Search

This chapter describes the results of investigations of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract in subjects with complete and incomplete spinal cord injury. In one study, gastric emptying was investigated and found delayed. The delay was tentatively attributed to a colo-gastric inhibitory reflex triggered by inappropriate colonic emptying. In another study, anorectal motor and sensory functions were measured. Decreased tone of the internal anal sphincter, exaggerated recto-anal reflexes following rectal distension and spontaneous high-amplitude rectal contractions at low distension volumes were among the findings of the study. Some of the subjects, classified as having a complete injury according to usual clinical criteria (American Spinal Injury Association, ASIA), reported sensation of distension of the rectum. This raises the issue of the need for better methods for the clinical assessment of sensory transmission in the spinal cord. Promising results obtained with functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain during rectal stimulation in a small group of paraplegics, with complete injuries by ASIA criteria, showed evidence of activation of several brain regions.

Patients with spinal cord lesion suffer from complex disorders of bladder and anorectal function. We assessed the value of urodynamics and anorectal manometry as prognostic and diagnostic tools in these patients and evaluated the usefulness of these techniques for the differentiation between complete and incomplete spinal cord lesions. Thirty patients with suprasacral spinal cord injury (six women, 24 men; mean age, 31 years) underwent anorectal manometry and urodynamics within the first 40 days after injury. The findings were compared to the results of a clinical neurologic evaluation. Fifteen patients were classified as complete lesions on their clinical signs, three of these lesions were incomplete according to urodynamic testing and five were incomplete according to visceral sensory testing by anorectal manometry. Despite significant differences in maximum bladder capacity (589 versus 465 mL), maximum detrusor pressure (18 versus 31 cm H2O) was not significantly different between patients with complete and patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Anorectal manometry did not reveal any significant differences in resting pressure, abdominal pressure, and maximal rectum volume between these groups. Urodynamics and anorectal manometry may be superior to neurologic assessment of completeness of spinal cord lesions. Urodynamics and anorectal manometry were not helpful in the prediction of onset or severity of detrusor hyperreflexia. Thus, we do not regard anorectal manometry as a standard diagnostic tool in spinal cord injury patients.

We wished to establish anorectal functions in patients with spinal cord lesions, related to the level of lesion and its completeness. We also wished to determine the value of neurophysiological tests for completeness of transsections in comparison with manometry and visceral sensory testing. In 32 patients (31.5 +/- 14.1 years, 25 males) with spinal trauma, completeness of transsection was assessed clinically. In 16 of these patients (30 +/- 15.6 years, nine males), a neurological work-up included recording of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEP) from the pudendal nerve within the first week after trauma. Also, anal sphincter EMG and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) were assessed. All patients also underwent conventional anorectal manometry and visceral sensory testing. Of all 32 patients, 15 were judged as 'complete' based on their clinical signs. Of those 16 tested neurologically, seven were labelled 'complete' since no MEP or SEP were detectable; one had pudendal SEP and MEP present, while SEP were present but delayed (47.0 +/- 8.8 msec) in the remaining patients. In four of these patients, also MEP were recorded (27.9 +/- 5.2 msec) and normal. PNTML was present in 12/16 patients independent of the completeness of lesion, and was rated normal in nine and delayed in three patients. EMG was normal in five, and pathological in 11 cases. In 5/15 cases of those judged as 'complete' (in 3/7 evaluated neurologically), visceral sensory testing revealed a minimal threshold for rectal perception of distension of 44 mL (range: 10-130), which sometimes was also perceived as urge to defecate. In a further case, manometry showed major voluntary action of the anal sphincter. These patients had lesions at all levels of the spinal column, ranging from cervical (C4,C6,C7) via thoratical (2 x T7,T8,T12) to lumbar segments. Anorectal function testing, and specifically visceral sensory testing may be superior to neurological assessment of 'completeness' of spinal cord lesions. It may be that visceral afferent pathways others than spinothalamic tract are involved in rectal perception that are less accessible to conventional neurophysiological diagnostic work-up.