Search

Objectives: Preoperative identification of the artery of Adamkiewicz can help prevent postoperative spinal cord injury in patients undergoing thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Although several studies have shown the feasibility of evaluating the artery of Adamkiewicz using multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT), no detailed investigations regarding the collateral circulation to the artery of Adamkiewicz have been performed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the collateral circulation to the artery of Adamkiewicz using MDCT in patients with thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms., Methods: Our institutional review board approved this study. Sixty-four patients with descending thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms associated with the occlusion of the segmental artery from which the artery of Adamkiewicz originated were scanned using 64- or 320-detector row computed tomography. Two independent observers evaluated the MDCT images based on the degree of visualization of the artery of Adamkiewicz and its collateral circulation using a 4-point scale., Results: The average visualization score was 2.8 ± 0.6. In 53 of the 64 (83%) patients, image quality was judged to be diagnostic. MDCT demonstrated 75 collateral pathways to the artery of Adamkiewicz in these 53 patients. Sixty-four of the 75 (85%) pathways were collaterals around the spinal column, and the remaining 11 (15%) pathways were collateral arteries in the thoracic wall., Conclusions: MDCT revealed the collateral pathways to the artery of Adamkiewicz around the spinal column and in the thoracic wall in 83% of our patients with thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Purpose: This study assessed Adamkiewicz artery (AKA) detectability using multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) and time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T., Materials and Methods: This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 117 patients with thoracoabdominal aortic disease scheduled for aortic repair. A total of 111 patients underwent MDCTA for AKA identification; 43 patients whose AKA identification was not definitive on MDCTA underwent additional MRA. The remaining six patients, who were not indicated for iodine-contrast MDCTA, underwent only MRA. Two reviewers independently evaluated both MDCTA and MRA data. The 4-point confidence index was used. Grades 3-4 were considered sufficient for AKA diagnosis., Results: AKA detectability was at 80.2% (89/111) using MDCTA and 89.8% (44/49) with MRA. In the 43 patients who underwent both MDTCA and MRA, the AKA detectability and consensus grades were significantly elevated using MRA vs. MDCTA (detectability: 88.4 vs. 69.8%, respectively, p = 0.043). AKA detectability was also higher in aortic aneurysm than aortic dissection patients on MDCTA (90.9 vs. 69.6%, respectively, p < 0.01), but not on MRA (92.9 vs. 88.6%, respectively, p = 0.99)., Conclusions: Time-resolved MRA at 3 T increases AKA detectability and is recommended for patients without definitive AKA identification on MDCTA.

Purpose: Preoperative identification of the artery of Adamkiewicz can help prevent postoperative spinal cord injury following thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of evaluating the artery of Adamkiewicz using multi-detector row computed tomography (CT), but precise visualization remains a challenge. The present study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of ultra-high-resolution CT for visualizing the artery of Adamkiewicz with a slice thickness of 0.25 versus 0.5 mm in patients with aortic aneurysms. Methods: Our institutional review board approved this study. Twenty-four patients with thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms were scanned with beam collimation of 0.25 mm × 128. Images were reconstructed with slice thicknesses of 0.25 and 0.5 mm. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the aorta and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the anterior spinal artery and spinal cord were measured. Two independent observers evaluated visualization of the artery of Adamkiewicz and its continuity between the anterior spinal artery and the aorta using a four-point scale. Results: No significant differences in the SNR of the aorta or CNR of the anterior spinal artery were observed between 0.25- and 0.5-mm slices. The average visualization score was significantly higher for 0.25-mm slices (3.58 ± 0.78) than for 0.5-mm slices (3.13 ± 0.99) ( p = 0.01). The percentage of patients with nondiagnostic image quality was significantly lower for 0.25-mm slices (8.3%) than for 0.5-mm slices (33.3%) ( p = 0.03). Conclusion: In patients with aortic aneurysms, ultra-high-resolution CT with 0.25-mm slices significantly improves visualization of the artery of Adamkiewicz compared to 0.5-mm slices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]