Search

The ischemia/reperfusion mechanism is believed to be responsible for parenchymal damage caused by temporary hypoperfusion and worsened by the subsequent attempt of reperfusion. This represents a true challenge for physicians of several fields, including neurosurgeons. A limited number of papers have shed the light on a rare pathologic condition that affects patients experiencing an unexplained neurologic deficit after spine surgery, the so-called "white cord syndrome." This entity is believed to be caused by an "ischemia/reperfusion" injury on the spinal cord, documented by a postoperative intramedullary hyperintensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequences. To date, the cases of white cord syndrome reported in literature mostly refer to cervical spine surgery. However, the analysis of several reviews focusing on spine surgery outcome suggests postoperative neurologic deficits of new onset could be charged to a mechanism of ischemia/reperfusion, even if the physiopathology of this event is seldom explored or at least discussed. The same neuroradiologic finding can suggest mechanical damage due to inappropriate surgical manipulation. On this purpose, we performed a systematic review of the literature with the aim to identify and analyze all the factors potentially contributing to ischemic/reperfusion damage of the spinal cord that may potentially complicate any spinal surgery, without distinction between cervical or thoracic segments. Finally, we believe that postoperative neurologic deficit after spinal surgery constituting the "white cord syndrome" could be under-reported; both neurosurgeons and patients should be fully aware of this rare but potentially devasting complication burdening cervical and thoracic spine surgery., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

(1) Background: Treatment of cancer-related pain is still challenging, and it can be managed by both medical and interventional therapies. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive technique, and its use is rapidly increasing in the treatment of chronic pain. (2) Materials and Methods: Our study aims to perform a review of the pertinent literature about current evidences in cancer pain treatment by Spinal Cord Stimulation. Moreover, we created a database based on case reports or case series (18 studies) in the literature. We analyzed a clinical group of oncological patients affected by intractable pain undergoing SCS implantation, focusing on outcome. (3) Results: The analysis of the 18 included studies in our series has shown a reduction in painful symptoms in 48 out of 56 treated patients (87.51%); also 53 out of 56 patients (96.64%) have shown an improvement in their Quality of Life (QoL). (4) Conclusions: Spinal Cord Stimulation can be considered an efficient method in the treatment of cancer-related pain. However, literature regarding SCS for the treatment of cancer-related pain is largely represented by case reports and small case series, with no effective population studies or Randomized Controlled Trials demonstrating the efficacy and the level of evidence. Further prospective studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recurrent and chronic low back pain, caused by degenerative lumbar spondylosis, commonly affects elderly patients, even those with no previous low back surgery. These patients, like those affected by failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), may become unresponsive to medical conservative treatment and their quality of life could be easily compromised. Moreover, general comorbidities, obesity, and other typical conditions of the elderly may make surgery under general anesthesia riskier than the natural history of the disease. These patients could be considered affected by surgical back risk syndrome (SBRS). In this article, we report our preliminary observational prospective study on the role of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in 3 groups of patients: the FBSS group, the SBRS group, and the "other" group. Selection criteria, treatment modality, and outcomes for each patient group are described and discussed. Moreover, a potentially useful diagnostic and therapeutic flowchart on the management options for lumbar back diseases is discussed. The FBSS group included 25 patients, the SBRS group included 10 patients, and the other group included 3 patients. In 22/25 patients with FBSS (88% of the total), the implantation of a definitive neurostimulator was successful. In almost all patients in both the SBRS and the other groups, the implantation of a definitive neurostimulator was successful. In our opinion, SCS could be considered as a valid alternative treatment not only in selected patients affected by FBSS but also in selected patients affected by SBRS, in whom back surgery under general anesthesia may be challenging and overcome the potential benefit of the surgery itself. SBRS could be considered a new disease entity to be managed through SCS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the most accurate examination to study the spinal cord. Nevertheless, the use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can demonstrate additional key details about spinal cord lesions. We examined the literature to investigate and discuss the role, limitations, and possible evolution as a prognostic tool of DTI in spinal cord injury (SCI). For this systematic literature review, a detailed search was performed using PubMed (2005–2021), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2016–2021), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2016–2021). To be included, studies had to report the use of DTI in SCIs, its clinical relevance, and its use as a prognostic tool. We identified 17 studies comprising 299 patients. The mean age of patients was 41.22 ± 10.62 years. There was a prevalence of males (70.9%) compared with females (29.1%). The main spinal cord tract involved and studied in SCIs was the cervical tract (57.5%), followed by conus terminalis (15.4%) and dorsal tract (13.7%). In all studies based on American Spine Injury Association impairment scale score for neurological assessment, a correlation was found between FA values and American Spine Injury Association impairment scale: patients with complete SCI had a statistically significative lower FA value at the injured site compared with patients with incomplete SCI. Published clinical studies showed promising results for the utility of DTI parameters as noninvasive biomarkers in SCI grade evaluation, remaining an evolving area of further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]