Search

Background: Most cervical fusion cages imperfectly mimic the anatomy of the intervertebral disc space. The production of individualized cages might be the next step to further improve spinal implants due to their enhanced load-bearing surface., Objective: To evaluate the planning, manufacturing, and implantation of an individualized cervical cage in co-operation with EIT and 3D Systems., Methods: A digital 3D model of the patient's cervical spine was rendered from the patients CT data. It was then possible to correct degenerative deformities by digitally repositioning the vertebrae and virtually resecting the osteophytes. The implantation of the cage can be simulated to check the accuracy of the fit. The cage is made of trabecular titanium and manufactured by Direct Metal Printing., Results: The pilot project for the implantation of the first individualized cervical cage ever, resulted in a highly accurate fit. During surgery, the cage self-located into the correct position after suspending distraction due to the implants unique end plate design. Furthermore, it was impossible to move the cage in any direction with the inserting instrument after suspending distraction for the same reason. Thus, it can be assumed that an individualized cervical implant provides excellent primary stability., Conclusion: Preconditions for the manufacturing of individualized cervical fusion cages using specific patient data are given. The implantation is uncomplicated. The improved load-bearing surface will lower the rate of implant dislocation and subsidence. The production of individualized cages at a reasonable price has to be evaluated by spine surgeons and the industry.

Purpose: Illustrative cases are presented to demonstrate the surgical management of complex instability of the cervical spine., Methods: Six patients with different underlying pathologies are presented along with their clinical and radiologic findings, surgical procedures, complications, and outcomes., Results: Five patients underwent anteroposterior (AP) decompression and stabilization, of which two required secondary posterior stabilization because of dislocation or subsidence of the anterior osteosynthesis. In another case, a patient with a two-level corpectomy, a stable situation was achieved with an anterior approach only. The outcomes, measured according to Odom's criteria, were excellent in one patient, good in three patients, and fair in two patients., Conclusions: In cases of complex cervical instability, combined AP decompression and stabilization minimizes the risk of anterior plate failure or dislocation of the vertebral body prosthesis. However, there may be increased risk of adjacent-level degeneration. Therefore, a combined procedure should be considered in selected patients. Not all patients with cervical instability require circumferential surgery. In two-level corpectomy cases, the decision between the less invasive anterior-only approach and the more stable combined approach can be difficult. However, in patients with proof of poor bone quality or with metabolic disorders, a more stable combined approach should be considered., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: The authors describe their experience with the choice of anterior, posterior and combined approaches for the surgical treatment of spondylotic myelopathy., Methods: Description of surgical anatomy, surgical technique, indications, limitations, complications, specific perioperative considerations and specific information to give to the patient about surgery and potential risks and a summary of 10 key points is given., Conclusions: If the disease extends behind the posterior vertebral body and if reestablishing spinal sagittal and coronal balance is an aim, then the anterior approach is the best choice. In cases of predominant posterior spinal cord compression and lordotic configuration the posterior approach should be preferred. Decompression of three or more levels, especially in combination with poor bone quality, requires a combined approach.

In the last 25 years of spinal surgery, tremendous improvements have been made. The development of smart technologies with the overall aim of reducing surgical trauma has resulted in the concept of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Enhancements in microsurgery, endoscopy and various percutaneous techniques, as well as improvement of implant materials, have proven to be milestones. The advancement of training of spine surgeons and the integration of image guidance with precise intraoperative imaging, computer- and robot-assisted treatment modalities constitute the era of reducing treatment morbidity in spinal surgery. This progress has led to the present era of preserving spinal function. The promise of the continuing evolution of spinal surgery, the era of restoring spinal function, already appears on the horizon. The current state of minimally invasive spine surgery is the result of a long-lasting and consecutive development of smart technologies, along with stringent surgical training practices and the improvement of instruments and techniques. However, much effort in research and development is still mandatory to establish, maintain and evolve minimally invasive spine surgery. The education and training of the next generation of highly specialized spine surgeons is another key point. This paper will give an overview of surgical techniques and methods of the past 25 years, examine what is in place today, and suggest a projection for spine surgery in the coming 25 years by drawing a connection from the past to the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]