated with ACDF, while both TDR and ACDF-TDR had 0% mortality rates.Rates of complications significantly differed across the cohorts. ACDF-TDR patients had the highest rates of cardiac complications (1.3% vs. 0.4% ACDF and 0.9% TDR) and pulmonary embolism (0.4% vs. 0% for ACDF and ACDF-TDR) (both p<.05), while TDR had the most individual surgical complications (2.4% vs. 1.7% ACDF-TDR and 1.4% ACDF) as well as the highest rates of complications related to the device, internal fixation, and prosthesis (1.8%, 1.8%, and 0.2%, all p≤.014). Revision rates differed as well, with ACDF-TDR patients experiencing the lowest rate (5.2% vs. 6.4% ACDF and TDR 10.9%).Total disc replacement associated with increased odds of developing any surgical complications (OR 1.9, p=.03). Deyo Index was found to predict any medical or surgical complications (OR 1.4 and 1.2, respectively), while Black race was found to predict any medical and total complications (OR 1.5 and 1.3) (all p<.004). Female gender was associated with increased odds of readmission (OR 1.2) but was the only significant protective factor against readmission (OR 0.9) (both p≤.002). CONCLUSIONS There were significant differences in the patient cohorts that underwent ACDF, TDR, or both procedures, where TDR patients were younger but incurred the least amount of hospital charges. Total Disc Replacement patients could expect increased rates of surgical complications and revisions in comparison to the other cohorts, and the procedure was found to predict surgical complications. This study of a large cohort of patients can provide surgeons and their patients with evidence to better individualize and optimize procedure choice for each patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]