Search

Purpose: To investigate the incidence and risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following occipitoaxial fusion (OAF) for atlantoaxial instability (AAI) in non-rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: The study group comprised 41 patients without RA who underwent OAF due to AAI. Fifteen patients with postoperative ASD after OAF were classified as the ASD group, and the other 26 patients without postoperative ASD were included in the non-ASD group. There were 12 men and 3 women with a mean age of 43.52 years in the ASD group, and 19 men and 7 women with a mean age of 45.31 years in the non-ASD group. The mean follow-up period was 6.1 and 5.9 years in the ASD group and non-ASD group, respectively. Clinical outcomes and plain radiographs were retrospectively reviewed and compared between the two groups., Results: The difference between pre- and postoperative O-C2 angles in the non-ASD group was significantly greater than that in the ASD group. The C2-7 angles changed significantly between the pre- and postoperative periods. It was suggested that the small O-C2 angle and large C2-7 angle observed in the early postoperative period were risk factors for the development of ASD. We also demonstrated a high incidence of subaxial subluxation (SAS) and swan neck deformity in the ASD group (27 versus 3.8% and 20 versus 0%, respectively)., Conclusion: Under-correction of the O-C2 angle is likely to cause malalignment of the cervical spine, resulting in the development of postoperative ASD, SAS, and swan neck deformity.

Objective: To describe lower cranial nerve (CN) palsy following vertical overdistraction when performing occipitocervical fusion (OCF) to treat vertical atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) and basilar invagination (BI) and investigate its possible causes., Methods: We report 4 cases with vertical AAD and BI who presented postoperatively with neurogenic dysphagia, dysarthria, and bucking after undergoing anatomic reduction., Results: Patients underwent revision surgery to achieve partial reduction and demonstrated remarkable recovery of CN IX, X, and XI deficits., Conclusions: Performing OCF in the overdistraction position to treat vertical AAD may caudally displace the brainstem relative to the cranial base, resulting in traction injury to the CN IX, X, and XI where they exit the skull base through the jugular foramen., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND Atlantoaxial posterior pedicle screw fixation has been widely used for treatment of atlantoaxial instability (AAI). However, precise and safe insertion of atlantoaxial pedicle screws remains challenging. This study presents a modified drill guide template based on a previous template for atlantoaxial pedicle screw placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our study included 54 patients (34 males and 20 females) with AAI. All the patients underwent posterior atlantoaxial pedicle screw fixation: 25 patients underwent surgery with the use of a modified drill guide template (template group) and 29 patients underwent surgery via the conventional method (conventional group). In the template group, a modified drill guide template was designed for each patient. The modified drill guide template and intraoperative fluoroscopy were used for surgery in the template group, while only intraoperative fluoroscopy was used in the conventional group. RESULTS Of the 54 patients, 52 (96.3%) completed the follow-up for more than 12 months. The template group had significantly lower intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency (p<0.001) and higher accuracy of screw insertion (p=0.045) than the conventional group. There were no significant differences in surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, or improvement of neurological function between the 2 groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this study, it is feasible to use the modified drill guide template for atlantoaxial pedicle screw placement. Using the template can significantly lower the screw malposition rate and the frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy.